Jul 25, 2022·edited Jul 25, 2022Liked by el gato malo
Fantastic article and a great debunking of "vaccines save lives" narrative.
There possibly was a small benefit from vaccines against mortality in 2021. However, if the USA is like Europe, this benefit evaporated by Mar of 2022 and became NEGATIVE in June 2022.
We, meaning the people who did NOT vaccinate, knew that we had to balance a small improvement in death risk from Covid in 2021, against an UNKNOWN risk of taking an experimental crazy "vaccine" based on mRNA technology with a track record of complete failure, with vaccinology having a history of only failure for ALL coronavirus vaccines.
Data from June 2022 validates our judgment (for those of us who did not die of Covid)
I am going to struggle with any physician who recommended people vaccinate with this. I think the only honest answer any physician could have given when someone asked them was they literally do not know. They have no information to know whether the vaccine will help or hurt.
This has nothing to do with excess deaths but everything to do with inconvenient truths in stats and how governments exorcise those: I have been in touch with the Minister of Health for the province of Alberta, Canada, recently because Alberta Health Services( AHS) had an employee vax mandate. Nothing new here, except that this particular mandate applied ONLY to new hires after the date of Nov 30.21, and healthcare students. You read that right- existing employees before Nov 30 did not need to be vaccinated -because they threatened to quit in droves- but new hires and students, did. I argued to the Minister (for months) that there is absolutely no scientific evidence that vaccines work on any group after a certain date (Nov 30) or that students are somehow at higher risk of spreading or contracting C 19. Mr Health Minister finally replied to me early last week, skirting the lack of scientific basis for such a mandate altogether, and instead telling me that vaccines are 'safe and effective' and to get boosted. Problem for him is that he carelessly added a link to AHS' own 'vaccine outcomes' stats. Little did he know that I had been following these stats for months- something he himself apparently had not been doing: his own stats clearly showed was that while 38% of the population is boosted, they comprise over 50% of hospitalizations! Needless to say, I could not pass up the opportunity to ridicule and chastise him, so I screen shot the stats he linked to, and sent them back him, replying " you mean these stats? See you in court." I kid you not: three days later, without replying to me, AHS REMOVED the " vaccine outcomes" numbers from its website and replaced them with studies that tell us how wonderful vaccines are! They also magically removed the completely unsupportable mandate. Now, unfortunately for them I have many screen shots of their erstwhile data, and have put Mr Minister on notice that this is the case. Not sure what his next move will be. Bottom line is don't believe a word they say and instead, assume the exact opposite is true. Because it is.
I have almost finished reading Malcolm Kendrick’s book on atherosclerosis The Clot Thickens. In it, I have learned about the role of stress (among other things, like smoking drinking and lack of exercise) in leading to high blood pressure and heart attacks and so on.
Given what we have all lived through over the past 2.5 years, I am not convinced that the excess mortality we are currently seeing is entirely due to the vaccines (no doubt some is, in my mind, given the biologically plausibility of it, and the anomalous nature of many reported deaths in young and healthy people). With a 7-fold increase in heart disease seen in Latvia and Russia in middle aged men in the tumultuous years post collapse of the USSR, stress clearly has a massive role to play. It is debatable who might have felt that stress most keenly during the pandemic, but one might think it could be the poorest in society, and those who had lost businesses and income. This WILL confound any relationship with vaccination rates.
I personally still feel very stressed. It has been like being sent to prison for a crime you did not commit, during the lockdowns, and then treated as a pariah for being justifiably cautious over a hastily developed and poorly characterised gene therapy product. I am suddenly surrounded by zombie people who cannot use logic. It’s terrifying.
Perfect timing. Need to share this article with a friend. He “got high blood pressure from covid”. I asked are you sure it wasn’t from the booster? “No, I got covid 3 weeks after I had the booster”. Oh ok. He just had covid for the second time.
Here's Micah's devastating concise and data-laden takedown of Ethical Skeptic's chart:
"This account has been spreading misleading "statistics" since the pandemic began. Not only are they anonymous (with questionable credibility) but the account is run by either someone very good at statistics (knowing how to best distort/mislead) or someone very bad at statistics."
Naturally, he lists "He/Him" in his twitter bio, which appears to be close to 100% predictive of idiocy, which in Micah's case is immediately confirmed by his obsession with corn nuts and pink unicorns with gold lamé paws he carries around in his car.
The best rebuke of the "vaccines" and expose of all cause mortality is contained in Pfizer's own "safety and efficacy" data with over 46,000 participants. It had a "pure" group of placebo participants in 2020.
All cause mortality:
"Vaxxed": 22
Placebo: 16
That should've been the end of the scamdemic. But that data unbelievably led to the EUA of the Pfizer "vaccine"
Data point. In the years 2020/2021 combined US had approx 900,000 excess mortality (5 yr baseline avg). One 8 week period, the last 4 weeks of 2020 and first 4 weeks of 2021, accounted for 20 percent of that 2 year total. This 8 week period corresponds with the vaxx rollout for the elderly- draw your own conclusions.
If you look at Week 45 of 2020 thru to Week 5 of 2021 that period makes the 6 week "spike" of March/April 2020 look like a walk in the park.
The same is true looking at Week 32 of 2021 thru to Week 6 of 2022. This begs the question- what is happening that is causing all of these deaths. Not even in the official narrative are these being chalked up to "Covid"- at least not in this volume.
As an aside If you remove 8 states from the mortality equation of the March/April 2020 "spike" there was no meaningful excess death count in the other 42 states combined.
As for "variants" and mass media conjured pathogenic threats (Monkeypox etc.) these are the convenient scapegoats for the huge toll of injection injuries.
I'm on the other side of this debate. I think the Covid jabs really do reduce all-cause mortality.
We need a system analogous to VAERS but for all the unexpected good things the jabs do, like cures and healing and lifesaving. People can file reports like, "Covid jab shrank my brain tumor," "Covid jab deployed my car's air bag during an accident" or "Covid jab turned on my gun's safety before I dropped gun on floor."
When my community was hot and heavy into Covid November 2020. Of course we were putting the death stats out in our local news. I asked them if they would also publish ages and comorbidities so that people could see the actual risks. At that point they told me it was a HIPAA issue. I’m like so you’re able to put out who died but you’re not able to put out the age range and the comorbidities. They literally wanted everyone scared and following all of their little mandates.
Reminds me of psychotropics. SSRI/MAOI alter brain chemistry. From what level to what level? What is normal brain chemistry? Don't worry about it. Yours is obviously not normal.
Does altering brain chemistry have systemic effects that should be considered? yes, there are side effects. Your doctor can prescribe moar pills for that. Or put you on a different brand. Luckily, there are a lot of options to alter your brain chemistry.
No actual neurochemical baseline, 'efficacy' metrics absent all kinds of controls, no personal risk assessments let alone systemic. How does reported efficacy of one's "mood" compare to say, 30 minutes of cardio 3x/week? Why do you hate SCIENCE! Also, common sense gun laws.
Since they can no longer control the narrative, they’re now attempting to corrupt or muddy it with bogus science. I remain optimistic that real world events and data will soon prove irrefutable.
I think there's a psychological attempt at trying to convince themselves they weren't duped.
As such, they're going to try every way possible to 'prove' the vaccines worked. Just like how sports fans will find every possible stat to prove their guy is better than the actual best player (for example, I remember people trying to convince that Jonathan Toews was better than Sidney Crosby). But to those with a knack for spotting shifting rhetorical narratives and justifications applying critical thinking, it becomes more and more apparent the vaccines not only aren't working but they likely never did because they were using specious data points and metrics to claim this. I was suspicious of this from the start. It may have worked for, I don't know, 15 minutes but no more. And the plan to 'boost away' is just an example of authorities not knowing what they're doing and believing there are no other alternatives. It's sink or swim with experimental 'jections. Can't deviate from that. What? Admit we were wrong? F that! And I have no idea how doctors who keep peddling these lies look at themselves in the mirror at this point.
It's very hard to get people who took the shots and just wanted to move on to see they may have taken it for nothing. This is fine if it came with no consequences. But it apparently does - and mighty dangerous ones.
A health expert here was saying how we can't mandate it for kids because the experimental "vaccines" simply aren't that effective anymore. Big win on that given it was mainstream. You could see the veins popping out of the interviewer's head and neck. But she softened the blow by keeping to the myth the "vaccines" worked super well early. It was a confusing message for me, imagine a normie - I can just see the confused Shaggy and Scooby look.
They're skating and engaging in revisionism to try and hang on to what little credibility they have left. 'They worked but no now' routine suggests to me they never worked in the first place.
I also find it interesting China and Russia aren't using mRNA.
Fantastic article and a great debunking of "vaccines save lives" narrative.
There possibly was a small benefit from vaccines against mortality in 2021. However, if the USA is like Europe, this benefit evaporated by Mar of 2022 and became NEGATIVE in June 2022.
We, meaning the people who did NOT vaccinate, knew that we had to balance a small improvement in death risk from Covid in 2021, against an UNKNOWN risk of taking an experimental crazy "vaccine" based on mRNA technology with a track record of complete failure, with vaccinology having a history of only failure for ALL coronavirus vaccines.
Data from June 2022 validates our judgment (for those of us who did not die of Covid)
I am going to struggle with any physician who recommended people vaccinate with this. I think the only honest answer any physician could have given when someone asked them was they literally do not know. They have no information to know whether the vaccine will help or hurt.
This has nothing to do with excess deaths but everything to do with inconvenient truths in stats and how governments exorcise those: I have been in touch with the Minister of Health for the province of Alberta, Canada, recently because Alberta Health Services( AHS) had an employee vax mandate. Nothing new here, except that this particular mandate applied ONLY to new hires after the date of Nov 30.21, and healthcare students. You read that right- existing employees before Nov 30 did not need to be vaccinated -because they threatened to quit in droves- but new hires and students, did. I argued to the Minister (for months) that there is absolutely no scientific evidence that vaccines work on any group after a certain date (Nov 30) or that students are somehow at higher risk of spreading or contracting C 19. Mr Health Minister finally replied to me early last week, skirting the lack of scientific basis for such a mandate altogether, and instead telling me that vaccines are 'safe and effective' and to get boosted. Problem for him is that he carelessly added a link to AHS' own 'vaccine outcomes' stats. Little did he know that I had been following these stats for months- something he himself apparently had not been doing: his own stats clearly showed was that while 38% of the population is boosted, they comprise over 50% of hospitalizations! Needless to say, I could not pass up the opportunity to ridicule and chastise him, so I screen shot the stats he linked to, and sent them back him, replying " you mean these stats? See you in court." I kid you not: three days later, without replying to me, AHS REMOVED the " vaccine outcomes" numbers from its website and replaced them with studies that tell us how wonderful vaccines are! They also magically removed the completely unsupportable mandate. Now, unfortunately for them I have many screen shots of their erstwhile data, and have put Mr Minister on notice that this is the case. Not sure what his next move will be. Bottom line is don't believe a word they say and instead, assume the exact opposite is true. Because it is.
I have almost finished reading Malcolm Kendrick’s book on atherosclerosis The Clot Thickens. In it, I have learned about the role of stress (among other things, like smoking drinking and lack of exercise) in leading to high blood pressure and heart attacks and so on.
Given what we have all lived through over the past 2.5 years, I am not convinced that the excess mortality we are currently seeing is entirely due to the vaccines (no doubt some is, in my mind, given the biologically plausibility of it, and the anomalous nature of many reported deaths in young and healthy people). With a 7-fold increase in heart disease seen in Latvia and Russia in middle aged men in the tumultuous years post collapse of the USSR, stress clearly has a massive role to play. It is debatable who might have felt that stress most keenly during the pandemic, but one might think it could be the poorest in society, and those who had lost businesses and income. This WILL confound any relationship with vaccination rates.
I personally still feel very stressed. It has been like being sent to prison for a crime you did not commit, during the lockdowns, and then treated as a pariah for being justifiably cautious over a hastily developed and poorly characterised gene therapy product. I am suddenly surrounded by zombie people who cannot use logic. It’s terrifying.
Perfect timing. Need to share this article with a friend. He “got high blood pressure from covid”. I asked are you sure it wasn’t from the booster? “No, I got covid 3 weeks after I had the booster”. Oh ok. He just had covid for the second time.
Also appreciated this thread…https://twitter.com/remnantmd/status/1551152434357194754?s=21&t=Pvw9W6DOkIkvV0b_xMsN0g
Here's Micah's devastating concise and data-laden takedown of Ethical Skeptic's chart:
"This account has been spreading misleading "statistics" since the pandemic began. Not only are they anonymous (with questionable credibility) but the account is run by either someone very good at statistics (knowing how to best distort/mislead) or someone very bad at statistics."
https://twitter.com/MicahPollak/status/1551025659677446144
Naturally, he lists "He/Him" in his twitter bio, which appears to be close to 100% predictive of idiocy, which in Micah's case is immediately confirmed by his obsession with corn nuts and pink unicorns with gold lamé paws he carries around in his car.
https://twitter.com/MicahPollak/status/1551354590142005250
One can only imagine the sort of "economics" this idiot "teaches" and how much they charge students to receive his wisdom.
The best rebuke of the "vaccines" and expose of all cause mortality is contained in Pfizer's own "safety and efficacy" data with over 46,000 participants. It had a "pure" group of placebo participants in 2020.
All cause mortality:
"Vaxxed": 22
Placebo: 16
That should've been the end of the scamdemic. But that data unbelievably led to the EUA of the Pfizer "vaccine"
How are we still even discussing this trash?
Data point. In the years 2020/2021 combined US had approx 900,000 excess mortality (5 yr baseline avg). One 8 week period, the last 4 weeks of 2020 and first 4 weeks of 2021, accounted for 20 percent of that 2 year total. This 8 week period corresponds with the vaxx rollout for the elderly- draw your own conclusions.
If you look at Week 45 of 2020 thru to Week 5 of 2021 that period makes the 6 week "spike" of March/April 2020 look like a walk in the park.
The same is true looking at Week 32 of 2021 thru to Week 6 of 2022. This begs the question- what is happening that is causing all of these deaths. Not even in the official narrative are these being chalked up to "Covid"- at least not in this volume.
As an aside If you remove 8 states from the mortality equation of the March/April 2020 "spike" there was no meaningful excess death count in the other 42 states combined.
As for "variants" and mass media conjured pathogenic threats (Monkeypox etc.) these are the convenient scapegoats for the huge toll of injection injuries.
I'm on the other side of this debate. I think the Covid jabs really do reduce all-cause mortality.
We need a system analogous to VAERS but for all the unexpected good things the jabs do, like cures and healing and lifesaving. People can file reports like, "Covid jab shrank my brain tumor," "Covid jab deployed my car's air bag during an accident" or "Covid jab turned on my gun's safety before I dropped gun on floor."
Man, you are just such a breath of fresh air for sanity in these crazy-making times...
Thanks again.
When my community was hot and heavy into Covid November 2020. Of course we were putting the death stats out in our local news. I asked them if they would also publish ages and comorbidities so that people could see the actual risks. At that point they told me it was a HIPAA issue. I’m like so you’re able to put out who died but you’re not able to put out the age range and the comorbidities. They literally wanted everyone scared and following all of their little mandates.
Reminds me of psychotropics. SSRI/MAOI alter brain chemistry. From what level to what level? What is normal brain chemistry? Don't worry about it. Yours is obviously not normal.
Does altering brain chemistry have systemic effects that should be considered? yes, there are side effects. Your doctor can prescribe moar pills for that. Or put you on a different brand. Luckily, there are a lot of options to alter your brain chemistry.
No actual neurochemical baseline, 'efficacy' metrics absent all kinds of controls, no personal risk assessments let alone systemic. How does reported efficacy of one's "mood" compare to say, 30 minutes of cardio 3x/week? Why do you hate SCIENCE! Also, common sense gun laws.
Since they can no longer control the narrative, they’re now attempting to corrupt or muddy it with bogus science. I remain optimistic that real world events and data will soon prove irrefutable.
Prof Pollack doin' woowoo.
I think there's a psychological attempt at trying to convince themselves they weren't duped.
As such, they're going to try every way possible to 'prove' the vaccines worked. Just like how sports fans will find every possible stat to prove their guy is better than the actual best player (for example, I remember people trying to convince that Jonathan Toews was better than Sidney Crosby). But to those with a knack for spotting shifting rhetorical narratives and justifications applying critical thinking, it becomes more and more apparent the vaccines not only aren't working but they likely never did because they were using specious data points and metrics to claim this. I was suspicious of this from the start. It may have worked for, I don't know, 15 minutes but no more. And the plan to 'boost away' is just an example of authorities not knowing what they're doing and believing there are no other alternatives. It's sink or swim with experimental 'jections. Can't deviate from that. What? Admit we were wrong? F that! And I have no idea how doctors who keep peddling these lies look at themselves in the mirror at this point.
It's very hard to get people who took the shots and just wanted to move on to see they may have taken it for nothing. This is fine if it came with no consequences. But it apparently does - and mighty dangerous ones.
A health expert here was saying how we can't mandate it for kids because the experimental "vaccines" simply aren't that effective anymore. Big win on that given it was mainstream. You could see the veins popping out of the interviewer's head and neck. But she softened the blow by keeping to the myth the "vaccines" worked super well early. It was a confusing message for me, imagine a normie - I can just see the confused Shaggy and Scooby look.
They're skating and engaging in revisionism to try and hang on to what little credibility they have left. 'They worked but no now' routine suggests to me they never worked in the first place.
I also find it interesting China and Russia aren't using mRNA.
Just look around you.
More people are getting sick and/or dying AFTER the jabs came out than before.