Yeah, all those Foundations & NGOs are part of the corrupt deep state. Charity can happen on an individual basis. But institutionalized charity is not a thing. It is just a front. A cover. A dodge. A hustle. Ford Foundation. Carnegie Foundation. Do you think the founders really cared about "the people"? And even if they did, do you think those who run them now care?
Repeat after me: Large organizations do not care about you. They are just that - organizations. They do not love. They do not hate. They do not feel. The people who run them will do whatever they think is in their interests. The trick is to try to align the leader's interests with the broad interests of society. Currently that is definitely not the case with the leaders of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Or the leaders of NPR. Or Pfizer, for that matter.
I have never thought that these organizations had any component of "caring." I always just thought of them as a way for very wealthy people to legally avoid certain taxes. And while doing so, manage to do something that is in the best interest of the owners. :-)
But then again, I never thought that any of them SHOULD do anything "for the people," or that they owed "the people" anything. I just think they should do what they say they are doing, instead of saying one thing and doing another.
They're a bunch of grifters, sucking dollars in and then using said dollars towards their social agenda. And since they're seen as oh-so-virtuous they can get away with all sorts of chicanery without consequence.
Their wealth is shielded from taxes, so actually they do owe 'the people', just as "not for profit" public hospitals do. Unfortunately they aren't held to account.
NPR is the worst but look at their sponsors... The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, for example. All media is captured by big pharma, too.
Yeah, all those Foundations & NGOs are part of the corrupt deep state. Charity can happen on an individual basis. But institutionalized charity is not a thing. It is just a front. A cover. A dodge. A hustle. Ford Foundation. Carnegie Foundation. Do you think the founders really cared about "the people"? And even if they did, do you think those who run them now care?
Repeat after me: Large organizations do not care about you. They are just that - organizations. They do not love. They do not hate. They do not feel. The people who run them will do whatever they think is in their interests. The trick is to try to align the leader's interests with the broad interests of society. Currently that is definitely not the case with the leaders of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Or the leaders of NPR. Or Pfizer, for that matter.
Related:
https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/11/belarus-leader-alexander-lukashenko-defends-shutting-down-liquidating-scum-globalist-ngos/
I have never thought that these organizations had any component of "caring." I always just thought of them as a way for very wealthy people to legally avoid certain taxes. And while doing so, manage to do something that is in the best interest of the owners. :-)
But then again, I never thought that any of them SHOULD do anything "for the people," or that they owed "the people" anything. I just think they should do what they say they are doing, instead of saying one thing and doing another.
They're a bunch of grifters, sucking dollars in and then using said dollars towards their social agenda. And since they're seen as oh-so-virtuous they can get away with all sorts of chicanery without consequence.
yeah, like murder of millions...
Their wealth is shielded from taxes, so actually they do owe 'the people', just as "not for profit" public hospitals do. Unfortunately they aren't held to account.
I hear what you are saying and I donтАЩt necessarily disagree, but I do a whole lot better when I live my life as though no one owes me anything. :-)
Oh, I know. That's why I listen to them. Have to keep up with what the opposition is doing. Otherwise we won't know.