this will one day be studied as a "how to" case in market conditioning and seeding.
it will also be studied as a "how not to" case in ethics classes.
and the former will be embraced and the latter ignored until such time as we break the public health monopoly and stop using the state to subsidize grifters selling snake oil as triumphalism.
and the ethics classes will be taken by politicians and medical students not to learn to be ethical but to learn to tailor their rhetoric to sound ethical while being unethical
Those classes start young. My youngster brought home "Scholastic News" from school telling the kids to be kind. I said, well the school wasn't so kind to you when they made you take a bunch of COVID tests for being unvaxxed. She understood...
Already done. Long time ago. We are living the fruition of those successful graduates of that school. I recently met a new friend who told me that he was instructed by his superior to lie to a client. No couching it in soft words. 'Lie. It is the best way to make money.' He left the job and now he's left America because he found living the American way of business was killing his soul.
I am having the same ethical problem being a public health researcher. CDC&FDA are corrupted, local health departments are sick with the group think and "diversity", academia is "diverse' and rejects White people, BigPharma is corrupt; CROs help pharma to falsify clinical trial data, military is culling its personnel while leading unethical wars. It is unclear where to work.
It is easy for me to say because I am now retired, but you have to think that maybe some of the trades are the way to go and be free. I mean like staying non-union and doing say framing, sheet rocking, plumbing, etc. Just thinking.
Contract Research Organizations. Apparently businesses that contract with pharmaceuticals to run trials on their drugs, or research how to market them. (I had to look it up too!)
I saw this in college in 1970, 71 when I was taking classes in deductive and inductive logic. I looked at a number of the students and figured out what their reason for being there was and what their majors were (a lot of poly sci majors) They were learning the rules of logic so they could violate them to make persuasive speeches appealing to emotion and using well reasoned subterfuge.
Agree. If you look at the WEF young global leaders website (I know it's hard) and see the degrees, experience and training these so called leaders have, you see no producers, only managers of some nebulous subject areas e.g., 'managing diversity in business'.
MBA-itis came to my employer and perhaps the epitome of More Bad Advice came when we got a notice that the plants in the office had become toxic and ugly and would be removed. If anyone wanted them they were free to take them home. No kidding! That is almost a direct quote.
When the staff expressed outrage the mba who devised this method of closing the plant contract relented and said that the unhealthy and unaesthetic plants can remain in the office if individuals committed to watering them. So I asked the plant person whose contract was being closed what needed to be done for the few plants I committed to attend. And so I gave myself some time every week to move from my desk to water and/or remove dead leaves. A fantastic opportunity to get up and stretch and maybe share some 'cooler education' time, after the formal schooling practices had been closed in my engineering job to be replaced by the informal learning practices that we all get talking to each other at the water cooler. That was removed because it was too expensive and created inefficient workers.
When I was young, I disbelieved that Nero would watch Rome burn while fiddling. Now I watch our society being burnt by MBAs and accountants fiddling the books. Amazing.
China's beating people's pets to death or drowning them by the thousands and enslaving people and putting them in concentration camps sounds kinda Nazi to me
There’s no diversity of oppression. The totalitarian state seems a one trick pony. Shades of MCMLXXXIV. Fear slavery repeat or virtue signaling fear slavery repeat.
Canada is building 'voluntary' internment camps right now. And headquarters with an armoury for the environmental police force being recruited.
Yes, lunacy everywhere, from both left and right, imo. I don't really see the difference in the tyrannous practices, regardless which direction they come from.
the classes will be beautiful, hosted atop a circle of flowers, given by the most compassionate intellectual, taken by psychopaths trying to learn to act human
I love your optimism. Let's hope we get to a time where sanity is de rigueur. History (and truth) are written by the winners, after all. Of course, since so many of them have taken the jabs, perhaps they won't be around to write. I know, I know. That was dark.
I'm starting to see the logic of people who said that there would be a >70% population drop in the USA by 2025. The vaxxes will probably only do 3% of the people. The rest? Ugly.
Hope for? Seriously? Nearly every member of my family is triple jabbed and still lining up. I take no satisfaction in what is happening. It scares the hell out of me. Dark times call for dark humor. And I would point out that many on what I assume is your side of the divide wished a painful death for those of us who refused the jabs.
Oh, lots of people last fall on Twitter (but not just there) were saying “the unvaccinated should be denied medical treatment” etc. I believe there was a statement from someone at Berkeley to that effect too.
It was everywhere. Getting repeatedly jabbed with an experimental gene therapy that didn't stop infection or transmission of the virus and was disabling and killing people was a patriotic and moral duty. We were granny killers who deserved every bad thing that happened to us. People (including children) on transplant lists were kicked off. I take no satisfaction in what is happening, but I have little tolerance for complaints from people who wished me dead.
More to the point, is that *this is* the PhD thesis study in the "How to Market and the Utility of Ethics" graduate course in many 'liberal' current universities. John Ralston Saul explored that in his books, Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West and The Doubter's Companion: A Dictionary of Aggressive Common Sense and many others. Prescient, in an odd way, is The Unconscious Civilisation.
Fun fact: CDC said it wasn't their policies that were a problem, it was the messaging. They just didn't explainerize it well 'nuf.
Next time they will have a list of those unconvininced last time. Godda utterly silence them ahead of time. Ethics is so last century. Hooray for scientism!
Who would have thought an apex predator could be such a soft-hearted optimist! Education in a classroom will probably continue, but the age of the grifter known as a marketing consultant and probably the age of the bioethicist is at an end.
Please... my way of making a living dies with the electric supply to the internet. True marketers are the people who figure out the gaps in desired products and encourage supplying them. Then there are the people who just tell the producers of the crap that's not selling how to push it on people. I suspect there will always be work for the former. The latter are going to be in trouble, along with the CRT people.
A bit of both. I did the first, had success but found it constant, ongoing work that I disliked (mostly the constant ongoing software updates that just kept breaking things, forever, without end. Just soul-destroying bullshit updates forever...)
When so many fellow 'gap finders' asked me for advice and help how to sell their software I ended up becoming a consultant and copywriter. I find it more fun and satisfying to help others sell then to forever fuck around fixing shit because some twat updated something for the sake of updating the update that they updated in the last updated update of yet another fucking update... I'm getting annoyed just remembering it!
Oh yeah, also come to use my knowledge of human minds to offer therapy for people with phobias and fears, such as my deep, deeep hatred of unneeded 'updates'....
This was the original intent of mRNA technology. The risk made more sense if you were dying of cancer, I would trying that Hail Mary. It crossed the line going into healthy young people. A lot of lines.
True. The technology was never intended to be used for a flu virus, the unknown risks and complications were acknowledged and respected by the (few) ethical scientists in the field. Testing it on billions is beyond insane! That said, the potential for mRNA tech is impressive, too bad no one can check for themselves now that most of the studies have been memory-holed (some time between Feb and June 2020 for the NIH studies, I read them in the spring of 2020).
The acceleration could be with the initial immune system suppression I bet - hopefully for those that had the shot without incident that the stuff eventually breaks down and leaves the body ... My second was a year ago and thankfully the tinitus and weird sensations in my chest stopped a while ago - no third for me ... might lose my job but would rather be alive haha
Thanks honey 💅 I get a kick out of all the “pure bloods” telling me I’m going to die for how I mistakenly believed “it stops transmission” - it’s certainly a big tent approach that brings everyone together
I loved being left outside, literally, because I only had natural immunity and told by the President of the United States wish me a horrible winter of death.
Maybe the goal is to make sure people don't live long enough to get cancer in the first place? I think that would technically meet the goal of reduction of cancer.
To me, it seems like it shuts off the cells that normally fight cancer, so really, mRNA probably causes cancer. Look up Ethical Skeptic on Twitter; the cancer cases in the last year have exploded.
It def causes cancer. Ethical Skeptic’s graphs show that in no uncertain terms.
All the previous attempts at this type “vax” also showed good results initially and the next flu/cold/disease presented, the body practically rolled out the welcome mat. “Come one, come all, and bring your pals!”
Unfortunately, you can present people with charts and papers, and they just shrug. "I'm fine." Or "They got (fill in the blank) because they were on lockdown and couldn't see their doctors."
Until it’s overwhelmed with what amounts to Niagra Falls injected past all the filters our good God put in place to sheild our innards from toxins, like skin, stomach acid, gall bladder, liver… Just shove the whole waterfall directly into everyone. What could go wrong?
To quote a bio-physicist I know (I think bio-physicist is the right translation anyway, she studies cells at the molecular level, espeically their lifecycle) "Everyone gets cancer. It's just a question of when, not if, since every iteration increases the risk of a cell becoming cancerous" and then she gave me the technical explanation and I just nodded along, since I don't get "half past seven" of what she's saying.
If we go with the depop-ideas floating around, how are these conspirators going to reverse the dying off of humans you think? It's not like a virus or a cancer has "Stop"-function.
Yes, your understanding is correct. Within the last 10-15 years, scientists realized that cancers come and go in our bodies. This was an issue for mammography: women who received annual mammograms had higher breast cancer rates that women who received mammograms less frequently. The conclusion was that a tumor shows up, mammography detects without the body having a chance to eliminate the tumor. Same issue for men for prostrate cancer.
If I am not mistaken, this is one of the issues with the idea that HPV vaccines reduce cervical cancer. The studies used a reduction in surrogate endpoints to extrapolate that the vaccine was going to reduce cancer. There was no accounting for the body taking care of the "endpoints" on its own
Surrogate endpoints are markers that are associated with and precede a particular outcome. But they don't necessarily guarantee the outcome. I don't recall exactly what the surrogate endpoints were in the case of the HPV vax tests.
Cervical cancer is slow developing, so vaccine studies didn't wait for an actual cancer reduction to result from the vax.
Yes, thanks! I remember reading some time ago about concerns that mammograms and other screenings were not as beneficial as they seem but like many medical matters THE science is no longer allowing free exchange of ideas etc. I had my first one last year and a small growth was detected (not cancer). Lots of women are getting frightened by this and somehow end up believing they are 'cancer' survivors.
Re: prostate cancer. I'd read, pre covid and in more than one reference, that almost all men who die in old age die WITH prostate cancer, but dying from prostate cancer is actually quite rare.
As I understand it, all cells are potential cancer cells - there's no special kind of cancer cell floating around waiting to activate. Every time the cells renews, there's a miniscule risk of it becoming a cancer cell. Hence why eating right and varied is so important - antioxidants and other stuff helps lower this risk, while other stuff increases it.
And since all reasearch of this is done on the population level, it doesn't say very much of the specific individual as such.
Very big caveat: I'm not a doctor, nor a researcher and I dn't have any natural science background so I may well be way off here!
I've heard others say that all diseases are caused by stress. I think there are even papers published to support this. I believe stress over all else: it comes in many forms, even physical, think repeated stress injury like carpal tunnel syndrome.
I'm not sure I could answer exactly, but I think yes. Essentially, after reading her book, I believe that, yes, she says everything, viruses, and bacteria included, are parasites; or I should say viruses are parasite derived. Bacteria I believe are parasites.
And that wonderful moneymaking scam of "preventative tests" where they search and search and find that tiny little whatever and then cut you open to get it out and then and then and then and then...
Don’t we have to consider the $$ aspect? Less cancer less $. They can always mess with data to “confirm” less cancer and still make doodas of swag on govmint paid treatment. Sorry--“you and me” paid treatment. 🤔 Apparently the average ejit is easy to fool. So cynical I am I am.
Just think about all those jobs and vocations out there that would benefit from the "safe and effective" name attached to them. "Safe and effective" weather forecasting. "Safe and effective fortune telling" etc.
& effective” meds that have been recalled. Narrow that down to the ones they KNEW weren’t. VIOXX by MERCK is a great starting place. Safely & effectively led between 15,000-90,000 to open heart surgery/an early grave even while the data gal lied for nearly two years, KNOWING the satay was incorrect. Fined $5Million but MERCK is chugging along just fine. WHY? Because they made like 3 BILLION just on VIOXX. $5million may as well be $1000.
Nurses I know call remdesivir “RUN-death-is-near”.
When I had covid last August with pneumonia (awful but I’d still NEVER get the clot shot!) they prescribed me some antibiotic I’d never seen. I happened to have the mental capacity to look it up, though my blood oxygen was around 88. It has all kinds of awful side effects and people saying they were “floxed” and on & on! I didn’t take it, thank GOD. The last thing my body needed was another fire to try to put out. SO, so tired of health care not care.
Vioxx is why my mother is permanently disabled and why I'm permanently taking care of her until a better person can be found to take over that job for me. She got a pittance in the settlement. I haven't trusted pHARMa since.
I’m so very sorry. I do not know how people can look at themselves in the
mirror after what they’ve knowingly
done.
You always want to believe Hitler and the handful of other dictators like Mao are once in a lifetime monsters. Sadly, we now know we live among hundreds.
I’m just unwilling to be passive here. This is ironic as I’m Winnie the Pooh meets golden retriever, by nature. Everyone have some honey and wag your tail. Be happy. THIS whole hot tsunami of 💩💩💩💩, however, has felt like watching Nazi’s cart away jews, knowing their likely fate and shrugging it off as if to say, what can one lady do? EVERY DAY hundreds of kids are getting shots that will affect their ability to play sports, have children, walk, get out of bed, or perhaps they’ll be OK for decades, then get some horrid autoimmune disease because Fauci and friends decided it was a good idea. Liars! I can’t be passive. If I’m nothing but a keyboard warrior, then a GOOD keyboard warrior I will be. If one of my silly TWEETS (and God knows I don’t really want to be on twitter) gets through to some thick parent and gets them not too inject poison straight into their kids, feeling all superior and lofty, then I’ll tweet— or whatever. I’m getting ready to call some congressman in Mississippi for some reason, pertaining these stupid clot shots. I don’t wanna. I want to play with my litter of golden doodle pups, but here we are.
Absolutely agree. I'm very much a "leave me alone, I'll leave you alone" type of gal myself. Until you, as the kids say these days, "fuck around and find out"...which has been since 2020 for me.
And I would also like to play with that adorable litter of floofers of yours. 🤗
I think VIOXX was Pfizer? Maybe I'm thinking about the drug they made the killed thousands of people. There's also the Pfizer drug that killed millions of cattle--an mRNA vaccine.
VIOXX was made by Merck. They knew it caused heart attacks and strokes before it was released and covered it up. And no one was punished. Screw the fines. People need to go to prison.
THIS is another thing I’d like to sort of crowd source and then regurgitate onto the general public AND the alphabet groups AND the media over a period of ONE- 2 days.
I want Steve Kirsch and his million followers, the bad cat, and all of us to choose a day or 2, choose 2-3 of our most compelling articles/videos/studies and send them to various entities. I want them all to get them around the same day(s), and en masse, so that everyone KNOWS that everyone KNOWS, if you get what I’m saying? I want the sheer avalanche of people emailing, snail mailing and calling in these compelling studies to be overwhelming. If people are bold and energetic enough to print them out into poster board and mail them onto power poles at the CDC and CNN, so much the better. If all of them get GOOD studies and stats AT ONCE, will they not be forced to at least recognize the tsunami of damage? If just half of Kirsch’s followers send 2 articles to 2 news stations each, that’s million studies under noses at once.
YES, VIOXX was MERCK and the cow fiasco was Pfizer, BOTH were based on lies and purposely skewed data if I remember correctly.
Merck Manipulated the Science about the Drug Vioxx
Published Oct 12, 2017
Scientists from the pharmaceutical giant Merck skewed the results of clinical trials in favor of the arthritis drug, Vioxx, to hide evidence that the drug increased patients’ risk of heart attack.
FEATURE
Diagram of evasive football play
The Disinformation Playbook
Five tactics business interests use to sideline science, deceive the public and buy influence at the expense of public health and safety.
To increase the likelihood of FDA approval for its anti-inflammatory and arthritis drug Vioxx, the pharmaceutical giant Merck used flawed methodologies biased toward predetermined results to exaggerate the drug’s positive effects. Internal documents made public in litigation revealed that a Merck marketing team had developed a strategy called ADVANTAGE (Assessment of Differences between Vioxx And Naproxen To Ascertain Gastrointestinal tolerability and Effectiveness) to skew the results of clinical trials in the drug’s favor. As part of the strategy, scientists manipulated the trial design by comparing the drug to naproxen, a pain reliever sold under brand names such as Aleve, rather than to a placebo.
The scientists highlighted the results that naproxen decreased the risk of heart attack by 80 percent, and downplayed results showing that Vioxx increased the risk of heart attack by 400 percent. This misleading presentation of the evidence made it look like naproxen was protecting patients from heart attacks, and that Vioxx only looked risky by comparison. In fact, Vioxx has since been found to significantly increase cardiovascular risk, leading Merck to withdraw the product from the market in 2004.
Merck’s manipulation of the science around Vioxx also included a pattern of ghostwriting of scientific articles. Internal documents reveal that in 16 of 20 papers reporting on clinical trials of Vioxx, a Merck employee was initially listed as the lead author of the first draft; on the published versions, an outside academic was listed as the primary author. In one draft of a Vioxx research study that did not yet have a prominent outside name attached, Merck officials listed the lead author only as “External author?” A Merck scientist was also found to have removed the evidence of three heart attacks among patients in a dataset from the results presented.
Tragically, Merck’s manipulation of its data—and the FDA’s resulting approval of Vioxx in 1999—led to thousands of avoidable premature deaths and 100,000 heart attacks. Dr. David Graham, the Associate Director for Science and Medicine in FDA’s Office of Drug Safety, testified in 2004 before the Senate Finance Committee that the FDA's failure to recall Vioxx earlier had resulted in as many as 55,000 premature deaths from heart attacks and stroke, calling it the equivalent of allowing "two to four jumbo jetliners" to crash every week for five years. Even years after discontinuing use of the drug, patients who have taken Vioxx continue to experience complications.
Further Reading
Vioxx shows what happens when the drug safety system breaks down
MOST people-- by far-- have not been injured by the mRNA vaxxes. Sure, they've gotten CV several times, but have not died of it, which is their new requirement. So they are all on board with mRNA tech because they think it's helped them.
The vast majority of people I know are over 50; only a few have had any jab side effects. Three have acknowledged they are jab injured. The rest are perfectly fine and seem to have no other health issues at the moment.
Every senior I know is buying the BS that what is happening to them is just "aging."
One person walked into the facility on their own for the first jab and had to be supported and rest at several points at the second jab. He has had to have handholds installed all over his house.
All this from one month to the next.
They all have things going on that they don't want to think is caused by those ever-virtuous jabs.
They are not connecting the dots. And you may not know about their troubles.
It's unacceptable to suggest or think it is the jabs, even for the sudden heart troubles or clots or strokes.
I've never known so many people having clots.
It's a nightmare but we're all to pretend we don't see it.
My godfather was 88 when he got the first jab. He was having some minor memory issues, but they were not terribly apparent and not debilitating. As soon as he got it, his memory started failing badly.
Not sure if he's on jab 3 or 4; his memory is horrific, and everyone around him-- his neighbors (vaxxed), his stepson and wife (vaxxed), his step grandkids (vaxxed) and his doctor (probably vaxxed) just chock it all up to "old age." It's heartbreaking for me, because he will not listen.
My missus in her late 60's was sharp as a tack, the only woman who ever beat me at scrabble. Two shots later (no boosters, or she didn't tell me anyway (her daughter is all in and may have snuck her off for a booster)), now she is getting rather ditzy sometimes. The sad part is that I think that part of her realizes it. She is getting clingy and, I think, emotionally 'lost' more and more. I feel her fear of what she may done to herself sometimes. I never thought I would feel sorry for her, of all people!
yeah, scary. I'd stay as far away as possible, too. and I am pretty sure this is technology they have been working on - for treating cancer - for a decade+, unsuccessfully. Now that they have masses believing it is safe and effective... just horrifying.
As I just read C&C about the Moonshot Cancer jab I thought Jeff gave it that silly name... It's getting so hard to tell the difference between truth and satire these days....
It's another irony, what with NASA having to delay its latest rocket twice due to problems. Apparently "moonshot" doesn't hold the same cachet it did sixty years ago.
My hubby has a relative who is team leader for designing new space suits down at NASA. He did mention actual moonshot when we talked. I haven’t seen him this year so no idea what’s really going on.
Bezos's latest rocket launch blew up yesterday. NASA can't launch their spiffy new Artemis rocket 'cause weather and leaks. But, fear not, the plans for us to join the cyborg hive mind in the cloud in a decade are still a go.
Why can't we see Apollo space junk left behind on the surface of the moon? Perhaps I've been down a few too many rabbit holes these past two years, but it seems to me that we should have photos taken from Earth orbit satellites or even a good telescope on the surface. I've never seen one.
This is especially ironic: Prior to (trying to be) "vaccines," mRNA gene therapies were tried for, among other things, treatments for cancer. They didn't work very well. Among other problems early on were a decreased immune response with more than one dose. In fact, the problems with multiple doses was a prime reason that Moderna (and no doubt others) decided to apply mRNA tech as vaccines, which was not their first choice since they presumed only one/few doses would be needed (WRONG!) and it would not be as lucrative.
[Disclaimer: the above is from reading a few, scant articles on early mRNA. That raises an interesting point: For all that we've heard of these supposedly "safe and effective" mRNA jabs since 2020, surely there must be some literature predating their repurposing as "vaccines." I'm sure they exist, but I've never seen reference to them, including in popular articles that purport to examine the background of the jabs. I continue on the assumption that whatever early research exists paints mRNA as as having too many problems. I've never seen any good argument to the contrary.]
I occasionally use it. For those interested, be aware that virtually all media, including the professional journals, is to some degree censored by the usual suspects. Even with that limitation, yes there is a lot of information available that you won't see in the mainstream press. For example, earlier this year when I was prescribed Paxlovid, I found studies about it that show it's not very effective, and no word about safety. And these were paid-by-Pharma studies.
NIH deleted most off their mRNA research studies in late spring or early summer of 2020, I read many of them when I first heard the term mRNA associated with a potential vaccine. None of the studies got past the animal trials due to unforeseen mortality issues in the medium-term. Yup, having ALL your subjects die within a year or two is a bit of an issue.
Unlikely cancer data will be know to the general population due to media censorship of this information.. that's why us scientist call the injections experimental and therefore unethical because injected are not being given informed consent about immediate adverse effects and long term adverse effects.
They’ll tell you they will not be able to treat you until you are fully up-to-date with your vaccines. That’s the rules. That’s how the system works. Safe and effective.
After repeating “safe and effective” he scratches his nose. Is that like crossing your fingers behind your back when you make a promise you don’t intend to keep?
Actually, that is a "tell" in body language, the adult version of when a small child covers his mouth when telling a whopper. Since politicians base their success largely on being successful liars however, I postulate it's more likely his nose itched.
Globalist like to advertise with a "tell" and dose of condescension to their viewers. Like the queen having a bottle of ivermectin photo op during her covid treatment. Jacindas honorary doctorate from Harvard for no reason.have to laugh at it all. Reducing society to meaninglessness to those awake.
watching that “announcement” was just weird. for a while I couldn’t even understand what they were talking about. moonshot? cancer? cure cancer on the moon? huh? messaging fail.
Cure, cause....who can tell the difference these days
fun fact:
this will one day be studied as a "how to" case in market conditioning and seeding.
it will also be studied as a "how not to" case in ethics classes.
and the former will be embraced and the latter ignored until such time as we break the public health monopoly and stop using the state to subsidize grifters selling snake oil as triumphalism.
and the ethics classes will be taken by politicians and medical students not to learn to be ethical but to learn to tailor their rhetoric to sound ethical while being unethical
Those classes start young. My youngster brought home "Scholastic News" from school telling the kids to be kind. I said, well the school wasn't so kind to you when they made you take a bunch of COVID tests for being unvaxxed. She understood...
https://sn2.scholastic.com/issues/2022-23/090122.html
Already done. Long time ago. We are living the fruition of those successful graduates of that school. I recently met a new friend who told me that he was instructed by his superior to lie to a client. No couching it in soft words. 'Lie. It is the best way to make money.' He left the job and now he's left America because he found living the American way of business was killing his soul.
I am having the same ethical problem being a public health researcher. CDC&FDA are corrupted, local health departments are sick with the group think and "diversity", academia is "diverse' and rejects White people, BigPharma is corrupt; CROs help pharma to falsify clinical trial data, military is culling its personnel while leading unethical wars. It is unclear where to work.
It is easy for me to say because I am now retired, but you have to think that maybe some of the trades are the way to go and be free. I mean like staying non-union and doing say framing, sheet rocking, plumbing, etc. Just thinking.
What are CRO's?
Contract Research Organizations. Apparently businesses that contract with pharmaceuticals to run trials on their drugs, or research how to market them. (I had to look it up too!)
Ask the Lord for a job.
I saw this in college in 1970, 71 when I was taking classes in deductive and inductive logic. I looked at a number of the students and figured out what their reason for being there was and what their majors were (a lot of poly sci majors) They were learning the rules of logic so they could violate them to make persuasive speeches appealing to emotion and using well reasoned subterfuge.
Agree. If you look at the WEF young global leaders website (I know it's hard) and see the degrees, experience and training these so called leaders have, you see no producers, only managers of some nebulous subject areas e.g., 'managing diversity in business'.
MBA-itis came to my employer and perhaps the epitome of More Bad Advice came when we got a notice that the plants in the office had become toxic and ugly and would be removed. If anyone wanted them they were free to take them home. No kidding! That is almost a direct quote.
When the staff expressed outrage the mba who devised this method of closing the plant contract relented and said that the unhealthy and unaesthetic plants can remain in the office if individuals committed to watering them. So I asked the plant person whose contract was being closed what needed to be done for the few plants I committed to attend. And so I gave myself some time every week to move from my desk to water and/or remove dead leaves. A fantastic opportunity to get up and stretch and maybe share some 'cooler education' time, after the formal schooling practices had been closed in my engineering job to be replaced by the informal learning practices that we all get talking to each other at the water cooler. That was removed because it was too expensive and created inefficient workers.
When I was young, I disbelieved that Nero would watch Rome burn while fiddling. Now I watch our society being burnt by MBAs and accountants fiddling the books. Amazing.
If you have never managed a business, how can you manage diversity in business?
If the goal is diversity, what happens to qualification to do the job?
I have a philosophy degree. Your comments stunned and shocked me. WOW. And I believe you.
China's beating people's pets to death or drowning them by the thousands and enslaving people and putting them in concentration camps sounds kinda Nazi to me
There’s no diversity of oppression. The totalitarian state seems a one trick pony. Shades of MCMLXXXIV. Fear slavery repeat or virtue signaling fear slavery repeat.
Canada is building 'voluntary' internment camps right now. And headquarters with an armoury for the environmental police force being recruited.
Yes, lunacy everywhere, from both left and right, imo. I don't really see the difference in the tyrannous practices, regardless which direction they come from.
Kathy Hochul in New York State is trying very hard to get approval for her own mysterious prisons.
perfectly put
the classes will be beautiful, hosted atop a circle of flowers, given by the most compassionate intellectual, taken by psychopaths trying to learn to act human
I keep laughing at the perfectly horrible beauty of your on-point description. Thank you.
I love your optimism. Let's hope we get to a time where sanity is de rigueur. History (and truth) are written by the winners, after all. Of course, since so many of them have taken the jabs, perhaps they won't be around to write. I know, I know. That was dark.
I'm starting to see the logic of people who said that there would be a >70% population drop in the USA by 2025. The vaxxes will probably only do 3% of the people. The rest? Ugly.
I think there'll be more than 3% by vaxx, it will just be over a longer time frame.
Despite what you may hope for - not everyone who got the jab is going to croak because of it
Hope for? Seriously? Nearly every member of my family is triple jabbed and still lining up. I take no satisfaction in what is happening. It scares the hell out of me. Dark times call for dark humor. And I would point out that many on what I assume is your side of the divide wished a painful death for those of us who refused the jabs.
yes. what you said
who is hoping for that?
What an awful thing to even say.
Oh, lots of people last fall on Twitter (but not just there) were saying “the unvaccinated should be denied medical treatment” etc. I believe there was a statement from someone at Berkeley to that effect too.
It was everywhere. Getting repeatedly jabbed with an experimental gene therapy that didn't stop infection or transmission of the virus and was disabling and killing people was a patriotic and moral duty. We were granny killers who deserved every bad thing that happened to us. People (including children) on transplant lists were kicked off. I take no satisfaction in what is happening, but I have little tolerance for complaints from people who wished me dead.
Howard Stern said we should go home and die. There were others. But I think he lost a lot of subscribers.
I made a dark joke that the evil people behind the clot shot cull might not be around to "write" history. RD took offense.
wasn't that dark. Not like, Abel Ferrara film, dark...
and I liked your response.
a lot.
More to the point, is that *this is* the PhD thesis study in the "How to Market and the Utility of Ethics" graduate course in many 'liberal' current universities. John Ralston Saul explored that in his books, Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West and The Doubter's Companion: A Dictionary of Aggressive Common Sense and many others. Prescient, in an odd way, is The Unconscious Civilisation.
Great analogy by el gato -
It’s been such a long time since I heard this used I needed to look up the definition:
Tri-um-phal-ism, noun
excessive exultation over one's success or achievements ;
( used especially in a political context):
For example , the
moment calls for humility
and hard work, not triumphalism.
Perfect job, e g !
Fun fact: CDC said it wasn't their policies that were a problem, it was the messaging. They just didn't explainerize it well 'nuf.
Next time they will have a list of those unconvininced last time. Godda utterly silence them ahead of time. Ethics is so last century. Hooray for scientism!
Who would have thought an apex predator could be such a soft-hearted optimist! Education in a classroom will probably continue, but the age of the grifter known as a marketing consultant and probably the age of the bioethicist is at an end.
As a marketing consultant (and hypnotherapist) I resent that remark :P
Please... my way of making a living dies with the electric supply to the internet. True marketers are the people who figure out the gaps in desired products and encourage supplying them. Then there are the people who just tell the producers of the crap that's not selling how to push it on people. I suspect there will always be work for the former. The latter are going to be in trouble, along with the CRT people.
Given your jollity, I suspect you're the former.
A bit of both. I did the first, had success but found it constant, ongoing work that I disliked (mostly the constant ongoing software updates that just kept breaking things, forever, without end. Just soul-destroying bullshit updates forever...)
When so many fellow 'gap finders' asked me for advice and help how to sell their software I ended up becoming a consultant and copywriter. I find it more fun and satisfying to help others sell then to forever fuck around fixing shit because some twat updated something for the sake of updating the update that they updated in the last updated update of yet another fucking update... I'm getting annoyed just remembering it!
Oh yeah, also come to use my knowledge of human minds to offer therapy for people with phobias and fears, such as my deep, deeep hatred of unneeded 'updates'....
🤨 yep
To quote a famous joke:
"Do you think we have the time"?
This was the original intent of mRNA technology. The risk made more sense if you were dying of cancer, I would trying that Hail Mary. It crossed the line going into healthy young people. A lot of lines.
This was also the test case proving that it would never work to fight or prevent cancer.
True. The technology was never intended to be used for a flu virus, the unknown risks and complications were acknowledged and respected by the (few) ethical scientists in the field. Testing it on billions is beyond insane! That said, the potential for mRNA tech is impressive, too bad no one can check for themselves now that most of the studies have been memory-holed (some time between Feb and June 2020 for the NIH studies, I read them in the spring of 2020).
The acceleration could be with the initial immune system suppression I bet - hopefully for those that had the shot without incident that the stuff eventually breaks down and leaves the body ... My second was a year ago and thankfully the tinitus and weird sensations in my chest stopped a while ago - no third for me ... might lose my job but would rather be alive haha
I hope so for your sake.
But you can be a little less judgmental of those of us who are seeing people die around us and are worrying.
Thanks honey 💅 I get a kick out of all the “pure bloods” telling me I’m going to die for how I mistakenly believed “it stops transmission” - it’s certainly a big tent approach that brings everyone together
I loved being left outside, literally, because I only had natural immunity and told by the President of the United States wish me a horrible winter of death.
how about Peace. It was horrible psychopathic bureaucrats who separated us, lying on purpose. let's not let them win.
No. WE don't. However, I know lots of people who are refusing to connect the dots.
When truth is whatever you want it to be.....
💥
You have to start somewhere...
I'd say that SADS is practically a cure for cancer.
The lies will never end.
https://markoshinskie8de.substack.com/p/desperately-preserving-the-covid
Maybe the goal is to make sure people don't live long enough to get cancer in the first place? I think that would technically meet the goal of reduction of cancer.
The problem is that cancer is more and more common amongst young people. It is no longer a matter of age, or not that much
Lifestyle and so many toxins and messing with our immune systems. and now MRNA. Our immune systems stop cancer all day every day in our bodies
The mRNA garbage appears to "distract" the immune system allowing things that would normally be in the background to take root.
To me, it seems like it shuts off the cells that normally fight cancer, so really, mRNA probably causes cancer. Look up Ethical Skeptic on Twitter; the cancer cases in the last year have exploded.
It def causes cancer. Ethical Skeptic’s graphs show that in no uncertain terms.
All the previous attempts at this type “vax” also showed good results initially and the next flu/cold/disease presented, the body practically rolled out the welcome mat. “Come one, come all, and bring your pals!”
Unfortunately, you can present people with charts and papers, and they just shrug. "I'm fine." Or "They got (fill in the blank) because they were on lockdown and couldn't see their doctors."
mRNA as is used in the covid shots inhibits the body's ability to repair itself. That's been shown by research:
https://www.academia.edu/69301433/Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS_CoV_2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G_quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs
The above link downloads the pdf file.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538446/
The above article was retracted but for all the wrong reasons.
Until it’s overwhelmed with what amounts to Niagra Falls injected past all the filters our good God put in place to sheild our innards from toxins, like skin, stomach acid, gall bladder, liver… Just shove the whole waterfall directly into everyone. What could go wrong?
zactly
To quote a bio-physicist I know (I think bio-physicist is the right translation anyway, she studies cells at the molecular level, espeically their lifecycle) "Everyone gets cancer. It's just a question of when, not if, since every iteration increases the risk of a cell becoming cancerous" and then she gave me the technical explanation and I just nodded along, since I don't get "half past seven" of what she's saying.
If we go with the depop-ideas floating around, how are these conspirators going to reverse the dying off of humans you think? It's not like a virus or a cancer has "Stop"-function.
The only "stop" function of cancer or a virus is our immune system, which they keep making drugs to compromise.
My understanding is that we all have cancer cells in us all the time. They get killed by a healthy immune system.
Yes, your understanding is correct. Within the last 10-15 years, scientists realized that cancers come and go in our bodies. This was an issue for mammography: women who received annual mammograms had higher breast cancer rates that women who received mammograms less frequently. The conclusion was that a tumor shows up, mammography detects without the body having a chance to eliminate the tumor. Same issue for men for prostrate cancer.
Here's some links I saved from a few years ago:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cancer-breast-mammograms-idUSBRE8AK1FL20121121
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2120750/The-expert-branded-woman-hater-saying-breast-cancer-screening-ruins-lives.html
https://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g1403
If I am not mistaken, this is one of the issues with the idea that HPV vaccines reduce cervical cancer. The studies used a reduction in surrogate endpoints to extrapolate that the vaccine was going to reduce cancer. There was no accounting for the body taking care of the "endpoints" on its own
What are 'surrogate endpoints' if you can explain in a nutshell?
There's an interesting essay by a Canadian nephrologist that discusses medical research.
https://blog.thefastingmethod.com/the-corruption-of-evidence-based-medicine-killing-for-profit/
Surrogate endpoints are markers that are associated with and precede a particular outcome. But they don't necessarily guarantee the outcome. I don't recall exactly what the surrogate endpoints were in the case of the HPV vax tests.
Cervical cancer is slow developing, so vaccine studies didn't wait for an actual cancer reduction to result from the vax.
Interesting… thank you for the links!
Yes, thanks! I remember reading some time ago about concerns that mammograms and other screenings were not as beneficial as they seem but like many medical matters THE science is no longer allowing free exchange of ideas etc. I had my first one last year and a small growth was detected (not cancer). Lots of women are getting frightened by this and somehow end up believing they are 'cancer' survivors.
Re: prostate cancer. I'd read, pre covid and in more than one reference, that almost all men who die in old age die WITH prostate cancer, but dying from prostate cancer is actually quite rare.
I have heard the same...decades ago!
I knew about individual rogue cells being eliminated but not tumors. Wow!
As I understand it, all cells are potential cancer cells - there's no special kind of cancer cell floating around waiting to activate. Every time the cells renews, there's a miniscule risk of it becoming a cancer cell. Hence why eating right and varied is so important - antioxidants and other stuff helps lower this risk, while other stuff increases it.
And since all reasearch of this is done on the population level, it doesn't say very much of the specific individual as such.
Very big caveat: I'm not a doctor, nor a researcher and I dn't have any natural science background so I may well be way off here!
Not a scientist either but my research and reading says you're on the right track.
Hulda R. Clark in her book, The Cure for All Diseases says that all diseases are caused by parasites.
I've heard others say that all diseases are caused by stress. I think there are even papers published to support this. I believe stress over all else: it comes in many forms, even physical, think repeated stress injury like carpal tunnel syndrome.
What causes stress?
wild animals die from stress.
Is she looking at viruses and bacteria as parasites, because I could see that?
I'm not sure I could answer exactly, but I think yes. Essentially, after reading her book, I believe that, yes, she says everything, viruses, and bacteria included, are parasites; or I should say viruses are parasite derived. Bacteria I believe are parasites.
Well, that's pretty much the way I understand it.
The book "The Gene" is a favorite of mine.
LOL don't give pharma any great ideas!
Wow! right!
And that wonderful moneymaking scam of "preventative tests" where they search and search and find that tiny little whatever and then cut you open to get it out and then and then and then and then...
And forgetting a forceps in your abdomen, charging you extra for nicking "hospittle" property...
Depop people need to spend a few minutes looking at the worldometer population clocks.
Yes, definitely!
Don’t we have to consider the $$ aspect? Less cancer less $. They can always mess with data to “confirm” less cancer and still make doodas of swag on govmint paid treatment. Sorry--“you and me” paid treatment. 🤔 Apparently the average ejit is easy to fool. So cynical I am I am.
If everybody ded, cancer is cured! HYayy!!
"But it would have been so much worse if I hadn't gotten the jab!"
everything they say assume the opposite
“Safe and effective” is repeated so often it’s nauseating.
I’m thinking of naming my company “Safe and Effective”...think of all that free advertising it’d get! 👍🏽👍🏽
Brilliant. The Safe and Effective Brewery. SEB. Pack em in.
Do it! Doesn't matter if you're a plumber or pharmacist.
Maybe you could then later sue for infringement and stuff too?
Just think about all those jobs and vocations out there that would benefit from the "safe and effective" name attached to them. "Safe and effective" weather forecasting. "Safe and effective fortune telling" etc.
😂😂 that is true!
Better hurry and get the copyright!
YES! Find the lengthy list of “safe $
& effective” meds that have been recalled. Narrow that down to the ones they KNEW weren’t. VIOXX by MERCK is a great starting place. Safely & effectively led between 15,000-90,000 to open heart surgery/an early grave even while the data gal lied for nearly two years, KNOWING the satay was incorrect. Fined $5Million but MERCK is chugging along just fine. WHY? Because they made like 3 BILLION just on VIOXX. $5million may as well be $1000.
All big pHARMa are felons.
Vioxx screwed up my coworkers kidneys years ago.
They finished him and his kidneys off with Remdesivir back in Jan 2022 when he went into the hospital.
OMGOSH, I’m so sorry.
Nurses I know call remdesivir “RUN-death-is-near”.
When I had covid last August with pneumonia (awful but I’d still NEVER get the clot shot!) they prescribed me some antibiotic I’d never seen. I happened to have the mental capacity to look it up, though my blood oxygen was around 88. It has all kinds of awful side effects and people saying they were “floxed” and on & on! I didn’t take it, thank GOD. The last thing my body needed was another fire to try to put out. SO, so tired of health care not care.
Oh no!
That's awful.
I'm sorry.
Vioxx is why my mother is permanently disabled and why I'm permanently taking care of her until a better person can be found to take over that job for me. She got a pittance in the settlement. I haven't trusted pHARMa since.
I’m so very sorry. I do not know how people can look at themselves in the
mirror after what they’ve knowingly
done.
You always want to believe Hitler and the handful of other dictators like Mao are once in a lifetime monsters. Sadly, we now know we live among hundreds.
Most people are go along to get along, that's the problem. So when being a monster is acceptable, well...
I’m just unwilling to be passive here. This is ironic as I’m Winnie the Pooh meets golden retriever, by nature. Everyone have some honey and wag your tail. Be happy. THIS whole hot tsunami of 💩💩💩💩, however, has felt like watching Nazi’s cart away jews, knowing their likely fate and shrugging it off as if to say, what can one lady do? EVERY DAY hundreds of kids are getting shots that will affect their ability to play sports, have children, walk, get out of bed, or perhaps they’ll be OK for decades, then get some horrid autoimmune disease because Fauci and friends decided it was a good idea. Liars! I can’t be passive. If I’m nothing but a keyboard warrior, then a GOOD keyboard warrior I will be. If one of my silly TWEETS (and God knows I don’t really want to be on twitter) gets through to some thick parent and gets them not too inject poison straight into their kids, feeling all superior and lofty, then I’ll tweet— or whatever. I’m getting ready to call some congressman in Mississippi for some reason, pertaining these stupid clot shots. I don’t wanna. I want to play with my litter of golden doodle pups, but here we are.
Absolutely agree. I'm very much a "leave me alone, I'll leave you alone" type of gal myself. Until you, as the kids say these days, "fuck around and find out"...which has been since 2020 for me.
And I would also like to play with that adorable litter of floofers of yours. 🤗
that's terrible, for both of you
I think VIOXX was Pfizer? Maybe I'm thinking about the drug they made the killed thousands of people. There's also the Pfizer drug that killed millions of cattle--an mRNA vaccine.
VIOXX was made by Merck. They knew it caused heart attacks and strokes before it was released and covered it up. And no one was punished. Screw the fines. People need to go to prison.
agreed. I appreciate the info. My only defense lately.
THIS is another thing I’d like to sort of crowd source and then regurgitate onto the general public AND the alphabet groups AND the media over a period of ONE- 2 days.
I want Steve Kirsch and his million followers, the bad cat, and all of us to choose a day or 2, choose 2-3 of our most compelling articles/videos/studies and send them to various entities. I want them all to get them around the same day(s), and en masse, so that everyone KNOWS that everyone KNOWS, if you get what I’m saying? I want the sheer avalanche of people emailing, snail mailing and calling in these compelling studies to be overwhelming. If people are bold and energetic enough to print them out into poster board and mail them onto power poles at the CDC and CNN, so much the better. If all of them get GOOD studies and stats AT ONCE, will they not be forced to at least recognize the tsunami of damage? If just half of Kirsch’s followers send 2 articles to 2 news stations each, that’s million studies under noses at once.
WHAT DO YOU SAY, BAD CAT???
YES, VIOXX was MERCK and the cow fiasco was Pfizer, BOTH were based on lies and purposely skewed data if I remember correctly.
Merck Manipulated the Science about the Drug Vioxx
Published Oct 12, 2017
Scientists from the pharmaceutical giant Merck skewed the results of clinical trials in favor of the arthritis drug, Vioxx, to hide evidence that the drug increased patients’ risk of heart attack.
FEATURE
Diagram of evasive football play
The Disinformation Playbook
Five tactics business interests use to sideline science, deceive the public and buy influence at the expense of public health and safety.
To increase the likelihood of FDA approval for its anti-inflammatory and arthritis drug Vioxx, the pharmaceutical giant Merck used flawed methodologies biased toward predetermined results to exaggerate the drug’s positive effects. Internal documents made public in litigation revealed that a Merck marketing team had developed a strategy called ADVANTAGE (Assessment of Differences between Vioxx And Naproxen To Ascertain Gastrointestinal tolerability and Effectiveness) to skew the results of clinical trials in the drug’s favor. As part of the strategy, scientists manipulated the trial design by comparing the drug to naproxen, a pain reliever sold under brand names such as Aleve, rather than to a placebo.
The scientists highlighted the results that naproxen decreased the risk of heart attack by 80 percent, and downplayed results showing that Vioxx increased the risk of heart attack by 400 percent. This misleading presentation of the evidence made it look like naproxen was protecting patients from heart attacks, and that Vioxx only looked risky by comparison. In fact, Vioxx has since been found to significantly increase cardiovascular risk, leading Merck to withdraw the product from the market in 2004.
Merck’s manipulation of the science around Vioxx also included a pattern of ghostwriting of scientific articles. Internal documents reveal that in 16 of 20 papers reporting on clinical trials of Vioxx, a Merck employee was initially listed as the lead author of the first draft; on the published versions, an outside academic was listed as the primary author. In one draft of a Vioxx research study that did not yet have a prominent outside name attached, Merck officials listed the lead author only as “External author?” A Merck scientist was also found to have removed the evidence of three heart attacks among patients in a dataset from the results presented.
Tragically, Merck’s manipulation of its data—and the FDA’s resulting approval of Vioxx in 1999—led to thousands of avoidable premature deaths and 100,000 heart attacks. Dr. David Graham, the Associate Director for Science and Medicine in FDA’s Office of Drug Safety, testified in 2004 before the Senate Finance Committee that the FDA's failure to recall Vioxx earlier had resulted in as many as 55,000 premature deaths from heart attacks and stroke, calling it the equivalent of allowing "two to four jumbo jetliners" to crash every week for five years. Even years after discontinuing use of the drug, patients who have taken Vioxx continue to experience complications.
Further Reading
Vioxx shows what happens when the drug safety system breaks down
Thank you!
It's a mantra. Whatever you apply it to, the hypnotized populace will embrace.
Like “misinformation”. Eyes start twirling. Brain shuts down.
SAFE from prosecution and EFFECITVE at padding the bottom line!
Thank you, I’ve now settled on my decision not to watch the clip 🤣
now they're just messing with us... right?
i mean, they've got to just be messing with us?
vaxxed + double boosted man who got the rona twice is telling us THIS is the technology that will stop cancer?
seriously, they're punkin' us.
Well.... you have to look at it another way.
MOST people-- by far-- have not been injured by the mRNA vaxxes. Sure, they've gotten CV several times, but have not died of it, which is their new requirement. So they are all on board with mRNA tech because they think it's helped them.
Time will tell if "most" were unharmed.
I know people who are not connecting their new illnesses to the jabs. lots of them.
I'm seeing so much of that that it is to my mind a pattern unto itself.
Jab = not as healthy as previous.
The vast majority of people I know are over 50; only a few have had any jab side effects. Three have acknowledged they are jab injured. The rest are perfectly fine and seem to have no other health issues at the moment.
I guess those are the key words. At the moment.
Every senior I know is buying the BS that what is happening to them is just "aging."
One person walked into the facility on their own for the first jab and had to be supported and rest at several points at the second jab. He has had to have handholds installed all over his house.
All this from one month to the next.
They all have things going on that they don't want to think is caused by those ever-virtuous jabs.
They are not connecting the dots. And you may not know about their troubles.
It's unacceptable to suggest or think it is the jabs, even for the sudden heart troubles or clots or strokes.
I've never known so many people having clots.
It's a nightmare but we're all to pretend we don't see it.
And if a connection is made, it's "long Covid."
It's happening
My godfather was 88 when he got the first jab. He was having some minor memory issues, but they were not terribly apparent and not debilitating. As soon as he got it, his memory started failing badly.
Not sure if he's on jab 3 or 4; his memory is horrific, and everyone around him-- his neighbors (vaxxed), his stepson and wife (vaxxed), his step grandkids (vaxxed) and his doctor (probably vaxxed) just chock it all up to "old age." It's heartbreaking for me, because he will not listen.
My missus in her late 60's was sharp as a tack, the only woman who ever beat me at scrabble. Two shots later (no boosters, or she didn't tell me anyway (her daughter is all in and may have snuck her off for a booster)), now she is getting rather ditzy sometimes. The sad part is that I think that part of her realizes it. She is getting clingy and, I think, emotionally 'lost' more and more. I feel her fear of what she may done to herself sometimes. I never thought I would feel sorry for her, of all people!
That is so sad. And happening all around us.
I'm so sorry that the crowd drowned you out. You did (are doing) what you could.
I agree cannot unsee this. I know someone ailments confounded by doctor’s misdiagnosis, no details but it’s certainly suspicious.
so sad
ok... let us say that most people have not been injured by the mRNA vax... what he is suggesting at that point is a placebo to prevent cancer.
Cure it like they cured Covid?
Pass. 😅
Hard pass
yeah, scary. I'd stay as far away as possible, too. and I am pretty sure this is technology they have been working on - for treating cancer - for a decade+, unsuccessfully. Now that they have masses believing it is safe and effective... just horrifying.
Blood cancers to be exact and yes... none cleared Ph3 trials.
But it will be another tool in the bag to go along with cut, burn, and toxify.
As I just explained at C&C, Brandon is confused, once again. He meant "cause," not "cure":
• https://etana.substack.com/p/turbo-cancer
As I just read C&C about the Moonshot Cancer jab I thought Jeff gave it that silly name... It's getting so hard to tell the difference between truth and satire these days....
It's another irony, what with NASA having to delay its latest rocket twice due to problems. Apparently "moonshot" doesn't hold the same cachet it did sixty years ago.
Did we even go...?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJZ9sqvH9dY
My hubby has a relative who is team leader for designing new space suits down at NASA. He did mention actual moonshot when we talked. I haven’t seen him this year so no idea what’s really going on.
Bezos's latest rocket launch blew up yesterday. NASA can't launch their spiffy new Artemis rocket 'cause weather and leaks. But, fear not, the plans for us to join the cyborg hive mind in the cloud in a decade are still a go.
The moon!? We can't even leave Florida!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DVyt6vj4QBc/
Why can't we see Apollo space junk left behind on the surface of the moon? Perhaps I've been down a few too many rabbit holes these past two years, but it seems to me that we should have photos taken from Earth orbit satellites or even a good telescope on the surface. I've never seen one.
I suspect there's too much outsourcing. Think Thiokol.
I feel the same. The name is ludicrous. Every time I hear it, I think NASA.
ironically, i might be incredibly apt.
the moon missions were incredibly expensive triumphalism that was a circus to capture the imagination but provided little tangible benefit.
but it was a MASSIVE, company making grift for the companies involved.
and this is more of the same.
The space nerd in me wants to protest that there was a lot of intangible benefit.
That doesn't mean it wasn't also incredibly expensive triumphalism. Wasn't the whole thing because of Sputnik and getting back at the Russians?
He's probably right but I think he's being a little bit of a curmudgeon on this one...;]
True.
Cognitive dissonance for a nerd like me though.
We might not have as realistic Sci Fi movies/books without the space race.
And Velcro!
Duct tape. I use that shit for everything.
Poe's Law
had to look that up.
Brilliant connection you made there
It's everywhere these days. So I can't really take credit.
sure you can. You brought it to my attention
One of my missions in life is to spread awareness of Poe's Law.
This technology will definitely allow the oncologists to submit much larger invoices to the insurance companies.
This is especially ironic: Prior to (trying to be) "vaccines," mRNA gene therapies were tried for, among other things, treatments for cancer. They didn't work very well. Among other problems early on were a decreased immune response with more than one dose. In fact, the problems with multiple doses was a prime reason that Moderna (and no doubt others) decided to apply mRNA tech as vaccines, which was not their first choice since they presumed only one/few doses would be needed (WRONG!) and it would not be as lucrative.
For those interested, consult Whitney Webb's articles at unlimitedhangout.com
[Disclaimer: the above is from reading a few, scant articles on early mRNA. That raises an interesting point: For all that we've heard of these supposedly "safe and effective" mRNA jabs since 2020, surely there must be some literature predating their repurposing as "vaccines." I'm sure they exist, but I've never seen reference to them, including in popular articles that purport to examine the background of the jabs. I continue on the assumption that whatever early research exists paints mRNA as as having too many problems. I've never seen any good argument to the contrary.]
Try pubmed.gov for science articles on the history of injections.
I occasionally use it. For those interested, be aware that virtually all media, including the professional journals, is to some degree censored by the usual suspects. Even with that limitation, yes there is a lot of information available that you won't see in the mainstream press. For example, earlier this year when I was prescribed Paxlovid, I found studies about it that show it's not very effective, and no word about safety. And these were paid-by-Pharma studies.
You didn't take it, did you?
Also, whoever prescribed it doesn't like you or is a bad medical professional
NIH deleted most off their mRNA research studies in late spring or early summer of 2020, I read many of them when I first heard the term mRNA associated with a potential vaccine. None of the studies got past the animal trials due to unforeseen mortality issues in the medium-term. Yup, having ALL your subjects die within a year or two is a bit of an issue.
Question: Will they be using the pre-jab rates of cancer or the rates in the jabbed??
Unlikely cancer data will be know to the general population due to media censorship of this information.. that's why us scientist call the injections experimental and therefore unethical because injected are not being given informed consent about immediate adverse effects and long term adverse effects.
They’ll tell you they will not be able to treat you until you are fully up-to-date with your vaccines. That’s the rules. That’s how the system works. Safe and effective.
I have a feeling I'm less likely to get cancer if I avoid the jabs.
I've managed the past 14 years
So are you says if I am in a car accident, hospitals won't accept care for me until I prove to be up to date?
That's my plan
After repeating “safe and effective” he scratches his nose. Is that like crossing your fingers behind your back when you make a promise you don’t intend to keep?
Actually, that is a "tell" in body language, the adult version of when a small child covers his mouth when telling a whopper. Since politicians base their success largely on being successful liars however, I postulate it's more likely his nose itched.
I think his dementia may have unraveled sone of his learned " avoidance " behaviors...
Thinking the same
Well there you go! 🤥
Globalist like to advertise with a "tell" and dose of condescension to their viewers. Like the queen having a bottle of ivermectin photo op during her covid treatment. Jacindas honorary doctorate from Harvard for no reason.have to laugh at it all. Reducing society to meaninglessness to those awake.
He scratches his nose often. I do believe it is his tell.
as he lies often
Well, if his lips are moving…
Yes! Touching or scratching the nose is many times the sign of lying.
For it to really be a "tell" you'd need a baseline of Biden truthfully answering a question and look for deviation.
Has he ever truthfully answered a question in his whole "career"?
The dementia is diminishing his lying skills?
Could have always been a "tell," but since he lies constantly no one would be the wiser.
To answer your question, probably not.
To covidium and beyond!
watching that “announcement” was just weird. for a while I couldn’t even understand what they were talking about. moonshot? cancer? cure cancer on the moon? huh? messaging fail.
Pfizer ads
Desperation
breeds Contempt
👏🏻