Actually, this would make a great game or puzzle, i.e., to find ways to justify each of the responses. When I was a test editor, I had to reject one proposed test because there would be too many ways a really creative person could answer each question. I've always wished that instead of rejecting it outright I'd suggested publishing it w…
Actually, this would make a great game or puzzle, i.e., to find ways to justify each of the responses. When I was a test editor, I had to reject one proposed test because there would be too many ways a really creative person could answer each question. I've always wished that instead of rejecting it outright I'd suggested publishing it with a few modifications as a test of creativity. But of course such a test would have to require discursive answers instead of machine-graded bullet sheets, so it would have been too expensive to administer.
Actually, this would make a great game or puzzle, i.e., to find ways to justify each of the responses. When I was a test editor, I had to reject one proposed test because there would be too many ways a really creative person could answer each question. I've always wished that instead of rejecting it outright I'd suggested publishing it with a few modifications as a test of creativity. But of course such a test would have to require discursive answers instead of machine-graded bullet sheets, so it would have been too expensive to administer.
Indeed - "freedom" in particular is contextually superfluid, though the political meaning is pretty solid as it refers to state action.