173 Comments

cancel the wsj and have breakfast, better tradeoff

Expand full comment

Indeed. I have saved thousands of dollars, and feel that I am much better informed about world events, since I cancelled my subscription many years ago.

Expand full comment

That was my thought as well. β€œTo save money, cancel your subscriptions to woke publications.”

Expand full comment

I used to subscribe to the WSJ. That was a looooooooooong time ago, in another universe. (Been asking Scottie to beam me up ever since)

Expand full comment

Hang in there. Just a little while longer. If recent news reports are to be believed, the Mother Ship should be coming along shortly.

Expand full comment

Not anymore. They shot it down over Michigan. The shrapnel killed Elvis, so it was a sad day for America.

Expand full comment

There is always the Sasquatch...

Keep hope alive!

Expand full comment

Funny but scary at the same time

Expand full comment

agree.

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜πŸ™„πŸ₯ΊπŸ˜’😭😱🀯

Expand full comment

If it doesn't sound like THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSERB93GYfw

I ain't gettin' on.

Expand full comment

Let me put on my sunglasses here

So I can see what I'm doing

Expand full comment

Swing down, sweet chariot

Stop and let me ride

Expand full comment

I did. I miss some of the New Yorker cartoons though. It was also fun for a while to see how much propaganda each issue of the newspapers and mags contained.

Expand full comment

The WSJ is still useful for its Op-eds and financial data.

The news has become thoroughly woke since the Murdoch Boys took over. An ex-NYT employee runs the comment boards, so you can imagine how those are.

Ex - headline today: "What is Pushing the National Debt to its Limit?. In years past, that story would not have a "big question" as its headline, rather an accusatory statement...

Expand full comment
Feb 15, 2023Β·edited Feb 15, 2023

I think WSJ is still more balanced than most news sources. It does allow for wide editorial opinion which can be extreme or not mainstream.

Expand full comment

The expression is 'the cleanest shirt in the dirty clothes hamper'.

Not exactly a compliment.

Expand full comment

So true 🀣

Expand full comment

Did you like β€œ inflation cools but at a slower pace”? Joe Biden liked it.

Expand full comment

Those who subscribe are funding the efforts of those who are working to destroy the USA.

Expand full comment

And what a nosebleed it was to get the subscription cancelled - needed a phone call to a service desk that took their time with cancelling.

Never again - there’s nothing in that paper for me.

Expand full comment
founding

Despite 3 calls they continued to bill me. It took a fourth call.

Expand full comment

I can always cancel my PayPal account if they won’t stop.

Expand full comment

The WSJ columnist Allysia Finley has been doing fantastic work on all things Covid-related. My wife has turned around on the uselessness of Covid vaxxes, based on Finley's reports.

For better or worse, she wouldn't have been open to the idea if I had shown her the exact same information from Breitbart, the Daily Sceptic, or even the Epoch Times.

It's a sad commentary on the state of the world, of course, but this is the hand we have to play with.

Expand full comment

Ha! I got a trial subscription just to read coverage of the professor suing for employment with natural immunity vs a shot. Then I flew back to Europe and had the worst time canceling the subscription! Time difference, phone charges, US address issues, such a pain....

Expand full comment

I had the same experience with a telephone scammer once: trial subscription that was practically impossible to cancel, negative billing.

Gee, you think there's a connection? MSM and scammers?

Expand full comment

Dirt bags all of them

Expand full comment

I subscribed at a very low yearly rate to get their daily crossword puzzle. That promo has expired and I keep forgetting/putting off/avoiding the call to customer service to cancel. They make it so easy to join, harder to escape.

Expand full comment

Although, there are some erudite writers at WSJ, I think the material from the independent journalists and writers on Substack is more resourceful.

Expand full comment

I'm seriously considering it

Expand full comment

Brilliantly suggested

Expand full comment

Figures. The Wall St Journal, Fox News & the NY Post are all owned by gun-grabbing "cheap labor" globalist scumbag Rupert Murdoch.

Expand full comment

Marie Antoinette: Let them eat cake.

Wall Street Journal: Let them skip meals.

Expand full comment

WDF: "Let us eat $900/plate Fresh Lobster and Wagyu Tartar. Oh, my - Johnson: Please warm up the Gulfstream. We have to be in Monte Carlo by sunset!"

Expand full comment

Indeed it is always the same story. You would think people would learn at some point. Don’t need a memory longer than two years. Went from β€œhere’s an idea” to β€œwe will harass you until you do as we say” real fast. No.

Expand full comment

If you read the most recent post by Spartacus at the ICENI substack, you'll understand that as difficult as it is now, we still have a window of opportunity to act. Once that closes, it's going to be a lot harder.

Expand full comment

I've wondered if she really said "Let them eat caca" (poo), but that it was censored in English to a similar sounding word.

Expand full comment

I am unrivalled in my black, adamantine hatred for the political class and their hangers-on - and Marie-Antoinette was one of those - but facts are more important.

She never said any such thing, and the use of the term predates her adult life; she was about 6 years old at the time of the first recorded use of the term.

I have no qualms about dragging every political parasite on the planet to the gallows or the guillotine, and expropriating their descendants - but fair's fair.

Expand full comment

My (admittedly limited) understanding of 'caca' as slang for poo is that it came from Polish originally, brought to N.A. English by immigrants. Sounds exactly the same, however, as "kakke/kake" - Danish/Norwegian for cake. Ms. Antoinette, of course, spoke French, for whatever that would be worth.

This got me wondering how much historical violence has come about from simple misunderstandings of "would you like some cake?" turning in to "Eat shit!"

Expand full comment

"kaka" and its cognates date from Prota-Indo-European root 'kakka-' ([to] defecate), which evolved into the ancient Greek κακκκάω ([to] shit) and the modern Greek ΞΊΞ±ΞΊΞ± 'poo'.

It's also - I like to think - the origin of 'ΞΊΞ±ΞΊΟŒΟ‚' (bad, evil, wicked... etc); that's true of the Phrygian ΞΊΞ±ΞΊΞΏΞ½ (kakon, β€œharm”) and the Albanian keq (bad).

Almost every time you see the prefix ΞΊΞ±ΞΊ- in Greek, you can use "shit" without loss of explanatory power. Cacophony: shit sound. Kakistocracy: rule by the shittest people.

This motivates my assertion that when Bias of Priene said

>>> Ξ˜Ξ™ Ξ Ξ›Ξ•Ξ™Ξ£Ξ€ΞŸΞ™ Ξ‘ΞΞ˜Ξ‘Ξ©Ξ ΞŸΞ™ ΞšΞ‘ΞšΞ˜Ξ™

He was being a bit puckish, intending - or at least permitting - "kakoi" to be interpreted as "shit", rather than 'bad' or 'evil' or 'wicked': if he meant 'wicked' or 'evil' he could have used a much more specific word.

So this 2500-year old aphorism makes perfect sense if read as

>>> MOST PEOPLE ARE SHIT.

Change my mind.

(LOL just kidding: nobody will ever change my mind on this)

Expand full comment

Thanks for this (and HauptsturmfΓΌhrer) for clearing this up for me; thinking it through, I'd heard N.A. Spanish speakers using 'caca' as 'shit' also; must run through most of the European and descended languages.

Additionally, I had yet to settle on what type of government our purported democratic republic had been replaced with, trying kleptocracy, oligarchy, plutocracy and others. Nope - we live in a Kakistocracy. Thanks for expanding my lexicon!

Expand full comment

"Kakistocracy" is (notionally) the opposite of "aristocracy" - 'aristos' in Greek means "best".

Two things are abundantly clear regarding aristocracy (and inherited positions, generally):

β‘  the very first thing that the 'best' do, is try to make their positions HEREDITARY; and

β‘‘ there is always a point past which the people who inherit positions in the 'aristocracy' are not within artillery range of "the best".

My guess: the moment the family takes it for granted, the next generation will not longer be anywhere near 'the best'.

Queen Lizard-Breath II got the Big Chair (and the Blood-Diamond-encrusted hat) by a quirk of fate, namely that her uncle found some Yank cooch more appetising than the Big Chair.

Her kids wound up taking it for granted... and her grandkids do warcrimes and podcasts with their idiot American wives. That doesn't compare favourably with anyone who has a credible claim to being the "best" at literally anything (jigsaw puzzles, f'r'instance).

That 'Spare' English Ginger - to narrow it down: the one who married the talentness Yank Octoroon and who has done more war crimes than podcasts - is a case in point: his mother's entire 'aristocratic' family could be guillotined, and nobody would need to concern themselves that we mght be losing another Shannon or Gauss (or even Napier).

Bring back the kleroterion, I say (shakes fist at cloud).

The best solutions for positions of 'public trust' is to appoint common-or-garden mugs at random from the adult population. It is unlikely that society would be WORSE off than the present - where Alpha bullshit-artists (second-rate Law students) occupy the Commanding Heights.

Expand full comment

Nice. Thanks. Maybe how Elena Kagan got her family name? 2nd person plural for Kagar in some language or other. They shit. Kidding, sort of.πŸ˜‚

"Kakistocracy: rule by the shittiest people"

Perfect. Gotta remember that one.

Expand full comment

Yep. According to several translators, caca is translated from French to English as "poo".

https://dictionary.reverso.net/french-english/caca

I'm betting she said something like "Let them eat shit."

Pretty much the Wall Street Journal's ultimate attitude. WSJ, Fox News, NY Post, are all owned by globalist scumbag Rupert Murdoch. Even before Murdoch bought them, the WSJ had long promoted Julian Simon/business class/LOLibertarian dogma that mass immigration & population growth are happy meals with no downside, mainly for "cheap labor". They don't give a F that US real estate & "housing" costs ~100 times what it did 60 years ago for the same land & space, with just a doubling of average population density that was almost entirely due to immigration.

E.g. My folks bought a home in a Southern California beach city in 1960 for $15,000 and had the mortgage paid off within 10 years with only my dad working. Today it would cost a similar middle class couple ~$2m and they'd both have to work like sled dogs forever and never pay it off.

All the business crowd cares about is cheap labor. Their bogus measure of economic success is GNP/GDP, not per capita real disposable median income. Quality of life, liberty, freedom of movement, dignity, privacy, cost of living, cost of land, cost of elbow room, culture, security, can all be damned.

Expand full comment

Different etymologies: kaka (swedish) and kage (danish) does not share etymology with greek kaka or PIE kakka (great run-down, Kratoklastes!), but instead shares roots with old germanic word(s) meaning "soft lump" (koka in present day swedish which also means 'to boil'): kuocho.

However, just to confuse matters, 'kacka' means 'to shit' in swedish, mostly used nowadays in the idiom "att kacka i eget bo" = "to soil your own nest/dwelling", i.e. to make a mess for and of yourself.

Random tangent just to show how confusing it can get: hand truck/hand trolley of the two-wheeled kind is called "pirra" in informal middle and northern Sweden parlance. In Skania, the southernmost part, "pirra" is slang for intercourse.

Why? No one knows.

Etymology is confusing.

Expand full comment

Interesting that nobility at least wanted the peasants to eat something, n'est-ce pas?

Expand full comment
founding
Feb 15, 2023Β·edited Feb 15, 2023

Donut get me started. These people cerealously give me the crepes.

Orange you glad we still get two meals?

We're toast. Muffin to see here.

Expand full comment

Just sleep til noon, call your first meal lunch. It's the same way they make 'green' energy.

Expand full comment

You're on πŸ”₯ this morning!

Expand full comment

So cute!!!

Expand full comment

Must be time for brunch. Are you buying?

Expand full comment
founding

I am hungry!

Expand full comment

We still get two meals and real meat on Sundays.

Expand full comment
founding

Yeah. And you get to stand in long lines every other Tuesday to get one mismatched pair of shoes.

All the cool kids are doing Communism these days

Expand full comment

I actually skip breakfast most mornings. I intermittent fast. I have 3 small meals after

11:00 am. Bacon and eggs or protein first. Works for me. But still that stupid advice has a different agenda.

Expand full comment

I intermittent fast too.

I don't believe it should have to be a financial decision. And what about the children?

Expand full comment

Children need to eat good nutritious food to grow. Stuff like eggs!

Expand full comment

Didn't Jonathan Swift write 'A Modest Proposal' concerning the children of the "useless eaters"? I halfway expect the WEF to suggest it as policy in a few years.

Expand full comment

Swift was prescient! He accurately predicted, nearly 300 years ago, many aspects of our current slide into chaos.

Expand full comment

With rulers flying around on an island called 'La Puta', and scientists spending their time in an academy thinking up things like how to extract sunlight from cucumbers.

Yep. Swift pretty much nailed it so hard the hammer ablated.

Expand full comment

Great reference! 😳

Expand full comment

Agree! Intermittent fasting is great. I’m usually 8pm - 11:30am. Good for the ole blood sugar. Plus I find myself not eating as much when I can eat. The overall all advice from the news ....is stupid. πŸ€”.

Expand full comment

I notice the same thing. If eat early in the day I keep munching all day. However, if I wait until my mid-afternoon snack (usually nuts of some type) I can get by with very little food until I eat a late dinner (usually pure carnivore food - my ancestry is Dene Indian, so very few veggies or starches for me!)

Expand full comment

Same, noon to 8pm

Expand full comment

Same. Intermittent fast until around 1:00 with two large meaty meals before 7:00.

It works well for me.

Expand full comment

I IF 5 of 7 days,and I work it into my 5/2 schedule. My window is usually 2ish-8:Isham.

Expand full comment

After I parsed out "Isham", it made sense. I seldom dine between 2 and 8 AM myself.

Expand full comment

I do intermittent fasting and skip breakfast during the workweek. Just coffee. Now I don't generally get hungry until about 11 am. But I love cooking a big breakfast/brunch on the weekends.

Expand full comment

(Black) Coffee is such a great compliment to a fast for so many reasons! I like to switch my fasting window on the weekends and eat a big earlier brunch and then "supper" - still just two meals in a compressed timeframe.

Expand full comment

Al Gore would benefit from skipping a few meals.

Expand full comment

I take Gore’s climate advice about as seriously as I take Pritzker’s advice on public health.

Expand full comment

perfect point

Expand full comment

I try - repeat try - to practice intermittent fasting, where I limit my meals to an eight hour window, which usually means having breakfast around noon. Breakfast is the one meal you can never skip, because whatever time you have your first meal of the day, that is when you "break your fast" from the night before. You may skip lunch, dinner or supper; but you can never skip breakfast.

Expand full comment

Agreed. I skip dinner and I sleep better.

Expand full comment

Nothing makes me want to abandon my IF routine like seeing the Marxists recommend it. But then, they always have been fans of people not eating.

Expand full comment

It comes easily to them, since their policies destroy the food supply.

Expand full comment

zactly.

Expand full comment

In the interest of the Great Reset, consider skipping lunch and dinner too. Yer gonna die anyway, someday.

https://williamhunterduncan.substack.com/p/east-palestine

Expand full comment

What's really disturbing about this? It's the Wall Street Journal. I expect this out of the New York Times or Bloomberg, but the WSJ? When the WSJ isn't pretending anymore, we've got problems.

Expand full comment
Feb 15, 2023Β·edited Feb 15, 2023

You can have my Huevos Rancheros con Queso y Bacon when you pry them from my cold dead hands!

Expand full comment

I have found myself saying β€œfrom my cold dead hands” quite often recently. I’m sure it’s just coincidence.

Expand full comment

*nods... shakes head... nods again*

Expand full comment

The story itself is just about how the price of breakfast foods has gone up. It doesn't advocate not eating. Some dopey headline writer came up with that one.

Expand full comment

Oh, that was dirty. And I didn't go looking. When will I learn?

Expand full comment

Don't forget, the WSJ is part of the Trusted News Initiative. We definitely have problems;

https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/media-centre/trusted-news-initiative-plan-disinformation-coronavirus

Expand full comment

The WSJ is very much in support of the establishment, so I'm not surprised. It's just that they don't often go to the lengths to justify that the others do. They just pretend the problems don't exist.

Expand full comment

Yeah, food, shelter and clothing are for wimps. I’m going to live naked, under a bush, in Alaska, and eat nothing but fresh air and the odd unicorn steak. Think of all the money I’m going to save!

Expand full comment

"There are no solutions. Only tradeoffs."

- Living Legend Thomas Sowell

Expand full comment

And the favors you'll be doing Mother Gaia!

Expand full comment

Same with the push for EVs - you think they stop there?

No way - bicycles my friends, everyone on bicycles!

Expand full comment

Everyone with a sufficiently high social credit score earns the right to ride a bicycle. Everyone else goes to re-education camps.

Expand full comment

Where they get to ride stationary bikes hooked up to dynamos to charge EV-batteries.

Expand full comment

Funny’

Expand full comment

I haven't eaten "breakfast" in the morning for years, and correctly, it is better for your health to extend your fasting period each day. However, I DO eat grass fed animal products as the staple of my diet, and stay away from processed foods and therefore BUGS. Blech! Let the reptiles in Davos eat ze bugs. Personally, at over age 60 and since cutting out the carbs, I've never been healthier. Just about everything they tell the masses from grade school through college about health is exactly the opposite of the truth. And we can see the evidence all around us.

Expand full comment

To save the planet, stop breathing.

Same thinking, different issue.

Expand full comment

I havnt eaten breakfast in years, when you eat nothing but meat you can eat less often. This won't work with crickets 🀑

Expand full comment

The lesson to take home, from WEF to WaPo to "liberal democracy" to global capitalism, is this:

You aren't important.

You aren't needed.

You are a resource to be exploited until you are no longer profitable.

And whatever happens, you will not be missed.

Expand full comment

The move is to herd people into dense, urban areas, force vaccinate, and restrict dietary choices to food stuffs of 'their' choosing; we are being treated like animals.

What did Anthony Fauci consign those poor little beagles to?

Expand full comment