Clearly this diatribe begins with the premise that 100% compliance (aka vaccination) is the only goal. The assumptions underlying the goal shall not be discussed. You shall accept that this goal is good, just and proper - even essential for the survival of the human race.
Real science is all about challenging assumptions. When real science doesn't support the polibival objectives, no problem - simply decree what is true and disallow challenge. Call it misinformation (a la California's recent act that empowers medical board to revoke the licensed of any licensed professional who doesn't tow the party line on COVID or any other policy matter). It's for the greater good y'all!
That's the problem. Critical mass is...critical. I found out just a few days ago that a large employer in my city (4,000 people) was unable to put in place a vaxx mandate because enough people refused to comply so they would have lost too many employees. The refuseniks had critical mass. Lots of places people either eagerly lined up or folded to pressure.
The same thing happened with Fonterra, the largest dairy company, in New Zealand. They dropped compulsory injections because if they did, they would lose too many drivers. In the press they lied and said it that the situation had simply evolved or some such nonsense.
David Kohler did this for all his daddy's USA based companies he inherited. Many didn't know they could complain or request exemption. Think he will ever have remorse for the reduced life of the cattle (employees) he believes he owns?
THAT is the answer! My bf and I both lost our jobs(me after 23 years and him after 17 years). Imagine if every one of my coworkers said, “NO!”. I look back after 3 years and say, “What the hell happened? These are Americans?” I don’t even know my countrymen anymore.
That’s why some cities (usually deep blue) are facing MAJOR shortages…shortages I don’t think they’ll EVER recover from. The conspiracy is 100% successful! And I believe the collateral damage is just starting.
Well done Renee. At least you can take satisfaction from the knowledge that you will probably live a longer life than many of those who caved in to the coercion.
The mandates still exist for most big companies in the US. Last interview I had the company still required the bioweapon shots or testing. I told them I would do neither. Surpise! I didn't get past the first interview. I see unemployment in my future until the shots are removed from the market.
It is why I am looking for a job in the State of Florida. State Employees are not required to jab. Most smaller businesses have let the 'mandate' go, and it is more like 'don't ask, don't tell'. Go Florida. Also Post Office still not jabbed. (Gotta have the postal workers for election fraud - so I figure they will be safe through 2024). My brother got a great job, great pay with a bank, but of course he's jabbed and boosted. Sigh.
Reading what happened to you is when I wish I was super rich & owned many businesses so I could hire you and your husband. A woman commented above that she doesn't even know her own countrymen any longer. I concur here in Michigan. My own mother hasn't spoken to me in over a year for refusing the shot. She literally said, " I want nothing to do with anyone who chooses to die alone on a ventilator or not listen to " science". This situation has affected many of us in different ways. I have hope though, as more are waking up each day. I will continue to keep praying we reach a critical mass! Blessings & Peace to your family!
I know what you mean, but they could be evil AND incompetent (in the sense that their science doesn't hold up to anything, not even the efficacy in killing that they imagine they have down to a t).
Yup and when these folks talk about "reducing carbon" it is those carbon units they are talking about reducing in numbers :-(. When you see this, the rest starts to make more sense.
The reproductive impact of the vaccine.
The rise in all-cause mortality post vaccine availability.
Policies that increase rather than decrease health risk from COVID.
Oh, they are loosing! LIGHT IS WINNING! Light became more powerful for the first time in humanities history in 2012. Do you think they're feeling' it now? YOU BET! I think (even if we don't see it directly) they're running scared. I understand that this whole lab leak was "released" early just for that reason. Fu-k them all! When we stand united, WE WIN! ❤️
They don’t need us for collateral; All of our resources including national parks will be seized “for the greater good”....(meaning for the benefit of the elite megalomaniacs running the world).
I want to disabuse people of the notion that the vaccines are a surreptitious way of reducing the population. With a fatality rate of 1 in a thousand, it is a pretty ineffective method. I do however have an open mind on their effect on fertility which may well be deliberate and may well significantly reduce populations over the longer term. Sadly, I am unlikely to still be alive to see the denouement of this conspiracy theory.
Yes, the fatality rate seems to be just a bit above one in a thousand. Something like 1 in 800 die from the vaxx, and multiple lines of evidence converge on this number. That's still at least a thousand times too high for any medical product. It should be pulled immediately, and all of those who mandated must be prosecuted.
The fertility problems are also very interesting, and it does seem clear that the vaxx is reducing fertility all around the world.
Thanks for the reply Patrick. I would like to add to your observation and emphasize that the 1 in 800 is simply the fatality rate for those dying within 6 to 9 months of the vaxx. There is also the shortened life spans of the 1 in 200 who have sustained heart damage. This could well result in a loss of life-years that exceeds even that caused by Mao Tse Tung's Great Leap Forward. In 70 years time, historians might consider these times as the greatest atrocity of the 21st century.
And another thing: the unknown consequences of the alarming class switch in immune response post-vaxx that Mr. Gato wrote about recently (article published in Science Immunology; a response was also published there a day or two ago). The new paper does not dispute the findings and acknowledges that this effect was unpredicted.
As noted by several responses (including yours), direct fatality from adverse reaction to the drug is one piece of a larger puzzle. It is when we put multiple pieces together we start to see the picture on the box :-). And wonder if it is must coincidence that many of the "experts" insisting on mandates have in the past (and present) advocated for abortion on demand, force sterilization, "climate policy" that degrades standard of living for billions of people, control of food supply to limit population growth, and other population controlling measures. Are all these things isolated, random, or signs of a pattern?
The unifying pattern does seem to be the leftist billionaires' desire to kill off poorer people, or at least prevent them from reproducing.
Gayness and transsexuality also prevents reproduction, and was I believe explicitly promoted by one of the founders of Planned Parenthood for that exact reason.
Excepting where it NEEDS to be used, Africa (pop. still growing), Pakistan and India.. those countries need to slow their growth of population. Yet, mysteriously (or not) no poison juice (or very little) for them! Of course, Africa's all on IVM or HCQ so, not likely Covid would EVER be a danger there. Lots of other stuff, Tuberculosis, etc etc. however to target them with...
Do you dispute the graphs on this NY Times website that has COVID-19 deaths for the unvaccinated being consistently higher than for the vaccinated (e.g., COVID deaths 5 times higher for unvaccinated vs vaccinated for the period of November 27-December 3, 2022)?
Yes, I do dispute it. Consider the Australian or Japanese data showing that hospitalization and death from the virus is a function of the number of vaccinations received. More vaxxing inevitably leads to more death from the virus. Example graph:
It is also true that excess death in various countries is proportional to the percentage of the population of that country which took the vaxx. These deaths tend to be from cardiac problems caused by the vaxx.
I believe that the data the NY Times uses is corrupted by Pfizer.
"I believe that the data the NY Times uses is corrupted by Pfizer."
The NY Times is just plotting data from the CDC. So you think the CDC was corrupted by Pfizer?
How would that be done? I know from experience University of North Carolina Hospital that every patient who is admitted is given a COVID test (swab in the nose, analyzed in a lab). If that person dies, the hospital knows whether or not the person had COVID. Separately, records are kept for everyone regarding vaccination status (Social Security number is one of the pieces of information given before vaccination, I'm virtually certain).
So if the person dies in the hospital, the hospital knows whether or not they had COVID. And their vaccination status is also known. So how do you think that Pfizer is manipulating this system?
Another thing...you estimate that vaccination causes 1 death in approximately 800 persons vaccinated. But there are over 228 million people in the U.S. considered fully vaccinated:
So by your estimate, there must have been 285,000 deaths caused by vaccination alone. Don't you understand how that is simply not possible...that the number of deaths recorded in the U.S. since the start of vaccination can't include 285,000 deaths caused by vaccination? It's only been about 2 years since vaccinations started, so that would be about 150,000 excess deaths per year caused just by vaccinations. Where can you find numbers of excess deaths that support that many excess deaths due to vaccination?
Mr Robson, the payloads are just getting started. In the music world it’d best be characterized as a crescendo. And, there’ll be other vectors that compound these payloads’ impacts....one big symphony....
Neil Oliver worded it so well in a convo with Bret Weinstein. He uses the same reasoning as this woman but to reach the opposite conclusion. Once they pulled out a stick to beat me into submission I knew they didn’t have any scientific argument. I had reached the same conclusion myself with similar timing. Anyone who says: take this, it’s good for you! and then quickly moves to: take this or else! You can be sure it’s not actually good for you. Majid Mawaaz also said it beautifully.
Yes. This was the dead give away: since when has gov't EVER done anything FOR FREE that is GOOD for you? And, also.. if the product is intend for good health, why are you bribing me with smokes, drinks, fast food, lotteries and all the 'bad' things for my health? Hum... It is enough to make you wonder...*is this product really good* for my health or is it the exact opposite?*
When you make it easy for people to treat you like idiots, they will.
The most important "never forget" we need is the demonization and mocking of "do your own research."
The most useful time in the human lifespan is toddlerhood, 'cause them kids ain't afraid to ask "why" and they got enough energy to keep asking. Everything that comes after is society trying to crush that out of you.
Now the Bereans were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.
that is probably the general assumption. But imagine he meant something entirely different. Something like, keep your faith in your own judgment and do not trust others to explain what you see as clear. Might be wrong I know, it is just one of these gut feelings.
I suggest looking into Christian Apologetics. Which is the "the intellectual defense of the truth of the Christian religion." CA shows that Christianity is true and can withstand scrutiny. God Himself, in the scriptures invites us : "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good" (I Thessalonians 5:21) Many mistakenly believe that God wants us to have a blind faith...I find this is erroneous and unbiblical. I have taken several courses in CA and have found them quite helpful in my growth as a Christian!
We had Apologetics courses in Catholic high school. I loved the challenge. When I would engage the teacher - a TOR priest - in discussions, we inevitably got to the bottom line - "you have to have faith." That doesn't go very far with me as a rational explanation of the Christian religion or Catholicism. But maybe I am not able to understand because I am not "blessed" with faith. Also may be sharing too much in this public forum.
I am totally comfortable with EVERYONE asking "why" on EVERYTHING. Jesus was the ultimate proponent of free will, which requires free thought, which requires sincere questioning.
More and more I realize that's how we're being treated: herding us into densely packed cities is a goal, feeding us approved food is a goal, no possessions, constant control & surveillance are a goals.
She is hinting that if a country has many genuinely religious people, they (the Science demons) should use religious leaders to force them to take the vaxxx. If not, just use the military.
This was actually one of the very first tactics I saw in writing from our state health system back in 2020 - a document outlining how to deal with the pandemic. One of the tenets was to use religious leaders to convince their people to take the vaxxx. I shared this doc with our church leaders so they would be on the lookout for the ploy.
As I said before, we are being studied. This is more about how to manipulate us through communication than it is about anything else.
In my state, one of the first things that caught my attention.....during the supposed early crisis stage of the pandemic, our CDC director (past Soros Fellow) took time out of his busy role as the CDC director updating the state regularly, to appear before the Natural Resource Council of Maine. And in doing so, he explained that part of what was being done was "messaging" and the importance of messaging. That is, he stated that like the "climate change" narrative/approach it was critical to convince the public to participate in vaccination for their neighbor, for their community, for the elderly, etc. He basically was advocating not a rational response or argument but was putting forth an emotional appeal and expressing how that could be used to make the masses do what they otherwise might not do. On its face, one might think that is not so bad----but in reality it is a whole lot of manipulation especially if that is the principle means used to essentially get people to act how you want them to and also to compel them to mistreat others who do not act in the same fashion.
The second part of this approach...weaponizing those who are compliant against their peers is the nasty underside that they do not want to talk about. And when it comes to "apologies" and moving on.....rest assured that what is going to happen is an appeal to the emotions once again. It will be argued that the people who did get vaccinated did so because they are good humans and those of us who did not, we just got lucky and are still despicable people who would not throw ourselves on the altar for our neighbors. Missing from this entire discussion will be any basis for believing or not believing what the powers that be gave us as reliable information (which clearly it was not).
And the little tidbit I forgot to mention.....our CDC director’s notoriety and fame was such among those in our state eager to comply that they elevated him regularly to hero status (despite in my mind his appointment to the post just before the pandemic being suspect and his record from a prior job was problematic on a certain front involving a Legionaire’s outbreak).
Our “beloved” Dr. Nirva Shah has been promoted and is headed to DC to become deputy director at the federal CDC. So there is that....oh, and he voted for the COVID jab to be on the children’s vaccine schedule.
There is such a thing as 'perception management'. I watched the video at the link below last night, it's a finance video and in the first 15 minutes, a clip is shown from a Nov 22 meeting of the FDIC Systemic Resolution Advisory Committee where the members discuss exactly that. It's scary to watch and I absolutely recommend watching the entire 1 hour video:
Will do; thank you; I need that. I will admit that I am shocked to realize that they knowingly lied about the ability of the non-vaccines to prevention infection and transmission. Where are the reparations for those whose businesses were destroyed, who lost their jobs, whose health or indeed life was destroyed, whose liberty and pursuit of happiness were injured? Who have lost friends and family to "The Science?"
That retired army General in Portugal led his people to the death injections after I had shown on January 15 that the vaccine didn't block infection. He also didn't know you NEVER give any medical treatment without knowing anything about long term side effects. (This is why I told people not to have the vaccine before they came out.) It's all in my book: https://www.amazon.com/Heroes-Villains-COVID-19-Book-Lists/dp/B0BKHQ7CWN/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=
My doctor explained to me in the ‘60’s that doctors are trained to diagnose an issue and treat it with medicine (medical doctor) or surgery (which uses medicine). They are completely controlled by pharmaceutical companies, as seen in California. I’ve known too many people who have died at the hands of doctors. Question everything and act responsibily in taking care of your health. If your doctor is lacking, go to someone else. Same with these evil ones.
Are you kidding? I’m a Christian and follow the real science, same as you. Most of my friends at church haven’t been vaxxed and the friends who were vaxxed didn’t follow up with boosters and wish they hadn’t been vaxxed. We truly recognize the evil in the evil ones. We’re trusting that God IS in charge and his plan will win, however it goes. Study the Bible and see how this has been explained. Some of it is in code and you need to learn what is code and what it means.
I think he’s saying they have blind faith in the vaccine instead of doing actual research (science). I don’t think he was slamming any actual faith. Many Bible believers are way more scientific than the vaccine apologists, although the apologists have been brainwashed to believe the opposite
I've decided to stop calling them "elites". Just because they may have more money or think xyz of themselve doesn't mean they are more "elite" than me.
at least 30% of the population refused the jab (if you believe the numbers they provide, which i haven't since 2008). Why doesn't EL GATO combine with the rest of the writers and such who oppose all this and form a new political party?
That pleasant sounding woman is rejoicing that in Bhutan & Portugal, she could report that murders were going very well and there were few complaints (all censored).
These people are demons, and they don't even hide it (and surely many of them don't even recognise it).
But yikes. Imagine having this mindset.
Scary.
Clearly this diatribe begins with the premise that 100% compliance (aka vaccination) is the only goal. The assumptions underlying the goal shall not be discussed. You shall accept that this goal is good, just and proper - even essential for the survival of the human race.
Real science is all about challenging assumptions. When real science doesn't support the polibival objectives, no problem - simply decree what is true and disallow challenge. Call it misinformation (a la California's recent act that empowers medical board to revoke the licensed of any licensed professional who doesn't tow the party line on COVID or any other policy matter). It's for the greater good y'all!
AB 2098 is now held up! The judge decided that “Newsom’s assembly bill” is too vague.
SO the judge didn't throw it out because it is dangerously absurd and counter to every fundamental principle of a free and open system of governance?
Well thar's your problem...
Is this real or from a 1970's low budget sci fi...? Yikes.
The name of the original was 1984. The remake is called 2020 through 2023 (and beyond).
This woman is evil. And it shows the true nature of the people of the WEF. She’s a Bond villain.
It is time to unify over our biggest problem: Corruption.
It’s the one thing the people who are doing the corrupting fear most:
https://open.substack.com/pub/joshketry/p/lets-unify-over-our-biggest-problem?r=7oa9d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
That's the problem. Critical mass is...critical. I found out just a few days ago that a large employer in my city (4,000 people) was unable to put in place a vaxx mandate because enough people refused to comply so they would have lost too many employees. The refuseniks had critical mass. Lots of places people either eagerly lined up or folded to pressure.
The same thing happened with Fonterra, the largest dairy company, in New Zealand. They dropped compulsory injections because if they did, they would lose too many drivers. In the press they lied and said it that the situation had simply evolved or some such nonsense.
Yeah, that 'evolved' excuse has been used a lot!
Kohler Company
David Kohler did this for all his daddy's USA based companies he inherited. Many didn't know they could complain or request exemption. Think he will ever have remorse for the reduced life of the cattle (employees) he believes he owns?
Ghandi used mass-non-compliance to create a Nation. I suspect it would work to restore one, too.
THAT is the answer! My bf and I both lost our jobs(me after 23 years and him after 17 years). Imagine if every one of my coworkers said, “NO!”. I look back after 3 years and say, “What the hell happened? These are Americans?” I don’t even know my countrymen anymore.
imagine if even one quarter of your coworkers had said no.
is there any business which can afford to fire one quarter of its employees, all at once?
That’s why some cities (usually deep blue) are facing MAJOR shortages…shortages I don’t think they’ll EVER recover from. The conspiracy is 100% successful! And I believe the collateral damage is just starting.
10%
Well done Renee. At least you can take satisfaction from the knowledge that you will probably live a longer life than many of those who caved in to the coercion.
It’s a day at a time David, sometimes a minute at a time. I’m here because of God. Bless you!
The mandates still exist for most big companies in the US. Last interview I had the company still required the bioweapon shots or testing. I told them I would do neither. Surpise! I didn't get past the first interview. I see unemployment in my future until the shots are removed from the market.
It is why I am looking for a job in the State of Florida. State Employees are not required to jab. Most smaller businesses have let the 'mandate' go, and it is more like 'don't ask, don't tell'. Go Florida. Also Post Office still not jabbed. (Gotta have the postal workers for election fraud - so I figure they will be safe through 2024). My brother got a great job, great pay with a bank, but of course he's jabbed and boosted. Sigh.
Last I heard, jetBlue won't hire ANYONE, for ANY position in the company, who's not jabbed.
And just think if every person at Jet Blue said, “NO!” There would be no Jet Blue!
Renee Marie
Reading what happened to you is when I wish I was super rich & owned many businesses so I could hire you and your husband. A woman commented above that she doesn't even know her own countrymen any longer. I concur here in Michigan. My own mother hasn't spoken to me in over a year for refusing the shot. She literally said, " I want nothing to do with anyone who chooses to die alone on a ventilator or not listen to " science". This situation has affected many of us in different ways. I have hope though, as more are waking up each day. I will continue to keep praying we reach a critical mass! Blessings & Peace to your family!
Irish democracy
I know what you mean, but they could be evil AND incompetent (in the sense that their science doesn't hold up to anything, not even the efficacy in killing that they imagine they have down to a t).
I got to keep my job because enough said No to deathvax
Why bother? The Interchangeable Carbon Units of the peasantry are neither capable nor deserving of receiving holy gnosis.
"the soylent green agenda is people."
Yup and when these folks talk about "reducing carbon" it is those carbon units they are talking about reducing in numbers :-(. When you see this, the rest starts to make more sense.
The reproductive impact of the vaccine.
The rise in all-cause mortality post vaccine availability.
Policies that increase rather than decrease health risk from COVID.
it all fits...
just sayin' there is a pattern
Since we're all just collateral for the loans at this point what does it matter?
Let's at least raise a little hell on the way out
“I want to have my kicks before the whole shithouse goes up in flames.”
“No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn.”
Had this quote on my wall all through high school. We could do worse than listen to Jim. I’ll always be glad my dad was a doors fan.
That one is incredible. Screenshot worthy.
He was a real smart dude that didn't know when the party was over.
Nice to know you’re still alive, Jim.
"This is the strangest life I've ever known"
Actually that's a great quote for the last 3 years.
Oh, they are loosing! LIGHT IS WINNING! Light became more powerful for the first time in humanities history in 2012. Do you think they're feeling' it now? YOU BET! I think (even if we don't see it directly) they're running scared. I understand that this whole lab leak was "released" early just for that reason. Fu-k them all! When we stand united, WE WIN! ❤️
Right beside you Sister!
Let the Lion of Truth roar!
Couldn't help myself with the Killary quote.
when you're headed for hell in a bucket, make sure you are enjoying the ride!
The loan are going bad, that is why they want to liquidate you!
They don’t need us for collateral; All of our resources including national parks will be seized “for the greater good”....(meaning for the benefit of the elite megalomaniacs running the world).
Exactly. "YOU are the carbon they want to reduce."
I need to make a meme out of that.
There’s one using bugs bunny! 🐰
Us and our food are the carbon to be reduced
I want to disabuse people of the notion that the vaccines are a surreptitious way of reducing the population. With a fatality rate of 1 in a thousand, it is a pretty ineffective method. I do however have an open mind on their effect on fertility which may well be deliberate and may well significantly reduce populations over the longer term. Sadly, I am unlikely to still be alive to see the denouement of this conspiracy theory.
Yes, the fatality rate seems to be just a bit above one in a thousand. Something like 1 in 800 die from the vaxx, and multiple lines of evidence converge on this number. That's still at least a thousand times too high for any medical product. It should be pulled immediately, and all of those who mandated must be prosecuted.
The fertility problems are also very interesting, and it does seem clear that the vaxx is reducing fertility all around the world.
Thanks for the reply Patrick. I would like to add to your observation and emphasize that the 1 in 800 is simply the fatality rate for those dying within 6 to 9 months of the vaxx. There is also the shortened life spans of the 1 in 200 who have sustained heart damage. This could well result in a loss of life-years that exceeds even that caused by Mao Tse Tung's Great Leap Forward. In 70 years time, historians might consider these times as the greatest atrocity of the 21st century.
Right, long term, this could be truly catyclysmic.
And another thing: the unknown consequences of the alarming class switch in immune response post-vaxx that Mr. Gato wrote about recently (article published in Science Immunology; a response was also published there a day or two ago). The new paper does not dispute the findings and acknowledges that this effect was unpredicted.
As noted by several responses (including yours), direct fatality from adverse reaction to the drug is one piece of a larger puzzle. It is when we put multiple pieces together we start to see the picture on the box :-). And wonder if it is must coincidence that many of the "experts" insisting on mandates have in the past (and present) advocated for abortion on demand, force sterilization, "climate policy" that degrades standard of living for billions of people, control of food supply to limit population growth, and other population controlling measures. Are all these things isolated, random, or signs of a pattern?
The unifying pattern does seem to be the leftist billionaires' desire to kill off poorer people, or at least prevent them from reproducing.
Gayness and transsexuality also prevents reproduction, and was I believe explicitly promoted by one of the founders of Planned Parenthood for that exact reason.
Excepting where it NEEDS to be used, Africa (pop. still growing), Pakistan and India.. those countries need to slow their growth of population. Yet, mysteriously (or not) no poison juice (or very little) for them! Of course, Africa's all on IVM or HCQ so, not likely Covid would EVER be a danger there. Lots of other stuff, Tuberculosis, etc etc. however to target them with...
Do you dispute the graphs on this NY Times website that has COVID-19 deaths for the unvaccinated being consistently higher than for the vaccinated (e.g., COVID deaths 5 times higher for unvaccinated vs vaccinated for the period of November 27-December 3, 2022)?
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/covid-cases.html
the New York Times is not a reputable source for facts.
The NY Times graphs are just plotting data from the CDC. Do you also think the CDC is not a reputable source for facts?
Yes, I do dispute it. Consider the Australian or Japanese data showing that hospitalization and death from the virus is a function of the number of vaccinations received. More vaxxing inevitably leads to more death from the virus. Example graph:
https://patrick.net/uploads/2/7/8/278fd15c7124e56f6817a9da586794f2.gif
It is also true that excess death in various countries is proportional to the percentage of the population of that country which took the vaxx. These deaths tend to be from cardiac problems caused by the vaxx.
I believe that the data the NY Times uses is corrupted by Pfizer.
"I believe that the data the NY Times uses is corrupted by Pfizer."
The NY Times is just plotting data from the CDC. So you think the CDC was corrupted by Pfizer?
How would that be done? I know from experience University of North Carolina Hospital that every patient who is admitted is given a COVID test (swab in the nose, analyzed in a lab). If that person dies, the hospital knows whether or not the person had COVID. Separately, records are kept for everyone regarding vaccination status (Social Security number is one of the pieces of information given before vaccination, I'm virtually certain).
So if the person dies in the hospital, the hospital knows whether or not they had COVID. And their vaccination status is also known. So how do you think that Pfizer is manipulating this system?
Another thing...you estimate that vaccination causes 1 death in approximately 800 persons vaccinated. But there are over 228 million people in the U.S. considered fully vaccinated:
https://usafacts.org/visualizations/covid-vaccine-tracker-states
So by your estimate, there must have been 285,000 deaths caused by vaccination alone. Don't you understand how that is simply not possible...that the number of deaths recorded in the U.S. since the start of vaccination can't include 285,000 deaths caused by vaccination? It's only been about 2 years since vaccinations started, so that would be about 150,000 excess deaths per year caused just by vaccinations. Where can you find numbers of excess deaths that support that many excess deaths due to vaccination?
Mr Robson, the payloads are just getting started. In the music world it’d best be characterized as a crescendo. And, there’ll be other vectors that compound these payloads’ impacts....one big symphony....
Said what I tried to say, but more poetically and with less words!
thx!
💯
No Science just good old fascist prodding. Spoken like a good Nazi.
Neil Oliver worded it so well in a convo with Bret Weinstein. He uses the same reasoning as this woman but to reach the opposite conclusion. Once they pulled out a stick to beat me into submission I knew they didn’t have any scientific argument. I had reached the same conclusion myself with similar timing. Anyone who says: take this, it’s good for you! and then quickly moves to: take this or else! You can be sure it’s not actually good for you. Majid Mawaaz also said it beautifully.
Yes. This was the dead give away: since when has gov't EVER done anything FOR FREE that is GOOD for you? And, also.. if the product is intend for good health, why are you bribing me with smokes, drinks, fast food, lotteries and all the 'bad' things for my health? Hum... It is enough to make you wonder...*is this product really good* for my health or is it the exact opposite?*
When you make it easy for people to treat you like idiots, they will.
The most important "never forget" we need is the demonization and mocking of "do your own research."
The most useful time in the human lifespan is toddlerhood, 'cause them kids ain't afraid to ask "why" and they got enough energy to keep asking. Everything that comes after is society trying to crush that out of you.
so follow the advise of a man who already knew 2000 years ago... somewhere in the bible Jesus says, be like children. Is that what he meant?
Acts 17:11
Now the Bereans were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.
That phrase actually refers to the faith (and imagination) that children have...a bit opposite of where we're going here :-).
that is probably the general assumption. But imagine he meant something entirely different. Something like, keep your faith in your own judgment and do not trust others to explain what you see as clear. Might be wrong I know, it is just one of these gut feelings.
Well, I ain't one to advise putting too much faith in Biblical references, but each to his own.
neither am I . But the times when sayings apply one might as well follow them.
I suspect Christians wouldn't be overly comfortable with anyone asking too much "why."
I suggest looking into Christian Apologetics. Which is the "the intellectual defense of the truth of the Christian religion." CA shows that Christianity is true and can withstand scrutiny. God Himself, in the scriptures invites us : "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good" (I Thessalonians 5:21) Many mistakenly believe that God wants us to have a blind faith...I find this is erroneous and unbiblical. I have taken several courses in CA and have found them quite helpful in my growth as a Christian!
https://seminary.grace.edu/what-is-apologetics/
We had Apologetics courses in Catholic high school. I loved the challenge. When I would engage the teacher - a TOR priest - in discussions, we inevitably got to the bottom line - "you have to have faith." That doesn't go very far with me as a rational explanation of the Christian religion or Catholicism. But maybe I am not able to understand because I am not "blessed" with faith. Also may be sharing too much in this public forum.
All of formal religion shrinks God to fit man's version.
Your smug suspicion demonstrates no understanding of Christianity at all.
I have great understanding of Christianity; ain't smug, and ain't averse to a little elasticity in my language.
Why do you suppose that faith is even possible without doubt?
Instinct is more useful in my view.
I am totally comfortable with EVERYONE asking "why" on EVERYTHING. Jesus was the ultimate proponent of free will, which requires free thought, which requires sincere questioning.
Well, if you redefine "free will" the way people have redefined the meaning of "vaccine," say...
So true!!!!!!!
A farmer doesn't explain himself to his livestock and that's how they think of us.
More and more I realize that's how we're being treated: herding us into densely packed cities is a goal, feeding us approved food is a goal, no possessions, constant control & surveillance are a goals.
Not even livestock. Flies.
yup. the mark of the beast ... meant *we* are the beasts.
By definition, "no science" abolishes "informed consent".
She is hinting that if a country has many genuinely religious people, they (the Science demons) should use religious leaders to force them to take the vaxxx. If not, just use the military.
Hmmm don't think that was a hint, actually.
This was actually one of the very first tactics I saw in writing from our state health system back in 2020 - a document outlining how to deal with the pandemic. One of the tenets was to use religious leaders to convince their people to take the vaxxx. I shared this doc with our church leaders so they would be on the lookout for the ploy.
She flat out said it.
They want you dead.......
As I said before, we are being studied. This is more about how to manipulate us through communication than it is about anything else.
In my state, one of the first things that caught my attention.....during the supposed early crisis stage of the pandemic, our CDC director (past Soros Fellow) took time out of his busy role as the CDC director updating the state regularly, to appear before the Natural Resource Council of Maine. And in doing so, he explained that part of what was being done was "messaging" and the importance of messaging. That is, he stated that like the "climate change" narrative/approach it was critical to convince the public to participate in vaccination for their neighbor, for their community, for the elderly, etc. He basically was advocating not a rational response or argument but was putting forth an emotional appeal and expressing how that could be used to make the masses do what they otherwise might not do. On its face, one might think that is not so bad----but in reality it is a whole lot of manipulation especially if that is the principle means used to essentially get people to act how you want them to and also to compel them to mistreat others who do not act in the same fashion.
The second part of this approach...weaponizing those who are compliant against their peers is the nasty underside that they do not want to talk about. And when it comes to "apologies" and moving on.....rest assured that what is going to happen is an appeal to the emotions once again. It will be argued that the people who did get vaccinated did so because they are good humans and those of us who did not, we just got lucky and are still despicable people who would not throw ourselves on the altar for our neighbors. Missing from this entire discussion will be any basis for believing or not believing what the powers that be gave us as reliable information (which clearly it was not).
And the little tidbit I forgot to mention.....our CDC director’s notoriety and fame was such among those in our state eager to comply that they elevated him regularly to hero status (despite in my mind his appointment to the post just before the pandemic being suspect and his record from a prior job was problematic on a certain front involving a Legionaire’s outbreak).
Our “beloved” Dr. Nirva Shah has been promoted and is headed to DC to become deputy director at the federal CDC. So there is that....oh, and he voted for the COVID jab to be on the children’s vaccine schedule.
There is such a thing as 'perception management'. I watched the video at the link below last night, it's a finance video and in the first 15 minutes, a clip is shown from a Nov 22 meeting of the FDIC Systemic Resolution Advisory Committee where the members discuss exactly that. It's scary to watch and I absolutely recommend watching the entire 1 hour video:
https://www.kitco.com/news/video/show/VRIC-2023/4395/2023-02-07/It-is-too-late-to-stop-The-Great-Reset-CBDCs---Lynette-Zang#_48_INSTANCE_puYLh9Vd66QY_=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kitco.com%2Fnews%2Fvideo%2Flatest%3Fshow%3DVRIC-2023
Will do; thank you; I need that. I will admit that I am shocked to realize that they knowingly lied about the ability of the non-vaccines to prevention infection and transmission. Where are the reparations for those whose businesses were destroyed, who lost their jobs, whose health or indeed life was destroyed, whose liberty and pursuit of happiness were injured? Who have lost friends and family to "The Science?"
Well said!
Yes to this!
That retired army General in Portugal led his people to the death injections after I had shown on January 15 that the vaccine didn't block infection. He also didn't know you NEVER give any medical treatment without knowing anything about long term side effects. (This is why I told people not to have the vaccine before they came out.) It's all in my book: https://www.amazon.com/Heroes-Villains-COVID-19-Book-Lists/dp/B0BKHQ7CWN/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=
My doctor explained to me in the ‘60’s that doctors are trained to diagnose an issue and treat it with medicine (medical doctor) or surgery (which uses medicine). They are completely controlled by pharmaceutical companies, as seen in California. I’ve known too many people who have died at the hands of doctors. Question everything and act responsibily in taking care of your health. If your doctor is lacking, go to someone else. Same with these evil ones.
There are no "second opinions".
They all follow the same narrative or else lose their license.
No doubt it is also now leading in excess mortality.
Holy cow. Is this a lack of self-awareness or are they just evil?
Embrace the power of AND.
A popular meme has suggested that they’re not even smart enough to be as evil as we give them credit for being. I like that!
This thought gives me a lot of hope, actually. Watching the stupidity is somewhat reassuring.
smart and evil have nothing to do with each other
Yes, I agree! I'm just hopeful that stupidity does correlate with incompetence
I once worked with a girl who played dumb, worked for her, didn't have to do as much work. Playing dumb and ditzy is a nice cop out
My dad used to say 'be smart, play dumb'.
They just make a dangerous combination.
They're just Evil
The vaccine cult prefers faith to science.
The vaccine cult prefers brainwashing to science. Don't confuse that with faith.
Are you kidding? I’m a Christian and follow the real science, same as you. Most of my friends at church haven’t been vaxxed and the friends who were vaxxed didn’t follow up with boosters and wish they hadn’t been vaxxed. We truly recognize the evil in the evil ones. We’re trusting that God IS in charge and his plan will win, however it goes. Study the Bible and see how this has been explained. Some of it is in code and you need to learn what is code and what it means.
I think he’s saying they have blind faith in the vaccine instead of doing actual research (science). I don’t think he was slamming any actual faith. Many Bible believers are way more scientific than the vaccine apologists, although the apologists have been brainwashed to believe the opposite
The issue is not "the science", not the virus or the vaxx, not anything except:
Our exalted elites will CONTROL and the rest of us will OBEY.
(but we all knew this already)
I've decided to stop calling them "elites". Just because they may have more money or think xyz of themselve doesn't mean they are more "elite" than me.
Maybe we should label the elites as “deletes”. Delete them from our lives!
Yep. Thought o’ that. (Great minds. 😬)
Alternative: pestilencia, ...speaking of bugs... ...and gotta get rid of them...
Sumpthin’, just blow off the aura of the elevated select few.
Ha!!! Love that!!
Demon possessed.
at least 30% of the population refused the jab (if you believe the numbers they provide, which i haven't since 2008). Why doesn't EL GATO combine with the rest of the writers and such who oppose all this and form a new political party?
order out of chaos; while the bullseyes in mansions lounge around in sublime peace watching us scrabble over arrows.
That pleasant sounding woman is rejoicing that in Bhutan & Portugal, she could report that murders were going very well and there were few complaints (all censored).
Is it not amazing how often they say the quiet parts out loud and most people don't even blink?
No science needs to be discussed because there is actually no science behind any of this - just lies, lies and more lies.
Be awesome if one of them to passed out on stage (I'm kidding! I'm kidding!)
They most likely got saline.