228 Comments

Burn the CDC and the FDA to the ground. This wasn't incompetence. The malfeasance was deliberate

Expand full comment

Open source all the way. Totally agree. No need for FOIA if it's open.

Expand full comment

Bingo. Deliberate obfuscation. Recall when Dr Pierre Kory explained the govt insider he was networking with (Andrew Hill?) revealed the govt had far more detailed analyses on Ivermectin efficacy than the entire FLCCC network combined. They knew it worked. Also, an FDA official said at their Oct 2020 meeting that IBM (think ID2020) was working with academic institutions and other private companies to collect and analyze data on AEs. Where is that data?

Expand full comment

DARPA knew IVM and HCQ were effective immediately, this was disclosed by the whistleblower, I believe he was a Major, cannot recall last name, story also buried. Per the usual.

Expand full comment

Data buried by Gates et al.

Expand full comment

Lock the doors first. From the outside.

Expand full comment

Lock the doors with everyone inside and THEN burn them to the ground.

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022·edited Jun 23, 2022

Love how the people I watch keep learning from each other.

Dr Been video regarding this substack post today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBT87_egYa8

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing. I have never heard of Dr Been.

Expand full comment

Dr Been is very smart and interesting. I don’t agree with all he says (e.g., pro-vax) but appreciate his depth of knowledge in so many areas. If you watch enough, you also learn how to read between the lines. Because of YT censors, he sometimes needs to speak in code. Of course YT has taken down some of the content. And sometimes the content is posted elsewhere.

Expand full comment

take all the rest of the three letter agencies, and BATFE with it while you do.

Expand full comment

Tribute to Josh. He is one of the giants of this fight. Was great to meet him and Jessica in TLV last month. 😊Rare sweet moment these past 2 yrs.

Unfortunately, what is coming out of these 2 years is that vaccines have been dangerous for decades triggering Alzheimer, Parkinson, Autism, but also SIDS...

We've been played by greedy people, who just got greedier... But never gave a... for people's lives.

Gracias Gatito, Gracias à Josh !

Expand full comment
Jun 22, 2022·edited Jun 22, 2022

i wish i could go back to 2019 me and tell him that in a matter of months he'd be upvoting comments about vaccines causing autism, just so i could see his head explode.

Expand full comment

Tribute to you, Marc. It was an honor to meet you in person.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your work.

Expand full comment

Using PRR with other vaxxes as "comparitors" is also corrupt, it's how they game the data, by corrupting the placebo, comparing to the adjuvants or other chemicals. How about "before and after?!" Comparing to other dangerous vaxxes or worse, to other covid vaxxes, is demonically laughable.

Expand full comment

Came here to say the same thing. There’s no true control group doing it this way. Stinky method.

Expand full comment

Too corrupt to even follow through on their own planned corruption.

Expand full comment

Greedy is the best case scenario.

Expand full comment

Just wait until people find out the hard way that FDIC insurance is really just a nice sticker on the bank teller window.

Expand full comment

Isn't that the very point so many of us simply refuse to see? I read so many substacks by otherwise smart, articulate people (and the smart comments generated thereby) who refuse to see that almost (almost?) everything we have believed up to now via government is lies and distortions.

One big one that the Red Pilled community still refuses to see is the futility of our electoral system. Too many of us can't bear to acknowledge that we have been conned about elections every bit as much as vaccines, FDIC insurance, Constitutional rights, the judiciary, the economy, border Invasion...

We dont know when the fight will come, but when it does I hope we're ready.

Expand full comment

Gato could have literally substituted "adverse events" for "election fraud" in this epic post.

Expand full comment

Yes I see this planned collapse as the cover for the failed contracts and systems that have evolved into hidden pyramid schemes resulting in losses for the masses and benefiting a few.

Expand full comment

Yes another nightmare.

Expand full comment

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

― Upton Sinclair

Expand full comment

Another brilliant mind. I've often used an example from my own life. We all *knew* that the company I worked for was releasing poison water but none of us said a word and even went as far as to march on our state capitol. Because we didn't want to lose our jobs. The only difference with us in comparison to honorable Mr Sinclair's brilliant words is: We *did* understand, yet *chose* to feign ignorance.

Expand full comment

On your final line: there is no difference; this is exactly the choice Mr. Sinclair is describing.

Expand full comment
founding

A century of progressive State empowerment has brought us to a nearly perfect inversion of the U.S. Constitution.

The founding document makes perfectly clear that the activities and affairs of the government are to be completely transparent, while those of the citizens are to be completely opaque, except under limited, specified circumstances.

This has been completely reversed: the State now has almost complete opacity, whereas nearly everything a citizen does, owns, buys, sells, earns, says or writes is subject to government surveillance, oversight and interference.

Needless to say, unless this inversion is itself reversed, and soon, we are in deep trouble as a nation.

Expand full comment

Damn right!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
founding

I hear you, but when I say deep trouble, I mean blood in the streets trouble.

Expand full comment

At what point can a citizen sue the government officials for failing to perform their duties? What entity could have legal standing to do do? The disclosure opportunities from such a lawsuit would be as important as any verdict. Lawyers in the crowd, any insight or ideas on this?

Expand full comment

Lawyers will make big $$ off these cases for years but nothing will change until people start to unseat these goons at the local level and stop believing that any institution has their best interest in mind. As Gato always says, become Ungovernable - that starts at the individual and local level.

Expand full comment

The perpetrators of this genocide are not elected officials, so voting won’t fix this particular problem. The issue is that it’s damn near impossible to fire federal employees like Fauci.

Expand full comment

And holding officials accountable is a HUGE part of what makes the Republic work in the first place.

https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/everything-is-an-attack-on-democracy?s=w

It’s sort of a sick irony that the very people who call everything a ‘threat to democracy’ are the people who most ignore the rules of our Republic. As I previously discussed, the new idea of America was that nobody was above the law, and that government officials who passed laws were held to account by voters. Over and over during his short administration, Joe Biden has ignored the proper rule-making process of our Republic while proclaiming to be saving it.

With executive orders, he shut down the Keystone pipeline and suspended other energy projects. He sanctioned Russia (long before the war) and shut down travel that Trump had opened. Vaccine mandates were executive orders. Now, certainly Biden isn’t the first president to use the executive order, but he may be the most hypocritical by sidestepping the proper lawmaking procedures of the country for the biggest issues of the day.

Though the vaccine mandates were the most egregious example, nearly all covid rules were made via executive fiat and use of emergency powers. Governors and mayors found a lackey in a lab coat to stand behind so they could pass the buck and be held blameless for the chaos that followed. “Just following guidelines” became the borg-like ‘get out of jail free’ chant of government officials. But nobody voted for Anthony Fauci or anybody working under him. We have no mechanism to hold these bureaucrats responsible - and holding officials responsible is the foundation of the Republic.

Expand full comment

Amen to that…that is exactly what happened here in San Diego County…The ‘officials’ hid behind the very lame

(and appointed not elected) Public Health Officer Dr. Wilma Wooten, who still won’t answer what constitutes a ‘public emergency’ and why we are still in a ‘State of Emergency’!

Expand full comment

Make Tar and Feathers Great Again ...

Expand full comment

Yeah, there's a mechanism, but it's quite unpleasant.

Expand full comment

Next time you get to debate a moron who says everything is a "THREAT TO OUR DEMOCRACY " , ask them for their definition of "democracy " ( try to hold back your grin) then you'll know how to attack!!!

Expand full comment

The ‘local officials’ may not have been the ‘perpetrators’ of this event, but the ‘locals’ too are complicit in the game…as they carried out these ‘mandates’ & ‘lockdowns’ per the CDC public health mandates…this goes for your County Public Health Officers, County Boards of Supervisors, City Mayors, City Councils, and County Sheriffs…they all participated in the fraud and measures, that killed millions of people and contributed to loss of businesses. I live in San Diego County in CA…it has a number of incorporated ‘cities’ within its boundaries. Many of the smaller cities within the County, if they had a Mayor and a City Council, they voted to not enforce the mandates & lockdowns within their city. The City of San Diego and the County Board Of Supervisors have turned out to be comprised of some truly evil folks!

Expand full comment

So right!

Expand full comment

Public officials are self interested, and they respond to pressure. Here in Oregon, three people- the Governor, head of Health Authority, and public health officer made the Covid lockdown decisions and Vax mandates. Those people don’t care if you comply, they care about their own careers; their position, finances, and future appointments. The only way to get them to change is to apply pressure and change incentives. In order to affect future behavior, there have to be consequences for past behavior and current behavior. There are two pathways you can choose- judicial, and extra-judicial, political or extra-political. The one with the highest probability of success is judicial. It can create legal consequences within the system, and consequences in the public political system. These are wins. Nice of you to refuse a mask/jab, but 20% non-compliant population changes nothing for those political figures. A lawsuit and exposure of their emails and phone records does, as it impacts their re-election and future appointments.

Expand full comment

It seems to me that our government officials are acting like they don't think there's going to be another vote.

Expand full comment

They just might be right!😒

Expand full comment

Yep. Once the current power-holders are gone and the future power-holders will benefit from attacking them, the snowball gains steam.

Expand full comment

Most lawyers are still hiding from this opportunity. The only ones making bank are working for the side of evil.

Expand full comment

The French have this really useful device consisting of a heavy blade that slides up and down between two uprights.

Expand full comment

It wasn't the French peoples' device. It was the device of the Communist Takeovers of the French nation during the French Revolution of 1789-1799.

Expand full comment

I shan't disagree with you. I was commenting more on the utility, rather than the origins of said device.

Expand full comment

Yes, I agree. Your comment relates to the "device", but I thought what I said should be entered.

Expand full comment

Even better. Turn it on the communists.

Expand full comment

The word Revolution was supposed to be in quotes, but I forgot to insert them.

Expand full comment

Too humane.

Expand full comment

Never fear. Fauci and pals will burn in hell for all eternity

Expand full comment

Ha ha ha ha ha! Made me laugh out loud!

Expand full comment

In early June the CDC ordered nursing homes to STOP weekly reporting of Covid reinfections in both staff and residents. They also stopped collection of vaccine breakthroughs.

This was useful data, and there was a better chance of accurate reporting and medical records, but I guess the information itself could become embarrassing.

Here's a link with my email exchange about it (they provide a link to the page with the CDC directive): https://imgur.com/a/SPmnveS

This is the page with the now-deleted and uncollected data: https://data.cms.gov/covid-19/covid-19-nursing-home-data/data

Expand full comment

I found troubling signs in the data for vaccines & pregnancies in the UK data (e.g. https://inumero.substack.com/p/vaccination-and-pregnancy-in-the?r=tv61s&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web)

After questioning the UKHSA, not receiving sufficient answers, and following up, I finally received this back from them, "Addressing repeated correspondence on this matter places an unnecessary burden on already stretched resources and deviates from UKHSA’s ability to address legitimate correspondence. We must therefore bring this correspondence to an end as it is not a good use of public funded resources to continue to address your continued correspondence on this matter.  " 🤡

Expand full comment

Another very good reason to open the damn books.

Expand full comment

Wow that's.........something.

Expand full comment

I reported the first set of husband's problems from the shots only to have VAERS come back and ask for more information, information which I couldn't get and information that was so in depth it made me lose interest. I suspect that was their objective. So they only have half of what happened to him.

Expand full comment

No surprise. That seems to be in the plan perpetual need for information. Our taxes are used against our interests to keep our lawyers busy with the foia and excess laws like in California and FDA regulations approvals back to back...so busy you can't keep up.

Expand full comment

Where are our class-action lawsuits?

I remember how proud I felt, just as an ordinary citizen reading the news, that the Innocence Project used law school students to do the grunt work and how wonderfully they did it.

Maybe that's why they're dumbing down law schools and ensuring the rebel kind will never get admitted no more?

Expand full comment

It’s the same for nursing students. And probably the doctors too. Soon AI will run all positions and humans, with pesky needs, won’t be necessary anymore.

Expand full comment

If only AI was the problem. It's human nature that's the problem; it always is. Civilization tries to tame it but civilization, of course, is a human creation. We need to remind our children that yes, unfortunately, the same battles must always be re-fought.

Expand full comment

It won't be an AI, it will be a checklist. "all boxes must be completed for treatment to be considered successful. Because of compensation guidelines, extraneous information cannot be considered."

Expand full comment

Potato, potato.

Expand full comment

The malfeasance started back in the 70s when the USDA recommended low-fat diets for heart disease, then came to recommend them for everyone. Diabesity ensued. (You have to run on something, and if it's not fat, its carbohydrates. Diabetes is a disease of carbohydrate intolerance. Carbohydrates stimulate insulin, which stores fat and prevents you from burning it, making you hungry.)

There were no RCTs on low-fat diets long-term, just crappy observational studies based on questionnaires asking subjects to recall how many serving of this, that and they other they ate over the last month.

Nobody has been able to change the USDA's recommendations, but mostly through social media conventional wisdom changed.

Expand full comment
Jun 22, 2022·edited Jun 22, 2022

And the "pusher" of this flawed guidance was Ancel Keys with his fat/cholesterol- heart disease hypothesis, with studies which he made to serve his narrative, so sure was he... by removing the countries that did not fit the results ( I believe 12 countries became 7, don't quote me).

Funnily enough, food manufacturers stood to make £££ in cereal and low fat edible products.

Ringing any bells? ; ))

I was aware of Big Food's political shenanigans through Gary Taubes' "the diet delusion' ( "good calories bad calories" in US).... before i saw the Pharma politi- science in realtime

Expand full comment

22 original countries, cut down to 7 to fit Key's theory. France, the high fat, but low #CVD outlier expunged!

Expand full comment

Here's the full story of BS vendor Ancel Keys and the official adoption of low-fat diets, "a vast uncontrolled experiment on the entire population, with disastrous consequences for our health." https://www.proteinpower.com/big-fat-surprise/

Expand full comment
Jun 22, 2022·edited Jun 22, 2022

So are we just waiting for a whistle or something? When will the guillotines be erected or hangings start?

Expand full comment

We must be waiting for the red flag laws to be enacted nationally so the populace can be disarmed first. It's typical Biden regime end-run, backdoor tactic.

"Red Flag laws, also known as “Extreme Protection Orders,” are generally associated with assumptions of mental health and instability (remember the word “assumptions”). The parameters of such laws tend to be incredibly broad and ambiguous, and allow for almost anyone in regular proximity to a person to accuse them of being psychologically unstable. The accusation can come from a family member, a significant other, a work associate, etc.

Once the accusation is made, authorities can confiscate the target person's firearms without due process under the law on the grounds that they present a danger to themselves and others. No jury, no testing, no proof is required to get a court order. It is then up to the accused to prove they are NOT unstable and that they deserve to have their firearms returned. This process could take years, if the guns are ever returned at all." https://www.zerohedge.com/political/red-flag-gun-laws-set-stage-selective-disarmament-conservatives

Nineteen states and the District of Columbia have already enacted Red Flag gun confiscation laws. They are: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Washington. An 80 page gun control bill, which funds red flag laws, made a pass through the Senate 64-36 yesterday.

Expand full comment

And just like with the mandated "vaccines" where people like us were *screaming* "they won't stop with one!". It will be the same with "red flag" laws. Pretty soon if we dare look at someone crosseyed we could be rounded up and disappeared. It *never* ends with just one thing with these monsters. They won't stop until our very souls are locked up in their hell.

Expand full comment

This is very alarming

Gives more insight into

The last Uvalde school shooting.

Create crisis

Profit from crisis

Offer solution

Be a hero saint

All the while people willing to

Give away their God given immunity

Why not take their guns

Then their souls

It’s the only thing they have not

Taken

Take a man’s health

He can’t work

Take a man’s work

You rob him of his dignity

Take just another step

To rob his soul

His eternity

Evil is a wolf that preys on the sheep

Expand full comment

"It is then up to the accused to prove they are NOT unstable and that they deserve to have their firearms returned." It is impossible to prove a negative. Clearly a key element of the policy.

Expand full comment

This is alarming yesterday ya say

Well they need to cover their

Murderous tracks and create

Every conceivable chaotic

Conniving way to control

Confuse in order to keep one

Step ahead of the gallows

Awaiting.

Thinking the only thing keeping

American free is the 50 million or

So people with 300 million guns.

Expand full comment

The NRA provided 9 of its top 11 funded gop senators to that fight. Thanks for nothing. Disgusting.

Expand full comment

I am loosing patience as well. Especially as the roll out for the vaccine as young as 6 months comes out amidst all of this. At least it makes it easier to decide what doctor is worth seeing. “What do you think of covid vaccine?” First question.

Expand full comment

Lamp posts are everywhere. No waiting.

Expand full comment

The FDA did warn us about dangerous peanut butter. How many healthy young people have died the last six months from eating a peanut butter sandwich? And yet getting a jab of mRNA spike protein seems to be killing hundreds of young adults. No FDA warning about that!

Smuckers needs to start paying royalties to FDA officials. Do that and all peanut butter will be deemed safe and effective.

Expand full comment

About the peanut butter recall. In the FDA notice the data provided indicated 16 reported illnesses and 2 hospitalizations. The FDA interviewed 10 of the sickened and all 10 had recently consumed JIF peanut butter

On this basis the JIF peanut butter was linked to the illness.

Good detective work, now do same with the the question of why young people are dying in their sleep. Ok, you can't interview the dead. But you can check medical records. Perhaps there is a common medical procedure, such as a recently received shot of a particular substance?

Back to peanut butter. Given the scope of products sold that use Smuckers made peanut butter, likely millions of people consumed the contaminated product. Based on only ten linked illnesses, a recall and official health advisement was announced.

That no such official health investigation has even been announced for the jabs is beyond belief. It is inexplicable. There is no rational other than a deliberate intent to sell jabs with zero accountability.

Expand full comment
Jun 22, 2022·edited Jun 22, 2022

The AE bar graphs are provocative. But, anticipating a possible objection from vaxx apologists, do we have a reliable figure for the number of vaccines administered on a yearly basis prior to 2021?

The reason is that I can see a pro-vaxxer trying to argue that, "Well, no wonder AEs went up, we'd never vaccinated that many people in a year before." So it would be useful to have pre-2021 vaccination data to make a good comparison between, say, 2016-2020 and 2020-2021.

Expand full comment
author

this was not that different from what you'd see in a lot of flu vaccines etc.

~175 million flu vaxxes alone in the 2019-20 flu year.

it also suppressed a lot of other vaccination programs.

from 2006-16, the US administered 3.2 billion doses of vaccines.

https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vaccine-compensation/monthly-website-stats-2-01-18.pdf

the base rate here is much too high to have even a 50% annual rise in doses drive a 60X rise in deaths.

it's clear what's driving the signal.

Expand full comment

I address that and other types of criticisms in the article from September that el gato links to where I looked for safety signals using the CDCs methodology.

Expand full comment
author

hey josh, nice to see you.

great work on these.

Expand full comment

Thank you. And also thank you for writing about it!

Expand full comment

Thank you, I'm making my way through the article and it looks very promising.

I expect that the vaxxers will make their last stand on the hoary argument that, "Well, if it kills 100 people but it saves 101, then it's worth it. Get the jab or lose your job."

Expand full comment

Yeah, logic fails when you're under the spell of some kind of mass hypnosis. You might also appreciate this article on my substack about a survey the Israel Ministry of Health did on adverse events after the booster: https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/the-israeli-ministry-of-health-actually-db7

Expand full comment

The CDC, FDA, NIH, etc. clearly don't care if the population doesn't trust them. They are in charge, so the plebs just have to do what they say. When a government stops caring if the populace has lost faith and trust in its institutions, that is worrying and a sign of a tyrannical government. Begs the question... what are the larger objectives at play here? Perhaps CBDC, Digital ID, privilege society vs a freedom society. Clearly, the WHO-redefined pandemic was never about public health.

Expand full comment

Clearly, they don't care that anyone knows it. Why? Because except for a few loudmouths, nobody cares. They just follow the path in front of them.

Expand full comment