87 Comments

"People who criticize me are actually criticizing philosophy and truth."

-Fau Chi

Expand full comment

Guys, this is starting to look like Stockholm Syndrome. Even my family and friends get upset if I use logic or research to point out concerns. 🙄

Expand full comment

Today a client of mine said, "may I ask you a personal question? Are you vaccinated?" I realized that ONLY vaccinated people are worried about whether or not someone is vaccinated. Isn't that an indication that the vaccinated don't trust these shots? No one who is unvaccinated has asked about my vaccination status.

Expand full comment

Too real.... makes it 'comedy' Laughter, in my opinion, helps us to retain some semblance of sanity. Thank you for the share :)

Expand full comment

So, so helpful for the quarterlies! And that is all that matters. ~ Pfizer

Expand full comment

It works………..until it doesn’t.

Lithuania vaccinated ~75% of its adults and instituted a very strict vaccine pass program

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/lithuania-vaccinated-75-of-its-adults?r=bm3n6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=

Moderna, Fauci, Gates and our own Department of Defense, have been trying to make mRNA genetic modified spike protein injections work for years and all they did was kill a lot of lab rats. They were all well aware that they could harm our immune systems.

DNA vaccines, which were first created in 2005, have never been approved for human use in the United States and past studies have warned that they “possess significant unpredictability and a number of inherent harmful potential hazards” and that “there is inadequate knowledge to define either the probability of unintended events or the consequences of genetic modifications.” Another long-standing issue with such vaccines is mitigating “unwanted immune reactions” that result from natural immune response to the foreign genetic material they contain.

Since 2016, Moderna’s RNA vaccine program has received $100 million in funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The Gates Foundation has since poured millions directly into both Moderna’s and Inovio’s Covid-19 vaccine efforts.

Gates’ backing of DNA and RNA vaccines is significant, given that Gates – a billionaire with unparalleled influence and control over global healthcare policy – recently asserted that the best options for a Covid-19 vaccine are these same vaccines, despite the fact that they have never before been approved for use in humans. Yet, thanks to the emergency authorizations activated due to the current crisis, both Moderna’s and Inovio’s testing for these vaccines has skipped animal trials and gone straight to human testing. They are also set to be fast-tracked for widespread use in a matter of months. Moderna’s clinical trial in humans began in mid-March, followed by Inovio’s in the beginning of April. Thus, they are not only Gates’ favorites to be the new vaccine, but are also slated to be the first to complete clinical trials and garner emergency U.S. government approval, especially Moderna’s vaccine which is being jointly developed with the government’s NIH.

In the years since, our Department of Defense -backed DNA and RNA vaccine companies, includingModerna, Inovio as well as Germany’s CureVac, have been unable to get their products licensed for human use, largely due to the fact that their vaccines have failed to provide sufficient immunity in human trials. Examples of these ineffective vaccines include CureVac’s attempt at a rabies vaccine and Moderna’s efforts to create a vaccine for the Zika virus (which was funded by the U.S. government).

The two coronavirus vaccines for SARS that managed to pass phase 1 trials ended up, in subsequent studies, causing immune hypersensitivity in mice “resulting in severe immunopathology,” i.e. permanent defects or malfunctions in the immune system

I will repeat…..those that have trusted our Government, and have been injected, are little more than lab rats in the eyes of a number of very evil greedy players. They knew this could happen and pushed these mRNA injections on the World anyway.

THIS NEEDS TO BE STOPPED THOSE RESPONSIBLE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this. We all need to remember that laughter is often the best medicine and not the mRNA version.

Expand full comment

rand paul is a liar not me -fau chi , i dont know why it appears they get AIDS - fau chi, i dont know why people used to die from AIDS treatments - fau chi

Expand full comment

A laugh a day makes doctors go away

Expand full comment

Stand up for the kids by sending comments to the FDA before they approve this poison! https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/no-to-covid-vaxs-for-kids/

Expand full comment

I have bravely started posting things to my LinkedIn account. I worked in public health most my career and started seeing things run amuck in the field when Obama was elected. Most my LinkedIn contact s are in public health...I feel so betrayed by my own field...

Expand full comment

Brilliant in the darkness this points out.

Expand full comment

lol. one of my fave chinese quotes is "a man who cannot smile should not operate a store" or something to that measure. which is now hilarious bc you can see no smiles as they are hidden behind the muzzle. so the inverse of that is, if muzzles are required do not enter that location nor give you money. and to your post, that lifetime will be short as the poison works quickly.

Expand full comment

gatito - I wish to deny this dark humor made me laugh ... but it did. Thanks!

Expand full comment

the only hypothesis that can be accepted is: "the vaxxes have not been proven deadly".

course, some of the really lousy effects of mrna destruction on immune and neuro systems takes years to cook.

the consumer risk of the cdc/fda claim "the vaxxes are safe" is nearly 90% that the hypothesis is false. with a ban of 100% to 80%.

Expand full comment

Somewhat off topic for this post - Alex Berenson posted about severe restriction, high vaccination, and failure of correlation to test results. I wondered why he showed test data, so I looked up deaths in Lithuania and found deaths at about 2/3 the level of previous peak. So 75% inoculation rate only maps to 33% reduction? 25% of the population can't account for the death rate unless fatality rate more than doubled but this has not been shown elsewhere. 33% is an interesting level - it occurs to me that what if most "efficacy" is not the shot itself but previous exposure? Lithuania reports 385k positive tests out of 2.7M population - 14%. Some positive cases were surely missed, but assuming normal distribution due to strict mandates forcing previously exposed to get the shot - wouldn't this suggest efficacy is a bit lower and due in part to previous exposure being attributed to the shot? I doubt any country is collecting the necessary data, or really wants to know at this point.

Expand full comment

Bill Gates Is evil

Expand full comment

Brought to you by Pfizer.

Expand full comment

Imagine what the people who are willing to get an experimental shot will do if the powers that be tell them they should do it. Will American families once again literally fight against each other? Over a so called vaccine? If enough of the people who won't get the shot are put out of work, not allowed to go to the grocery store, etc. life will become hard and at some point desperate. Desperate people are very dangerous.

Expand full comment

I'm smilin'--thanks gatito!!!

Expand full comment

I need this on a t-shirt.

Expand full comment

Thanks you! Best laugh I've had for a while. Still laughing.

Expand full comment