234 Comments

Nobel Prize. Brought to you by Pfizer.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 6, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023Author

excuse me, but i think maybe you misspelled "nobel pfrize."

Expand full comment

Please forgive me , gatito. Nobel prize. Brought to you by Pfixer.

Expand full comment

Well played to you as well

Expand full comment

There was a popular TV show called "Mad Men." About Madison Avenue ad and marketing agencies. Trust The Science (TM) is in the capable hands of madmen.

Expand full comment

If the criteria is marketing based then Don Draper deserves one. “I’d like to give the world a coke” was an all timer.

Expand full comment

Well played

Expand full comment

Nobel Peace Prize. Sponsored by Raytheon. Would you bet against Zelensky winning it?

Expand full comment

Obama got it 🤷‍♂️

Expand full comment

I have personally met some Pakistani villagers who would endorse this. /s

Expand full comment

for absolutely nothing but being a shiny well spoken negro.

Expand full comment

Now, now, white cow...

Expand full comment

My Raytheon stock just gave tendies last week.

Always bet on the bad guys.

Expand full comment

Crime pays?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Nah, I was sitting on that crap from mid-2020. It's still up from then even if it's in the toilet now. I'm holding long (I basically always do unless something clears 200%), I was just happy to get some reinvested dividends.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Standing on the shoulders of giants such as Yasir Arafat and Barak Hussein Obama.

Expand full comment

"Nobel Drones of Peace Missiles"

Expand full comment

Sounds about right. The woman who won, Katalin Kariko, is the senior vice president at BioNTech.

Expand full comment

Disgusting isn't it...

Expand full comment

"Bought" to you by Pfister :)

Expand full comment

Pardon me, but I think maybe you misspelled "Bought" to you by Pfizer. (That's actually how my mind first read your comment!!)

Expand full comment

you, bought by pfizer.

Expand full comment

and ModeRNA

Expand full comment

Excellent!

Expand full comment

"Bought to you by Pfizer".

Expand full comment

It has become that cynical now? They award a Nobel Prize, not because of great achievement, but to incentivize the great unwashed masses of sheeple to continue to take the jabs even though so many have watched friends and family and, probably, themselves suffer adverse events including deaths that are most likely a result of taking the shots. Well, those masses may not have the scientific education to understand longstanding principles of virology, but they have street smarts and know when they are being gas lighted. Now since Obama got the peace prize for just being elected, I think it is time that Biden should receive the prize for economics.. (Or did that already go to Sam Bankman Fried).

Expand full comment

Stolen valor, just like Watson, Crick and DNA labs in CSH Labs, home of Bill Gates Senior and the American euthanasia / master race / eugenics / planned parenthood / democide project.

Expand full comment

Today's job numbers, touted as successful by your vote for economics prize, were sketchy at best. Forty percent of the new jobs counted are people having to take second jobs in order to afford the basics. Don't believe your lying eyes...or growling stomach.

Expand full comment

Taxpayer-paid statisticians quietly admit the Biden economy sucks.

The Bureau of Economic Analysis revised down the past 3 years of data. Now they say inflation was higher, growth was worse, and consumer spending is at a crawl while government spending gallops. Now that media's not paying attention, they quietly bumped up Trump's numbers, and bumped down Biden's.

At some point we're China. Where everybody knows the numbers are fake. As always, believe what you see, not what they say.

Expand full comment

BEA recently revised a number of measures, some going back to 2013, others to either 1997 or 2005, and current dollar annual GDP back to 1979.

Close, though - not

Expand full comment

"Forty percent of the new jobs counted are people having to take second jobs ... "

Please cite your credible source.

Thank you

Expand full comment

Trying to remember the analyst's name on Fox Business who cited this based on labor participation rate. Will do so asap.

Expand full comment

That's funny because ivermectin's Nobel Prize didn't stop the marketers from waging a smear campaign against it, including the FDA's infamous "y'all" tweet:

• “Letter to a Scientifically-Minded Friend” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-scientifically-minded)

Expand full comment

Well, see, my dear Margaret Anna Alice, Ivermectin's cheap.

Why would BigGovPublicPanic suggest an inexpensive, effective, readily available treatment? Where's the graft in that? How's a useless legislator supposed to get to be a kabillionaire on $175k/year?

#TeamSnoutinTrough

Expand full comment
Oct 6, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023

Part of me thinks this is yet another attack on Ivermectin.

"Well the covid vaccines also won a Nobel Prize and it was designed purely to fight covid!"

Yeah I know it was the mRNA delivery platform that earned them the prize, but that's splitting hairs to the sheep who fall for this crap.

Expand full comment

I hadn’t thought about this either

Expand full comment

Interesting angle. That rings true as a least "one" of the purposes of this fiasco.

First the Nobel Committee let their silence show their submission to corruption. Now, it is obvious, active participation. 100%

Expand full comment

You said it!

That ivermectin incident helped us see how thoroughly corrupt media is, including alternative media.

This Prize is helping us see how corrupt every last respected institution is. Bar none.

Expand full comment

I hadn’t thought about that.

Expand full comment

I’m not a kitten, but can someone please explain how increasing the uptake of the vaccine can improve its safety???

Expand full comment

Oh, it can if you follow the example and wear mask. Vaxxines are highly effective, don't you know that?! Yeah, what a circus and yet many are still entertained.

Expand full comment
Oct 7, 2023·edited Oct 7, 2023

Spellbound, more like. The fearmongerers are the sorcerers who cast the spell.

Expand full comment

To reduce the control group to zero would be their ultimate goal, then we can’t compare the health of the two groups and thus it is safe and effective

Expand full comment

Because more people are dumb enough to take? I don’t know, just spitballing

Expand full comment

There you go, critical thinking.

They are clearly relying on mind-poisoned group-thing and some mystery mental weakness we all have, like unprocessed childhood shame or animalistic herd survival instincts.

Expand full comment

This ranks right up there with the Nobel for lobotomies, and Obama’s and Kissinger’s. What a total crock.

Expand full comment

Yasser Arafat too for his services to international terrorism and murderer.

Expand full comment

(Rabin and Peres too, of course, right?)

Expand full comment

Giving the Nobel prize for the most horrific iatrogenic atrocity is proof we live in Evil Clown World.

Expand full comment

We will only get confirmation when Pennywise wins the Nobel peace prize.

Expand full comment

So as I understand the reasoning the awarding of a Nobel prize makes things effective and safe. Following that logic couldn’t we just speed up the drug approval process by awarding the Nobel prize to every company that submits an NDA and then approving the drug immediately? Think of the progress that could be made!

Expand full comment

Pay attention: they used the phrase 'efficient and safe'. It's no longer 'effective'.

Expand full comment

Which I imagine then evolves to efficient and benign followed by efficient and efficient when they run out of positive adjectives, but can no longer credibly use safe. At that point it becomes efficient and redundant which is kind of how I see the covid vaccines so it all works for me.

Expand full comment

Good catch.

Expand full comment

Yeah I thought that was weird. Efficient?!

Expand full comment

Further evidence there is a difference between “believing the science” and understanding the science.

Expand full comment
Oct 6, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023

They don't do "science."

They do The Science™

Expand full comment

"Duh" Science.

Expand full comment

Teh Science™

Expand full comment

The Nobel Prize has been a branding exercise for at least 50 years. No remotely wise person takes it as a measure of anything at all. It's an endorsement by a community, like the Oscars or every other useless statue award.

It's the academic equivalent of being elected Homecoming Queen- which, I was very disappointed to learn, did not come with command of a standing army, control over school lunch menus, or the use of a dungeon.

Expand full comment

If I lie often enough, with fake sincerity, you will finally believe the lies, not what you see everyday. Right!

Expand full comment
Oct 6, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023

Unfortunately, that is how much of the corporate media works. Witness the number of people that still believe proven disinformation like Russian collusion, lab leak is a conspiracy theory, masking, etc.

Expand full comment

These Nobel prize winners and the foundation who gave the prize to them should be bombarded with emails from people who took the jab and became vaccine-injured!

They will delete the first 1,000 emails, dismiss the second 1,000, pooh-pooh the third 1,000, but by the time they receive 100,000 emails - from injured and from survivors who had lost loved ones to the evil Covid jab - they will start trembling at the realization of the profound harm they have caused!

Seriously, if you were vaccine-injured, contact these clueless scientists and open their eyes!

Expand full comment

Better still - take a page from their playbook. Employ a swarm of bots to speak for the injured, maimed and killed interspersed with the hundreds of thousands irl emails.

Expand full comment

The Nobel wieners will never wake up and repent. Never admit they made any mistakes with the information they had "at the time." At best they'll point fingers at lower level scapegoats like spoiled rotten children caught with their fingers in a cookie jar.

Expand full comment

Giving a Nobel prize to Obama didn't make me any less "hesitant" regarding oily-slick democrats nor did it make me think they were efficient or safe...

Expand full comment

The nobel prize for peace, no less...

Expand full comment

Most corruption-free administration in history

Expand full comment

of the UNIVERSE

Expand full comment

TNK, with best answer! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment

It's cute that they think there's a single human being left on the planet who is on the fence about mRNA vaccines. The set "vaccine-hesitant" is null.

Expand full comment

This won’t make the vaccine hesitant take the vaccine. All this will do is give the sheeple who took the vaccine another thing to point at and say, “it won the Nobel prize” as they wonder where their turbo cancer or auto immune disease came from…or why their grandma or son died soon after taking it.

Expand full comment

Ivermectin received the Nobel prize for medicine in 2015 - did our esteemed leaders at the FDA/NIH forget about that?

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2015/press-release/

Expand full comment

You aren't a horse! That's just horse paste!

I remember when the FDA put out ads that said something to that effect. Disgraceful.

Expand full comment

Did you mean: "Noble Lies"

Expand full comment