161 Comments

In other words, Pfizer did NOT run any chronic (6 months or longer) clinical studies on their vaccines. If I recall correctly from my days at the research lab, a 90-day (three month) study was considered subchronic. Also, I have not heard anything at all about the types of studies that were conducted either by Pfizer or the other manufacturers. Specifically, I would want to know about studies (either clinical or preclinical) involving reproductive and fertility parameters, oncogenicity, carcinogenicity, neurotoxicity, cardiovascular and pulmonary parameters, safety and efficacy, among other things. What kind of long-term effects are we looking at? Even in short-lived species like rats, 90 days isn't enough to determine this sort of thing, you want at least a two year study. As I said I spent nearly 4 decades in the business; if someone wants to talk vaccine safety with me, then they'd better be able to demonstrate they know and understand the terms I just used above, and that includes my present employer. Don't just quote something you got off the CDC website, show me you know your stuff.

Expand full comment

Not only shut down the trial at 90 days, they vaxxed the control group so no follow up would be possible.

Expand full comment

It's very heartening to see someone from the industry speak honestly and intelligently. I have 2 friends 'in the industry' that drink the kool-aid by the gallon.

Expand full comment

This is how I knew this was bullshit from the beginning. Good on you!

Expand full comment

check

https://www.modernatx.com/ecosystem/strategic-collaborators/mrna-strategic-collaborators-government-organizations

scroll to "DARPA – Advancing mRNA therapies and vaccines for biodefense" moderna project work in 2013!!

Expand full comment

That does not surprise me. When I left MPI Research in 2017 it was one of the top three contract research laboratories in the world (the others being Charles River and Covance) and as such would have been involved in mRNA work if this was being done by any of our clients. As a data technician/data coordinator I was in a position to know who they were and what they were working on, and I do not recall anything regarding mRNA vaccines of any type. This doesn't mean that they weren't being worked on there but if they were it was not widely discussed, which seems strange for something that is supposedly cutting edge technology. The big buzz at the time was a new piece of equipment called a cyclotron which apparently our competitors did not have. I also never heard anything about any DARPA projects being conducted there, which based on what I have heard about them does not surprise me; my impression is that DARPA is pretty closed-mouth and likes to keep things in-house instead of contracting them out.

Expand full comment

If this was happening at any of these facilities, it was highly classified because it was part of the CEP.

COMPASSIONATE EXTINCTION PLAN (CEP)

1. Every country on the planet is on board with the Injections. Even Sweden. When have all countries aligned on any issue? Never.

2. Not a single MSM outlet is interviewing any of the expert dissenters – Yeadon, Bridle, Montagnier, Bossche etc… and the mainstream social media platforms are blocking them.

Why?

Conventional Oil peaked in 2005 http://www.euanmearns.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/C-Cdec141.png

Shale in 2018.

According to Rystad, the current resource replacement ratio for conventional resources is only 16 percent. Only 1 barrel out of every 6 consumed is being replaced with new resources

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Biggest-Oil-Gas-Discoveries-Of-2019.html

Shale binge has spoiled US reserves, top investor warns Financial Times. https://energyskeptic.com/2021/the-end-of-fracked-shale-oil/

Shale boss says US has passed peak oil | Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/320d09cb-8f51-4103-87d7-0dd164e1fd25

THE PERFECT STORM : The economy is a surplus energy equation, not a monetary one, and growth in output (and in the global population) since the Industrial Revolution has resulted from the harnessing of ever-greater quantities of energy. But the critical relationship between energy production and the energy cost of extraction is now deteriorating so rapidly that the economy as we have known it for more than two centuries is beginning to unravel https://ftalphaville-cdn.ft.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Perfect-Storm-LR.pdf

Our fossil fuel energy predicament, including why the correct story is rarely told https://ourfiniteworld.com/2021/11/10/our-fossil-fuel-energy-predicament-including-why-the-correct-story-is-rarely-told/

“The global economy was facing the worst collapse since the second world war as coronavirus began to strike in March, well before the height of the crisis, according to the latest Brookings-FT tracking index. “The index comes as the IMF prepares to hold virtual spring meetings this week, when it will release forecasts showing the deepest contraction for the global economy since the 1930s great depression. https://www.ft.com/content/9ac5eb8e-4167-4a54-9b39-dab48c29ac6c

Collapse Imminent: https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/a-self-fulfilling-prophecy-systemic-collapse-and-pandemic-simulation/

The Illusion of Stability, the Inevitability of Collapse http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2021/09/the-illusion-of-stability-inevitability.html

Fed is sharply increasing the amount of help it is providing to the financial system https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/23/fed-repo-overnight-operations-level-to-increase-to-120-billion.html Banks did not trust each other - similar situation when Lehman collapsed

Oil Gluts – do NOT indicate we have found more oil. We just pumped what’s left too fast.

Summary In 2019 a second Perfect Storm was approaching – the central banks had been doing ‘whatever it takes’ for over a decade…. Essentially nothing was off the table --- throw the kitchen sink at pushing GFC2.0 into the future. In 2019 the guns were blazing but the beast was no longer held at bay…

What do you do when you are burning far more oil than you discover --- and your efforts to offset the impact of expensive to produce oil push you to the edge of the cliff? You can accept your fate and allow the beast to shove you into the abyss…. Or you can take the ‘nuclear option’ and shut down as much of the economy as possible, preserve remaining oil and pump in trillions of dollars of life support to keep the system feebly alive.

Punchline: The problem global leaders face is that if you unleash the nuclear option without some sort of cover, the sheeple and the markets would be thrown into a panic and you risk blowing things up prematurely. So you need a reason for putting the global economy on ice --- one that does not spook the masses – one that is big enough to justify such epic amounts of stimulus and extreme policies --- and one that allows you to explain ‘this is just temporary – once this is gone --- we will get back to normal’

A pandemic is the perfect cover.

End Game – Covid was foisted on us as cover for the response to peak oil (if we don’t slow the burn oil prices go through the roof and we collapse) but it is also being used to convince billions to be Injected. The Injection is meant to cause extremely deadly variants similar to Marek’s this .. only worse because we are deploying into a pandemic https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/tthis-chicken-vaccine-makes-virus-dangerous.

“Mass infection prevention and mass vaccination with leaky Covid-19 vaccines in the midst of the pandemic can only breed highly infectious variants.” https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/

French virologist and Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier called mass vaccination against the coronavirus during the pandemic “unthinkable” and a historical blunder that is “creating the variants” and leading to deaths from the disease.

The Vaccines and Boosters will Result in a Catastrophic Outcome - From a scientific viewpoint it is, therefore, difficult to understand how booster immunizations using vaccines which are not evolution-proof could prevent a highly mutable virus from escaping neutralizing anti-S Abs while driving the pandemic in a catastrophic direction, both in Israel and worldwide. How can the WHO stand by and watch as this additional experiment unfolds, soon to be followed by other countries? https://thehighwire.com/videos/vaccine-expert-warns-of-covid-vaccination-catastrophe/

The reason for this is that 8B people need cheap oil to live. They would starve without it. And 8B people without food would result in epic starvation, violence, rape and cannibalism. Industrial civilization ends soon after peak oil. Unfortunately we also have 4000 spent fuel ponds that will boil off and release toxic substances for centuries. These facilities cannot be controlled with computers and energy. So even the few remaining hunters and gatherer tribes will die as they consume these toxins in the food, air and water.

The PTB understand all of this and that is WHY every leader is on board with the Injections. There is NO way out of this --- so they have decided to mitigate the suffering as much as possible by putting us down and here is the mechanism https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/why-the-ongoing-mass-vaccination-experiment-drives-a-rapid-evolutionary-response-of-sars-cov-2.

Expand full comment

Thank you for these links! This is very interesting.

However, there is an alternate explanation. Given the control they have over the economy:

https://rumble.com/vn7lf5-monopoly-who-owns-the-world-must-see.html

... and given that Covid was under development for 20 years:

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/a-manufactured-illusion-dr-david-martin-with-reiner-fuellmich-9-7-21_hPChWe1no7nxGDM.html

... and given that Fauci announced the coming pandemic in January 2017:

https://youtu.be/fe-cbMLJZzU

... and given that Deagel forecast huge population reductions in 2015 - between 1/3 and 2/3 population reductions in developed countries, but no reductions in developing countries:

https://archive.is/nAHJK

... does it not seem likely that they STOPPED investing into new oil discoveries BECAUSE of the planned population reductions; not the other way around?

Expand full comment

You can find out in 55 years.

Expand full comment

What I understand so far:

1. The PCR test was never intended to be a method to diagnose COVID.

2. Using this test to dx COVID yields a 90% False Positive rate.

3. The PCR test cannot distinguish between COVID or any other coronavirus or the flu.

Bearing this in mind, how can variants possibly be diagnosed from a PCR test? How can any coronavirus or flu be eliminated as the cause of the person's illness?

I think this is a bigger hoax than people realize.

Expand full comment

I believe it is not quite so simple. First people want binary answers, yes/no, but we live in an analog world. Telling someone they have an 80% chance of having Covid is just not a very satisfying answer. This is a result of constraints when designing the probes because you have to make trade offs; such as the longer the sequence the more unique it is, but less impact individual mismatches have on the overall binding. Still in the original SARS outbreak PCR was able to pull SARS out amongst all the millions of viruses that typically inhabit a human body. With this virus perhaps because we didn't understand the typical progression of the disease and as a result Chinese doctors where finding patients that definitely were suffering from Covid based on lung scans, but were still showing up PCR negative not understanding that the virus was gone at this point and the damage was being caused by an immune over reaction rather than the virus itself. Yet still the sensitivity of the test was ramped up so it could detect the few virus fragments still remaining at this stage of the disease. Of course, if you ramp of the sensitivity of the test enough to detect these few remaining fragments if they are not present then the probes are not pulled out of the solution and are going to bind to the next closest match, all be it not as well, but with no competition, good enough to produce a signal with enough amplification, thus you start getting false positives. Now if Covid were Ebola and people had a 50% chance of dying than yes, lets error on the side of caution, but Covid is not that and a simple way to make the PCR test useful is simple provide the CT (cycle threshold) number thus allowing one to determine the probability they actually currently have the infection. A CT less than 20 and you likely have sufficient virus particles to be infectious as you head towards a CT of 30 that becomes less and less probable. On the 3 probe test if only two probes detect a match, you likely have Omicron instead of Delta, because Omicron has mutated enough so one of the probes no longer matches well enough. So I don't think you should blame the test only how its results are being interpreted. People may regret the EUA on the PCR test ending with rapid test being in short supply, the determinant of whether you have Covid or not may become whether you are Vaccinated or not. If yes its just the flu if not it must be Covid. Of course, the answer doesn't change, get plenty of sleep, avoid all highly processed foods, get plenty of sunshine or at least Vit D, and spend as much time as you can outside playing/interacting with friends, especially if you're over 70.

Expand full comment

I'm guessing a fair bit here so if I'm wrong, please excuse me. I think 'sequencing' is done to detect a variant after a PCR test. The PCR test doesn't detect the variant.(?)

From gov of Canada website influenza tracker:

'Nationally, the 2019-2020 influenza season in Canada began on week 47 (November 17 to 23, 2019), peaked in late January (week 5) and ended early and abruptly on week 13 (March 22 to 28, 2020), eight weeks earlier than the average end of season.'

a bit further down the same page:

'During the active influenza season (mid-November to mid-March), all seasonal influenza types and subtypes (A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and B/Victoria) circulated concurrently, resulting in higher than average numbers of influenza detections and hospitalizations being reported during that time period.'

I have yet to hear/read a good explanation of why a higher than average flu season stopped abruptly when covid started getting press coverage in Canada. I believe that the PCR does not differentiate between influenza, colds and covid-19.

Expand full comment

It is common for one respiratory infection to drive out others. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(20)30114-2/fulltext

discusses how in 2009 Rhinovirus infection kicked H1N1 infection to the kerb, through the “stimulation of antiviral defences in the airway mucosa”. So that’s one theory as to why it happened in the past, at any rate.

So, if the same thing happened here, when the flu viruses went to infect more people they found that the people were already fighting covid with their own mucus membranes, etc. Which meant that the flu viruses were out of luck. They'd been out-competed for access to people they can reproduce in.

Expand full comment

There used to be 3 or 4 influenza strains come up from the souther hemisphere every fall but only one would be dominant. In the years where they guessed wrong and put the non-circulating one in the vaccine there were no excess deaths despite NOBODY being vaccinated for what was in circulation. Small sample size but doesn't bode well for proving the flu vax was any use. I went with vitamin D3

Expand full comment

What's the difference between Vit D, Vit D1, Vit D3?

Expand full comment

D3 lasts longer in circulation. D2 comes from dairy & plants, D3 from animals (mostly fish).

Expand full comment

So D3 is the recommendation because it stays in system longer? I see Dr. John Campbell always recommending "D".

Expand full comment

That's an interesting article. When people claim that COVID-19 driving out the flu is pro-mask evidence, we can ask if masks were common in 2009.

Expand full comment

Went away in Sweden also and no mask requirements at all. It is viral competition/interference.

Expand full comment

And mention that flu went away _everywhere_ last year, whether or not you lived in place that demanded mask wearing.

Expand full comment

Last fall, only 10-20% of the population had been exposed to Covid so, obviously, the other 80% not getting flu was not viral competition. Masks and distancing stopped flu spread and if it is stopped in one place, it should be no surprise that vast, connected areas will have no cases at all.

Expand full comment

But it would be a real surprise if countries where masks were not used and distancing was minimal didn't have lots of flu, if it were the measures that were responsible for the decline. Also recall that in any given year most people do not get the flu because prior infection in years past with a flu strain that is 'close enough' to whatever is circulating now protects them.

Expand full comment

Thanks, I really appreciate the explanation and link.

Expand full comment

You are most welcome.

Expand full comment

Genomic sequencing is done on very few cases. Fewer than 1% in the US. I believe it is near 30% in some other countries. Computer modeling is used to assess variant prevalence. Dr. McCullough stated on Joe Rogan there was something about Omicron that allows a binary decision of yes or no for Omi but I have yet to read that anywhere.

Expand full comment

You are right. Take a look at Dr. Andrew Kaufman's website www.thebigvirushoax.com and search online for Dr. Thomas Cowan's free PDF book titled, The Contagion Myth.

Expand full comment

The PCR identifies a Covid infection but not the variant. A sequencing test is done on a small number of the samples and variant prevalence is modelled from the results.

The science is simpler than people realise.

Expand full comment

Undoubtedly.

Expand full comment

I have some anecdotal evidence for you.

Leeds United players all took the booster either last week or after Saturday’s game against Arsenal. https://archive.md/caTiZ#selection-807.42-807.125

They just had to cancel their next game against Liverpool on December 26th due to positive tests: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/dec/23/liverpool-v-leeds-and-wolves-v-watford-off-on-boxing-day-due-to-covid-premier-league

Expand full comment

so would that be a leeds-ing indicator?

Expand full comment

GROAN :)

Expand full comment

And the Leeds fans now sing "Boris is a C*nt" from the stands.

Apologies to anyone who thought us Brits were a genteel race . . .

Expand full comment

Call him a prick instead, since he has one.

Expand full comment

Oh, gosh. I never thought that about the Brits! LOL!

Expand full comment

Not Boris is a B*tch? Or Bum B*tch? Nothing quite like Let's go Brandon, of course.

Expand full comment

Brandon+Boris=

Brandis

Expand full comment

But let's not forget the 'spin': "“All of the cases we have experienced are asymptomatic which we believe is due to our high vaccine take up,” the club said. This is the insidious part of this......the spin and how effective it is to keep people clinging to "the vaccination is the only way out of this" narrative.......that needs addressing to strengthen the doubts most people are starting to have about the policy.

Expand full comment

As an Arsenal supporter, I enjoyed that one. Leeds was pretty bad. Are you sure that they were not boosted before the game? I could also think it's an excuse after 0-7 and 1-4, they probably fear double digits against Liverpool! I have a friend in Chicago who thinks he has corona; he then tells me that got a booster 30 days ago......

Expand full comment

The NHL and NFL are seeing huge covid numbers... they are likely to be in the Booster phase as well.

Expand full comment

Completely nuts. The top players are on long term contracts with numbers like $100+ million not too uncommon. So they get a cardiac vaccine injury so that they can't play for the rest of their career and the team is stuck paying out the contract. This happened with a player called Yashin who was signed in 2000 (!) to close to $100 million for 10 years and he only played 2 years effectively before injury. The team then bought out the contract after his being sidelined for a number of years but then has to pay 2/3 of the remaining amount up front (depends on contract wording obviously).

Expand full comment

I am thinking ... if the athletes agree to not blame the injections ... and maintain radio silence... they get paid the balance of their contracts.... (or at least a significant portion).

Expand full comment

Well, they get it regardless. If they inject themselves with something unsanctioned then yes the clubs can break the contracts probably, but the league and state is demanding or encouraging the vaccination. If the contract is short and lawyers can prove that heart injury is linked to the vaccine then they could sue the league or club for further damage concerning the athlete's lost earnings over his career. The big money long term contracts are reserved for the best players in US sports. I don't think European soccer clubs sign more than around 4 years. Players don't want it because of wage inflation and if they improve then they can demand more money.

The first major international case in all this, Eriksen from Denmark in June 2021 at the Euros, is still mum about his vaccine status. It must be because he was vaccinated even though the national federation had declared that they could not jump the queue in July, so the Danish national team overall was officially not vaccinated. But his club doctor or president was quoted as saying that "everyone is vaccinated" in May 2021.

Expand full comment

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result. In California healthcare workers are now mandated to take a booster in order to keep the workforce working. As a physician working in public health I am embarrassed by the panicked lack of data driven decision making before putting in place potentially unsound mandates. Thank you for this information, it fits with the breakthrough data patterns I am seeing by mining public health websites.

Expand full comment

They have until Feb 1. Crazy. What can I say. Newsom and California are absolutely crazy. I hate it here.

Expand full comment

Also any student or worker at the UC system..... and Cal State too. Nuts.

Expand full comment

Is it insane if they intent is to extermination the species? You repeat the sin until you get the desired outcome. Some sort of 'Marek's' type disease?

Expand full comment

The vaccinated are lucky that Omicron is only a cold. The question is: does an infection with Omicron “reset” the immune system of the vaccinated, thus washing away the Original Antigenic Sin induced by the Covid vaccine?

Expand full comment

Each time vaxxed further trains the immune system on the spike & further damages parts of the innate system

Only time will tell if this spike is different enough to throw the adaptive system off the track so it doesn't "jump the gun" and give innate a chance to respond.

Expand full comment

One can hope but it's unlikely. I'm only glad I had the infection back in early March 2020. I have tested and at least have some T-cell immunity and no jab induced IgM Antigen.

Expand full comment

I am no scientist but I don't think so. The reason for the evasion is due to the spike only vax where the whole virus is not present. When exposed to omicron, immune system is producing antibodies to spike only vax, rendering a faulty immune response.

That is how i understand it anyway.

Expand full comment

...as in the 'Letter'?

Expand full comment

I’d be curious to see how the vaccinated who come down with Omicron respond to future variants. Hopefully fighting off Omicron overcomes some of the OAS.

Expand full comment

I think it depends on the genetic distance from Omicron on the next variant. Right now if Omicron changed from upper respiratory to lung based infection, there would be a big issue IMO.

The data suggests that naturally immune to Alpha->Delta are having little problems with Omicron but I have not seen definitive proof.

I am hopeful that Omicron can stop the insane vax policy but if not, we can get into trouble.

Expand full comment

I heard a public health official on NPR yesterday state that the immune suppression from the booster wasn’t as long lived or significant as it was for the first dose. She was trying to convince people to get the booster even if they were heading out to meet family in the near future. I was primarily surprised because it was the first time I had heard anybody in public health acknowledge the risk from immune suppression. I was also surprised because I had no idea that studies had been done on immune suppression from boosters. Where did she get this information?

Expand full comment

NPR=National Propaganda Radio ....I, too, listen to NPR and the confirmational bias and utter lack of any discussions beyond the narrative both astounds and sickens me. Not a word on Acquired Immunity.....the only reason I listen now is for intel on what the public is hearing and often turn it off after 3 minutes of Chicken Little "The Sky is falling" babble...

Expand full comment

I'm in the Boston market where we actually have two NPR stations. I don't watch the MSM news, so I use NPR to understand the narrative like you do. I just imagine all of the commuters listening to NPR on their way into their city jobs in the morning and despair that we are ever getting out of this. NPR is also important for understanding the democratic party narrative and the expectations of the neoliberal world order. It isn't pretty and I would love to know who is feeding NPR its news stories and topics to cover.

Anyway, every once in awhile they let something slip like this post vaccine immune suppression topic. I'm sure this public health bureaucrat will not be invited back on the show. I just wish I knew where she got her information that the boosters didn't cause suppression of the immune system. Maybe she was just making it up.

Expand full comment

The source of their stories? Just go to their website and see the list of contributors. I think that is proof that public funding be withdrawn.

Expand full comment

Yep, B&M Gates Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (J&J), and I am sure many other charitable foundations whose funders are heavily invested in Pharma/Bio-Tech.

Expand full comment

NPR died some years ago when the GatesofHell began oversight via donation

Expand full comment

NPR went woke early, but it took me awhile to realize it was actively spreading propaganda. NPR stopped trying to hide that it was disinformation when it hired the head of Voice of America as CEO. https://www.npr.org/2019/09/05/758047287/npr-names-veteran-media-executive-john-lansing-as-its-new-ceo

Expand full comment

And I adore Masterpiece Theater! Pains me knowing who funds it.

Expand full comment

SHEEPLE WATCH….https://youtu.be/NHgoeIdti-A

from Just an Observer

Director General “It is better to use the booster shots on the dying elderly than use them to kill the children like some countries are doing.” 2:40

This wasn’t a Freudian slip. It is  the way the discussions and debates within in WHO have taken place over the last two years and normal conversation. It is unfolding before our eyes with these deadly spike protein magnetic graphene injections are being mandated.

…Bill Gates, “if we are doing a real good job vaccinating, we may reduce the world population by 10% to 15%”. See “Innovating to Zero!” speech to the TED2010 annual conference, Long Beach, California, February 18, 2010).

ARTICLE EXPLAINING IN DETAIL THE MASTER PLAN.

BILL GATES HAS BEEN OPENLY TOUTING IT FOR YEARS.

People like Sam Parker have been warning us.

Sam Parker May 10, 2020

https://behind-the-news.com/post-lockdown-the-rockefeller-game-plan-part-1-of-a-2-part-series/

Here, just the key elements as a precursor to what the world is living now, and what is to come, if we don’t stop it – to demonstrate how this entirely criminal sham has been planned. Parts of the scenario are:

A massive vaccination program, probably through compulsory vaccination – Bill Gates’ dream and brainchild is vaccinating 7 billion people.

Massive population reduction, a eugenics plan – in part through vaccination and other means (Ref. Bill Gates, “if we are doing a real good job vaccinating, we may reduce the world population by 10% to 15%”. See “Innovating to Zero!” speech to the TED2010 annual conference, Long Beach, California, February 18, 2010).

Bill Gates has been advocating for years the need for a massive population reduction – and indeed the more than 20 years of the BMGF’s extensive vaccination programs in Africa, India and other places around the world have seen a record of involuntary sterilization of women between 14 and 49 years.

An electronic ID for every person on the planet – in the form of a nano chip, possibly injected along with the mandatory vaccination. This nano-chip could be remotely uploaded with all personal data.

Graphene Oxide in the injections to test human tolerance

Digitized money, no more cash.

Universal rolling out of 5G, later to be followed by 6G.

This is leading to a total control of every individual on the planet. It is sold to the public as the Internet of Things (IOT), meaning self-driving cars, robotized kitchen equipment, artificial intelligence (AI) for the production and delivery of everything. What the sales pitch doesn’t say, is how humans would be marginalized and enslaved. To carry this masterplan forward, high frequency electromagnet waves are needed. Therefore, rolling out of 5G is a must, no matter what the health impact on humans, fauna and flora may be – and no matter how it may influence viral infections, like possibly the current COVID19.

This is a precursor for understanding how things are being planned. It may help connecting the dots for what is coming.

It may also help us understand what is happening right now, in the first phase of the Lock Down scenario. It portrays in vivid colors the criminal nature of the Dark Deep State, itself a division of the Rockefeller Empire.

The World is being misled concerning the causes and consequences of the corona crisis.

The COVID-19 crisis is marked by a public health “emergency” under WHO auspices which is being used as a pretext and a justification to triggering a worldwide process of economic, social and political restructuring. 

Social engineering is being applied. Governments are pressured into extending the lockdown, despite its devastating economic and social consequences.

What is happening is unprecedented in World history. 

Prominent scientists support the lockdown without batting an eyelid, as a “solution” to a global health emergency.

Amply documented, the estimates of the COVID-19 disease including mortality are grossly manipulated. 

In turn, people are obeying their governments. Why? Because they are afraid? 

Causes versus solutions?

The closing down of national economies applied worldwide will inevitably result in poverty, mass unemployment and an increase in mortality. It’s an act of economic warfare. 

Expand full comment

We may also be under a planetary attack; the evil you have described need not be just banal and businesslike. If there is a dark entity behind it all, it seems it needs to act by proxy, which means mankind as such should be able to fight it. That is the message of hope this X-mas: Invoke God, and go to war.

Expand full comment

Meanwhile, cities across the US keep mandating vaccines for 5 year olds.

Expand full comment

This is insanity and the young people natural immunity is part of the saving grace for getting out of this mess.

Expand full comment

As I understand it, the conventional public health argument seems to go that even if omicron is mild, more infections will result in more opportunities for people to become sick and die.

The fact that the conventional public health recommendation continues to be "get vaccinated" is troubling in light of the possibility that vaccines provide negative efficacy against omicron (and lack of evidence-- from what I can tell-- that they mitigate symptoms or even that the degree to which they would mitigate symptoms from this mildest variant-- especially among the low-risk-- would offset the potential to increase chances of infection).

Expand full comment

"The fact that the conventional public health recommendation continues to be "get vaccinated"

...and if you get sick, go home until you can't breathe, then go to the ER where they will admit you to the ICU to be put on a ventilator and die.

Expand full comment

Not to endorse Pfizer at all with its equivocal results and possible harms, but you may notice that there is NO POINT in the timecourse of vaxx, in which the Moderna vaxx does NOT risk a fraction of their population in re: Omicron. At every stage, SOME people are getting owned by Omicron under Moderna regime. EVERY population's immune systems make WIDE BERTH for Omicron under Moderna. With Moderna, the whole entire calendar IS the worry-window. Sad! As long as the governmedia continues to insist that vaxx mix-n-match is a legit thing, that one "approved" is as good as the other, a deception the PFDA prefers, you will keep seeing stories of "I am (Pfizer) vaxxed and boostered, waiting for #4" coupled alongside (but not the same person) "OMG I am fully vaxxed and in the hospital with Omicron." This is how these seemingly contradictory stories can arise. Media will never ask the hospitalized WHICH vaxx for fear that they may say that their sponsor's product harmed them.

Expand full comment

Mr. Gato- in the interest of you not wasting time doing something that someone else is already doing. This dashboard includes the case, hospitalization, and death data for all the UK reports going back to when they started giving detailed data: https://public.tableau.com/views/UKReportsRiskRatios/UKCharts?:language=en-US&:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link

Expand full comment

Very good and useful work! Why not add vax/unvax timeseries with cases per 100k? Would make comparison more useful?

Expand full comment

The report provides data over successive 4 week periods (without breaking down by individual week), so I am not able to show a pure time series. I do allow you to show cases/100K by vax status, so not exactly sure I understand your request, but I'm happy to receive suggestions. Maybe add more detail in the comments here: https://inumero.substack.com/p/uk-reports-new-dashboard?r=tv61s&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

Sorry, I missed that part in my very small phone screen :) Subscribed!

Expand full comment

Ha! Yes, I wish there was some way of telling people that these dashboards really should be viewed on a monitor... even a laptop screen can be difficult.

Expand full comment

You are really smart. I don't understand a lot of this. I used to, but it has all gotten so complicated. But I appreciate your work, and all you do to get to the final conclusions, which I do understand, and make me sad.

Expand full comment

What I believe is that people are getting sick and dying from experimental mRNA vaccine toxemia. The Omicron "virus" just like the Corona "virus were never isolated, purified and sequenced from a sick person or persons with said illness. These so called pathogenic "viruses" only exist in computer models and not in reality. Germ-Viral Theory is still a scam theory based on junk science since its inception. Louis Pasteur was a conman, plagiarist and a mediocre chemist. See www.thebigvirushoax.com

Expand full comment

By the way eugyppius on substack has been doing weekly updates with graphs if you want to see what week 50 looks like:

https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/ukhsa-vaccine-efficacy-statistics

spoiler alert, the boosters for the 80+ & 70+ seem to have had a minor effect and show a slight benefit for the vaxxed for now.

Expand full comment

2 people i know told me proudly of their boosters via email- I do not know what to say to them; nice knowing you seems appropriate, but I shall refrain. This is in the context of efforts I have made to share the dangers. I tried, I tried. Fuck.

Expand full comment