Neither - today is Thursday so that meant seeing my physiotherapist and doing volunteer work at a local church in the closest township, handing out grocery bags to the poor hudled masses; lots of very poor senior citizens, local alkys, the usual crowd.
They get a free lunch, cup of coffee/tea, and whatever food we get donated from the stores in town, plus a little chat, meeting friends and so on. Our recycling system works in such a way business dumping stuff like food past sell-by date must pay a fee, so by donating it they instead save those money and do a good deed too.
Two weeks back, one of the supermarkets had their annual "clean out all the stuff we haven't sold since last year's Yule"-day, so we got 1 500 ½ kilo tubes of rice porridge. It is humbling (and rage inducing) to see a mother with children bite down her tears of gratitude because she knows wont have to tell the kids to eat as much as they can in school this week.
Oh, and by spreading such unsavory details that we in Sweden have people so poor they live below the UN's poverty line, I'm committing a crime.
Every food we eat has been poisoned by these creatures. Even if you grow your own it is poisoned by the chemicals sprayed by geoengineering planes. No rainwater on earth is safe to drink.
Sure, but there is some nuance to that. There's a difference between eating cancer-inducing, endocrine disrupting petrochemicals in high concentration every day, to minimizing your exposure.
Humans are resilient, we can tank radiation, mutations, poison, cancer etc... as long as the dose isn't so high (even prions for a while).
So all is not lost.
Growing your own food is the most revolutionary act of today.
I'm not sure I believe the new rainwater proclamations. I'm ambivalent. You must remember "they" know people are prepping in various ways. Some by collecting rainwater. Wouldn't it be advantageous for them to make sure people believed it is toxic? Make it harder to get bottled water, because people would be hoarding more of it. ...?
We are getting a nose for smelling money Bandit ! I think you are right. Plastic bottles contain poisonous chemicals too. All animals consume rainwater by choice (cats and dogs the dirtier, the better) and humans did until 100 years ago too. It is like those asking how can you knit socks by hand !
Have it tested at a lab. We have done that in many different states. it is very contaminated with nanoparticles of aluminum, barium, strontium, and even graphene oxide. Yes they are spraying graphene oxide in the geoengineering trails. It is sickening. Also bacteria, red blood cells, and fungi are present. Take a sample to get tested at a lab. You will find out what's in the rainwater, river water, and all water on earth. What is sprayed up high must come down, and it does. We are also breathing i the nanoparticles daily. That is one reason people have become so much sicker during the last 30 years.
and of course all the chemicals in food (colorants, preservatives, smell and taste agents) in the packaging (remember as a kid everything packed in wax paper) all the chemicals the doctor gives you, and that lots of people buy over the counter, all the jabs... my dad, now 88, tends to say that a person from 150 years ago being brought back to life, would immediately die again from all that grub ! Imagine a world like the Amish still live in... no cars, TV or radio or computer, no cooling, no electricity, no gas, only real fire from wood, it is possible, they still live like that. But of course, we are all so spoiled !
I know about the chemtrails and what they're spraying. This would also be all over our food. As you say, also all water on Earth. Meaning, this isn't any more toxic than what we already drink.
The Carnivore Diet is the f#cking bomb. Fifteen years ago my doctor told me I had asthma and despite a steroid inhaler it would get progressively worse over the course of my life. I tried the inhaler for a month, gained 10 lbs from the steroid and tossed it. I did my own research and ultimately went low carb. My asthma immediately went away (within a couple days), I lost 40 lbs, my hand tremors disappeared and my eyesight improved. About 5 years ago I was following Dr. Shawn Baker on twitter when he first tried Carnivore and saw his results, I immediately went full Carnivore myself. I lost more weight, I no longer need glasses at all and my lifelong hayfever disappeared.
I'm pretty much convinced that meat (particularly beef) is the optimal food for humans and I will fight to the death anyone who tries to take that away from me.
Hey Bob, remember the "Eat mor chikin" cows in the Chick-fil-A commercials? I am glad you didn't dox yourself with your comment above. Still, if I were you I'd make sure to double lock my doors at night: There could be a lot of mad cows out there!
True, but I think if you played it safe by following the tried-and-true method of keeping them in a tank and purging them with cornmeal for a few days prior to slaughter, then they might be okay. Perhaps not delectably toothsome, but acceptable. Fava beans and a nice Chianti will help to round things out.
I tried eating nothing but meat for two months and it was great. I moved to France and here the meat is super expensive. ~15€\kg even for minced meat. I can’t afford to eat just meat. My ultimate goal is to buy or rent land and graze animals. The beef you eat has been fed grain. Cows are supposed to eat nothing but grass. I want to produce real food for myself and others. For anyone interested: read or watch Joel Salatin.
well my food bill is half what is was, when you eat just meat your appetite suppresses. i used to do the 'normal' 3 meals a day bullshit plus snacks. now i eat like my ancestors and its a damn sight cheaper. your body adapts to caloric needs, i used to probably consume 5000 cals a day, now im at 3000 tops
I wrote a food column for a newspaper for a few years. I talked a lot about the history of different ethnic foods, and how much they were a result of and intertwined with invasion, conquest, war, famine, etc., as well as human ingenuity and the observation of the rest of the natural world.
How else can you explain eating artichokes and grape leaves?
Yes, they are, I couldn't agree more. But the very first time, millennia ago, some person watched camels eating thistles (artichokes) and they were very hungry and said why don't I try that, some part of that thorny thing must be good. Same with grape leaves - they aren't all that great when they're raw, but if you use them as a cooked container for other things, yum! Someone got innovative, and that probably came from hunger. Necessity is a mother.
I'm a bit of a hermit, but as I've already stated publicly that any result to throw anything like a burka or hajib over my head would result in - - less than satisfactory results..let's say-- for the provider of said clothing....I'm guessing my reaction to having a habit putbon me would have the same results .
Mmm I should have clarified. I was thinking in terms of reincarnation. Maybe you had a past life as a high-born Brahmin; cows were sacred and eating beef anathema to you.
That's interesting. Or maybe sometime back I was cruel on a ranch or cattledrives, and now am deprived of their sustenance...
Can you imagine the willpower of being Jainist? Of wearing a mask alllllll the time ( and what that does to you?) So you don't inadvertently swallow bugs or other living creatures??
I use butter for everything— gave up on oils a few years ago. Everything IS better with butter! Eating butter and meat (especially beef and bacon) is my small rebellion against the forces that have been trying to destroy the dairy and meat industries for decades.
Once upon a time, my grandparents came to the US from Poland. As in "1914." My grandmother would not bring margarine into the house and said it was poison.
"If you are afraid of cream...use butter." Or something like that. God I loved that woman. I have a lot of roses, and one of my favorites is "Julia Child". She chose it herself, when she was awarded the honor of a rose in her name. It is big and fragrant and so happy, and the color of - you guessed it - butter!
Cholesterol was long ago shown to have no effect on heart disease. The first big study showed that you could not control cholesterol through diet, but exercise might provide some benefit. The next big study showed that the plaques attributed to cholesterol had no effect on heart disease (much like the recent Alzheimer’s revelations). I am relying on memory here, which at my age can be suspect, but I’m reasonably sure I've gotten it right. Maybe someone else with a better grasp of current research can expand or correct.
Seems to me that all of the doctor-driven edicts have been wrong, from margarine to salt to the food pyramid to soy and seed oils. Smoking was good for you, everyone should be sprayed with DDT, asbestos was wonderful — on and on. We should treat doctors, particularly public health doctors with a healthy dose of skepticism. And we should make more room for the terrain theorists — germ theory is obviously flawed, but I’m not convinced that the terrain folks have it figured out either. And each individual will have a unique response to certain treatments — you can generalize all you like about a population, but never about an individual. We all need to take part in our own health — treat our bodies as the wondrous gift that they are, and depend less on the “health care” system that is failing everyone.
I’ve read that cholesterol actually doesn’t cause heart disease. Heart disease brings on cholesterol, which is kinda like spackling for your veins. Sugars make tiny holes in your veins and cholesterol comes along and patches them. It’s our FRIEND! Eat all the
protein/keri you want and stay away from sugars. Cholesterol goes away when spackle isnt needed.
The answer to your question is probably not. Back in the 1960s, there was a group of people led by Ancel Keys at the University of Minnesota who said that cholesterol was a leading cause of increased rates of heart disease. Their data was not necessarily wrong, but was cherry-picked to show the results they wanted (a common problem in science I hate to admit). Another group disagreed with him and said that sugar was the reason why there was more heart disease. Unfortunately, Dr. Keys was more powerful and destroyed the careers of those scientists so that his results were deemed to be the "correct" reason for the increased rates of heart disease. We as a society have the paid the price ever since because we are addressing the wrong source. For me, it is very simple. The human body needs fat (and cholesterol) to survive. It does not need sugar. Get rid of the sugar, keep the meat and the fat that comes with it.
The public and medical conversation about cholesterol is similar to what we're seeing with the Covid jabs right now.
The mainstream, conventional medical establishment continues to recommend and believe in cholesterol lowering drugs. They are widely prescribed. Medical schools continue to emphasize low saturated fat and low cholesterol diets as do many MDs.
At the same time, many non-mainstream MDs, Naturopathic doctors, alternative medical providers, non-medical scientists and various writers have argued against the use of cholesterol lowering drugs, citing their side effects and powerfully criticizing the notion that serum cholesterol levels alone cause heart disease.
This debate has gone on for at least 50 years. Both sides have claimed victory the whole time.
Chemotherapy treats cancer sort of like a bacterial infection, like something we can successfully "kill off" with a strong medication. But, agreeing with you, IMHO, it seems like the problem is that the immune system, which usually prevents metastatic cancer, sometimes fails to do that job.
So, right now, immunotherapy seems to be a very good thing to research for cancer treatment. And I find it interesting that a therapy we all criticize here -- mRNA injections -- just might turn out to be very promising as a way to shift the attention of the immune system so that it starts to attack cancer cells.
But I wonder, given all the negativity I currently feel about mRNA jabs: would I be able to objectively calculate a risk/reward ratio for an mRNA based cancer treatment in the face of a highly deadly cancer?
Look up Dr Malcolm Kendrick, who's written several books on the subject. RationalWiki lambastes him unsurprisingly as a conspiracy theorist because he doesn't believe high cholesterol increases the risk of heart disease. Statins, like vaccines, are a huge source of income for Pharma, which has been "persuading" and rewarding doctors to prescribe them for decades.
I used to predict that one day cholesterol would be seen as a NUTRIENT. Lately though, I don't think I'll live to see that day due to the globalists agenda. Cholesterol is key for humans making Vitamin D from the sun. And it's key to steroid hormones - cortisol, testosterone, estrogen, progesterone and more. We cannot live without good cholesterol levels. It's a critical building block in our BRAINS.
I myself think it's the best way to get real results after one has reached a certain age (when pounds glue themselves to you and refuse to be shed). I would never do keto for the rest of my life, I love fruit too much, but as a way to kickstart a healthier lifestyle which would include a careful accounting of good carbs, I cannot think of a better plan. At least it's true for me, and I have vast experience in this field.
A while back, when I was trying to lose weight, I tried the Fat Smash diet. It's kind of a moderate keto. That worked, and I didn't have the keto taste in my mouth or the lack of carb... let's just call it "disagreeableness."
I was keto for a few months. For about six weeks it felt really good. After that it went downhill. Since then though I’ve cut my carbs in half from what they were pre keto. And when I creep up I feel it. Keto though was too low for me, carb wise. But 100 grams a day seems fine. I love toast in the morning. But it slows my metabolism down all day. A meat sandwich though at lunch is fine for me. The carbs seem okay with protein. And as much as I looove potatoes I’ve cut way down.
Grassfed beef & free range (hopefully from hens who have never seen a chicken house) eggs are far superior for your health. We used to have 8 hens who were allowed to roam free all day eating bugs (before that was cool! 🐛) and weed seeds. Those yolks weren’t even yellow. They were ORANGE— so full
Try A2 raw butter. I get mine from Amos-Miller online. Also get soy free eggs since they don’t have ruminant stomachs like cows to process those PUFA poisons
Now there's a topic! Boogers are in the news!! New research (which really doesn't bear thinking about) has PROVEN SCIENTIFICALLY that boogers are very, very good for the immune system. Yes, consuming them. A rich trove of anti-viral, antimicrobial, interferon-activating thingummies. Think I'll stop right there.
I'm a liberal Democrat surrounded by liberal Democrats and I'd really like to stay that way but gosh my pals are making it hard. First they wanted me to risk my life with an experimental "vaccine" and now I'm supposed to give up hamburgers? C'mon man!
Brush up on those cognitive dissonance skills and you'll be okay. After all, your President is the most popular in history. The vaccines fight racism or something.
Not yet, but Comrade Biden is working on it. He's got some big shoes to fill.
After all, just look at the partial list of what the fascist, er, I mean progressive/democrat/totalitarian/moron, poster boi FDR accomplished:
- Stealing the people's gold via executive order
- The Tuskeegee Experiment
- Appointing a KKK member to the Supreme Court
- Creating the regulatory state that is choking the economy
- Lying about Pearl Harbor being a surprise attack
- Imprisoning citizens of Japansese descent in concentration camps
- Sending Jewish refugees back to the Holocaust
- Allowing Stalin to enslave all of Central Europe
- Keeping the Vichy government in power, running concentration camps, after Allied victory in North Africa
And he was admired and lauded by all the right people:
'Roosevelt himself called Mussolini “admirable” and professed that he was “deeply impressed by what he has accomplished.” The admiration was mutual. In a laudatory review of Roosevelt’s 1933 book Looking Forward, Mussolini wrote, “Reminiscent of Fascism is the principle that the state no longer leaves the economy to its own devices.…Without question, the mood accompanying this sea change resembles that of Fascism.” The chief Nazi newspaper, Volkischer Beobachter, repeatedly praised “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” and “the development toward an authoritarian state” based on the “demand that collective good be put before individual self-interest.”'
I appreciate your expression of doubt about the party that you have long identified with. You are one of many with the same thoughts. The political parties are very different than they were a few years ago. When a party of inclusion and diversity does the exact opposite, it is time to leave it.
"I'll take the one that gave my ancestors the nourishment needed to build a society privileged enough for soy boys to preach at me about what I eat."
I wish I could save likes, then I could like this sentiment to the extent it deserves to be!
You'd have like 3 of them in your like folder.
Heh, business oppostunity right there - pay for likes. Though I guess Facebook already cornered that one years ago?
They're like Christmas cards. I feel obligated to send you a like when I get one from you.
Are you picking berries today or painting?
Neither - today is Thursday so that meant seeing my physiotherapist and doing volunteer work at a local church in the closest township, handing out grocery bags to the poor hudled masses; lots of very poor senior citizens, local alkys, the usual crowd.
They get a free lunch, cup of coffee/tea, and whatever food we get donated from the stores in town, plus a little chat, meeting friends and so on. Our recycling system works in such a way business dumping stuff like food past sell-by date must pay a fee, so by donating it they instead save those money and do a good deed too.
Two weeks back, one of the supermarkets had their annual "clean out all the stuff we haven't sold since last year's Yule"-day, so we got 1 500 ½ kilo tubes of rice porridge. It is humbling (and rage inducing) to see a mother with children bite down her tears of gratitude because she knows wont have to tell the kids to eat as much as they can in school this week.
Oh, and by spreading such unsavory details that we in Sweden have people so poor they live below the UN's poverty line, I'm committing a crime.
I was so poor growing up that my mom would hover over all three of her boys at dinner waiting to see if we'd eat all our meal.
We always saved enough for her.
Good on you mate.
Instead of allowing government to criminalize truth, let's criminalize government.
In the meantime, should the Polismyndigheten come for you, know that I'll contribute to your GoFundMe to bail you out.
Here! Here!
dont spend your money in these places, its all poisonous crap anyway
Every food we eat has been poisoned by these creatures. Even if you grow your own it is poisoned by the chemicals sprayed by geoengineering planes. No rainwater on earth is safe to drink.
Sure, but there is some nuance to that. There's a difference between eating cancer-inducing, endocrine disrupting petrochemicals in high concentration every day, to minimizing your exposure.
Humans are resilient, we can tank radiation, mutations, poison, cancer etc... as long as the dose isn't so high (even prions for a while).
So all is not lost.
Growing your own food is the most revolutionary act of today.
Emancipate from the industry and opt out.
all animals drink rain water though. try giving your dog or cat city water ! they won't have it.
Mine won't. They only drink filtered water. Reverse osmosis.
I'm not sure I believe the new rainwater proclamations. I'm ambivalent. You must remember "they" know people are prepping in various ways. Some by collecting rainwater. Wouldn't it be advantageous for them to make sure people believed it is toxic? Make it harder to get bottled water, because people would be hoarding more of it. ...?
We are getting a nose for smelling money Bandit ! I think you are right. Plastic bottles contain poisonous chemicals too. All animals consume rainwater by choice (cats and dogs the dirtier, the better) and humans did until 100 years ago too. It is like those asking how can you knit socks by hand !
Have it tested at a lab. We have done that in many different states. it is very contaminated with nanoparticles of aluminum, barium, strontium, and even graphene oxide. Yes they are spraying graphene oxide in the geoengineering trails. It is sickening. Also bacteria, red blood cells, and fungi are present. Take a sample to get tested at a lab. You will find out what's in the rainwater, river water, and all water on earth. What is sprayed up high must come down, and it does. We are also breathing i the nanoparticles daily. That is one reason people have become so much sicker during the last 30 years.
and of course all the chemicals in food (colorants, preservatives, smell and taste agents) in the packaging (remember as a kid everything packed in wax paper) all the chemicals the doctor gives you, and that lots of people buy over the counter, all the jabs... my dad, now 88, tends to say that a person from 150 years ago being brought back to life, would immediately die again from all that grub ! Imagine a world like the Amish still live in... no cars, TV or radio or computer, no cooling, no electricity, no gas, only real fire from wood, it is possible, they still live like that. But of course, we are all so spoiled !
I know about the chemtrails and what they're spraying. This would also be all over our food. As you say, also all water on Earth. Meaning, this isn't any more toxic than what we already drink.
and the city water here has bleach in it. You can smell it right away, all on top of that.
Sure, but try going
Exactly
Incrementalism at its finest
Next Bugs
Then Soylent Green
For real - “Nudge theory” in play.
Classic Dialectic Capture ploy
No, Soylent Green is meat. (Come to think of it, so are bugs.)
The next question should be, "Traditional meat, Soylent Green, or bugs?"
Yeah, but Soylent Green: IT'S PEOPLE!!!!! Channeling Charleton Heston here...
I thought it was either a dessert topping or a floor wax !!
Soylent Green is people.
Next you realize they are already feeding you bugs. Then you realize it's already Soylent Green.
Carnivore diet saved me and many others from the hells of autoimmune disease and more. This is an attack on human health.
https://joshketry.substack.com/p/does-carnivore-diet-really-work-for
100%. When red meat is in *last* place below Frosted Mini Wheats on the WEF recommended food list, you know exactly what's up.
Red meat and eggs for the win.
The Carnivore Diet is the f#cking bomb. Fifteen years ago my doctor told me I had asthma and despite a steroid inhaler it would get progressively worse over the course of my life. I tried the inhaler for a month, gained 10 lbs from the steroid and tossed it. I did my own research and ultimately went low carb. My asthma immediately went away (within a couple days), I lost 40 lbs, my hand tremors disappeared and my eyesight improved. About 5 years ago I was following Dr. Shawn Baker on twitter when he first tried Carnivore and saw his results, I immediately went full Carnivore myself. I lost more weight, I no longer need glasses at all and my lifelong hayfever disappeared.
I'm pretty much convinced that meat (particularly beef) is the optimal food for humans and I will fight to the death anyone who tries to take that away from me.
i had a similar story only i took the inhalers for 30 years, havnt even owned one in 6 years now. i used to be allergic to pets, not a problem now!
Hey Bob, remember the "Eat mor chikin" cows in the Chick-fil-A commercials? I am glad you didn't dox yourself with your comment above. Still, if I were you I'd make sure to double lock my doors at night: There could be a lot of mad cows out there!
I love those ads!
Hell yeah love hearing this
Oh, me too. I'm gonna call all of you guys next time I need to run a mastodon off a cliff. How about it, you down?
Or a globalist
There's no way I'd eat a globalist, God only knows what they're made of!
True, but I think if you played it safe by following the tried-and-true method of keeping them in a tank and purging them with cornmeal for a few days prior to slaughter, then they might be okay. Perhaps not delectably toothsome, but acceptable. Fava beans and a nice Chianti will help to round things out.
Coffee snort!!
Always 👊
This is an amazing testimonial. Hayfever and glasses here... Hmmm.
Give it a try, what can it hurt?
I tried eating nothing but meat for two months and it was great. I moved to France and here the meat is super expensive. ~15€\kg even for minced meat. I can’t afford to eat just meat. My ultimate goal is to buy or rent land and graze animals. The beef you eat has been fed grain. Cows are supposed to eat nothing but grass. I want to produce real food for myself and others. For anyone interested: read or watch Joel Salatin.
I find it cheap since I only need to eat once a day
Not relevant in any way…
The amount of times one eats makes no difference on the amount of meat one has to eat to satisfy the caloric needs.
You get 'im!
well my food bill is half what is was, when you eat just meat your appetite suppresses. i used to do the 'normal' 3 meals a day bullshit plus snacks. now i eat like my ancestors and its a damn sight cheaper. your body adapts to caloric needs, i used to probably consume 5000 cals a day, now im at 3000 tops
same, im currently a full carnivore and will be till we run out of meat
We ain’t running out. We can always eat the globalists. ;)
I won't eat soy-based meat. :)
i feed the local pigeons just in case, cannibalism will be a last resort
Yes we have a whole cloud of them living and kaking on our roof. Hubby wants to shoot them. I said: not yet.
Delicious cooked with white wine, maybe over wild rice?
Great suggestion. I better stock up on wine then--I do have a large stock of rice. It will never be enough of course...
😂🤣
I wrote a food column for a newspaper for a few years. I talked a lot about the history of different ethnic foods, and how much they were a result of and intertwined with invasion, conquest, war, famine, etc., as well as human ingenuity and the observation of the rest of the natural world.
How else can you explain eating artichokes and grape leaves?
That they're delicious 😋!
Yes, they are, I couldn't agree more. But the very first time, millennia ago, some person watched camels eating thistles (artichokes) and they were very hungry and said why don't I try that, some part of that thorny thing must be good. Same with grape leaves - they aren't all that great when they're raw, but if you use them as a cooked container for other things, yum! Someone got innovative, and that probably came from hunger. Necessity is a mother.
I wonder about the first humans to eat oysters...
" yeah...it looks like snot. I'll think I'll eat it tho..."
I wonder about the first person to eat snails. And why they should be considered a delicacy as escargot when they are really just snot in a shell.
Absolutely!
ive never tried either, dont expect to unless/until the meat disappears
Hearing about the Carnivore diet makes me so sad... because I've been allergic to red meat for almost 40 years.
Beef smells SO good. 😓
( oddly , I can eat butter and dairy. It's the tissue I can't consume)
Try pasture raised beef that has been free from anti biotics and grain and everything else.
And humanely slaughtered. This is very important.
Well, I'd say it has to do with your karma, Karma. Does the monastic life appeal to you?
I'm a bit of a hermit, but as I've already stated publicly that any result to throw anything like a burka or hajib over my head would result in - - less than satisfactory results..let's say-- for the provider of said clothing....I'm guessing my reaction to having a habit putbon me would have the same results .
So...I reckon not.
My karma. How sad.
Mmm I should have clarified. I was thinking in terms of reincarnation. Maybe you had a past life as a high-born Brahmin; cows were sacred and eating beef anathema to you.
That's interesting. Or maybe sometime back I was cruel on a ranch or cattledrives, and now am deprived of their sustenance...
Can you imagine the willpower of being Jainist? Of wearing a mask alllllll the time ( and what that does to you?) So you don't inadvertently swallow bugs or other living creatures??
No I cannot imagine it. They are definitely a breed apart.
Do the butter! Do the butter!
Butter makes everything better!
Julia Child had it 100% right!
I use butter for everything— gave up on oils a few years ago. Everything IS better with butter! Eating butter and meat (especially beef and bacon) is my small rebellion against the forces that have been trying to destroy the dairy and meat industries for decades.
Once upon a time, my grandparents came to the US from Poland. As in "1914." My grandmother would not bring margarine into the house and said it was poison.
She was right, and I rarely use it.
Hey, living in postwar Poland I'll always remember
my mum saying it was rubbish ("margaryna dla Gagarina" m for Gagarin) and also to remember that
it is better for me to eat less but good stuff than
to fill myself up with crap. I have to say that I have
follow that to this day.
You know, I never thought about the quality of the food, but you're 110% correct.
Ghee is also a great way to cook with butter! For some reason, I couldn't like your comment, but I would've if I could've.
A jar of ghee on the shelf is like money in the bank.
"If you are afraid of cream...use butter." Or something like that. God I loved that woman. I have a lot of roses, and one of my favorites is "Julia Child". She chose it herself, when she was awarded the honor of a rose in her name. It is big and fragrant and so happy, and the color of - you guessed it - butter!
And right you are 😁
A bit off topic:
We were lied to about C0VID and the vaxxes. What are the other lies we have been told by the CDC/FDA? I'm sure this wasn't the first.
For example: does cholesterol cause heart disease? My guess is actually no. So yeah, the carnivore diet WOULD be healthy, if not optimal.
Cholesterol was long ago shown to have no effect on heart disease. The first big study showed that you could not control cholesterol through diet, but exercise might provide some benefit. The next big study showed that the plaques attributed to cholesterol had no effect on heart disease (much like the recent Alzheimer’s revelations). I am relying on memory here, which at my age can be suspect, but I’m reasonably sure I've gotten it right. Maybe someone else with a better grasp of current research can expand or correct.
Seems to me that all of the doctor-driven edicts have been wrong, from margarine to salt to the food pyramid to soy and seed oils. Smoking was good for you, everyone should be sprayed with DDT, asbestos was wonderful — on and on. We should treat doctors, particularly public health doctors with a healthy dose of skepticism. And we should make more room for the terrain theorists — germ theory is obviously flawed, but I’m not convinced that the terrain folks have it figured out either. And each individual will have a unique response to certain treatments — you can generalize all you like about a population, but never about an individual. We all need to take part in our own health — treat our bodies as the wondrous gift that they are, and depend less on the “health care” system that is failing everyone.
For what it’s worth ….
I’ve read that cholesterol actually doesn’t cause heart disease. Heart disease brings on cholesterol, which is kinda like spackling for your veins. Sugars make tiny holes in your veins and cholesterol comes along and patches them. It’s our FRIEND! Eat all the
protein/keri you want and stay away from sugars. Cholesterol goes away when spackle isnt needed.
I am convinced that cholesterol is a symptom, not a cause
The answer to your question is probably not. Back in the 1960s, there was a group of people led by Ancel Keys at the University of Minnesota who said that cholesterol was a leading cause of increased rates of heart disease. Their data was not necessarily wrong, but was cherry-picked to show the results they wanted (a common problem in science I hate to admit). Another group disagreed with him and said that sugar was the reason why there was more heart disease. Unfortunately, Dr. Keys was more powerful and destroyed the careers of those scientists so that his results were deemed to be the "correct" reason for the increased rates of heart disease. We as a society have the paid the price ever since because we are addressing the wrong source. For me, it is very simple. The human body needs fat (and cholesterol) to survive. It does not need sugar. Get rid of the sugar, keep the meat and the fat that comes with it.
Imagine that! Big pharma, cherry picking data to suit its narrative.
Yep, and now everyone and their twin brother is taking statins, you know, the ones that cause Alzheimer's.
Cholesterol has been blacklisted as soon as first statin was patented.
SMH
Your brain runs (mostly) on cholesterol. Now you know why people are so damn dumb! 🤣
The public and medical conversation about cholesterol is similar to what we're seeing with the Covid jabs right now.
The mainstream, conventional medical establishment continues to recommend and believe in cholesterol lowering drugs. They are widely prescribed. Medical schools continue to emphasize low saturated fat and low cholesterol diets as do many MDs.
At the same time, many non-mainstream MDs, Naturopathic doctors, alternative medical providers, non-medical scientists and various writers have argued against the use of cholesterol lowering drugs, citing their side effects and powerfully criticizing the notion that serum cholesterol levels alone cause heart disease.
This debate has gone on for at least 50 years. Both sides have claimed victory the whole time.
so then you have to ask yourself.... what about chemotherapy? what about an autism/childhood vaxxine link?
what else are they lying about?
and why is the only solution for any problem expensive drugs or expensive surgery?
I'm starting to believe that the actual scientific answers to those questions don't even matter in our system.
1. What matters to patients: will insurance pay for the treatment or therapy I want?
2. What matters to health care providers: will insurance pay for the treatment or therapy I offer?
You're 100% correct.
There is absolutely a vaccine autism HUGE link. I can give you dozens of book titles and sources.
Chemotherapy treats cancer sort of like a bacterial infection, like something we can successfully "kill off" with a strong medication. But, agreeing with you, IMHO, it seems like the problem is that the immune system, which usually prevents metastatic cancer, sometimes fails to do that job.
So, right now, immunotherapy seems to be a very good thing to research for cancer treatment. And I find it interesting that a therapy we all criticize here -- mRNA injections -- just might turn out to be very promising as a way to shift the attention of the immune system so that it starts to attack cancer cells.
But I wonder, given all the negativity I currently feel about mRNA jabs: would I be able to objectively calculate a risk/reward ratio for an mRNA based cancer treatment in the face of a highly deadly cancer?
We’re drinking pasteurized milk that offers far more benefits than raw milk… read about it..
All of the lies and regulations that bas been showed down our collective throats is mind numbing.
Far less benefits*
Pardon!
Look up Dr Malcolm Kendrick, who's written several books on the subject. RationalWiki lambastes him unsurprisingly as a conspiracy theorist because he doesn't believe high cholesterol increases the risk of heart disease. Statins, like vaccines, are a huge source of income for Pharma, which has been "persuading" and rewarding doctors to prescribe them for decades.
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/statin-nation-the-documentary/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry1Z8buyd8I
And as you prob know, statins can be very dangerous... More fun info about statins at https://spacedoc.com/
He's a great guy. Writes all sorts of interesting stuff.
I used to predict that one day cholesterol would be seen as a NUTRIENT. Lately though, I don't think I'll live to see that day due to the globalists agenda. Cholesterol is key for humans making Vitamin D from the sun. And it's key to steroid hormones - cortisol, testosterone, estrogen, progesterone and more. We cannot live without good cholesterol levels. It's a critical building block in our BRAINS.
We definitely were lied to. Read my story (it’s totally free substack):
https://joshketry.substack.com/p/its-my-carniversary
This is a great article, thanks for sharing!
I've done the moderate keto diet, and honestly, I need to get back to it. Many of us probably do.
I myself think it's the best way to get real results after one has reached a certain age (when pounds glue themselves to you and refuse to be shed). I would never do keto for the rest of my life, I love fruit too much, but as a way to kickstart a healthier lifestyle which would include a careful accounting of good carbs, I cannot think of a better plan. At least it's true for me, and I have vast experience in this field.
A while back, when I was trying to lose weight, I tried the Fat Smash diet. It's kind of a moderate keto. That worked, and I didn't have the keto taste in my mouth or the lack of carb... let's just call it "disagreeableness."
I was keto for a few months. For about six weeks it felt really good. After that it went downhill. Since then though I’ve cut my carbs in half from what they were pre keto. And when I creep up I feel it. Keto though was too low for me, carb wise. But 100 grams a day seems fine. I love toast in the morning. But it slows my metabolism down all day. A meat sandwich though at lunch is fine for me. The carbs seem okay with protein. And as much as I looove potatoes I’ve cut way down.
I agree. I also like Mark Sisson (Mark's Daily Apple website) - he has a kind of no brainer paleo / keto thing going... "lazy keto".
Grassfed beef & free range (hopefully from hens who have never seen a chicken house) eggs are far superior for your health. We used to have 8 hens who were allowed to roam free all day eating bugs (before that was cool! 🐛) and weed seeds. Those yolks weren’t even yellow. They were ORANGE— so full
of vitamin A!
My girls do the same. It gets so other eggs are almost unpalatable.
Just had one tonite...for dessert I dipped a ripe plaintain in egg and fried it up. Honey and butter FTW...
Chickens eat the bugs so we don't have to. Whats wrong with that?
I'm growing my plantain, have couple of leaves every
morning, going to try your way, thanks!
Here in Australia they have been telling us recently that
consuming eggs from your "yard hens" could be dangerous
to your health (apparently they could be full of lead), go
figure, probably starting early to discourage people. Here
(Queensland) we experiencing eggs shortages recently.
Try A2 raw butter. I get mine from Amos-Miller online. Also get soy free eggs since they don’t have ruminant stomachs like cows to process those PUFA poisons
Sounds great— except I’m ever injecting anything again, just in case. What are the adjuvants in the injection? Can you find an ingredient list?
Bugger King
As kids we called it Booger King 😂
Boogers are probably less carcinogenic.
Now there's a topic! Boogers are in the news!! New research (which really doesn't bear thinking about) has PROVEN SCIENTIFICALLY that boogers are very, very good for the immune system. Yes, consuming them. A rich trove of anti-viral, antimicrobial, interferon-activating thingummies. Think I'll stop right there.
Been there!
Bug King.
Hahaha
I'm a liberal Democrat surrounded by liberal Democrats and I'd really like to stay that way but gosh my pals are making it hard. First they wanted me to risk my life with an experimental "vaccine" and now I'm supposed to give up hamburgers? C'mon man!
Brush up on those cognitive dissonance skills and you'll be okay. After all, your President is the most popular in history. The vaccines fight racism or something.
My media told me he's accomplished more than FDR. This person's an FDR Democrat surely.
Not yet, but Comrade Biden is working on it. He's got some big shoes to fill.
After all, just look at the partial list of what the fascist, er, I mean progressive/democrat/totalitarian/moron, poster boi FDR accomplished:
- Stealing the people's gold via executive order
- The Tuskeegee Experiment
- Appointing a KKK member to the Supreme Court
- Creating the regulatory state that is choking the economy
- Lying about Pearl Harbor being a surprise attack
- Imprisoning citizens of Japansese descent in concentration camps
- Sending Jewish refugees back to the Holocaust
- Allowing Stalin to enslave all of Central Europe
- Keeping the Vichy government in power, running concentration camps, after Allied victory in North Africa
And he was admired and lauded by all the right people:
'Roosevelt himself called Mussolini “admirable” and professed that he was “deeply impressed by what he has accomplished.” The admiration was mutual. In a laudatory review of Roosevelt’s 1933 book Looking Forward, Mussolini wrote, “Reminiscent of Fascism is the principle that the state no longer leaves the economy to its own devices.…Without question, the mood accompanying this sea change resembles that of Fascism.” The chief Nazi newspaper, Volkischer Beobachter, repeatedly praised “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” and “the development toward an authoritarian state” based on the “demand that collective good be put before individual self-interest.”'
~ http://reason.com/archives/2007/09/28/hitler-mussolini-roosevelt
Delusional. Like their leader.
Well, they are killing a lot of white people.
The dumb compliant ones, anyway.
I appreciate your expression of doubt about the party that you have long identified with. You are one of many with the same thoughts. The political parties are very different than they were a few years ago. When a party of inclusion and diversity does the exact opposite, it is time to leave it.
Can you imagine if JFK was around today? He'd absolutely be considered a conservative.
this is Obama's Army.