Exactly. Completely on-point! As an aside, I recall Tweeting about the lunacy of the supposed "elite thinkers" of our time still following the paradigms of Malthus and the silly responses I got.
Much like the blue hats in Russia saw themselves far above the kulaks they exterminated during the DeKulakisation
Much like the Nazis saw themselves far above the Jews, the gypsies, the developmentally disabled & all those other people they exterminated
Much like “the othering” that is always done by the monstrously deluded people who always do it - time after time
They perceive themselves as worthy of life & living & freedom & understanding,
etc... while choosing to perceive all of the rest of us
as far beneath themselves
IN THEIR WORLD VIEW
They are the only real people on the planet
& all 7.5 Billion of the rest of us? Are just locusts ruining their paradise earth...
now they have the perfect slave THE PROGRAMMABLE COMPUTERIZED ROBOT. They never tire or die they don’t break & they do exactly what they’re programmed to do without pay or “Human Resources” needs requirements indefinitely...
So it’s time to set about causing us to murder each other
to distract us from
their world wide Genocidal plan...
their great reset
Klaus Schwab calls this “the 4th Turning”
kinda like the 3rd Reich 2.0...
But don’t talk about any of this stuff! Or you’ll be deplatformed demonetized & someone will call you “A RACIST”
Sooo
OBVIOUSLY 🙄 that wouod be oh so much worse, right?
This is what I have been told since I tried to speak the truth about Obama’s “Screw America” campaign baack in ‘07...
It was just soooo much worse to be called a racist by idiot brainwashed ignoramuses than to speak the obvious self evident truth about A Person promising to destroy our country & all of our accomplishments in a single potus term... I was A Fool as I didn’t know all the reality that brought u.s. Obama for decades prior - I was busy building a life
But like most Avalanches once the snowballs finally all got to rolling down hill? Eventually a quarter of the snowpack gave way &
There's pretty strong evidence for collusion between the Pharma companies for three versions of the "jab," rotating so that no one manufacturer could be tracked as responsible for the immediate deaths or the longer-term cancers, clots, and heart failure.
Rae, I can believe it. I know there are “hot lots” & many of the overlords & celebs (esp if they made a big show of getting jabbed on TV) were & are getting saline.
Amen. I've been saying the same thing for years. There's nothing stopping people who believe there's too many people on the planet from offing themselves.
It's always puzzled me that people are so readily willing to accept medical advice from politicians and government employees. When did we start trusting these people? I wouldn't buy a used car from Joe Biden or Tony Fauci, never mind accept medical advice from them. Thoroughly dishonest, corrupt, and untrustworthy people the lot of them.
I haven't had any kind of vaccination / innoculation / jab in 40 years. The last vaccination I had was a tetanus shot when I was a teenager after I punctured my foot on an old nail. No covid, no flu, no shingles, no thanks. I'm doing just fine.
I was a kid in the 70s when the swine flu was going around and more people died from the flu shot than from the flu. That made quite an impression on my young mind. I always err on the side of less medicine.
Proves the power of the propaganda--people found the exception to their own beliefs.
"I don't trust the politicians, or Big Pharma, EXCEPT when I'm glued to lamestream screens, slavering over body counts, so titillated into feeling ALIVE by finally, having this WORLD CHANGING EVENT bring MEANING to my pathetic life, and yet also pissing-my-pants anxious and scared. NOW is not the time to distrust."
I'm not quite as jaded as you. But I'm on that road. I'm currently weaning myself off a statin. Next will probably be the baby aspirin and the blood pressure med. All of these prescribed for "priamry prevention" of circulatory disease. Sounded good when Doc wrote the script. But I've been doing some research. Turns out that those interventions have very little expected benefit for the average patient and are quite possibly harmful. Come to think of it, the mRNA jab is a perfect example of this phenomenon. I'm doing this behind their backs. At some point I will tell them that I no longer trust their profession. I'll even offer to show them the data. But since they are some combination of brainwashed and/or legally required to prescribe me potentially harmful treatments that I probably don't need, I doubt they'll accept my offer. The last thing to negotiate is whether I should continue being their patient or perhaps I will be fired. Either is fine with me. I'm still willing to undergo routine testing and such, but I will view with a very skeptical eye any drug prescribed me. I suppose I'd make an exception in a serious emergency, but for routine care? Let the buyer beware.
This is a pretty good example of a little bit of information, misapplied, being dangerous.
The Statin family have proven to be effective in setting a target number. What the number means is largely misrepresented or misunderstood. The bulk of studies show lower the number can slow progression of arterial disease. This is extrapolated to presume that lowering the number in general, in the absence of disease, will reduce risk. We all know extrapolation in this context is not mathematically valid. The problem is that no one's figured out how to tell if a person's physiology is prone to developing arterial blockage. So the logic is that IF you might be one of those people prone to develop blockages, reducing cholesterol in your blood will prevent disease from developing - not well supported by real study but a common argument of physicians because it is the guidelines they've been given - hit the target number by whatever means available.
I have this ongoing debate with my doc over this. My number comes in just over the recommended max. The first round, I asked for more justification than "because we can hit the number with statins". So he ordered a cardio workup. The cardiologist shook his head in near amazement (or was it disappointment?) as he noted my CV function scores what would be good for a 30 year old. I'm over 60. And my exercise level has been hampered since 2020 due to COVID closures and some dumb injuries. I expect we'll continue the debate..
Now for the even darker side of statins. While one might believe lifestyle and diet in particular are them main affecters in cholesterol, this isn't the case. The liver plays a dominant role. There is considerable evidence that liver problems can cause high cholesterol. But most MDs will simply "treat" the high cholesterol with statins, instead of look for an actual cause. This is particularly worrisome when there has been a change in cholesterol, which may be an early indication of liver problems. So the use of statins masks the indication. That's never a good thing.
Most of these guys are totally hypnotised and owned by big pharma and the medical bureaucracy, Look into Plasmanex. Its otc so no Rx necessary. Keeps the pipes down to the capillaries clean and good for heart and brain function.
I’ve got bad news for you. Nothing you do (medically speaking) is done behind your doctor’s back. The insurance companies track your use of Rx meds and if you don’t refill your meds on time, they send an alert to your PCP or whoever wrote the prescription. I know, because I get these reports on a daily basis. Of course then I’m expected to “reach out” to the patient and determine why they are being non-compliant. Is it an issue of affordability? Maybe they are experiencing adverse effects? Or maybe, like you, they don’t see the need for these meds. And like many practitioners, I pitch these alerts in the trash. I don’t have the time or the inclination to tell people how to live their lives, and I’m not about to force people to take medications that they don’t want. I just wish they would tell me up front before a prescription is written, so we could talk about alternative treatments (diet, exercise and weight loss would fix about 90% of the health problems that most adults suffer from). But most folks don’t want to hear about that, they want a quick fix, and “that pill that my cousin takes” that helps their (fill in the blank).
I hear the "diet, exercise and weight loss" litany frequently, but the more I learn, the more I realize that the usual advice is not based on sound science. In deed, vast amounts of data show that boilerplate dietary advice in general does not work for a lot of people. Many medical practitioners simply reject anything that deviates from the standard advise. You seem like a more thoughtful practitioner, so I'd be interested in your view. I don't do things behind his back, we talk it out and if I do not agree I say so. I may be one of those "non-compliant" patients of which you speak (probably a good label overall ;-0).
Part of the issue may be defining "health problems". The industry seems to fixate on what metrics that are frequently misapplied or simply invalid (such as BMI). The main issue I have with typical medical practice is lack of seeking root causes. I understand that human physiology is complex and not well understood, and the statistical variation in physiology is vast. So there are times "try this and see what happens" is as good as it gets. But this seems to lead to a habit of treat with the usual drug rather than understand underlying causes. Sometimes there really more to the story than "get the number we want".
As a thinking medical doctor, how do you deal with the potential conflict between the "do no harm" principle, the use of drugs who's mechanisms are not fully understood, pressure to follow government and AMA "recommendations" and the desire to give quality care to the patient?
Thank you for the response. I try to simplify my life (and my patient’s) as much as possible. I start by ignoring almost all of whatever tripe the AMA and various specialty boards are pushing, since every one of these groups are beholding to Big Pharma. I despise “algorithms” and tend to ignore “evidence-based” recommendations unless they make sense for a particular patient. (TPTB are doing their best to turn medicine into some cookie cutter process that could be managed by a group of fairly well trained chimps.) Goals are nice, but not absolute. My quarterly “report cards” from the “healthcare system” I am employed by are fairly reflective of this as I rarely exceed the 30-40% mark in any of their metrics.
I’m also somewhat of a libertarian, I don’t do “paternalistic” medicine well, so I don’t argue with my patients. “Screening” for various preventable illnesses is something I’m in favor of, but in some people it’s extremely anxiety provoking and if they refuse, I don’t make an issue out of it. I do have discussions about their particular ailment, if it can be corrected, and what can be expected in the long term if it isn’t. When it comes to the biggies (hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes and obesity), I am not a stickler for meeting arbitrary goals but rather for at least improving the numbers. The only time I really insist on using medications are when the numbers are alarmingly high.
When it comes to bad habits (smoking/drinking/drugs) while recovering completely is always the goal, if I can nag, wheedle and guilt people into at least cutting back, I feel like it’s a small victory. Baby steps. Other ailments are generally associate with physical discomfort of some kind and most patients need/want/expect some type of medication (either short or long term).
I try my best to avoid harming patients (either physically or emotionally) and if they feel they are being injured in some way by anything I’ve prescribed, they know that they can discontinue that treatment although I ask them to notify me if that is the case. But not all patients will do that, because (I suppose) they don’t want me to feel like I failed at “fixing” them.
Despite all of this, most of my patients tend to live long enough to meet or exceed the average life expectancy. I’m not sure if that is something I can take any credit for but I’d like to think so.
Thanks for the explanation. You sound like a sound physician :-).
My PhD Thesis was on advanced medical imaging (CT and MRI) and I like empirical results (measuring things ;-). So I tend to like screening, testing and imaging. Data is good.
I'm also not against medications when needed. My analytical brain likes explanations that make sense.
I have a friend and former colleague who is a geneticist. Regarding long life, his advise is exercise, eat right, and choose your parents wisely. The first two don't affect quantity, only quality. The genetics is what matters most - not a surprise coming from a geneticist. FWIW.
Yes it is interesting. Many of the folks screaming for mandates are the same folks who've attacked "big pharma" over and over again. Also the same folks who call for MORE regulation by the government. Same folks who in 2020 decried the "fast track" program of the Trump administration as circumventing regulations (it did) and swore they'd never take the "Trump vaccine" and suddenly in 2021 proclaim we MUST all take the vaccine and we all trust the pharma companies?
Almost as entertaining as listening to the same folks explain why uncensored free speech is anti-democracy.
This is also why I never fell for the whole Ukraine scam from the beginning. The same people who were telling us garbage about Covid were the ones telling us to support Ukraine (Soros, Gates, WEF, Hollywood, etc, etc) Before I support anything, I always look to see who’s advocating it.
Nope, FTX is not the only laundering for sure. There has been more monkey business going on with Ukraine than anyone knows. Bidens with Burisma, banks in Cyprus, etc. etc. etc.
Russia knows about some of it, perhaps most... so far they are only talking about the biolabs but time will tell what else they reveal.
Of course to the MSM it will be RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA all over again... sigh.
This is a bit tangential but I am sure you have heard about the weird clots morticians have been pulling out of bodies... some 6 feet long... well here is why:
Amyloid and Hydrogel Formation of a Peptide Sequence from a Coronavirus Spike Protein
Valeria Castelletto and
Ian W. Hamley*Cite this: ACS Nano 2022, 16, 2, 1857–1867Publication Date:January 4, 2022
Thanks. I sure didn't get that from the paper. To be honest, it read like something prepared for a law suit intended to baffle the jury. But it's not my field ;-). I'm sure some of the papers I've written read like that to folks in other fields too.
Don't judge people by dress, unless it's a person who shouldn't be wearing a dress.
Tell the truth? My father, a scrupulously honest man and a career bureaucrat, if those two can be reconciled (it was a LONG time ago!!!) said "Always tell the truth, but not more of it than is required."
Most of what Fauci said, did and advised governments to do is a clear violation of Nuremberg Convention, and a crime against humanity. Ehrlich was no different.
Please tell me that's what you mean, because while "Eat the rich!" is both a hilarious movie and catchy slogan, I'm not too sure about how healthy a fricassé au Gates aux légumes would be, no matter how much Chianti I down...
that is good advice indeed. THEY should follow their own advice, but I just read that gates daughter is pregnant. Of course, THEY are not the ones that are useless eaters ! It is us, the ones they want to feed bugs....
Do the opposite of what they tell you is useful too.
Oh, yes.
I too listen very carefully to every word said by the CDC, FDA, NIH, and WEF---so I can do just about anything else!
Why aren’t they suicidal and help the cause?
Their idea is probably best summarized as: There's too many of YOU.
Exactly! they're the high priests of the concept, so we need them around to, you know, tell us we shouldn't be around.
they mean, we own the world and you can stay as long as you are submissive, do everything we want you to do, and then you can get lost (dead)
Stay submissive and CONSUME ! ... those Chinese trinkets our lives revolve around for maybe a minute aren't gonna buy themselves
If only they would start with themselves.
It is not because there is too many of them, just too many of you.
Ahh, the sweet breath of clarity.
🙌
Only the "perfect" left needs to live. Luckily, since they're all LGBTQWERTY+×#% there won't be much breeding going on.
I suspect they use migrants for breeding children.
Very true. And they're used to being slaves, too!
Exactly. Completely on-point! As an aside, I recall Tweeting about the lunacy of the supposed "elite thinkers" of our time still following the paradigms of Malthus and the silly responses I got.
Always my question. They never put their money where their mouth is and make the ultimate sacrifice for the cause.
THE GLOBALISTS do not see themselves as one of us
they perceive the rest of us as far beneath them.
Much like the blue hats in Russia saw themselves far above the kulaks they exterminated during the DeKulakisation
Much like the Nazis saw themselves far above the Jews, the gypsies, the developmentally disabled & all those other people they exterminated
Much like “the othering” that is always done by the monstrously deluded people who always do it - time after time
They perceive themselves as worthy of life & living & freedom & understanding,
etc... while choosing to perceive all of the rest of us
as far beneath themselves
IN THEIR WORLD VIEW
They are the only real people on the planet
& all 7.5 Billion of the rest of us? Are just locusts ruining their paradise earth...
now they have the perfect slave THE PROGRAMMABLE COMPUTERIZED ROBOT. They never tire or die they don’t break & they do exactly what they’re programmed to do without pay or “Human Resources” needs requirements indefinitely...
So it’s time to set about causing us to murder each other
to distract us from
their world wide Genocidal plan...
their great reset
Klaus Schwab calls this “the 4th Turning”
kinda like the 3rd Reich 2.0...
But don’t talk about any of this stuff! Or you’ll be deplatformed demonetized & someone will call you “A RACIST”
Sooo
OBVIOUSLY 🙄 that wouod be oh so much worse, right?
This is what I have been told since I tried to speak the truth about Obama’s “Screw America” campaign baack in ‘07...
It was just soooo much worse to be called a racist by idiot brainwashed ignoramuses than to speak the obvious self evident truth about A Person promising to destroy our country & all of our accomplishments in a single potus term... I was A Fool as I didn’t know all the reality that brought u.s. Obama for decades prior - I was busy building a life
But like most Avalanches once the snowballs finally all got to rolling down hill? Eventually a quarter of the snowpack gave way &
Well
HERE WE ARE TODAY
Hell, I wish the jab they are all so fond of or pretend to be would make the ultimate sacrifice for them
There's pretty strong evidence for collusion between the Pharma companies for three versions of the "jab," rotating so that no one manufacturer could be tracked as responsible for the immediate deaths or the longer-term cancers, clots, and heart failure.
Big Pharma needs some Big Karma!
Rae, I can believe it. I know there are “hot lots” & many of the overlords & celebs (esp if they made a big show of getting jabbed on TV) were & are getting saline.
“Big Pharma needs some Big Karma” - love it!
🙌 A lot sooner than it probably will IRL. IF they really took it.
Big if tho!
The "low level" lefties seem to be doing a pertty good job of being injured or kicking the bucket, though. Each and every one counts! 🤗
🤜🏻🤛🏻
Amen. I've been saying the same thing for years. There's nothing stopping people who believe there's too many people on the planet from offing themselves.
Perhaps if we all agreed to send flowers they would move forward?
Ah but you see those are the IMPORTANT people. It's the less important people we need to cull.
😝😝😝
because they do not believe there are “too many OF THEM!!!”
They believe there are way too many of YOU!
They believe there are far too many of US!
They do not identify us & them as “the same” WE ARE BENEATH THEM!!
they call us “USELESS EATERS” & they think of us AT BEST?
as livestock...
They Only want 500,000,000 of us to survive their great reset
Only 500,000,000 & only in so far as we are enslaved entirely by them & controlled as their livestock.
They are narcissistic egocentrics, and sadistic voyeurs.
So they puppet us to act out their desires.
It's always puzzled me that people are so readily willing to accept medical advice from politicians and government employees. When did we start trusting these people? I wouldn't buy a used car from Joe Biden or Tony Fauci, never mind accept medical advice from them. Thoroughly dishonest, corrupt, and untrustworthy people the lot of them.
I haven't had any kind of vaccination / innoculation / jab in 40 years. The last vaccination I had was a tetanus shot when I was a teenager after I punctured my foot on an old nail. No covid, no flu, no shingles, no thanks. I'm doing just fine.
I was a kid in the 70s when the swine flu was going around and more people died from the flu shot than from the flu. That made quite an impression on my young mind. I always err on the side of less medicine.
It's so weird, isn't it? Ask people if politicians can be trusted, they say no. Ask people if Big Pharma can be trusted, they say no. https://news.gallup.com/poll/266060/big-pharma-sinks-bottom-industry-rankings.aspx
Yet during covid we're supposed to blindly trust politicians and Big Pharma?
Spot on.
Great point.
Proves the power of the propaganda--people found the exception to their own beliefs.
"I don't trust the politicians, or Big Pharma, EXCEPT when I'm glued to lamestream screens, slavering over body counts, so titillated into feeling ALIVE by finally, having this WORLD CHANGING EVENT bring MEANING to my pathetic life, and yet also pissing-my-pants anxious and scared. NOW is not the time to distrust."
tl;dr="because pandemic!"
Oh, I lost so much respect for so many people.
I'm not quite as jaded as you. But I'm on that road. I'm currently weaning myself off a statin. Next will probably be the baby aspirin and the blood pressure med. All of these prescribed for "priamry prevention" of circulatory disease. Sounded good when Doc wrote the script. But I've been doing some research. Turns out that those interventions have very little expected benefit for the average patient and are quite possibly harmful. Come to think of it, the mRNA jab is a perfect example of this phenomenon. I'm doing this behind their backs. At some point I will tell them that I no longer trust their profession. I'll even offer to show them the data. But since they are some combination of brainwashed and/or legally required to prescribe me potentially harmful treatments that I probably don't need, I doubt they'll accept my offer. The last thing to negotiate is whether I should continue being their patient or perhaps I will be fired. Either is fine with me. I'm still willing to undergo routine testing and such, but I will view with a very skeptical eye any drug prescribed me. I suppose I'd make an exception in a serious emergency, but for routine care? Let the buyer beware.
This is a pretty good example of a little bit of information, misapplied, being dangerous.
The Statin family have proven to be effective in setting a target number. What the number means is largely misrepresented or misunderstood. The bulk of studies show lower the number can slow progression of arterial disease. This is extrapolated to presume that lowering the number in general, in the absence of disease, will reduce risk. We all know extrapolation in this context is not mathematically valid. The problem is that no one's figured out how to tell if a person's physiology is prone to developing arterial blockage. So the logic is that IF you might be one of those people prone to develop blockages, reducing cholesterol in your blood will prevent disease from developing - not well supported by real study but a common argument of physicians because it is the guidelines they've been given - hit the target number by whatever means available.
I have this ongoing debate with my doc over this. My number comes in just over the recommended max. The first round, I asked for more justification than "because we can hit the number with statins". So he ordered a cardio workup. The cardiologist shook his head in near amazement (or was it disappointment?) as he noted my CV function scores what would be good for a 30 year old. I'm over 60. And my exercise level has been hampered since 2020 due to COVID closures and some dumb injuries. I expect we'll continue the debate..
Now for the even darker side of statins. While one might believe lifestyle and diet in particular are them main affecters in cholesterol, this isn't the case. The liver plays a dominant role. There is considerable evidence that liver problems can cause high cholesterol. But most MDs will simply "treat" the high cholesterol with statins, instead of look for an actual cause. This is particularly worrisome when there has been a change in cholesterol, which may be an early indication of liver problems. So the use of statins masks the indication. That's never a good thing.
Most of these guys are totally hypnotised and owned by big pharma and the medical bureaucracy, Look into Plasmanex. Its otc so no Rx necessary. Keeps the pipes down to the capillaries clean and good for heart and brain function.
I’ve got bad news for you. Nothing you do (medically speaking) is done behind your doctor’s back. The insurance companies track your use of Rx meds and if you don’t refill your meds on time, they send an alert to your PCP or whoever wrote the prescription. I know, because I get these reports on a daily basis. Of course then I’m expected to “reach out” to the patient and determine why they are being non-compliant. Is it an issue of affordability? Maybe they are experiencing adverse effects? Or maybe, like you, they don’t see the need for these meds. And like many practitioners, I pitch these alerts in the trash. I don’t have the time or the inclination to tell people how to live their lives, and I’m not about to force people to take medications that they don’t want. I just wish they would tell me up front before a prescription is written, so we could talk about alternative treatments (diet, exercise and weight loss would fix about 90% of the health problems that most adults suffer from). But most folks don’t want to hear about that, they want a quick fix, and “that pill that my cousin takes” that helps their (fill in the blank).
I hear the "diet, exercise and weight loss" litany frequently, but the more I learn, the more I realize that the usual advice is not based on sound science. In deed, vast amounts of data show that boilerplate dietary advice in general does not work for a lot of people. Many medical practitioners simply reject anything that deviates from the standard advise. You seem like a more thoughtful practitioner, so I'd be interested in your view. I don't do things behind his back, we talk it out and if I do not agree I say so. I may be one of those "non-compliant" patients of which you speak (probably a good label overall ;-0).
Part of the issue may be defining "health problems". The industry seems to fixate on what metrics that are frequently misapplied or simply invalid (such as BMI). The main issue I have with typical medical practice is lack of seeking root causes. I understand that human physiology is complex and not well understood, and the statistical variation in physiology is vast. So there are times "try this and see what happens" is as good as it gets. But this seems to lead to a habit of treat with the usual drug rather than understand underlying causes. Sometimes there really more to the story than "get the number we want".
As a thinking medical doctor, how do you deal with the potential conflict between the "do no harm" principle, the use of drugs who's mechanisms are not fully understood, pressure to follow government and AMA "recommendations" and the desire to give quality care to the patient?
Thank you for the response. I try to simplify my life (and my patient’s) as much as possible. I start by ignoring almost all of whatever tripe the AMA and various specialty boards are pushing, since every one of these groups are beholding to Big Pharma. I despise “algorithms” and tend to ignore “evidence-based” recommendations unless they make sense for a particular patient. (TPTB are doing their best to turn medicine into some cookie cutter process that could be managed by a group of fairly well trained chimps.) Goals are nice, but not absolute. My quarterly “report cards” from the “healthcare system” I am employed by are fairly reflective of this as I rarely exceed the 30-40% mark in any of their metrics.
I’m also somewhat of a libertarian, I don’t do “paternalistic” medicine well, so I don’t argue with my patients. “Screening” for various preventable illnesses is something I’m in favor of, but in some people it’s extremely anxiety provoking and if they refuse, I don’t make an issue out of it. I do have discussions about their particular ailment, if it can be corrected, and what can be expected in the long term if it isn’t. When it comes to the biggies (hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes and obesity), I am not a stickler for meeting arbitrary goals but rather for at least improving the numbers. The only time I really insist on using medications are when the numbers are alarmingly high.
When it comes to bad habits (smoking/drinking/drugs) while recovering completely is always the goal, if I can nag, wheedle and guilt people into at least cutting back, I feel like it’s a small victory. Baby steps. Other ailments are generally associate with physical discomfort of some kind and most patients need/want/expect some type of medication (either short or long term).
I try my best to avoid harming patients (either physically or emotionally) and if they feel they are being injured in some way by anything I’ve prescribed, they know that they can discontinue that treatment although I ask them to notify me if that is the case. But not all patients will do that, because (I suppose) they don’t want me to feel like I failed at “fixing” them.
Despite all of this, most of my patients tend to live long enough to meet or exceed the average life expectancy. I’m not sure if that is something I can take any credit for but I’d like to think so.
Thanks for the explanation. You sound like a sound physician :-).
My PhD Thesis was on advanced medical imaging (CT and MRI) and I like empirical results (measuring things ;-). So I tend to like screening, testing and imaging. Data is good.
I'm also not against medications when needed. My analytical brain likes explanations that make sense.
I have a friend and former colleague who is a geneticist. Regarding long life, his advise is exercise, eat right, and choose your parents wisely. The first two don't affect quantity, only quality. The genetics is what matters most - not a surprise coming from a geneticist. FWIW.
Yes it is interesting. Many of the folks screaming for mandates are the same folks who've attacked "big pharma" over and over again. Also the same folks who call for MORE regulation by the government. Same folks who in 2020 decried the "fast track" program of the Trump administration as circumventing regulations (it did) and swore they'd never take the "Trump vaccine" and suddenly in 2021 proclaim we MUST all take the vaccine and we all trust the pharma companies?
Almost as entertaining as listening to the same folks explain why uncensored free speech is anti-democracy.
This is also why I never fell for the whole Ukraine scam from the beginning. The same people who were telling us garbage about Covid were the ones telling us to support Ukraine (Soros, Gates, WEF, Hollywood, etc, etc) Before I support anything, I always look to see who’s advocating it.
[They] are scared to death we might find out the truth of what they've been doing in Ukraine. The biolabs are just one small part of it.
Exactly, coupled with the money laundering that’s been going on! FTX is not the only laundering they’ve been doing, I’m sure!
The laundering has been going on the entire 'pandemic'
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/ftx-part-ii-covid-and-the-next-pandemic
Precisely!
Nope, FTX is not the only laundering for sure. There has been more monkey business going on with Ukraine than anyone knows. Bidens with Burisma, banks in Cyprus, etc. etc. etc.
Russia knows about some of it, perhaps most... so far they are only talking about the biolabs but time will tell what else they reveal.
Of course to the MSM it will be RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA all over again... sigh.
This is a bit tangential but I am sure you have heard about the weird clots morticians have been pulling out of bodies... some 6 feet long... well here is why:
Amyloid and Hydrogel Formation of a Peptide Sequence from a Coronavirus Spike Protein
Valeria Castelletto and
Ian W. Hamley*Cite this: ACS Nano 2022, 16, 2, 1857–1867Publication Date:January 4, 2022
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c10658
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society
you probably know of this, but just in case WMC has written at length about this for the last few months.
https://wmcresearch.substack.com/
Watch “Died Suddenly” the film about this.
Not science fiction!
Most interesting fact: this was published by the ACS, not any medical journal.
Sounds like they're still circling the wagons... they have not yet heard the news: TIME TO SWAP JERSEYS!!!
Wow, that's something to read! How does Amyloid and Hydrogel formation relate to blood clots?
The point is the so called blood clots may be nothing of the kind, but these masses of SPIKE/Amyloid complexes.
Thanks. I sure didn't get that from the paper. To be honest, it read like something prepared for a law suit intended to baffle the jury. But it's not my field ;-). I'm sure some of the papers I've written read like that to folks in other fields too.
Is common sense really that uncommon today?
I/we were raised according to stuff like this:
Be nice to people handling food and garbage for you, for obvious reasons.
Beware a physician not taking their own advice.
Never listen to prophets.
Always test the edge before buying.
Don't let your tools rust.
Don't judge people for how they dress.
Good manners cost nothing.
Speak truth, if you have to speak, but always listen for the lie.
But then, one can't go far wrong if heeding the wisdom of Allfather Oden, Frigg the Wise and the other gods.
Generally good advice, but I would modify a few:
Don't judge people by dress, unless it's a person who shouldn't be wearing a dress.
Tell the truth? My father, a scrupulously honest man and a career bureaucrat, if those two can be reconciled (it was a LONG time ago!!!) said "Always tell the truth, but not more of it than is required."
An apple a day keeps the doctor away….
Eaten or thrown hard enough, either is good, yes? :)
Though biased, I maintain that my wife's honeyed apple-mead does it even better.
Eaten or thrown, yes….
Gotta love mead, I keep bees and the girls do work hard. Honeyed-apple mead sounds fabulous.
Not anymore. Today all you need to do is say "I am not vaccinated". That'll do it.
In the Fauci deposition, Fauci couldn't name one scientific study showing masks prevent getting covid and he lied when he recommend mask use.
Thank you Mr. "I am the Science" and all of your virtue signalling useful idiots for creating several million tons of plastic medical waste.
I just wish you would all get your clot-shot jabs and leave the rest of us alone.
preferrably 10 at once and from the bad batches
Great point about medical waste! If our planet is in trouble bc of wastes by mankind, I dare say the past 3 years surpassed the previous 10!
i have been wondering what they do with all the used syringes, the outdated jabs, the plastic moonsuits ?
the traffic on the way home tho...
and maybe some beachfront property?
yes have you seen the prices?
Yes but with less people maybe those prices will come down. LOL.
😝😝😝😜
Your comment recalls the final verses of The Police's haunting "Synchronicity II":
https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/police/synchronicityii.html
"But abortion IS healthcare!"
Satan
Don't accept health advice from those who let healthy children under 12 take the shots.
or anyone under 70 with no medical problems.
Most of what Fauci said, did and advised governments to do is a clear violation of Nuremberg Convention, and a crime against humanity. Ehrlich was no different.
Well said!
I love it when you can summarize 100 legal cases, a global coercion campaign, and a few dozen bogus studies into twelve words. (cheer)
I am all for depopulation through elite cannibalism.
Meaning they eat eachother, right?
Please tell me that's what you mean, because while "Eat the rich!" is both a hilarious movie and catchy slogan, I'm not too sure about how healthy a fricassé au Gates aux légumes would be, no matter how much Chianti I down...
Exactly what I mean. LOL
Weekend long Barbecue in Chappaqua?
LOLOLOL
The more I think about this, the funnier it is.
that is good advice indeed. THEY should follow their own advice, but I just read that gates daughter is pregnant. Of course, THEY are not the ones that are useless eaters ! It is us, the ones they want to feed bugs....
They think that, but I honestly can't think of anything more useless than a plutocrat.
they are indeed the useless eaters !
That seems on a part with Sowell's observation, "Never give power to people who will pay no price for being wrong." (paraphrased)