I completely agree with you and understand your frustration. As a pathologist, I searched extensively to find the data supporting the high cycle threshold deemed "positive". I found nothing, nothing.
I completely agree with you and understand your frustration. As a pathologist, I searched extensively to find the data supporting the high cycle threshold deemed "positive". I found nothing, nothing.
Watch Kary Mullis when he is discussing the PCR and its application to diagnostics. His face is a mixture of sadness, disgust, and a little bit of anger. In short, DO NOT USE IT FOR DIAGNOSIS! Simple. It is too easy to game the results with increased CTs.
I completely agree with you and understand your frustration. As a pathologist, I searched extensively to find the data supporting the high cycle threshold deemed "positive". I found nothing, nothing.
Watch Kary Mullis when he is discussing the PCR and its application to diagnostics. His face is a mixture of sadness, disgust, and a little bit of anger. In short, DO NOT USE IT FOR DIAGNOSIS! Simple. It is too easy to game the results with increased CTs.