449 Comments

Cure, cause....who can tell the difference these days

Expand full comment
author

fun fact:

this will one day be studied as a "how to" case in market conditioning and seeding.

it will also be studied as a "how not to" case in ethics classes.

and the former will be embraced and the latter ignored until such time as we break the public health monopoly and stop using the state to subsidize grifters selling snake oil as triumphalism.

Expand full comment

and the ethics classes will be taken by politicians and medical students not to learn to be ethical but to learn to tailor their rhetoric to sound ethical while being unethical

Expand full comment

Those classes start young. My youngster brought home "Scholastic News" from school telling the kids to be kind. I said, well the school wasn't so kind to you when they made you take a bunch of COVID tests for being unvaxxed. She understood...

https://sn2.scholastic.com/issues/2022-23/090122.html

Expand full comment

Already done. Long time ago. We are living the fruition of those successful graduates of that school. I recently met a new friend who told me that he was instructed by his superior to lie to a client. No couching it in soft words. 'Lie. It is the best way to make money.' He left the job and now he's left America because he found living the American way of business was killing his soul.

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022·edited Sep 13, 2022

I am having the same ethical problem being a public health researcher. CDC&FDA are corrupted, local health departments are sick with the group think and "diversity", academia is "diverse' and rejects White people, BigPharma is corrupt; CROs help pharma to falsify clinical trial data, military is culling its personnel while leading unethical wars. It is unclear where to work.

Expand full comment

It is easy for me to say because I am now retired, but you have to think that maybe some of the trades are the way to go and be free. I mean like staying non-union and doing say framing, sheet rocking, plumbing, etc. Just thinking.

Expand full comment

What are CRO's?

Expand full comment

Contract Research Organizations. Apparently businesses that contract with pharmaceuticals to run trials on their drugs, or research how to market them. (I had to look it up too!)

Expand full comment

Ask the Lord for a job.

Expand full comment

I saw this in college in 1970, 71 when I was taking classes in deductive and inductive logic. I looked at a number of the students and figured out what their reason for being there was and what their majors were (a lot of poly sci majors) They were learning the rules of logic so they could violate them to make persuasive speeches appealing to emotion and using well reasoned subterfuge.

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022·edited Sep 13, 2022

Agree. If you look at the WEF young global leaders website (I know it's hard) and see the degrees, experience and training these so called leaders have, you see no producers, only managers of some nebulous subject areas e.g., 'managing diversity in business'.

Expand full comment

MBA-itis came to my employer and perhaps the epitome of More Bad Advice came when we got a notice that the plants in the office had become toxic and ugly and would be removed. If anyone wanted them they were free to take them home. No kidding! That is almost a direct quote.

When the staff expressed outrage the mba who devised this method of closing the plant contract relented and said that the unhealthy and unaesthetic plants can remain in the office if individuals committed to watering them. So I asked the plant person whose contract was being closed what needed to be done for the few plants I committed to attend. And so I gave myself some time every week to move from my desk to water and/or remove dead leaves. A fantastic opportunity to get up and stretch and maybe share some 'cooler education' time, after the formal schooling practices had been closed in my engineering job to be replaced by the informal learning practices that we all get talking to each other at the water cooler. That was removed because it was too expensive and created inefficient workers.

When I was young, I disbelieved that Nero would watch Rome burn while fiddling. Now I watch our society being burnt by MBAs and accountants fiddling the books. Amazing.

Expand full comment

If you have never managed a business, how can you manage diversity in business?

If the goal is diversity, what happens to qualification to do the job?

Expand full comment

I have a philosophy degree. Your comments stunned and shocked me. WOW. And I believe you.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

China's beating people's pets to death or drowning them by the thousands and enslaving people and putting them in concentration camps sounds kinda Nazi to me

Expand full comment

There’s no diversity of oppression. The totalitarian state seems a one trick pony. Shades of MCMLXXXIV. Fear slavery repeat or virtue signaling fear slavery repeat.

Expand full comment

Canada is building 'voluntary' internment camps right now. And headquarters with an armoury for the environmental police force being recruited.

Yes, lunacy everywhere, from both left and right, imo. I don't really see the difference in the tyrannous practices, regardless which direction they come from.

Expand full comment

Kathy Hochul in New York State is trying very hard to get approval for her own mysterious prisons.

Expand full comment

perfectly put

the classes will be beautiful, hosted atop a circle of flowers, given by the most compassionate intellectual, taken by psychopaths trying to learn to act human

Expand full comment

I keep laughing at the perfectly horrible beauty of your on-point description. Thank you.

Expand full comment

I love your optimism. Let's hope we get to a time where sanity is de rigueur. History (and truth) are written by the winners, after all. Of course, since so many of them have taken the jabs, perhaps they won't be around to write. I know, I know. That was dark.

Expand full comment

I'm starting to see the logic of people who said that there would be a >70% population drop in the USA by 2025. The vaxxes will probably only do 3% of the people. The rest? Ugly.

Expand full comment

I think there'll be more than 3% by vaxx, it will just be over a longer time frame.

Expand full comment

Despite what you may hope for - not everyone who got the jab is going to croak because of it

Expand full comment

Hope for? Seriously? Nearly every member of my family is triple jabbed and still lining up. I take no satisfaction in what is happening. It scares the hell out of me. Dark times call for dark humor. And I would point out that many on what I assume is your side of the divide wished a painful death for those of us who refused the jabs.

Expand full comment

yes. what you said

Expand full comment

who is hoping for that?

What an awful thing to even say.

Expand full comment

Oh, lots of people last fall on Twitter (but not just there) were saying “the unvaccinated should be denied medical treatment” etc. I believe there was a statement from someone at Berkeley to that effect too.

Expand full comment

It was everywhere. Getting repeatedly jabbed with an experimental gene therapy that didn't stop infection or transmission of the virus and was disabling and killing people was a patriotic and moral duty. We were granny killers who deserved every bad thing that happened to us. People (including children) on transplant lists were kicked off. I take no satisfaction in what is happening, but I have little tolerance for complaints from people who wished me dead.

Expand full comment

Howard Stern said we should go home and die. There were others. But I think he lost a lot of subscribers.

Expand full comment

I made a dark joke that the evil people behind the clot shot cull might not be around to "write" history. RD took offense.

Expand full comment

wasn't that dark. Not like, Abel Ferrara film, dark...

and I liked your response.

a lot.

Expand full comment

More to the point, is that *this is* the PhD thesis study in the "How to Market and the Utility of Ethics" graduate course in many 'liberal' current universities. John Ralston Saul explored that in his books, Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West and The Doubter's Companion: A Dictionary of Aggressive Common Sense and many others. Prescient, in an odd way, is The Unconscious Civilisation.

Expand full comment

Great analogy by el gato -

It’s been such a long time since I heard this used I needed to look up the definition:

Tri-um-phal-ism, noun

excessive exultation over one's success or achievements ;

( used especially in a political context):

For example , the

moment calls for humility

and hard work, not triumphalism.

Perfect job, e g !

Expand full comment

Fun fact: CDC said it wasn't their policies that were a problem, it was the messaging. They just didn't explainerize it well 'nuf.

Next time they will have a list of those unconvininced last time. Godda utterly silence them ahead of time. Ethics is so last century. Hooray for scientism!

Expand full comment

Who would have thought an apex predator could be such a soft-hearted optimist! Education in a classroom will probably continue, but the age of the grifter known as a marketing consultant and probably the age of the bioethicist is at an end.

Expand full comment

As a marketing consultant (and hypnotherapist) I resent that remark :P

Expand full comment

Please... my way of making a living dies with the electric supply to the internet. True marketers are the people who figure out the gaps in desired products and encourage supplying them. Then there are the people who just tell the producers of the crap that's not selling how to push it on people. I suspect there will always be work for the former. The latter are going to be in trouble, along with the CRT people.

Given your jollity, I suspect you're the former.

Expand full comment

A bit of both. I did the first, had success but found it constant, ongoing work that I disliked (mostly the constant ongoing software updates that just kept breaking things, forever, without end. Just soul-destroying bullshit updates forever...)

When so many fellow 'gap finders' asked me for advice and help how to sell their software I ended up becoming a consultant and copywriter. I find it more fun and satisfying to help others sell then to forever fuck around fixing shit because some twat updated something for the sake of updating the update that they updated in the last updated update of yet another fucking update... I'm getting annoyed just remembering it!

Oh yeah, also come to use my knowledge of human minds to offer therapy for people with phobias and fears, such as my deep, deeep hatred of unneeded 'updates'....

Expand full comment

To quote a famous joke:

"Do you think we have the time"?

Expand full comment

This was the original intent of mRNA technology. The risk made more sense if you were dying of cancer, I would trying that Hail Mary. It crossed the line going into healthy young people. A lot of lines.

Expand full comment

This was also the test case proving that it would never work to fight or prevent cancer.

Expand full comment

True. The technology was never intended to be used for a flu virus, the unknown risks and complications were acknowledged and respected by the (few) ethical scientists in the field. Testing it on billions is beyond insane! That said, the potential for mRNA tech is impressive, too bad no one can check for themselves now that most of the studies have been memory-holed (some time between Feb and June 2020 for the NIH studies, I read them in the spring of 2020).

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

The acceleration could be with the initial immune system suppression I bet - hopefully for those that had the shot without incident that the stuff eventually breaks down and leaves the body ... My second was a year ago and thankfully the tinitus and weird sensations in my chest stopped a while ago - no third for me ... might lose my job but would rather be alive haha

Expand full comment

I hope so for your sake.

But you can be a little less judgmental of those of us who are seeing people die around us and are worrying.

Expand full comment

Thanks honey 💅 I get a kick out of all the “pure bloods” telling me I’m going to die for how I mistakenly believed “it stops transmission” - it’s certainly a big tent approach that brings everyone together

Expand full comment

I loved being left outside, literally, because I only had natural immunity and told by the President of the United States wish me a horrible winter of death.

Expand full comment

how about Peace. It was horrible psychopathic bureaucrats who separated us, lying on purpose. let's not let them win.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

No. WE don't. However, I know lots of people who are refusing to connect the dots.

Expand full comment

When truth is whatever you want it to be.....

Expand full comment

You have to start somewhere...

I'd say that SADS is practically a cure for cancer.

Expand full comment

Maybe the goal is to make sure people don't live long enough to get cancer in the first place? I think that would technically meet the goal of reduction of cancer.

Expand full comment

The problem is that cancer is more and more common amongst young people. It is no longer a matter of age, or not that much

Expand full comment

Lifestyle and so many toxins and messing with our immune systems. and now MRNA. Our immune systems stop cancer all day every day in our bodies

Expand full comment

The mRNA garbage appears to "distract" the immune system allowing things that would normally be in the background to take root.

Expand full comment

To me, it seems like it shuts off the cells that normally fight cancer, so really, mRNA probably causes cancer. Look up Ethical Skeptic on Twitter; the cancer cases in the last year have exploded.

Expand full comment

It def causes cancer. Ethical Skeptic’s graphs show that in no uncertain terms.

All the previous attempts at this type “vax” also showed good results initially and the next flu/cold/disease presented, the body practically rolled out the welcome mat. “Come one, come all, and bring your pals!”

Expand full comment

Unfortunately, you can present people with charts and papers, and they just shrug. "I'm fine." Or "They got (fill in the blank) because they were on lockdown and couldn't see their doctors."

Expand full comment

mRNA as is used in the covid shots inhibits the body's ability to repair itself. That's been shown by research:

https://www.academia.edu/69301433/Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS_CoV_2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G_quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs

The above link downloads the pdf file.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538446/

The above article was retracted but for all the wrong reasons.

Expand full comment

Until it’s overwhelmed with what amounts to Niagra Falls injected past all the filters our good God put in place to sheild our innards from toxins, like skin, stomach acid, gall bladder, liver… Just shove the whole waterfall directly into everyone. What could go wrong?

Expand full comment

To quote a bio-physicist I know (I think bio-physicist is the right translation anyway, she studies cells at the molecular level, espeically their lifecycle) "Everyone gets cancer. It's just a question of when, not if, since every iteration increases the risk of a cell becoming cancerous" and then she gave me the technical explanation and I just nodded along, since I don't get "half past seven" of what she's saying.

If we go with the depop-ideas floating around, how are these conspirators going to reverse the dying off of humans you think? It's not like a virus or a cancer has "Stop"-function.

Expand full comment

The only "stop" function of cancer or a virus is our immune system, which they keep making drugs to compromise.

My understanding is that we all have cancer cells in us all the time. They get killed by a healthy immune system.

Expand full comment

Yes, your understanding is correct. Within the last 10-15 years, scientists realized that cancers come and go in our bodies. This was an issue for mammography: women who received annual mammograms had higher breast cancer rates that women who received mammograms less frequently. The conclusion was that a tumor shows up, mammography detects without the body having a chance to eliminate the tumor. Same issue for men for prostrate cancer.

Here's some links I saved from a few years ago:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cancer-breast-mammograms-idUSBRE8AK1FL20121121

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2120750/The-expert-branded-woman-hater-saying-breast-cancer-screening-ruins-lives.html

https://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g1403

Expand full comment

If I am not mistaken, this is one of the issues with the idea that HPV vaccines reduce cervical cancer. The studies used a reduction in surrogate endpoints to extrapolate that the vaccine was going to reduce cancer. There was no accounting for the body taking care of the "endpoints" on its own

Expand full comment

What are 'surrogate endpoints' if you can explain in a nutshell?

There's an interesting essay by a Canadian nephrologist that discusses medical research.

https://blog.thefastingmethod.com/the-corruption-of-evidence-based-medicine-killing-for-profit/

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022·edited Sep 13, 2022

Surrogate endpoints are markers that are associated with and precede a particular outcome. But they don't necessarily guarantee the outcome. I don't recall exactly what the surrogate endpoints were in the case of the HPV vax tests.

Cervical cancer is slow developing, so vaccine studies didn't wait for an actual cancer reduction to result from the vax.

Expand full comment

Interesting… thank you for the links!

Expand full comment

Yes, thanks! I remember reading some time ago about concerns that mammograms and other screenings were not as beneficial as they seem but like many medical matters THE science is no longer allowing free exchange of ideas etc. I had my first one last year and a small growth was detected (not cancer). Lots of women are getting frightened by this and somehow end up believing they are 'cancer' survivors.

Expand full comment

Re: prostate cancer. I'd read, pre covid and in more than one reference, that almost all men who die in old age die WITH prostate cancer, but dying from prostate cancer is actually quite rare.

Expand full comment

I have heard the same...decades ago!

Expand full comment

I knew about individual rogue cells being eliminated but not tumors. Wow!

Expand full comment

Yuppers. If we used the PET scan like we used the PCR test - 99.9% of 'mericans would be taking chemo and radiation 24/7/365.

Expand full comment

LOL don't give pharma any great ideas!

Expand full comment

As I understand it, all cells are potential cancer cells - there's no special kind of cancer cell floating around waiting to activate. Every time the cells renews, there's a miniscule risk of it becoming a cancer cell. Hence why eating right and varied is so important - antioxidants and other stuff helps lower this risk, while other stuff increases it.

And since all reasearch of this is done on the population level, it doesn't say very much of the specific individual as such.

Very big caveat: I'm not a doctor, nor a researcher and I dn't have any natural science background so I may well be way off here!

Expand full comment

Not a scientist either but my research and reading says you're on the right track.

Expand full comment

Hulda R. Clark in her book, The Cure for All Diseases says that all diseases are caused by parasites.

Expand full comment

I've heard others say that all diseases are caused by stress. I think there are even papers published to support this. I believe stress over all else: it comes in many forms, even physical, think repeated stress injury like carpal tunnel syndrome.

Expand full comment

What causes stress?

Expand full comment

wild animals die from stress.

Expand full comment

Is she looking at viruses and bacteria as parasites, because I could see that?

Expand full comment

I'm not sure I could answer exactly, but I think yes. Essentially, after reading her book, I believe that, yes, she says everything, viruses, and bacteria included, are parasites; or I should say viruses are parasite derived. Bacteria I believe are parasites.

Expand full comment

Well, that's pretty much the way I understand it.

The book "The Gene" is a favorite of mine.

Expand full comment

And that wonderful moneymaking scam of "preventative tests" where they search and search and find that tiny little whatever and then cut you open to get it out and then and then and then and then...

Expand full comment

And forgetting a forceps in your abdomen, charging you extra for nicking "hospittle" property...

Expand full comment

Depop people need to spend a few minutes looking at the worldometer population clocks.

Expand full comment

Yes, definitely!

Expand full comment

Don’t we have to consider the $$ aspect? Less cancer less $. They can always mess with data to “confirm” less cancer and still make doodas of swag on govmint paid treatment. Sorry--“you and me” paid treatment. 🤔 Apparently the average ejit is easy to fool. So cynical I am I am.

Expand full comment

If everybody ded, cancer is cured! HYayy!!

Expand full comment

"But it would have been so much worse if I hadn't gotten the jab!"

Expand full comment

everything they say assume the opposite

Expand full comment

“Safe and effective” is repeated so often it’s nauseating.

Expand full comment

I’m thinking of naming my company “Safe and Effective”...think of all that free advertising it’d get! 👍🏽👍🏽

Expand full comment

Brilliant. The Safe and Effective Brewery. SEB. Pack em in.

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022·edited Sep 13, 2022

Do it! Doesn't matter if you're a plumber or pharmacist.

Maybe you could then later sue for infringement and stuff too?

Expand full comment

Just think about all those jobs and vocations out there that would benefit from the "safe and effective" name attached to them. "Safe and effective" weather forecasting. "Safe and effective fortune telling" etc.

Expand full comment

😂😂 that is true!

Expand full comment

Better hurry and get the copyright!

Expand full comment

YES! Find the lengthy list of “safe $

& effective” meds that have been recalled. Narrow that down to the ones they KNEW weren’t. VIOXX by MERCK is a great starting place. Safely & effectively led between 15,000-90,000 to open heart surgery/an early grave even while the data gal lied for nearly two years, KNOWING the satay was incorrect. Fined $5Million but MERCK is chugging along just fine. WHY? Because they made like 3 BILLION just on VIOXX. $5million may as well be $1000.

All big pHARMa are felons.

Expand full comment

Vioxx screwed up my coworkers kidneys years ago.

They finished him and his kidneys off with Remdesivir back in Jan 2022 when he went into the hospital.

Expand full comment

OMGOSH, I’m so sorry.

Nurses I know call remdesivir “RUN-death-is-near”.

When I had covid last August with pneumonia (awful but I’d still NEVER get the clot shot!) they prescribed me some antibiotic I’d never seen. I happened to have the mental capacity to look it up, though my blood oxygen was around 88. It has all kinds of awful side effects and people saying they were “floxed” and on & on! I didn’t take it, thank GOD. The last thing my body needed was another fire to try to put out. SO, so tired of health care not care.

Expand full comment

Oh no!

That's awful.

I'm sorry.

Expand full comment

Vioxx is why my mother is permanently disabled and why I'm permanently taking care of her until a better person can be found to take over that job for me. She got a pittance in the settlement. I haven't trusted pHARMa since.

Expand full comment

I’m so very sorry. I do not know how people can look at themselves in the

mirror after what they’ve knowingly

done.

You always want to believe Hitler and the handful of other dictators like Mao are once in a lifetime monsters. Sadly, we now know we live among hundreds.

Expand full comment

Most people are go along to get along, that's the problem. So when being a monster is acceptable, well...

Expand full comment

I’m just unwilling to be passive here. This is ironic as I’m Winnie the Pooh meets golden retriever, by nature. Everyone have some honey and wag your tail. Be happy. THIS whole hot tsunami of 💩💩💩💩, however, has felt like watching Nazi’s cart away jews, knowing their likely fate and shrugging it off as if to say, what can one lady do? EVERY DAY hundreds of kids are getting shots that will affect their ability to play sports, have children, walk, get out of bed, or perhaps they’ll be OK for decades, then get some horrid autoimmune disease because Fauci and friends decided it was a good idea. Liars! I can’t be passive. If I’m nothing but a keyboard warrior, then a GOOD keyboard warrior I will be. If one of my silly TWEETS (and God knows I don’t really want to be on twitter) gets through to some thick parent and gets them not too inject poison straight into their kids, feeling all superior and lofty, then I’ll tweet— or whatever. I’m getting ready to call some congressman in Mississippi for some reason, pertaining these stupid clot shots. I don’t wanna. I want to play with my litter of golden doodle pups, but here we are.

Expand full comment

Absolutely agree. I'm very much a "leave me alone, I'll leave you alone" type of gal myself. Until you, as the kids say these days, "fuck around and find out"...which has been since 2020 for me.

And I would also like to play with that adorable litter of floofers of yours. 🤗

Expand full comment

that's terrible, for both of you

Expand full comment

I think VIOXX was Pfizer? Maybe I'm thinking about the drug they made the killed thousands of people. There's also the Pfizer drug that killed millions of cattle--an mRNA vaccine.

Expand full comment

VIOXX was made by Merck. They knew it caused heart attacks and strokes before it was released and covered it up. And no one was punished. Screw the fines. People need to go to prison.

Expand full comment

agreed. I appreciate the info. My only defense lately.

Expand full comment

THIS is another thing I’d like to sort of crowd source and then regurgitate onto the general public AND the alphabet groups AND the media over a period of ONE- 2 days.

I want Steve Kirsch and his million followers, the bad cat, and all of us to choose a day or 2, choose 2-3 of our most compelling articles/videos/studies and send them to various entities. I want them all to get them around the same day(s), and en masse, so that everyone KNOWS that everyone KNOWS, if you get what I’m saying? I want the sheer avalanche of people emailing, snail mailing and calling in these compelling studies to be overwhelming. If people are bold and energetic enough to print them out into poster board and mail them onto power poles at the CDC and CNN, so much the better. If all of them get GOOD studies and stats AT ONCE, will they not be forced to at least recognize the tsunami of damage? If just half of Kirsch’s followers send 2 articles to 2 news stations each, that’s million studies under noses at once.

WHAT DO YOU SAY, BAD CAT???

Expand full comment

YES, VIOXX was MERCK and the cow fiasco was Pfizer, BOTH were based on lies and purposely skewed data if I remember correctly.

Merck Manipulated the Science about the Drug Vioxx

Published Oct 12, 2017

Scientists from the pharmaceutical giant Merck skewed the results of clinical trials in favor of the arthritis drug, Vioxx, to hide evidence that the drug increased patients’ risk of heart attack.

FEATURE

Diagram of evasive football play

The Disinformation Playbook

Five tactics business interests use to sideline science, deceive the public and buy influence at the expense of public health and safety.

To increase the likelihood of FDA approval for its anti-inflammatory and arthritis drug Vioxx, the pharmaceutical giant Merck used flawed methodologies biased toward predetermined results to exaggerate the drug’s positive effects. Internal documents made public in litigation revealed that a Merck marketing team had developed a strategy called ADVANTAGE (Assessment of Differences between Vioxx And Naproxen To Ascertain Gastrointestinal tolerability and Effectiveness) to skew the results of clinical trials in the drug’s favor. As part of the strategy, scientists manipulated the trial design by comparing the drug to naproxen, a pain reliever sold under brand names such as Aleve, rather than to a placebo.

The scientists highlighted the results that naproxen decreased the risk of heart attack by 80 percent, and downplayed results showing that Vioxx increased the risk of heart attack by 400 percent. This misleading presentation of the evidence made it look like naproxen was protecting patients from heart attacks, and that Vioxx only looked risky by comparison. In fact, Vioxx has since been found to significantly increase cardiovascular risk, leading Merck to withdraw the product from the market in 2004.

Merck’s manipulation of the science around Vioxx also included a pattern of ghostwriting of scientific articles. Internal documents reveal that in 16 of 20 papers reporting on clinical trials of Vioxx, a Merck employee was initially listed as the lead author of the first draft; on the published versions, an outside academic was listed as the primary author. In one draft of a Vioxx research study that did not yet have a prominent outside name attached, Merck officials listed the lead author only as “External author?” A Merck scientist was also found to have removed the evidence of three heart attacks among patients in a dataset from the results presented.

Tragically, Merck’s manipulation of its data—and the FDA’s resulting approval of Vioxx in 1999—led to thousands of avoidable premature deaths and 100,000 heart attacks. Dr. David Graham, the Associate Director for Science and Medicine in FDA’s Office of Drug Safety, testified in 2004 before the Senate Finance Committee that the FDA's failure to recall Vioxx earlier had resulted in as many as 55,000 premature deaths from heart attacks and stroke, calling it the equivalent of allowing "two to four jumbo jetliners" to crash every week for five years. Even years after discontinuing use of the drug, patients who have taken Vioxx continue to experience complications.

Further Reading

Vioxx shows what happens when the drug safety system breaks down

Expand full comment

It's a mantra. Whatever you apply it to, the hypnotized populace will embrace.

Expand full comment

Like “misinformation”. Eyes start twirling. Brain shuts down.

Expand full comment

SAFE from prosecution and EFFECITVE at padding the bottom line!

Expand full comment

Thank you, I’ve now settled on my decision not to watch the clip 🤣

Expand full comment

now they're just messing with us... right?

i mean, they've got to just be messing with us?

vaxxed + double boosted man who got the rona twice is telling us THIS is the technology that will stop cancer?

seriously, they're punkin' us.

Expand full comment

Well.... you have to look at it another way.

MOST people-- by far-- have not been injured by the mRNA vaxxes. Sure, they've gotten CV several times, but have not died of it, which is their new requirement. So they are all on board with mRNA tech because they think it's helped them.

Expand full comment

Time will tell if "most" were unharmed.

I know people who are not connecting their new illnesses to the jabs. lots of them.

I'm seeing so much of that that it is to my mind a pattern unto itself.

Jab = not as healthy as previous.

Expand full comment

The vast majority of people I know are over 50; only a few have had any jab side effects. Three have acknowledged they are jab injured. The rest are perfectly fine and seem to have no other health issues at the moment.

I guess those are the key words. At the moment.

Expand full comment

Every senior I know is buying the BS that what is happening to them is just "aging."

One person walked into the facility on their own for the first jab and had to be supported and rest at several points at the second jab. He has had to have handholds installed all over his house.

All this from one month to the next.

They all have things going on that they don't want to think is caused by those ever-virtuous jabs.

They are not connecting the dots. And you may not know about their troubles.

It's unacceptable to suggest or think it is the jabs, even for the sudden heart troubles or clots or strokes.

I've never known so many people having clots.

It's a nightmare but we're all to pretend we don't see it.

And if a connection is made, it's "long Covid."

It's happening

Expand full comment

My godfather was 88 when he got the first jab. He was having some minor memory issues, but they were not terribly apparent and not debilitating. As soon as he got it, his memory started failing badly.

Not sure if he's on jab 3 or 4; his memory is horrific, and everyone around him-- his neighbors (vaxxed), his stepson and wife (vaxxed), his step grandkids (vaxxed) and his doctor (probably vaxxed) just chock it all up to "old age." It's heartbreaking for me, because he will not listen.

Expand full comment

My missus in her late 60's was sharp as a tack, the only woman who ever beat me at scrabble. Two shots later (no boosters, or she didn't tell me anyway (her daughter is all in and may have snuck her off for a booster)), now she is getting rather ditzy sometimes. The sad part is that I think that part of her realizes it. She is getting clingy and, I think, emotionally 'lost' more and more. I feel her fear of what she may done to herself sometimes. I never thought I would feel sorry for her, of all people!

Expand full comment

That is so sad. And happening all around us.

I'm so sorry that the crowd drowned you out. You did (are doing) what you could.

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022·edited Sep 13, 2022

I agree cannot unsee this. I know someone ailments confounded by doctor’s misdiagnosis, no details but it’s certainly suspicious.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

ok... let us say that most people have not been injured by the mRNA vax... what he is suggesting at that point is a placebo to prevent cancer.

Expand full comment

Cure it like they cured Covid?

Pass. 😅

Expand full comment

Hard pass

Expand full comment

yeah, scary. I'd stay as far away as possible, too. and I am pretty sure this is technology they have been working on - for treating cancer - for a decade+, unsuccessfully. Now that they have masses believing it is safe and effective... just horrifying.

Expand full comment

Blood cancers to be exact and yes... none cleared Ph3 trials.

Expand full comment

But it will be another tool in the bag to go along with cut, burn, and toxify.

Expand full comment

As I just explained at C&C, Brandon is confused, once again. He meant "cause," not "cure":

https://etana.substack.com/p/turbo-cancer

Expand full comment

As I just read C&C about the Moonshot Cancer jab I thought Jeff gave it that silly name... It's getting so hard to tell the difference between truth and satire these days....

Expand full comment

It's another irony, what with NASA having to delay its latest rocket twice due to problems. Apparently "moonshot" doesn't hold the same cachet it did sixty years ago.

Expand full comment

My hubby has a relative who is team leader for designing new space suits down at NASA. He did mention actual moonshot when we talked. I haven’t seen him this year so no idea what’s really going on.

Expand full comment

Bezos's latest rocket launch blew up yesterday. NASA can't launch their spiffy new Artemis rocket 'cause weather and leaks. But, fear not, the plans for us to join the cyborg hive mind in the cloud in a decade are still a go.

Expand full comment

The moon!? We can't even leave Florida!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DVyt6vj4QBc/

Expand full comment

Why can't we see Apollo space junk left behind on the surface of the moon? Perhaps I've been down a few too many rabbit holes these past two years, but it seems to me that we should have photos taken from Earth orbit satellites or even a good telescope on the surface. I've never seen one.

Expand full comment

I suspect there's too much outsourcing. Think Thiokol.

Expand full comment

I feel the same. The name is ludicrous. Every time I hear it, I think NASA.

Expand full comment
author

ironically, i might be incredibly apt.

the moon missions were incredibly expensive triumphalism that was a circus to capture the imagination but provided little tangible benefit.

but it was a MASSIVE, company making grift for the companies involved.

and this is more of the same.

Expand full comment

The space nerd in me wants to protest that there was a lot of intangible benefit.

That doesn't mean it wasn't also incredibly expensive triumphalism. Wasn't the whole thing because of Sputnik and getting back at the Russians?

Expand full comment
founding

He's probably right but I think he's being a little bit of a curmudgeon on this one...;]

Expand full comment
founding

True.

Cognitive dissonance for a nerd like me though.

We might not have as realistic Sci Fi movies/books without the space race.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

And Velcro!

Expand full comment
founding

Duct tape. I use that shit for everything.

Expand full comment

Poe's Law

Expand full comment

had to look that up.

Brilliant connection you made there

Expand full comment

It's everywhere these days. So I can't really take credit.

Expand full comment

sure you can. You brought it to my attention

Expand full comment

One of my missions in life is to spread awareness of Poe's Law.

Expand full comment

This technology will definitely allow the oncologists to submit much larger invoices to the insurance companies.

Expand full comment

This is especially ironic: Prior to (trying to be) "vaccines," mRNA gene therapies were tried for, among other things, treatments for cancer. They didn't work very well. Among other problems early on were a decreased immune response with more than one dose. In fact, the problems with multiple doses was a prime reason that Moderna (and no doubt others) decided to apply mRNA tech as vaccines, which was not their first choice since they presumed only one/few doses would be needed (WRONG!) and it would not be as lucrative.

For those interested, consult Whitney Webb's articles at unlimitedhangout.com

[Disclaimer: the above is from reading a few, scant articles on early mRNA. That raises an interesting point: For all that we've heard of these supposedly "safe and effective" mRNA jabs since 2020, surely there must be some literature predating their repurposing as "vaccines." I'm sure they exist, but I've never seen reference to them, including in popular articles that purport to examine the background of the jabs. I continue on the assumption that whatever early research exists paints mRNA as as having too many problems. I've never seen any good argument to the contrary.]

Expand full comment

Try pubmed.gov for science articles on the history of injections.

Expand full comment

I occasionally use it. For those interested, be aware that virtually all media, including the professional journals, is to some degree censored by the usual suspects. Even with that limitation, yes there is a lot of information available that you won't see in the mainstream press. For example, earlier this year when I was prescribed Paxlovid, I found studies about it that show it's not very effective, and no word about safety. And these were paid-by-Pharma studies.

Expand full comment

You didn't take it, did you?

Also, whoever prescribed it doesn't like you or is a bad medical professional

Expand full comment
Sep 14, 2022·edited Sep 14, 2022

NIH deleted most off their mRNA research studies in late spring or early summer of 2020, I read many of them when I first heard the term mRNA associated with a potential vaccine. None of the studies got past the animal trials due to unforeseen mortality issues in the medium-term. Yup, having ALL your subjects die within a year or two is a bit of an issue.

Expand full comment

Question: Will they be using the pre-jab rates of cancer or the rates in the jabbed??

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022·edited Sep 13, 2022

Unlikely cancer data will be know to the general population due to media censorship of this information.. that's why us scientist call the injections experimental and therefore unethical because injected are not being given informed consent about immediate adverse effects and long term adverse effects.

Expand full comment

They’ll tell you they will not be able to treat you until you are fully up-to-date with your vaccines. That’s the rules. That’s how the system works. Safe and effective.

Expand full comment

I have a feeling I'm less likely to get cancer if I avoid the jabs.

I've managed the past 14 years

Expand full comment

So are you says if I am in a car accident, hospitals won't accept care for me until I prove to be up to date?

Expand full comment

You'll stay alive longer with no treatment or shots.

Expand full comment

That's my plan

Expand full comment

After repeating “safe and effective” he scratches his nose. Is that like crossing your fingers behind your back when you make a promise you don’t intend to keep?

Expand full comment

Actually, that is a "tell" in body language, the adult version of when a small child covers his mouth when telling a whopper. Since politicians base their success largely on being successful liars however, I postulate it's more likely his nose itched.

Expand full comment

I think his dementia may have unraveled sone of his learned " avoidance " behaviors...

Expand full comment

Thinking the same

Expand full comment

Well there you go! 🤥

Expand full comment

Globalist like to advertise with a "tell" and dose of condescension to their viewers. Like the queen having a bottle of ivermectin photo op during her covid treatment. Jacindas honorary doctorate from Harvard for no reason.have to laugh at it all. Reducing society to meaninglessness to those awake.

Expand full comment

He scratches his nose often. I do believe it is his tell.

Expand full comment

as he lies often

Expand full comment

Well, if his lips are moving…

Expand full comment

Yes! Touching or scratching the nose is many times the sign of lying.

Expand full comment

For it to really be a "tell" you'd need a baseline of Biden truthfully answering a question and look for deviation.

Has he ever truthfully answered a question in his whole "career"?

Expand full comment

The dementia is diminishing his lying skills?

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022·edited Sep 13, 2022

Could have always been a "tell," but since he lies constantly no one would be the wiser.

Expand full comment

To answer your question, probably not.

Expand full comment

To covidium and beyond!

Expand full comment

watching that “announcement” was just weird. for a while I couldn’t even understand what they were talking about. moonshot? cancer? cure cancer on the moon? huh? messaging fail.

Expand full comment

Pfizer ads

Expand full comment

Desperation

breeds Contempt

Expand full comment