244 Comments

And slurs against Adam Schiff are up 110%. I may be responsible for 90% of them.

Expand full comment

excuse me miss renee, i don't mean to be a pedantapuss or anything, but i think maybe it's not really a slur if it's true...

Expand full comment

It’s a truthful slur! LOL!

Expand full comment

In full disclosure, I may also be part of those numbers. I would say I'm not proud of it, but I am.

Expand full comment

I can plausibly deny slurring Schiff on Twitter. I've never slurred anyone on Twitter. I'm not on Twitter ;-).

Expand full comment

I'll do it for you

Expand full comment

Yeah, and if you're too busy, I'll do it for you too.

Expand full comment

I don't get any new apps on my phone. I hate my phone. I won't let twitter use my phone, so they kicked me off on my computer. Meh, easy come??, easier go.

Expand full comment

I can help out too. In my circles, being banned on Twitter was considered a badge of honor.

Expand full comment

Well slurs should be up...because 132% of experts agree that Adam Schiff posting his percentages is micro-aggressing the marginalized, disenfranchised, historically inaccurate inflated percentage posters of Twitter.

And he didn’t even acknowledge his pronoun.

So he should just cancel himself at this point.

Expand full comment

:-)

For grins, I decided to look up what Twitter things is "hate speech" and slurs.

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policy

OMG that pretty much covers anything and everything. 100% of tweets are "hate" !

Expand full comment

I'd love to hear someone from Twitter explain how they differentiate "race" and "ethnicity", given the overlap between the two and nationality and culture and religion.

Interestingly enough, they do make adifference between "gender" and "gender identity" - what's up with that? If gender identity is the socially constructed part, not connected to biology in any way (which is the woke argument), then what is "gender"? It should obviously read "sex", not gender.

And "protected category", egads! That means that there are, by implication atleast, unprotected categories which Twitter is okay with people expressing hate against.

And how do they define disability? Where's the cutoff? What's it based on?

I could do this all day, and I'd just love a sit-down with the retarded little apple-polishing bootlicker of awoke-fascist what wrote this up.

I miss taking students to task over using non-defined or even worse non-definable terms in their statements, and this is the worst I have ever seen, (and I used to read my wife's books and reports and stuf when she was at the Institution for Women's Studies wayback when).

Expand full comment

I think it's lawyers making sure that everyone is in violation so they can cover the corporate arse when they decide to target an individual. I've had this discussion with many lawyers. The mention of equal application makes them laugh. We have a lot of complex rules no one understands and so no one is in compliance and so we can "selectively enforce" the rules when it suits our needs. Sadly this is an established practice in government, too. It's immoral, but it's common.

Expand full comment

I betcha the lawyers studied 1984 rather than the US Constitution & writing of the Founding Fathers to learn how to write laws; how else can one explain the contorted regulations/laws/terms of service that they write. Talk about wiggle room ...oy vay!

Expand full comment

I think it's actually 111%.

Expand full comment

When making stuff up, be precise: 111.28 %

The more removed from anything real, the more decimal places you use ;-)

Expand full comment

Excellent point.

Expand full comment

Nowhere near 110%. Telling the Truth is NOT a slur!

Expand full comment

Not high enough. We have to do better.

Expand full comment

Some folks need to put their shoulder to the wheel on this one!

Expand full comment

LOL!

Expand full comment

I’m sure I added at least another 70% on top of that!

And don’t forget, 10% for the Big Guy.

Expand full comment

I love you!

Expand full comment

It isn’t a slur if it is true.

Expand full comment

Good job and atta' girl.

Expand full comment

It's amazing. Before Musk, the Left always said “Twitter is a private company, they can do what they want. Don’t complain.” Well, Twitter is still a private company and the owner is doing what he wants. But now heads must roll.

Expand full comment

Ironic isn’t it? I am so sick of this hypocrisy

Expand full comment

"When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles."

Frank Herbert (Dune)

Expand full comment

Excellent. I shall add this to my collection of quotes.

Expand full comment

what an amazing quote. thank you for posting.

Expand full comment

It's SURPRISINGLY relevant these days.

Expand full comment

Especially when the hippyocracy are such sociopathetic liars.

Expand full comment

Since "heads must roll", the hysterical leftist screamers are safe, since all of 'em are BLOCKHEADS.

Expand full comment

Democrats are not the Left. They HATE the left. Just ask anyone who supported Bernie Sanders.

Expand full comment

You are absolutely right about that. We really, really need to move beyond believing that "left" and "right" have meaning anymore, if they ever did, other than just another way to divide us.

Expand full comment

They're just branding. And in the Democrats' case, deceitful branding. Always deceitful.

Expand full comment

I think American politics makes much more sense viewed through the Court Party/Country Party lens than the left/right

Expand full comment

what do you mean?

Expand full comment

Well that is one alternative to the Left/Right paradigm. In countries with established aristocratic, like ours, one party isn't really built on ideological lines, it is built on supporting the aristocracy, the Governing Class, this is often called a Court Party. The rather heterogenous mass of lesser voiced citizens from Left, Right, and all viewpoints winds up getting lumped together, particularly when the government and its followers are being foolish enough that the great majority of the citizens all agree that the Governing class is a bunch of idiots.

So Democrat is just a brand, Left isn't accurate, good names would be the Establishment Party, the Imperial Party, the Urban Party, the Bureaucratic Party, the Professional Managerial Elite Party, as revolver news likes to call them, or something like that.

Expand full comment

They're both the Left, factions fighting for power.

Expand full comment

"Both the Left"? They're both pro-war, pro-capitalist, anti-worker, anti-consumer protection, pro-warrantless surveillance, anti-election integrity, anti-Medicare for all parties. In fact, on the issues that most people care about, they're not only not Left, they're not even two parties.

Expand full comment

LOL. The continuum is liberty to collectivism. They're both collectivist. Leftists. No matter how they try to hide it under all those cute labels. I mean - whatever made you think "pro-war" is something Leftists are not?

Expand full comment

Because one like isn't enough ❤️❤️❤️❤️

Expand full comment

garn!

Expand full comment

I know. It's almost as if they didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.

Expand full comment

Actually, when they said that it was a lie, as Twitter was a *public company*. Now, Twitter *is* a private company, so they're super upset.

Expand full comment

Agreed, except the Democrats are not the Left.

Expand full comment

slurs against crooked politicians up 500%

Expand full comment

Unfortunately, votes for crooked politicians are up 600%.

Expand full comment

"Votes"? #Ahem

Expand full comment

Ballots... Not votes

Expand full comment

Only when the illegal votes are counted.

Expand full comment

Your assertion depends on the premise that there is such a thing as a non-crooked politician.

Expand full comment

It's a spectrum, to be sure.

Expand full comment

Fantasist!

Expand full comment

I saw an honest politician the other night. He was riding a unicorn. I may have been asleep...

Expand full comment

They are all liars, crooks and grifters! There how’s that?

Expand full comment

Is it a slur when it's accurate?

Asking for a friend...

Expand full comment

Slurs against Anthony Fauci are skyrocketing faster than excess deaths of all causes & adverse events on VAERS.

Expand full comment

damn thats steep curve!

Expand full comment

"The water in the creek isn't gonna clear up till you get the pigs outta the creek." Sen. John Kennedy (2022 , R-LA)

Expand full comment

DeSantis, Childers, & FL Surgeon General here with some pig lassos & mops, at your service, ‘MERICA! THANK YOU, DeSantis, Childers & FL Surgeon General.

Expand full comment

Most importantly though.....

Slurs against Science are up 27,677%.

Expand full comment

Wait...science, or The Science?

Expand full comment

When Science is capitalized, you serve it.

Expand full comment

I find myself remiss. How many Hail Faucis will that be?

Expand full comment

666.

And a full minute of self flaggelation.

Expand full comment

Dammit!... I guess I should be happy a hair shirt isn't specified...

( and also...unlike somr Southern grandma's...you haven't told me to bring back a switch. Self flaggulation with a ginger stalk...coming up!)

Expand full comment

Can we flagellate Fauci instead?

Expand full comment

If so, a change from a flimsy ginger stem might be in order.

Expand full comment

Triple Amen.

Expand full comment

The $cience

Expand full comment

It's so odd! that symbol looks " s" like, but makes a definitive " cha ching!" sound...🤔

Expand full comment

“The $cience”

Expand full comment

Amen.

Expand full comment

The best part is that there was a specific and coordinated push to skew the stats by having everybody spewing hate speech to protest Musk's takeover -- and it was STILL a completely insignificant amount of overall traffic.

"Send in the trolls to create a problem we need to fix" is standard Schiff.

Expand full comment

When the Left is done tearing down statues of real men they around build a few to honor those who have truly advanced their revolution. I nominate the as yet anonymous inventor of the Trollbot, who has done more for wokeism than all of the purple haired angry lesbians in Seattle.

Expand full comment

That's actually in the preface to the Dems S.O.P. manual. In upper case. Bold.

Expand full comment

I have an admitted unhealthy exaggerated desire to slap one of these criminals hard across the face... and it’s a tormenting struggle between Schiff, Pelosi and , of course, the Hillarybeast.... why and or how is it that they get away with pathological lying, over and over again?

Expand full comment

A slap is too quick. I would advocate for them to sit & watch hours of lectures about the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and other similar historical lectures on the founding of our nation. Full on re-education.

Expand full comment

Because we let them?

Expand full comment

"Women"? What's that? How does one slur a "social construct"?

Expand full comment

I love you. In a really neutral non-loaded way.

Expand full comment

Good point!!

Expand full comment

And slurs against white,evangelical males? Or white people in general? Or that doesn’t count?

Expand full comment

No. You can't be racist against whites, because (power + privilege) / toejam = avocado. It's called "science". That's why smart people learn it in college.

Expand full comment

Thank you for explaining it so clearly :-)

Expand full comment

My wife is still laughing. Thank you.

Expand full comment

= mocky finger? I’d rather shoot Coca Cola than the jab...

Expand full comment

You mean "The Science."

Expand full comment

“Hateful slurs on Twitter” is exactly the same as the “Nazi flag wavers” at the Truckers protest.

Expand full comment

Can’t believe he didn’t mention Russia

Expand full comment

He had to take a breath.

Expand full comment

Bwahaha!

Expand full comment

Slurs against Russia were already running at pretty high levels.

Expand full comment

Don't worry, Adam Schitt, your party's bots and NPCs are working hard to get those numbers up.

Expand full comment

I suspected everyone was misspelling his name. Thank you for the clarification Professor Maggie!

Expand full comment

😹👍👩‍🏫

Expand full comment

FOFL. The real issue: slurs against Adam Schiff are up 10,000 percent.

Expand full comment

Source, please. Otherwise it's just hot air from a pathological liar.

Expand full comment

THANK YOU!!! Show me the evidence! Oh wait, he can’t! He made this up on the fly or regurgitated from someone else, who got it from someone else’s mother’s best friends daughter whose nephew.......I wish he would fling himself into a ravine......

Expand full comment

I think Adam Schiff is a congenital pathological liar, a pseudologue. He'll keep lying as 'the train of truth' is rounding the bend. Their brains are different, a scan should have kept him out of politics. https://pathwhisperer.info/2011/06/01/search-pseudologia-fantastica-do-they-know-they-are-lying/

Expand full comment

I was raised to not hate anyone, but.... I cannot refrain, I hate this little sniveling duplicitous lying piece of shit. Still waiting for the evidence “ right in front of our eyes.” He could write an addendum to Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. God, I just despise the man.

Expand full comment

One of the few good things to come out of 2022: he'll no longer be chairman of anything except his ego.

Expand full comment

I think Schiff actually read the Muller Report... which led him to make that statement: "right in front of our eyes'. Have you read Mueller Report ?

Expand full comment

I have not. I just know that it is one of the most craftfully woven tapestries of ass covering in the history of ass covering!

Expand full comment

How can you know something about a document that you haven't read, and make definitive comments about those who have ? 'I just know' doesn't cut it..

Expand full comment

Some truths about certain protected groups cannot be stated. I doubt even Musk will allow that.

Expand full comment

We shall see. LMK if I miss something.

Expand full comment

We know the lay public is too damned stupid to understand this. Still, SOMEBODY had to have these numbers at the end of a report or something. This congresscritter is NOT just pulling these numbers out of his ass. In the time-honored tradition of the Internet, no one does that! Also, we're in a pandemic, FFS!

Expand full comment

Truth! Adam Shifty would NEVER bring an envelope full of blank pages and claim they were worthy of investigation! It's not how he rolls!

Expand full comment

I love "Adam Shifty" as a moniker. Two, here is how I answered his ass on "the Twitter"...

"I have it on good authority that 127% of politicians who cite statistics which will make them look better are FOS. My cousin's barber can verify my calculations."

Expand full comment

Wiltshire. I've always enjoyed your intellect and wit. As I don't use Twitter, would you think up something particularly acerbic and flung it at him ,with my compliments?

Expand full comment

Also...dammit! Intupe bad enough, but the app won't let me edit the crap I DO catch!? Uuugh

Expand full comment

Calling a algae covered bottom feeding lie spewing politician "shifty" is a slur!

Expand full comment

Catfish ain't allowed in the Senate... it makes the others feel inadequate

Expand full comment

I always figured the catfish wouldn't go that low...

Expand full comment

My nicknames for him: Pencil neck and Pinocchio.

Expand full comment

I’ll look for you there.

Expand full comment

Is he talking Twitter?

Expand full comment

Well, Shifty sure didn't provide any references plus he has been proven as a shameless liar. Pretty safe to assume he's lying again, if he opened his mouth

Expand full comment

You forgot the sarcasm off tag at the end of your comment :-)

Expand full comment