Yup. I definitely agree with your sarcasm there, Guttermouth!
Additionally, forcing many to relocate is also part of their plan. It's like kicking an anthill -- they simply move elsewhere and many of them (not all but many) take their stinkin' political leanings with them to the previously uncontaminated regions. More power at the polls and schools and businesses and hospitals and police stations and courts and ... ad nauseum.
Plus, it reduces the over-population and empties the prime real estate in the original regions and strengthens the animosity / political power in the stay-behinds.
I moved, and I could give a crap about the stay-behinds. My vote was already worthless, at least now me and my family are happy and I don't have to deal with covid tyranny.
You've hit, I think, on two of their key concepts. Whether deliberately planned or not, vax mandates in a particular city or State of course have the effect of driving out the non-compliant, who probably are mostly political opponents anyway. Those that remain tend to be the docile sheep, perfect for a local despot to lord over. Finally, there is the convenient side effect of businesses, homes and other immobile property that may be on sale at distress prices. Guess who buys it up? To some extent, this explains the decay - renewal cycle of certain areas of large urban areas, for example South Central LA post-riots (1990s) or the gentrification of Washington D.C.
Satan, I wouldn't exactly call BLM or ANTIFA "docile" yet they both serve their liberal, socialistic Democratic masters quite well. Those two groups probably don't believe the same things as their masters, but they certainly serve them and will be amongst the "stay-behinds" to take over the high-rent "distressed" properties as if THEY were the kings.
But my job, my kids' school, my vacation. Also I can't move because I don't want to.
Yup. I definitely agree with your sarcasm there, Guttermouth!
Additionally, forcing many to relocate is also part of their plan. It's like kicking an anthill -- they simply move elsewhere and many of them (not all but many) take their stinkin' political leanings with them to the previously uncontaminated regions. More power at the polls and schools and businesses and hospitals and police stations and courts and ... ad nauseum.
Plus, it reduces the over-population and empties the prime real estate in the original regions and strengthens the animosity / political power in the stay-behinds.
I moved, and I could give a crap about the stay-behinds. My vote was already worthless, at least now me and my family are happy and I don't have to deal with covid tyranny.
And I'd be happy to invite you and your family to "our" ever-so-slightly-more-sane region! Hope here is where you came.
You've hit, I think, on two of their key concepts. Whether deliberately planned or not, vax mandates in a particular city or State of course have the effect of driving out the non-compliant, who probably are mostly political opponents anyway. Those that remain tend to be the docile sheep, perfect for a local despot to lord over. Finally, there is the convenient side effect of businesses, homes and other immobile property that may be on sale at distress prices. Guess who buys it up? To some extent, this explains the decay - renewal cycle of certain areas of large urban areas, for example South Central LA post-riots (1990s) or the gentrification of Washington D.C.
Satan, I wouldn't exactly call BLM or ANTIFA "docile" yet they both serve their liberal, socialistic Democratic masters quite well. Those two groups probably don't believe the same things as their masters, but they certainly serve them and will be amongst the "stay-behinds" to take over the high-rent "distressed" properties as if THEY were the kings.