It certainly seems he was right about various predictions relating, for instance, to black holes and about Hawking radiation. Some things it seems he was probably wrong about.
The point is that his predictions are falsifiable - he published his thinking openly, including the mathematics used in deriving his conclusions etc. Now the theori…
It certainly seems he was right about various predictions relating, for instance, to black holes and about Hawking radiation. Some things it seems he was probably wrong about.
The point is that his predictions are falsifiable - he published his thinking openly, including the mathematics used in deriving his conclusions etc. Now the theories are being tested. That is how science works. What point were you trying to make?
It certainly seems he was right about various predictions relating, for instance, to black holes and about Hawking radiation. Some things it seems he was probably wrong about.
The point is that his predictions are falsifiable - he published his thinking openly, including the mathematics used in deriving his conclusions etc. Now the theories are being tested. That is how science works. What point were you trying to make?