They probably wrote a paper, called it a study and referred to it as a study in their next paper. It's probably not a double blind, peer reviewed study at all.
They probably wrote a paper, called it a study and referred to it as a study in their next paper. It's probably not a double blind, peer reviewed study at all.
They probably wrote a paper, called it a study and referred to it as a study in their next paper. It's probably not a double blind, peer reviewed study at all.
It happens.
Excellent. I've written all sorts of papers and shall henceforth cite them as evidence of cogency in all future arguments.
*opens folder named 'Maifestos'*
I mean, that's how this works - right?
You're a quick study!
ЁЯШБ