9 Comments
тна Return to thread

Section 230 reform? So weird- many of us have been talking about it for almost 2 years.

Expand full comment

The bit they missed is that 230 already does not apply to any censored social media platform. If the service owners want to be indemnified for all that their users post, they must not curate or censor the content. If they do, they are no longer common carriers but are in fact publications, to which 230 does not apply. They must provide an open forum to everyone to be exempt from liability, and they don't. The "new" Twitter will be the only major social media service that is still protected under 230. The rest of them, like old Twitter, are liable. All it takes is for someone to notice this and bring suit.

Expand full comment

Totally agree. 230 is meant to protect the ability for the Social media company to not be sued. They should not AlSO have censorship power.

Expand full comment

Agree, but it would most likely get thrown out due to тАЬlack of standingтАЭ. That seems to be how the gov. deals with problems it does not want to get published.

Expand full comment

Watch them dash for the Elon option when they realise this. This is the breach in the dam wall.

Expand full comment

They'll have some world class gymnastics on their hands to punish Twitter with 230 and not The Zuck.

Expand full comment

Simple: Twitter didn't block white supremacists. Therefore no 230 protection.

You've got to stop thinking logically. It just gets in the way here in clown world.

Expand full comment

Exactly. LetтАЩs see what moronic attempts they make to get around Zuck being attacked through their measures.

Expand full comment

No problem for them. They truly practice тАЬdouble thinkтАЭ.

Expand full comment