imagine a world where the media fact checked and held politicians accountable rather than kowtowed to them, slavishly pushed partisan talking points, and censored dissent.
what a world that would be…
Does this situtation mean that Facebook has become a state actor? And if so, aren't they liable for first amendment violations under U.S. law?
Facebook, Twitter and Google were all developed in black-budget DARPA, using taxpayer money, and then spun out into commercial settings with figureheads at the helm in a way that profited insiders and cut out taxpayers who funded them. No useful distinction between government and any social media company. Back on 2010s Kerry complaimed, "The internet makes it very hard to govern." Now, the internet and a collaborationist media make it very easy to govern.
Interesting case study of blatant media and medical BBC fear porn operation. BBC claims a certain part of England has massive rise in cases and hospitalizations, doctors scared, nurses pushed to breaking point, ad nauseum. This guy checks the figures from NHS. No deaths from covid in 76 consecutive days. Someone should reverse engineer all the moving parts that had to go in to producing just this one example of agitprop.
If NHS staff are “distressed”, it’s “spreading like wildfire”, and hospitals can “just about cope” then I was sure no mention of mortality figures was just an accidental omission & would paint a similar story to the one Pym and his colleagues like @SharonBarbour had promoted.
In fact, according to this NHS England data (which you can freely check), the North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust hasn’t reported a single Covid-19 death for 76 consecutive days, going right back to 28 April 2021.
Let me repeat that: NO DEATHS FOR SEVENTY-SIX DAYS
Personally I'm just SHOCKED that the formation of the Ministry of Truth would lead to wrongthink being banned!
FYI, Alex Berenson was temporally blocked on Twitter. It actually surprised me a bit they didn't block him way before. But it looks like they are going to take it seriously now.
After watching the media sit obediently for this, we need a new Trust in Media poll. Is their business model so challenged by social media they need censorship to stay relevant?
Why are they so afraid of other ideas? Why are they so afraid of the information coming out about ivermectin? I heard a video from an Aussie representative that cited actual studies saying how effective it is. Bret Weinstein got clobbered because he posted about it. Why? There are more VAERS reports on these vaccines than with any others. Why are they pushing them so hard? Profit motive? Get rid of so many people to save the earth?
Get the vaccine. We’ll give you your life. Well that’s kind of the spirit of the mark of the beast. All for a disease 99.8% people survive.
Have you sent an email after this? Just checking. I have not received any new ones since.