This is an old story where scientific fraud is concerned; Pasteur was falsifying the results of his lab experiments and plagiarizing almost everything else and then presenting the "data" to medical academies; this was in the 1800s and historical records show that the fraud was well known at the time and yet the world reveres the name Pasteur to this day in memory of one of the greatest charlatans that medical science ever produced; of course now we have Fauci and his ilk who have outdone Pasteur many times over!
The history of medical research reveals countless examples of fraud where lies and deception were used to promote false narratives; the history of inoculations and vaccine development from its inception reveal that fake science and propaganda were widespread in promoting special interests which were more interested in accumulating money and power than promoting human health.
RA Millikan won the Nobel in Physics with data that was most certainly not presented as faithfully as it was collected. The upside for him, and us, is that it has since been reproduced repeatedly and is well accepted.
Being right shouldn't make it okay to omit or distort data to conform to one's preconceived expectations. But, again, his hypothesis meshed with reality, which is the ultimate test in Science. And there's actually some dispute amongst The Philosophers of Science as to whether what Millikan is really *in Whoopi voice* Fraud Fraud.
Most fraudulent hypotheses do not mesh with reality and the ultimate test in science should be the truth, although sometimes we may have to wait a long time for it to come out; Pasteur admitted (on his death bed and far too late) that his germ theory was wrong but still wound up being a major founder of the allopathic model of medicine , not to mention the fraudulent basis of all vaccine development.
"not to mention the fraudulent basis of all vaccine development"
Well, then that would be bad.
In Millikan's defense, his "discovery" is integral to the engineering of products such as photovoltaics and solid state amplifiers so it beats Lysenkoism, I guess.
I have been calling out the Fake Data since 2017 . This man should go to jail, his fake data causes more illness .
Data is the New Gold so it’s time to look at the original investors and pick out the fraudulent criminals that were willing to do anything for money .
The LAW OVERRULES SCIENCE !
This is an old story where scientific fraud is concerned; Pasteur was falsifying the results of his lab experiments and plagiarizing almost everything else and then presenting the "data" to medical academies; this was in the 1800s and historical records show that the fraud was well known at the time and yet the world reveres the name Pasteur to this day in memory of one of the greatest charlatans that medical science ever produced; of course now we have Fauci and his ilk who have outdone Pasteur many times over!
I really didn't know this; thanks for pointing it out.
It makes sense, sin is as old as we are. I'm beginning to think everything I've been taught and 'know' is fake.
Check out how the Rockefellers manipulated the Flexner report back in the early 1900’s .
The history of medical research reveals countless examples of fraud where lies and deception were used to promote false narratives; the history of inoculations and vaccine development from its inception reveal that fake science and propaganda were widespread in promoting special interests which were more interested in accumulating money and power than promoting human health.
RA Millikan won the Nobel in Physics with data that was most certainly not presented as faithfully as it was collected. The upside for him, and us, is that it has since been reproduced repeatedly and is well accepted.
Being right shouldn't make it okay to omit or distort data to conform to one's preconceived expectations. But, again, his hypothesis meshed with reality, which is the ultimate test in Science. And there's actually some dispute amongst The Philosophers of Science as to whether what Millikan is really *in Whoopi voice* Fraud Fraud.
https://onlineethics.org/cases/ethics-science-classroom/millikan-case-discrimination-versus-manipulation-data
In fact, Claudine Gay should consult with these authors and see if there are any grey areas for her reputation.
Most fraudulent hypotheses do not mesh with reality and the ultimate test in science should be the truth, although sometimes we may have to wait a long time for it to come out; Pasteur admitted (on his death bed and far too late) that his germ theory was wrong but still wound up being a major founder of the allopathic model of medicine , not to mention the fraudulent basis of all vaccine development.
"not to mention the fraudulent basis of all vaccine development"
Well, then that would be bad.
In Millikan's defense, his "discovery" is integral to the engineering of products such as photovoltaics and solid state amplifiers so it beats Lysenkoism, I guess.