It would be in their best interest now to cause as much death by other means, in order to hide the vax deaths. Manufactured food shortages, fuel and electricity disruption, flooding the zone with lies claiming strokes and heart attacks are caused by 1000 random things....
Incentive structures.
Your Friday night cold-crushed red pill slipped into the drink to finish out the week. 💊
I always wait until these terms appear in the Online Urban Dictionary - by which time they're no longer in vogue and I can remain untainted by popular culture.
You missed "climatechange", but yeah.................. seeing it reported almost maniacally by news orgs. Hot summers cause heart issues; "Gardening" (AYFKM) causes heart issues............ list goes on. I even saw one that sunspot activity does the same.................. wtaf??
Yeah. It was toxins in the dirt. Like the very ground beneath our feet is a super fund site. Not bizarre; not hilarious; not ridiculous. Just a lie with a purpose.
They put that one there to discourage people from growing what they’ll need in order to stave off famine.
They really are deatheaters. Bacteria in soil acts like serotonin uptake inhibitors to alleviate depression too. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/66840#1 I actually wonder if they have little fusillages in their pockets or Gucci purses that they paint crosses on for how many they've murdered.
The gardening bit is a good example of how to lie with truth:
"If you suffer from immuno-deficiency conditions, the bacteria naturally present in the soil may cause severe and even life-threatening conditions unless you take due precautions and use protective gear" - this is true, despite not mentioning details such a the names of conditions or bacteria or even the odds/risk. But let's run it through my straw journalist/PR-scarecrow:
"Bacteria in soil cause life-threatening conditions."
Not a lie as such, just lacking even what little yet quite necessay context I bothered with. And this is called jornalism/PR - you make a story by working the material until it fits purpose, without outright fabricating or lying.
We, or at least those with real leanings to being an author or historian, should "collect receipts" for these and any other news items, for archival purposes. One cannot rely on stuff staying up on a website or whatever the wayback machine is. Orwell's Memory Hole is a real thing. Of course, this is more important for people writing "real" articles or books. Save a copy of a web page, a screen grab, or if it's not that important, at least basic citation (e.g. source and date as well as the actual quote or a summary.) Having obtained an MA in Literature, I did my share of papers. I used to save copies of my own papers or writings, interesting sources, etc. Then it occurred to me "What are you saving this stuff for? It's not like you'll ever write another paper or a book." So much is deleted.
H.L. Mencken, the famous American writer of a century ago or more, translated one of Nietzsche's books. In his introduction, he mentions in passing the various outrageous lies of Allied propaganda from the then-recent World War I. He said he'd saved clippings and might release a book of them. I don't know if he ever did such a book, but what stuck with me was the specific lies. Close variations of these were used in later wars, or even the current Ukraine war. Not that the Kaiser or other specific people were enemies of humanity, but bombing hospitals, making soap out of bodies, lamps out of human skin, etc.
Based HL Mencken connoisseur. Here's one of his best quotes.
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
Sheeple aren't even sheep... At least sheep have a flight response. Notice how the education system has churned out almost two generations of sheeple? And they said Common Core was a failure! It's worked SPLENDIDLY to dumb down the population.
Well yes and no. Allow me a horrid joke that I take all responsibility for.
One sheep to another: "Have you met the new shepherd yet? He's French. We're all going to someplace named 'Abattoir.' I've always wanted to see France!"
Well, some of my flock—the ram lambs—will go to a Texas “abattoir” (dang. Had to look it up, and I studied French in college.) Them’s the breaks I guess. The ewes, though, and a couple of lucky rams, will hopefully live long and productive and very sheltered lives—if I can keep feeding them as feed prices continue to go up.
Covidiocy, Climagheddon, saving the liberal world order from Putin have all morphed into one, society-destroying, economy-destroying, Humanity-destroying blob…. controlled by an evil cabal.
Since I started reading your writings my daughter gifted me her senior cat. We now have been adopted by an outside cat this week. I wonder as you keep writing and I keep reading how many kitty kats I will end up with.
You are correct, but that's only a tiny sub-set of the many techniques of "science." It also means carefully planning a study so that only results that support a desired conclusion are obtained, preferably not by outright fraud, but use that if no subtler alternative is available. Industry publications should be owned by Pharma or other private interests who prioritize profit and control over objectivity and impartiality. Similarly, those who lead non-profits, government agencies and such, that exert control over what gets funded, what drugs are approved, should always profess to be "professional, impartial, objective and (of course) scientific," when in actuality they are biased by personal connections, industry loyalties, ideologies and profit opportunity. Scientific merit or the serving the public health should be the last consideration, although if these are served at least occasionally, it will improve the overall image of the entire system. Any doctor, researcher or other professional who dares stray far from official dogma must be de-funded, demonized in the press, ostracized and silenced by any means available.
ha ha ha Ralph Nader posted a new radio program this week about "vaccine apartheid." I thought he would mean treating the unvaccinated as 2nd class citizens. NO NO He meant that Bill Gates and Tony should donate free vaccines to India, Brazil, Africa--all the 3rd world countries that couldn't afford to pay for their mRNA vaccines. I was so happy! HAPPY! Bill and Tony will NEVER donate free vaccines--even if the vaccines are totally worthless. Thank God! The vaccines are worthless and actually cause death and adverse reactions. The 3rd world countries are doing MUCH BETTER than the fully vaccinated western countries. We are fortunate we can rely on the greed of big Pharma to keep these destructive medicines out of these countries who are doing so well without them.
With the Covid-19 "vaccines" all, or substantially all, is directly funded by the government. Anyone in the USA gets their shot at no cost to them. This is also true for Paxlovid and probably many other drugs. I suspect it's much the same in other nations too. As with much "foreign aid," our government may "donate" the vaxxes to foreign nations. In the case of these, however, I suspect that more and more will pass on the kind offer. Not to worry; Big Pharma is still making its money, and virtually all of it directly off the government. Who needs that silly free market when you have a guaranteed contract regardless of demand?
Not according to some of Kipling's stories. I realize that "India" was different territories in the 19th century, but not all of it was tropical and sub-tropical.
I guess I've only heard about the hot parts. I've always taken the comments at face value and have never studied to see if they were from one area or another.
Things seem to be drifting a little. We've gone from, "Nothing to see here, nothing's happening" to "Hmmm, I wonder what's causing this excess mortality world wide? What could it be? Researchers need to look into this. Researchers are baffled, Austrian leadership are blaming doctors for the bad vaccine outcomes because they didn't explain the risk to their patients" ad infinitum ad nauseam. The rats are beginning to scramble.
I've never seen so many "experts" baffled for so long in my life. I thought the science was settled? That's what they've been screeching for years when it comes to "vaccine" technology anyway. 🙄
"The rats are the first to desert a sinking ship" is a metaphor, but it's (probably) literally true.
[Puts on Captain Obvious suit]
In modern usage, the term is usually meant in derogatory terms against people who are the first to leave a certain situation. Yet, is that fair? Not at all. At least in the days of older ships, the rats tended to inhabit the lower parts of a ship. If a ship began to take on water, naturally the rats would seek higher ground. So yes, if someone topside sees rats jumping off the side of the ship, even though everything looks hunky-dory above, then it was a sign that not all was well below deck. I envision a naive passenger looking over the rail of the ship: "That's funny, I don't recall the ship sitting so low in the water when we left port."
While I've never been on a sinking ship, I have at least a few times in my life worked in enterprises where people start leaving en masse. That too is an ill omen. In my experience, it wasn't the rats who left, but in fact the most talented, the most essential and critical workers for a project. Although I would sometimes hear someone use that "Rats" meme as criticism, if you accept my logic above, I'd have to say those rats are actually quite smart.
I was told that they had to unblind the control group because... wait for it... if they were not vaxxed, they would die of COVID. By unblinding, they saved their lives!
Yes. Really. I was told that by vaxtard friend at Pfizer.
Yes, I recall reading that. Sometimes there perhaps is an ethical justification. I think when antibiotics was first being trialed (1930s) they did something similar. The argument is that it works so well, it would be unconscionable to deny it to the controls. That is true, but it requires the condition "works well" for it to be valid. And in the case of the jabs, it probably is a lie.
While it is a side issue, that raises one of many difficult ethical questions for conducting drug trials or other research: how does one actually keep a control group? I claim no expertise in such, but medical or other ethics requires all manner of difficult decisions. It's easy for the outsider moralizing ("One death is too many.") That makes good copy in the media or for a politician, but in the real world, saving that one life may of necessity cost two, ten or a hundred collateral deaths elsewhere. The real world is full of such thorny dilemmas, a fact typically lost on the Leftist do-gooder, the airhead on social media, etc.
I thought that was well known. Also it's not the first time they've done it either. HPV vaccination (just as toxic) back in 2011 in Denmark they did this too.
You know, it's funny. A cynic outside looking in might jump to the erroneous conclusion that they wanted to not ask too many questions during safety trials, perhaps with the the intent to get permanent approval of a product so that they could start selling it.
Did that vaxtard ever think about all the deaths that will occur worldwide over the next 10 years as a result of the luxury to not think about the least amongst us?
I don't think they mean to mock us. The fact that WE FEEL MOCKED doesn't mean that was their intention. They have kept us completely censored, so there is no need to mock us. NOBODY is getting our message, so they don't need to reply to it, acknowledge in any way. Mocking it would just give free publicity to us. Instead, they are just carrying on with policies that insure as much vaccination as possible. Everything supports going along with mass one-size-fits-all vaccination protocols and ignoring everything that doesn't support that approach. That way, all the people who support traditional * vaccine policies will be forced to support this policy--unless and until more news of uptick in deaths forces them to entensely scrutina (scrutinize) our https://series.welloflife.com/grb/part4-live/
Mmmmm hm.
It would be in their best interest now to cause as much death by other means, in order to hide the vax deaths. Manufactured food shortages, fuel and electricity disruption, flooding the zone with lies claiming strokes and heart attacks are caused by 1000 random things....
Incentive structures.
Your Friday night cold-crushed red pill slipped into the drink to finish out the week. 💊
That meme is BASED.
#basedmemegod
Based? I don’t know what you mean.
Popular slang term among #coolkids ;)
Basically means, based in fact, unwoke, carrying your opinions with swagger... 😎
I've been ear spyin' everything you say...cuz your good on the handle.
Bravo!
I always wait until these terms appear in the Online Urban Dictionary - by which time they're no longer in vogue and I can remain untainted by popular culture.
That is wicked. Sick, dude.
:P
Well.
It also can mean you’re addicted to crack but I think the bad cat is tryin to keep things light and family friendly here.
Right over my head. Ear spyin' with my 11 year old twins and their friends means ; electronic eavesdropping.
I hope they're not doing crack.
Thanks! I'd been wondering about that, too!
You missed "climatechange", but yeah.................. seeing it reported almost maniacally by news orgs. Hot summers cause heart issues; "Gardening" (AYFKM) causes heart issues............ list goes on. I even saw one that sunspot activity does the same.................. wtaf??
the gardening was my favorite
Yeah. It was toxins in the dirt. Like the very ground beneath our feet is a super fund site. Not bizarre; not hilarious; not ridiculous. Just a lie with a purpose.
They put that one there to discourage people from growing what they’ll need in order to stave off famine.
Because they want you either controlled or dead.
They really are deatheaters. Bacteria in soil acts like serotonin uptake inhibitors to alleviate depression too. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/66840#1 I actually wonder if they have little fusillages in their pockets or Gucci purses that they paint crosses on for how many they've murdered.
The gardening bit is a good example of how to lie with truth:
"If you suffer from immuno-deficiency conditions, the bacteria naturally present in the soil may cause severe and even life-threatening conditions unless you take due precautions and use protective gear" - this is true, despite not mentioning details such a the names of conditions or bacteria or even the odds/risk. But let's run it through my straw journalist/PR-scarecrow:
"Bacteria in soil cause life-threatening conditions."
Not a lie as such, just lacking even what little yet quite necessay context I bothered with. And this is called jornalism/PR - you make a story by working the material until it fits purpose, without outright fabricating or lying.
We, or at least those with real leanings to being an author or historian, should "collect receipts" for these and any other news items, for archival purposes. One cannot rely on stuff staying up on a website or whatever the wayback machine is. Orwell's Memory Hole is a real thing. Of course, this is more important for people writing "real" articles or books. Save a copy of a web page, a screen grab, or if it's not that important, at least basic citation (e.g. source and date as well as the actual quote or a summary.) Having obtained an MA in Literature, I did my share of papers. I used to save copies of my own papers or writings, interesting sources, etc. Then it occurred to me "What are you saving this stuff for? It's not like you'll ever write another paper or a book." So much is deleted.
H.L. Mencken, the famous American writer of a century ago or more, translated one of Nietzsche's books. In his introduction, he mentions in passing the various outrageous lies of Allied propaganda from the then-recent World War I. He said he'd saved clippings and might release a book of them. I don't know if he ever did such a book, but what stuck with me was the specific lies. Close variations of these were used in later wars, or even the current Ukraine war. Not that the Kaiser or other specific people were enemies of humanity, but bombing hospitals, making soap out of bodies, lamps out of human skin, etc.
Based HL Mencken connoisseur. Here's one of his best quotes.
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
absolutely! history is being erased and/or rewritten before our eyes!
Summer vagene
The jabbed vigger sheeple will never wake up. Literally.
Ok. I keep sheep. It’s really a slander to my little flock to compare the vaxoholics to them.
Sheep do rather know what’s good for them. They make better choices. Just sayin.
Sheeple aren't even sheep... At least sheep have a flight response. Notice how the education system has churned out almost two generations of sheeple? And they said Common Core was a failure! It's worked SPLENDIDLY to dumb down the population.
Well yes and no. Allow me a horrid joke that I take all responsibility for.
One sheep to another: "Have you met the new shepherd yet? He's French. We're all going to someplace named 'Abattoir.' I've always wanted to see France!"
I’ll bet he’s Basque.
Well, some of my flock—the ram lambs—will go to a Texas “abattoir” (dang. Had to look it up, and I studied French in college.) Them’s the breaks I guess. The ewes, though, and a couple of lucky rams, will hopefully live long and productive and very sheltered lives—if I can keep feeding them as feed prices continue to go up.
Haha! I gave you a like just for your name.! I just might change mine to "Joe Biden's hair plugs"
You're absolutely right, the Vaxholes will continue to march onward, until they can't.
Little black pills
Dark
Definitely. Throw so much at everyone there is no focus on what is real and not scripted.
I think you hit the nail on the head. Distraction! A version of divide an conquer.
Covidiocy, Climagheddon, saving the liberal world order from Putin have all morphed into one, society-destroying, economy-destroying, Humanity-destroying blob…. controlled by an evil cabal.
Pfizer 0, Internet 1 million
hahaha
Since I started reading your writings my daughter gifted me her senior cat. We now have been adopted by an outside cat this week. I wonder as you keep writing and I keep reading how many kitty kats I will end up with.
I ended up with three! 😄
Good to know!
Can't have enough cats - either the internet kind, or the soft, furry purry ones!
http://whatwouldjackdo.net/images/the_crazy_cat_lady_starter_kit_by_kennerz27-d5wjl3i.jpg
Ha ha, love it!
Ha ha, that is totally for me! I need to get that 😄
Cats are the best. We have two, and I have been thinking about a kitten; I've never had one of those.
"Kitten" is a different breed from "cat." Be prepared for sheer unadulterated energy-bombing and death-by-cute.
Funny!
I've been scrolling the tweet's replies, and I have yet to find even ONE tweet in support of Pfizer.
I added this:
"By "science" I assume you mean conducting trials for sticking your poison in children by:
Excluding ALL children who got one shot
Excluding ALL children who got two shots
Excluding ALL children who got three shots, for 6 days after that third shot.
And only THEN counting AEs."
You are correct, but that's only a tiny sub-set of the many techniques of "science." It also means carefully planning a study so that only results that support a desired conclusion are obtained, preferably not by outright fraud, but use that if no subtler alternative is available. Industry publications should be owned by Pharma or other private interests who prioritize profit and control over objectivity and impartiality. Similarly, those who lead non-profits, government agencies and such, that exert control over what gets funded, what drugs are approved, should always profess to be "professional, impartial, objective and (of course) scientific," when in actuality they are biased by personal connections, industry loyalties, ideologies and profit opportunity. Scientific merit or the serving the public health should be the last consideration, although if these are served at least occasionally, it will improve the overall image of the entire system. Any doctor, researcher or other professional who dares stray far from official dogma must be de-funded, demonized in the press, ostracized and silenced by any means available.
I had 140 characters to work with. It's why I couldn't even write "adverse events" but had to abbreviate it as "AEs".
There was one calling out everyone as being afraid of a needle.
But that was only one
I believe in science and I see you pfizer.
Pfizer continues in a great tradition of pscience.
Unit 731 in China
Mengele's lab in germany
Etc.
FWIW, my humble contribution.
https://acmecity1870.substack.com/p/pfizer-cant-meme
That was frikkin effective!!
That’s good
In Spanish, the name of Pfizer's president translates to "mockery."
It's a beautiful thing!
Unjabbed. Unmasked. Untested. Uncaring.
The Untouchables!
I can’t believe they posted that. It’s going to age sooooo well
https://librti.com/view-video/schizer-we-make-sh-t
Hmm. Seemed to load but wouldn't play. Every time this happens with non-MSM media, I have to wonder.
I have also had these dire-sounding warnings plastered on many of the sites I visit: "Are you sure you want to load this content?" wtf!!!
Someone posted this- they would rather drop all of India as a client instead of allowing a trial....
https://mobile.twitter.com/WagsWags/status/1545124990629998592
ha ha ha Ralph Nader posted a new radio program this week about "vaccine apartheid." I thought he would mean treating the unvaccinated as 2nd class citizens. NO NO He meant that Bill Gates and Tony should donate free vaccines to India, Brazil, Africa--all the 3rd world countries that couldn't afford to pay for their mRNA vaccines. I was so happy! HAPPY! Bill and Tony will NEVER donate free vaccines--even if the vaccines are totally worthless. Thank God! The vaccines are worthless and actually cause death and adverse reactions. The 3rd world countries are doing MUCH BETTER than the fully vaccinated western countries. We are fortunate we can rely on the greed of big Pharma to keep these destructive medicines out of these countries who are doing so well without them.
With the Covid-19 "vaccines" all, or substantially all, is directly funded by the government. Anyone in the USA gets their shot at no cost to them. This is also true for Paxlovid and probably many other drugs. I suspect it's much the same in other nations too. As with much "foreign aid," our government may "donate" the vaxxes to foreign nations. In the case of these, however, I suspect that more and more will pass on the kind offer. Not to worry; Big Pharma is still making its money, and virtually all of it directly off the government. Who needs that silly free market when you have a guaranteed contract regardless of demand?
Cheers for the largest democracy in the world by a wide margin.
I want to move to India. Lots of real thinking going on there. (Don't really want to live in India. It's WAY toooo hot!)
Not according to some of Kipling's stories. I realize that "India" was different territories in the 19th century, but not all of it was tropical and sub-tropical.
I guess I've only heard about the hot parts. I've always taken the comments at face value and have never studied to see if they were from one area or another.
Someone run out and get the chips and ice cream for everyone. I'm too busy glued to my darling little laptop...
Things seem to be drifting a little. We've gone from, "Nothing to see here, nothing's happening" to "Hmmm, I wonder what's causing this excess mortality world wide? What could it be? Researchers need to look into this. Researchers are baffled, Austrian leadership are blaming doctors for the bad vaccine outcomes because they didn't explain the risk to their patients" ad infinitum ad nauseam. The rats are beginning to scramble.
I've never seen so many "experts" baffled for so long in my life. I thought the science was settled? That's what they've been screeching for years when it comes to "vaccine" technology anyway. 🙄
No, no ...Welensky said the science is grey.
"We may never know."
Just like the motivation of every jihadi attack.
Just like what happened with the Vegas shooter.
"We may never know."
"The rats are the first to desert a sinking ship" is a metaphor, but it's (probably) literally true.
[Puts on Captain Obvious suit]
In modern usage, the term is usually meant in derogatory terms against people who are the first to leave a certain situation. Yet, is that fair? Not at all. At least in the days of older ships, the rats tended to inhabit the lower parts of a ship. If a ship began to take on water, naturally the rats would seek higher ground. So yes, if someone topside sees rats jumping off the side of the ship, even though everything looks hunky-dory above, then it was a sign that not all was well below deck. I envision a naive passenger looking over the rail of the ship: "That's funny, I don't recall the ship sitting so low in the water when we left port."
While I've never been on a sinking ship, I have at least a few times in my life worked in enterprises where people start leaving en masse. That too is an ill omen. In my experience, it wasn't the rats who left, but in fact the most talented, the most essential and critical workers for a project. Although I would sometimes hear someone use that "Rats" meme as criticism, if you accept my logic above, I'd have to say those rats are actually quite smart.
I went to post the picture on the right on Pfizer's twitter account...and someone had already beaten me to it!
But I posted it again, anyway.
Which ones in the control group?
I was told that they had to unblind the control group because... wait for it... if they were not vaxxed, they would die of COVID. By unblinding, they saved their lives!
Yes. Really. I was told that by vaxtard friend at Pfizer.
I'm still waiting for my personal "winter of death" I was promised.
Such disappoint. Much splatter.
Yes, I recall reading that. Sometimes there perhaps is an ethical justification. I think when antibiotics was first being trialed (1930s) they did something similar. The argument is that it works so well, it would be unconscionable to deny it to the controls. That is true, but it requires the condition "works well" for it to be valid. And in the case of the jabs, it probably is a lie.
While it is a side issue, that raises one of many difficult ethical questions for conducting drug trials or other research: how does one actually keep a control group? I claim no expertise in such, but medical or other ethics requires all manner of difficult decisions. It's easy for the outsider moralizing ("One death is too many.") That makes good copy in the media or for a politician, but in the real world, saving that one life may of necessity cost two, ten or a hundred collateral deaths elsewhere. The real world is full of such thorny dilemmas, a fact typically lost on the Leftist do-gooder, the airhead on social media, etc.
I thought that was well known. Also it's not the first time they've done it either. HPV vaccination (just as toxic) back in 2011 in Denmark they did this too.
You know, it's funny. A cynic outside looking in might jump to the erroneous conclusion that they wanted to not ask too many questions during safety trials, perhaps with the the intent to get permanent approval of a product so that they could start selling it.
Did that vaxtard ever think about all the deaths that will occur worldwide over the next 10 years as a result of the luxury to not think about the least amongst us?
This is always her answer:
"Millions around the world died of the vaxxine. Without it, millions more would die."
She doesn't even really accept that there are side effects.
Don't ask--and they won't tell.
They're mocking us, you know that right?
Say more? Do you mean mRNA vaccine manufacturers are mocking us?
Yes. And the experts, bureaucrats and politicians.
I don't think they mean to mock us. The fact that WE FEEL MOCKED doesn't mean that was their intention. They have kept us completely censored, so there is no need to mock us. NOBODY is getting our message, so they don't need to reply to it, acknowledge in any way. Mocking it would just give free publicity to us. Instead, they are just carrying on with policies that insure as much vaccination as possible. Everything supports going along with mass one-size-fits-all vaccination protocols and ignoring everything that doesn't support that approach. That way, all the people who support traditional * vaccine policies will be forced to support this policy--unless and until more news of uptick in deaths forces them to entensely scrutina (scrutinize) our https://series.welloflife.com/grb/part4-live/
rekt