Well said. That has been exactly its usage in arguments with me. Most recently the Bangladeshi mask study. "Hurr, your evidence is a couple of charts some guy with a cat name made in 5 minutes on his computer, you want to see me make 5 more charts right now? My sources are PEER REVIEWED."
it's actually a useful shibboleth.
anyone who uses the term "peer reviewed" to mean "true" or "validated" understand neither peer review, nor scientific method.
it's a near perfect predictor for "scientifically illiterate ideologue."
I post my research papers in bathrooms next to the urinals for true pee-er review.
Here I sit
Broken Hearted
Paid a quarter
Merely got an eigenfactor of .1
тАЬтАж and the signs said the words of the prophets are written on the subway walls тАж and tenement halls тАжтАЭ
Well said. That has been exactly its usage in arguments with me. Most recently the Bangladeshi mask study. "Hurr, your evidence is a couple of charts some guy with a cat name made in 5 minutes on his computer, you want to see me make 5 more charts right now? My sources are PEER REVIEWED."
Or theyтАЩre deliberately using the term as a bludgeon against those they believe far less intelligent than themselves.