Every time I get a lecture about not being vaxxed, I tell people to sit down and put their hat back on next time they hear the National Anthem, because they don't deserve to live in land of the free and the home of the brave.
Some people would say since 1860. Depends on your reactionary point of view, I suppose. We know that change is inevitable, but a universal human failing is to believe that "new" is actually new, or indeed that it is necessarily "better." This is not an argument against change; I surely like many of the advances civilization has wrought. Yet there is much wisdom in the old saying "The good is the enemy of the best."
Well, Lincoln's War destroyed the voluntary union that preceded it and replaced it with a domestic empire, setting the precedent that any attempt to leave peacefully would be met with violence, so sure, the citizens of a given state no longer had the freedom to secede en masse, as a political unit, but they were still largely as free, individually, as they were before.
What we have witnessed over the the last century, however, is the conversion of our free republic into a progressive, corporatist kleptocracy, where the government and its legions of cronies rob the rest of us blind and control, to one extent or another, nearly every aspect of our lives.
Like all leftists everywhere and always, they are destroying our society and economy.
This would not be possible without the income tax and Federal reserve. Real change is not possible as long as those two abominations to freedom exist.
Don’t forget the game is all about people believing the lies and making them run scared!
READ THIS….
“Italian newspaper Il Tempo reports that the Institute has revised downward the number of people who have died from COVID rather than with COVID from 130,000 to under 4,000.
“Yes, you read that right. Turns out 97.1% of deaths hitherto attributed to Covid were not due directly to Covid,” writes Toby Young.
Of the of the 130,468 deaths registered as official COVID deaths since the start of the pandemic, only 3,783 are directly attributable to the virus alone.
“All the other Italians who lost their lives had from between one and five pre-existing diseases. Of those aged over 67 who died, 7% had more than three co-morbidities, and 18% at least two,” writes Young.
“According to the Institute, 65.8% of Italians who died after being infected with Covid were ill with arterial hypertension (high blood pressure), 23.5% had dementia, 29.3% had diabetes, and 24.8% atrial fibrillation. Add to that, 17.4% had lung problems, 16.3% had had cancer in the last five years and 15.7% suffered from previous heart failures.”
The Institute’s new definition of a COVID death means that COVID has killed fewer people in Italy than (whisper it) the average bout of seasonal flu.
If a similar change were made by other national governments, the official COVID death toll would be cut by a margin of greater than 90 per cent.“
“You’re gonna have to go through hell, worse than any nightmare you’ve ever dreamed. But when it’s over, I know you’ll be the one standing. You know what you have to do. Do it.” – Rocky Balboa
Yes! If only Fauci and co. would have done things differently and preoccupied themselves with following the "Weird Science" we might not be in this mess
I have been thinking the whole time that millennials are just too brainwashed with an Uber-type outsourced agency given to traumatized baby boomers doing the brainwashing. Gen X may not be sexy gen but for sure is giving the tough love now.
This study seems to be elucidating a potentially catastrophic consequence of the warp-speed science that brought us the mRNA "vaccines". If corroborated by other labs, the implication is that carcinogenic effects occur following the placement of SARS-Cov-2 mRNA spike protein into the human body. This MRNA is now shown to be present in the nuclei of cells of vaccinated people and that it interferes with DNA repair that is essential for the suppression of cancer. This could turn out to be one of the greatest medical disasters of all time and it is reprehensible that the CDC might continue to encourage inoculation of human bodies with synthetic mRNA, especially children, knowing that this study exists.
Alex Berenson addressed this study earlier today and pointed out that the study was in vitro and not in human subjects but that the study did show that the nRNA is capable of entering the nucleus of human cells and that it does interfere with DNA repair. This has not been demonstrated previously, but now that we know it can happen, we might consider more research before continuing to administer this incompletely understood biotechnology.
I retract the statement "This MRNA is now shown to be present in the nuclei of cells of vaccinated people ". It is shown to be able to enter the nuclei of cells in a laboratory. That should be enough to consider a pause in the use of the vaccine until we know more about it.
“Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site.”
but.... but.... but.... the darpa (dod) spec sheet said: ", delivered with near-immediate efficacy, and safely expressed in the body for only a limited duration, causing no permanent alteration to the genome." (ADEPT,PPP, moderna study contract 2013)
"only a limited duration, causing no permanent alteration to the genome". Do you have studies to show that support these assertions? Right... More like wishful thinking. I, on the other hand, saw studies disproving both of these assertions.
some labs tests commonly run to detect heart damage, heart failure or cardiac inflammation in adults, not sure how similar this is to a cardiac panel for pediatrics:
Troponin (I or T)
High Sensitivity Troponin aka HS Troponin
Creatine Kinase (CK) and CK-MB
Myoglobin
High Sensitivity CRP
BNP
Interesting idea for a prospective cohort study: follow cardiac markers on an uninjected and injected groups...but nah, nevermind planning careful, long-term research studies, 'cause FDA advisor, Dr. Eric Ruben admitted at the 10/26 FDA meeting “We’re never going to know how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, that’s just the way it goes.”
The cutoff point of D-dimer and fibrinogen was 424.89 ng/ml and 3.543 g/L, respectively. The specificity of fibrinogen was 0.777 which was better than D-dimer, while the sensitivity of fibrinogen was lower than that of D-dimer. Both PPV and NPV were similar in D-dimer and fibrinogen
Right! I just barged in to provoke more answers. D-dimer and troponin T or troponin I. As far as I remember, Dr. McCullough says that IF D-dimer is off the charts (x100+), as it often is post-vaxx, this is a clear indication of heart inflammation as well. We are not talking slightly elevated, not even 2-5 times.
i am not aware of where he saw troponins (not D-dimer) being that high in peds cases. it wouldn't make sense. no study has checked troponin levels in peds viral-induced myocarditis (to my knowledge)
also he is an adult cardiologist
i dont know how he has access to peds charts, if he made that finding it should be immediately reported to the FDA (who made no comment on troponin levels in the cases they examined, they found mild and resolving myocarditis)
On Nov.7th I am setting my clock back to 1945 when this country had balls.
Every time I get a lecture about not being vaxxed, I tell people to sit down and put their hat back on next time they hear the National Anthem, because they don't deserve to live in land of the free and the home of the brave.
I understand and relate to your post, but you might want to ponder the fact that we've not lived in a free country since 1913.
That was the year the progressives finally won the income tax and the Federal Reserve.
And since then, the progressives have systematically destroyed the land of the free and home of the brave.
Now we have a progressive -bolshevik dictating medical treatments. If you think it ends here you are a moron.
Do not comply.
Some people would say since 1860. Depends on your reactionary point of view, I suppose. We know that change is inevitable, but a universal human failing is to believe that "new" is actually new, or indeed that it is necessarily "better." This is not an argument against change; I surely like many of the advances civilization has wrought. Yet there is much wisdom in the old saying "The good is the enemy of the best."
"Some people would say since 1860."
Well, Lincoln's War destroyed the voluntary union that preceded it and replaced it with a domestic empire, setting the precedent that any attempt to leave peacefully would be met with violence, so sure, the citizens of a given state no longer had the freedom to secede en masse, as a political unit, but they were still largely as free, individually, as they were before.
What we have witnessed over the the last century, however, is the conversion of our free republic into a progressive, corporatist kleptocracy, where the government and its legions of cronies rob the rest of us blind and control, to one extent or another, nearly every aspect of our lives.
Like all leftists everywhere and always, they are destroying our society and economy.
This would not be possible without the income tax and Federal reserve. Real change is not possible as long as those two abominations to freedom exist.
I like to hit them with this:
There are two possibilities:
1. The jabs work. If so, then my status has no effect on you.
2. The jabs don't work. If so, then why in the world would I get one?
Either way, piss off.
The logic is flawless
Don’t forget the game is all about people believing the lies and making them run scared!
READ THIS….
“Italian newspaper Il Tempo reports that the Institute has revised downward the number of people who have died from COVID rather than with COVID from 130,000 to under 4,000.
“Yes, you read that right. Turns out 97.1% of deaths hitherto attributed to Covid were not due directly to Covid,” writes Toby Young.
Of the of the 130,468 deaths registered as official COVID deaths since the start of the pandemic, only 3,783 are directly attributable to the virus alone.
“All the other Italians who lost their lives had from between one and five pre-existing diseases. Of those aged over 67 who died, 7% had more than three co-morbidities, and 18% at least two,” writes Young.
“According to the Institute, 65.8% of Italians who died after being infected with Covid were ill with arterial hypertension (high blood pressure), 23.5% had dementia, 29.3% had diabetes, and 24.8% atrial fibrillation. Add to that, 17.4% had lung problems, 16.3% had had cancer in the last five years and 15.7% suffered from previous heart failures.”
The Institute’s new definition of a COVID death means that COVID has killed fewer people in Italy than (whisper it) the average bout of seasonal flu.
If a similar change were made by other national governments, the official COVID death toll would be cut by a margin of greater than 90 per cent.“
Me too and I was born in 1953
“You’re gonna have to go through hell, worse than any nightmare you’ve ever dreamed. But when it’s over, I know you’ll be the one standing. You know what you have to do. Do it.” – Rocky Balboa
Goose - Gen X - we got the movie list for fighting back! We know scientists are bad guys in the movies! And we remember movies when heros fought back!
Yes! If only Fauci and co. would have done things differently and preoccupied themselves with following the "Weird Science" we might not be in this mess
I have been thinking the whole time that millennials are just too brainwashed with an Uber-type outsourced agency given to traumatized baby boomers doing the brainwashing. Gen X may not be sexy gen but for sure is giving the tough love now.
Like Bruce Willis?
I'm starting to think I see dead people.
This study seems to be elucidating a potentially catastrophic consequence of the warp-speed science that brought us the mRNA "vaccines". If corroborated by other labs, the implication is that carcinogenic effects occur following the placement of SARS-Cov-2 mRNA spike protein into the human body. This MRNA is now shown to be present in the nuclei of cells of vaccinated people and that it interferes with DNA repair that is essential for the suppression of cancer. This could turn out to be one of the greatest medical disasters of all time and it is reprehensible that the CDC might continue to encourage inoculation of human bodies with synthetic mRNA, especially children, knowing that this study exists.
Alex Berenson addressed this study earlier today and pointed out that the study was in vitro and not in human subjects but that the study did show that the nRNA is capable of entering the nucleus of human cells and that it does interfere with DNA repair. This has not been demonstrated previously, but now that we know it can happen, we might consider more research before continuing to administer this incompletely understood biotechnology.
I retract the statement "This MRNA is now shown to be present in the nuclei of cells of vaccinated people ". It is shown to be able to enter the nuclei of cells in a laboratory. That should be enough to consider a pause in the use of the vaccine until we know more about it.
We might, but unfortunately they probably won't.
Citation?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538446/
"Together, these data show that the SARS–CoV–2 full–length spike protein inhibits DNA damage repair by hindering DNA repair protein recruitment."
Great. This just keeps getting better and better.
Thanks for posting.
Which study?
hey Gato, did you see this study out of Sweden about the spike protein being found in the nucleus and interfering with DNA repair? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538446/
“Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site.”
but.... but.... but.... the darpa (dod) spec sheet said: ", delivered with near-immediate efficacy, and safely expressed in the body for only a limited duration, causing no permanent alteration to the genome." (ADEPT,PPP, moderna study contract 2013)
well they got the 'limited duration' right!
"only a limited duration, causing no permanent alteration to the genome". Do you have studies to show that support these assertions? Right... More like wishful thinking. I, on the other hand, saw studies disproving both of these assertions.
in dod and their suppliers 'spec sheets' are wishful thinking....
you should see the 'spec sheets' that sold the f-22 and wonder why we got the expensive breaking dog we have.
when the test are not doneor failed the test are ignored just like cdc vaxx eua's.
Thanks for the comedic relief! We need it!
That critter is not going to be happy if he wakes up early.
Neither is the doctor.
nobody likes to be intubated so that docs can probe them.
Boy, they better hope they got the sedation dose right.
There's a song in there somewhere.... wait!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btPJPFnesV4
Don't you just hate it when the riffraff won't stay out of first class?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDdqifhua8k
A question for Gato and his ambush:
Are there tests to look for markers of myocarditis and/or other potential heart issues in youngsters?
https://www.facebook.com/DrScottJensen/videos/dr-peter-mccullough-explains-how-myocarditis-differs-when-caused-by-natural-infe/208426121400542/
I planted an ambush in my yard. Now I'm afraid to walk near it.
Have some pride, won't you?
some labs tests commonly run to detect heart damage, heart failure or cardiac inflammation in adults, not sure how similar this is to a cardiac panel for pediatrics:
Troponin (I or T)
High Sensitivity Troponin aka HS Troponin
Creatine Kinase (CK) and CK-MB
Myoglobin
High Sensitivity CRP
BNP
Interesting idea for a prospective cohort study: follow cardiac markers on an uninjected and injected groups...but nah, nevermind planning careful, long-term research studies, 'cause FDA advisor, Dr. Eric Ruben admitted at the 10/26 FDA meeting “We’re never going to know how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, that’s just the way it goes.”
troponins, rarely used on kids, more of a measure of ischemia in MI for adults
Is D-dimer same as fibrinogen?
The cutoff point of D-dimer and fibrinogen was 424.89 ng/ml and 3.543 g/L, respectively. The specificity of fibrinogen was 0.777 which was better than D-dimer, while the sensitivity of fibrinogen was lower than that of D-dimer. Both PPV and NPV were similar in D-dimer and fibrinogen
D-dimer is used as a rule out test...many things can cause elevation...if u have a low D-dimer all is well
Right! I just barged in to provoke more answers. D-dimer and troponin T or troponin I. As far as I remember, Dr. McCullough says that IF D-dimer is off the charts (x100+), as it often is post-vaxx, this is a clear indication of heart inflammation as well. We are not talking slightly elevated, not even 2-5 times.
Thanks guys, but I'm a software guy and D-dimer sounds like some sort of cron job to me... ;-)
Can one just go in and take a blood test for this?
Yes, D-dimer can identify "active" clotting activity, via blood test.
i am not aware of where he saw troponins (not D-dimer) being that high in peds cases. it wouldn't make sense. no study has checked troponin levels in peds viral-induced myocarditis (to my knowledge)
also he is an adult cardiologist
i dont know how he has access to peds charts, if he made that finding it should be immediately reported to the FDA (who made no comment on troponin levels in the cases they examined, they found mild and resolving myocarditis)
please don't trust simple anecdotes, we need data
Thanks for the laugh!
Respect
You have outdone yourself with this one.
Brilliant. Best laugh I've had all week.
hahaha