excuse me public health people, i am just a kitten and this is all so terribly confusing, so please pardon me if this is a silly question,
but given that the future protection from covid afforded by having already had and recovered from the disease is as good or better than that of vaccination, why are none of your rules or vaccination passports taking prior infection status into account?
i think maybe if people with vaccination are safe, then probably so are people who got sick and got better.
i have heard some people say that this is because you’re not really epidemiologists and are really just vaccine salesmen with a side order of tyranny, but i’m sure that cannot be true.
this must just be an oversight because you all are so terribly busy.
When there's no longer an excuse for not being vaccinated ("not open to my age group yet"), things are going to get interesting. I plan to try "I've had the virus", but I don't think that'll fly. This is going to turn our political divide into something new. Those who are "clean" and those who are "unclean". This is bizarre to witness. We're somehow morphing into a secular non-theistic theocracy (is there a name for this to avoid insulting healthy religion?), with zealots ready to drop the hammer on non-believers (those who refuse the sacred injection). This is the world of our own creation.
I can already hear the panic purveyors screaming: "But... but... this study isn't yet peer reviewed, we must inject everyone before they complete the peer review, just in case"
There is NO reason to jab after you had C19, other than paranoia and not assimilating even the most basic of numbers and stats listed above. You COULD get your blood tested to see where your immunity levels are at, at least a Dr would look at them and tell you it could be useful. HOWEVER, You shouldn't be using the local newscaster nor Bided) as your medical go to.... If you haven't noticed, they are LIARS and extremely untrustworthy.
kitten corner: recovered covid
When there's no longer an excuse for not being vaccinated ("not open to my age group yet"), things are going to get interesting. I plan to try "I've had the virus", but I don't think that'll fly. This is going to turn our political divide into something new. Those who are "clean" and those who are "unclean". This is bizarre to witness. We're somehow morphing into a secular non-theistic theocracy (is there a name for this to avoid insulting healthy religion?), with zealots ready to drop the hammer on non-believers (those who refuse the sacred injection). This is the world of our own creation.
I can already hear the panic purveyors screaming: "But... but... this study isn't yet peer reviewed, we must inject everyone before they complete the peer review, just in case"
100 years - “natural immunity is the best”
>3/1020 - “only vaccinated against individuals are eligible for freedom”
> not really epidemiologists and are really just vaccine salesmen with a side order of tyranny
gato chistoso
Preach, cat!
Does anyone have the title of this paper or a link to it?
There is NO reason to jab after you had C19, other than paranoia and not assimilating even the most basic of numbers and stats listed above. You COULD get your blood tested to see where your immunity levels are at, at least a Dr would look at them and tell you it could be useful. HOWEVER, You shouldn't be using the local newscaster nor Bided) as your medical go to.... If you haven't noticed, they are LIARS and extremely untrustworthy.
Am I conflicted if I fully agree with you and go long on $PFE at the same time?