excuse me everyone, i am just a kitten and not a world famous emoji nutritionist 🙀🙀🗣️☠️☠️ !! but i think that maybe we really need to be worried about an alpha beta delta combo.
that’s how you get fraternities in case you didn’t know…
How this fool stays around this long is beyond me. He's been exposed as apparatchick and propogandist long ago, and yet is still around hashtagging psuedo-scientific sophistry. Amazing how he relegates the South Africa issue to HIV, which is actually not a main issue in most of South Africa, but outside of it, and yet another region specific variant they have rediculous nomenclature for. Now he's saying the variants will "recombine" to create new variants like it's the Megazord from Power Rangers.
Someone should do a test on our side to see if we can say this foolishness and not be banned. Lol
Ding's rumination on N95 underpants was his only useful contribution. It was inadvertently useful, but provided some needed comic relief. He has otherwise been the equivalent of an incontinent, ankle-biting, yapping little snack dog, of the kind that somehow manages to get treed by a cat.
I actually got in a PM Debate with that clown over ivermectin, etc. all he could keep saying was we needed to do more studies. He obviously didn’t care that people were dying. They were expendable for his political leanings.
Ah part of the COVID expert squad! The head of the Ontario Scientology Table was also a COVID expert but that ended when he decided to vacation, I mean work from the Dominican Republic back in December while he demanded that we all “celebrate” Christmas in our own bubble. BTW, I am still waiting for the Ding Dong family picture wearing their Lederhosen!
This guy has only spewed non-sense and fear-mongering (don't forget his emoji style writing). Virus is going to mutate, like it or not. Also, perhaps he should investigate the role lockdowns have played (a long shot though).
I am not a virologist, but his comments about the "variants" "mixing" sounds a little strange to me. It sounds as if viruses had sex and could procreate a "mixed" progeny. I don't think it works that way. As far as I know, they just mutate...
Do viruses combine with each other to spawn variants of themselves? Or doesn't one type just change slightly by a small mutation of it's genetic code? If I am correct, that makes this guy a bloody crank.
2. "About two months after the NIH meeting on ivermectin, the NIH announced the award NOT-TR-21–024; funding of ACTIV-6 to study the use of repurposed drugs in COVID-19. Duke University was the only institution in the country that met the criteria for the study, according to the NIH. Funding was thus distributed on a sole source basis. The “initial investment” in the trial was later announced to be $155 million. The principal investigator of the trial was not identified initially but, in a later announcement, was identified to be Susanna Naggie, who is also a member of the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. The two positions Naggie holds clearly represent a conflict of interest. A positive recommendation on the use of the drug in COVID-19 would effectively end the clinical trial. The NIH award also raises the question of whether the prospect of the award played a role in the current recommendation on ivermectin."
kitten corner: recombinant RNA
Funny how I think "expert" means "hysteric" here.
How this fool stays around this long is beyond me. He's been exposed as apparatchick and propogandist long ago, and yet is still around hashtagging psuedo-scientific sophistry. Amazing how he relegates the South Africa issue to HIV, which is actually not a main issue in most of South Africa, but outside of it, and yet another region specific variant they have rediculous nomenclature for. Now he's saying the variants will "recombine" to create new variants like it's the Megazord from Power Rangers.
Someone should do a test on our side to see if we can say this foolishness and not be banned. Lol
Ding's rumination on N95 underpants was his only useful contribution. It was inadvertently useful, but provided some needed comic relief. He has otherwise been the equivalent of an incontinent, ankle-biting, yapping little snack dog, of the kind that somehow manages to get treed by a cat.
Just don't search for "N95 underwear" because innocent kittens have no need of such knowledge.
I actually got in a PM Debate with that clown over ivermectin, etc. all he could keep saying was we needed to do more studies. He obviously didn’t care that people were dying. They were expendable for his political leanings.
Ah part of the COVID expert squad! The head of the Ontario Scientology Table was also a COVID expert but that ended when he decided to vacation, I mean work from the Dominican Republic back in December while he demanded that we all “celebrate” Christmas in our own bubble. BTW, I am still waiting for the Ding Dong family picture wearing their Lederhosen!
This guy has only spewed non-sense and fear-mongering (don't forget his emoji style writing). Virus is going to mutate, like it or not. Also, perhaps he should investigate the role lockdowns have played (a long shot though).
This guy is relentless with the fear porn. A punk faced agent of disinformation
I am not a virologist, but his comments about the "variants" "mixing" sounds a little strange to me. It sounds as if viruses had sex and could procreate a "mixed" progeny. I don't think it works that way. As far as I know, they just mutate...
Don’t forget about the Triple Lindy variant coming soon!
https://www.google.com/search?q=rodney+dangerfield+triple+lindy+gif&rlz=1CDGOYI_enCA942CA942&hl=en-US&ei=Ao_xYIj2Btu0tQbojo7ADw&oq=rodney+triple+lindy&gs_lcp=ChNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwEAEYATIFCC4QkwIyBggAEBYQHjIFCCEQoAE6BAgAEEc6AggpOgUIABCRAjoICAAQsQMQkQI6BwgAELEDEAo6BQgAELEDOggIABCxAxCDAToFCC4QsQM6AggAOgIILjoECAAQQzoGCAAQChBDOggILhCxAxCDAToOCC4QsQMQgwEQxwEQrwE6CAgAEOoCEI8BOgsIABCxAxCDARCRAjoLCC4QsQMQxwEQowI6DgguELEDEIMBEMcBEKMCOgcILhBDEJMCOgQILhBDOgoILhCxAxCDARBDOgoILhDHARCjAhBDOgoILhCxAxBDEJMCOgcILhCxAxBDOggILhDHARCvAToLCC4QxwEQrwEQkwI6BAgAEAo6BAgAEA06BggAEA0QHjoICAAQCBANEB5QhEZY-sEBYJ7OAWgKcAF4AYABqQKIAbobkgEHMTIuMTQuM5gBAKABAbABHsgBCMABAQ&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp#imgrc=rFObXHdYJ25mOM
And this idiot guy gets no heat from the tech powers that be...why is that?
"really worried"
world famous emoji nutritionist 🙀🙀🗣️☠️☠️ !!
LOL
was he in to telling you fat was bad but sugar is okay?
he is a nutritionist with no regard for hypotheses error and testing arguments......
Dear Kitten, You need to start shopping here! (Wish I could post the photo!) https://www.armtheanimals.com/a/s/collections/12-99?gclid=CjwKCAjw3MSHBhB3EiwAxcaEu4Y6Znr438FC-f533vbDBHRxIbNtomX1YFvMMLLak1O8XeHNA2U6uRoCZiQQAvD_BwE
Do viruses combine with each other to spawn variants of themselves? Or doesn't one type just change slightly by a small mutation of it's genetic code? If I am correct, that makes this guy a bloody crank.
Good thing alpha males are immune to the beta soyboy variant.
When the Betas & Delts throw down, it’s a rager.
Are his kids still in Austria? Remember that story?
https://dossier.substack.com/p/the-impersonator-eric-feigl-ding
Two things:
1. 2002 patent out of UNC, patent later transferred to NIH: "Methods for producing recombinant Coronavirus"
https://patents.justia.com/patent/7279327
2. "About two months after the NIH meeting on ivermectin, the NIH announced the award NOT-TR-21–024; funding of ACTIV-6 to study the use of repurposed drugs in COVID-19. Duke University was the only institution in the country that met the criteria for the study, according to the NIH. Funding was thus distributed on a sole source basis. The “initial investment” in the trial was later announced to be $155 million. The principal investigator of the trial was not identified initially but, in a later announcement, was identified to be Susanna Naggie, who is also a member of the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. The two positions Naggie holds clearly represent a conflict of interest. A positive recommendation on the use of the drug in COVID-19 would effectively end the clinical trial. The NIH award also raises the question of whether the prospect of the award played a role in the current recommendation on ivermectin."