I was heartened to see an FB ad from a local vaxx pusher in Cumbria (England). The ad was urging locals to book home appointments for the jab. There were 0 likes on the ad. Of 1.6k reactions all of them were laughing or anger emojis. The comments, of which there were hundreds, were gold and all anti-jab. People are beginning to realise the jabs are dangerous.
I should NOT have read this while waiting for Mass to begin in church. Fortunately, it was early enough so that only a couple of people were there to hear my not-very-well-stifled guffaw.
Are they planning every 2 months forever? At this point, it could be a bet between them. "Let´s say 2 months and see how many people are stupid enough".
Why stop at 1 "vaccine" a year when you can make 6X the profit this way? This is common sense Gato. Obviously a daily "vaccine" would be most profitable and therefore the most "safe and effective", but big pharma/corrupt bureaucrats don't understand business at all.
Vax every 2 months? Why not every month? Why not every day? Oh sure! let's take medical advice from a another POLITICIAN/LAWYER WHO HEADS HHS. What could possibly go wrong? How about doctors start giving legal advice...tell the hacks "my body my choice" and F*** Off. The irony is Bill Gates' Microsoft baby is fso ull of viruses it's unusable, he utterly failed at anyivirus-ing his own monster. This is truly clown world!!
Perhaps they should try a new strategy of trying to "guess the next variant"? Oops, they tried that already - it's called "Flu Vaccine" and it hasn't worked too well.
It beats me how they can continue to make the claim that the gene therapies protect against severe illness, hospitalization and death. OK, the US has never released the incriminating data (I thought CDC was supposed to be a Public Health Agency, so how can they justify withholding data that other countries publish?). But said data from said other (major) countries consistently show that 2022 data has over 90% of cases, hostpitalizations and deaths being in the vaccinated. And the strains and "vaccines" are the same globally, so why would the US be any different? And if not, back to my original question, how can they continue to make this claim?
Unless the level of intellect "Administration" bureaucrats in the US is similar to an Australian lady I had a conversation with earlier this year at a social function. When I quoted the above data, her response was "Well what do you exppect, that because over 90% of people have been 'vaccinated" so it's in line". I forget my precide response but, recognizing there wasn't much point in continuing the conversation, I think I just said, thanks for your opinion but you might wish to consider the consequences of what you just said. And moved on!
That's what you get when a philanthropath like Bill Gates is designing the business model.
"A updated COVID vaccine can help protect you from the worst outcomes of COVID"
The worst outcome of COVID sure seems to be living around these idiots. Their shot doesn't seem to be working.
I was heartened to see an FB ad from a local vaxx pusher in Cumbria (England). The ad was urging locals to book home appointments for the jab. There were 0 likes on the ad. Of 1.6k reactions all of them were laughing or anger emojis. The comments, of which there were hundreds, were gold and all anti-jab. People are beginning to realise the jabs are dangerous.
"... they're gonna have to rename it Microsoft."
I should NOT have read this while waiting for Mass to begin in church. Fortunately, it was early enough so that only a couple of people were there to hear my not-very-well-stifled guffaw.
Just hook up an IV and walk around with the pole.
Do you still have to wear a mask?
Are they planning every 2 months forever? At this point, it could be a bet between them. "Let´s say 2 months and see how many people are stupid enough".
Why stop at 1 "vaccine" a year when you can make 6X the profit this way? This is common sense Gato. Obviously a daily "vaccine" would be most profitable and therefore the most "safe and effective", but big pharma/corrupt bureaucrats don't understand business at all.
Vax every 2 months? Why not every month? Why not every day? Oh sure! let's take medical advice from a another POLITICIAN/LAWYER WHO HEADS HHS. What could possibly go wrong? How about doctors start giving legal advice...tell the hacks "my body my choice" and F*** Off. The irony is Bill Gates' Microsoft baby is fso ull of viruses it's unusable, he utterly failed at anyivirus-ing his own monster. This is truly clown world!!
Anyone getting these shots at 2 months intervals deserves to be considered for a Darwin Award:-
Nominee must be dead or rendered sterile (likely if they continue)
Astoundingly stupid judgment (no question)
Cause of one's own demise (ain't nobody holding them down)
Capable of sound judgement (debatable in most cases)
Event must be verified (check social media for bragging about getting the latest injection).
I always wondered why a lawyer was appointed Secretary of HHS.
Absolutely fucking ridiculous. And anyone who still plays this game of Russian Roulette is a moron. I am over the crazy!!
Like Microsoft updates. LOL.
Still, some people actually believe this shit.
https://markoshinskie8de.substack.com/p/vaxxing-is-sick
This just in: Econo Lube 'n Tune just recommended oil changes every 15 miles; so by the time you get home, you have to go back!.
But at least they don't have gov't doing their "commercials" for them.
With 2 month updates, what exactly is the ‘effective’ period? Damn it. 😀
Perhaps they should try a new strategy of trying to "guess the next variant"? Oops, they tried that already - it's called "Flu Vaccine" and it hasn't worked too well.
It beats me how they can continue to make the claim that the gene therapies protect against severe illness, hospitalization and death. OK, the US has never released the incriminating data (I thought CDC was supposed to be a Public Health Agency, so how can they justify withholding data that other countries publish?). But said data from said other (major) countries consistently show that 2022 data has over 90% of cases, hostpitalizations and deaths being in the vaccinated. And the strains and "vaccines" are the same globally, so why would the US be any different? And if not, back to my original question, how can they continue to make this claim?
Unless the level of intellect "Administration" bureaucrats in the US is similar to an Australian lady I had a conversation with earlier this year at a social function. When I quoted the above data, her response was "Well what do you exppect, that because over 90% of people have been 'vaccinated" so it's in line". I forget my precide response but, recognizing there wasn't much point in continuing the conversation, I think I just said, thanks for your opinion but you might wish to consider the consequences of what you just said. And moved on!
too many people are listening and still getting shots because "government" and "experts"....it's maddening!