My (trademarked) "Law of Opposite Effects" gives me a sense of optimism. If what our rulers really want is more control, they are going to lose their control.
My (trademarked) "Law of Opposite Effects" gives me a sense of optimism. If what our rulers really want is more control, they are going to lose their control.
Here's what I think: They HAVE to keep 100-percent of the important "truth-seeking" organizations completely captured. If one or two "break ranks" and do real reporting, the whole pack might follow and the whole house of cards might crumble. So they must be worried about that key apostate going rogue.
I like thinking the critical mass could be just 2% of the ranks but the impact of Elon at X, and to a lesser degree (but feels like it's growing) Tucker Carlson gives me some hope that only a handful of fearless, perhaps nothing-to-lose actors [edit late upon reread] can change the landscape.
My (trademarked) "Law of Opposite Effects" gives me a sense of optimism. If what our rulers really want is more control, they are going to lose their control.
"Law of Opposite Effects"
I hadn't titled it yet but I think kinda the same thing. The tighter the grip, the more sand that's slipping through their fingers.
They're losing they're grip and they're completely freaked out about it.
Here's what I think: They HAVE to keep 100-percent of the important "truth-seeking" organizations completely captured. If one or two "break ranks" and do real reporting, the whole pack might follow and the whole house of cards might crumble. So they must be worried about that key apostate going rogue.
I like thinking the critical mass could be just 2% of the ranks but the impact of Elon at X, and to a lesser degree (but feels like it's growing) Tucker Carlson gives me some hope that only a handful of fearless, perhaps nothing-to-lose actors [edit late upon reread] can change the landscape.
Truth will out.