I mean, you can literally always say "what if they decide to ignore legal precedent and established law" and then, yes, absolutely anything could happen, but that isn't a meaningful discussion.
Within the boundaries of existing conditions- that we have a massive wave of tyrannical, undemocratic impulses perverting but not explicitly violating their legal authority, the previous is my take.
I mean, you can literally always say "what if they decide to ignore legal precedent and established law" and then, yes, absolutely anything could happen, but that isn't a meaningful discussion.
Within the boundaries of existing conditions- that we have a massive wave of tyrannical, undemocratic impulses perverting but not explicitly violating their legal authority, the previous is my take.
I mean, you can literally always say "what if they decide to ignore legal precedent and established law" and then, yes, absolutely anything could happen, but that isn't a meaningful discussion.
Within the boundaries of existing conditions- that we have a massive wave of tyrannical, undemocratic impulses perverting but not explicitly violating their legal authority, the previous is my take.