Are all of those states going to send thank you notes individually, or will they do it as a group?

Expand full comment

“Make no mistake: We’re in the midst of an unprecedented wave of bigotry and discrimination in this country…”

It’s remarkable that these people don’t even care whether their claims are true. “An unprecedented wave of bigotry…” Really?

So there is more bigotry and discrimination now than there was under slavery prior to emancipation?

Expand full comment

Uh, doesn’t this indicate that a few too many CA state employees were suddenly finding work-related reasons to travel to FL, a fully open state?

Expand full comment

Happy to be from Iowa, where we have Constitutional Carry coming; outlawing masks for kids in government schools; banning CRT (even though some are still trying to sneak it in)…

My state is on a roll...

Expand full comment

what were CA state employees doing on "optional" state business going to Kansas, anyway? Me-thinks this is a "ban" on something that never actually happened. Sounds good, no effect. And for everyone's edification, I looked up the "exceptions:"




The Legislature created exceptions in AB 1887 that allow travel to banned states in certain circumstances. (Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subd. (c).) These exceptions only apply if travel to a subject state is "required." (Ibid.)

Specifically, AB 1887 does not apply to state travel that is required for any of the following purposes:

Enforcement of California law, including auditing and revenue collection.


To meet contractual obligations incurred before January 1, 2017.

To comply with requests by the federal government to appear before committees.

To participate in meetings or training required by a grant or required to maintain grant funding.

To complete job-required training necessary to maintain licensure or similar standards required for holding a position, in the event that comparable training cannot be obtained in California or a different state not subject to the travel prohibition.

For the protection of public health, welfare, or safety, as determined by the affected agency, department, board, authority, or commission, or by the affected legislative office.

(Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subd. (c).)"

Expand full comment

Build that wall!!! (Around California)

Expand full comment

What political and woke slight of hand. “Don’t look over here, look over there”. And the progressive wokesters lap it right up!

Expand full comment

CA unfortunately has been captured. Those people do not represent a lot of us

Expand full comment

I am trying to leave California...

Expand full comment

one more step to a much needed breakup

Expand full comment

"And I'm not just saying this because it is written in the script for me to repeat," Bonta added. "Really, I truly believe this shit, man, because I have to believe it in order to have a political future."

Expand full comment

Ironically this is ACTUALLY the job for the federal government. One of the few that they actually have.

Expand full comment

“ make no mistake”, “let me be clear” 💩💩💩

Expand full comment

it is now "bigotry and discrimination" to do a Christians duty and "admonish the sinner"....

as if lack of control and sin were not the same....

'St Michael defend the usa in battle and cast.....'

Expand full comment