OSHA has a fair amount of physical science and testing behind most of their "requirements". Unlike CDC which is penetrated by the deep state and serves big pharma.
OSHA has precedent on enforcing (successful tort judgments) its requirements, based on a thing called safety not a CDC/Nazi slogan "to keep you safe".
When an employer requires a vaccine jab they make enduring the shot a "condition of employment". Aside from meddling in an employee's health they have no OSHA safety standard to fall back on!
I heard a story about OSHA requiring non-slip surfaces in a meat packing facility and the agriculture department requiring a smooth floor for cleaning and sanitation. The plant went to court and the judge said, you must obey both requirements. The plant found a solution with a removable non-slip mat on a smooth floor.
So you can’t sue big pharma but you can sue big business if you suffer an adverse event due to a mandated vaccine. Here’s hoping that some big tech company mandates it and an employee sues them and makes millions.
"and so when trying to choose between the CDC and OSHA here and discern the lesser evil, this is why i would urge siding with OSHA." Right on. They are going to have to gut OSHA to make this tyranny last.
Watching the airline industry force masks on its employees, wondering if OSHA will eventually come to their rescue, or tell the airlines that any adverse affects will be the company’s fault.
Re: "is it in legal for an employer to mandate an experimental vaccine that is only EUA, not FDA approved?"
Here's what I wrote about this question regarding mask mandates (non-surgical face masks are also authorized under an EUA) - the law (cited here) governing EUAs makes it pretty clear that any EUA products are to be voluntary, and offered with informed consent regarding the known risks and benefits. However it is not clear to me that this would apply to private actors (employers) as well as to govt. entities:
I'm hearing Twilight Zone music. If you had told me a year ago that OSHA would be riding to our rescue (rather than just harassing small businesses for huge fines and sinking them), I'd laughed myself silly. But bizarro world. Go, OSHA! (And, yes, pop the popcorn, 'cuz this is gonna get good.)
A thought. If you are required to wear a mask and develop respiratory problems then that’s work related, right?
OSHA has a fair amount of physical science and testing behind most of their "requirements". Unlike CDC which is penetrated by the deep state and serves big pharma.
OSHA has precedent on enforcing (successful tort judgments) its requirements, based on a thing called safety not a CDC/Nazi slogan "to keep you safe".
When an employer requires a vaccine jab they make enduring the shot a "condition of employment". Aside from meddling in an employee's health they have no OSHA safety standard to fall back on!
I heard a story about OSHA requiring non-slip surfaces in a meat packing facility and the agriculture department requiring a smooth floor for cleaning and sanitation. The plant went to court and the judge said, you must obey both requirements. The plant found a solution with a removable non-slip mat on a smooth floor.
This gonna be good
So you can’t sue big pharma but you can sue big business if you suffer an adverse event due to a mandated vaccine. Here’s hoping that some big tech company mandates it and an employee sues them and makes millions.
Forwarded multiple times before I even finished reading. Butter and light salt 🍿
Question. Does OSHA have any jurisdiction over schools, colleges?
"and so when trying to choose between the CDC and OSHA here and discern the lesser evil, this is why i would urge siding with OSHA." Right on. They are going to have to gut OSHA to make this tyranny last.
Watching the airline industry force masks on its employees, wondering if OSHA will eventually come to their rescue, or tell the airlines that any adverse affects will be the company’s fault.
Re: "is it in legal for an employer to mandate an experimental vaccine that is only EUA, not FDA approved?"
Here's what I wrote about this question regarding mask mandates (non-surgical face masks are also authorized under an EUA) - the law (cited here) governing EUAs makes it pretty clear that any EUA products are to be voluntary, and offered with informed consent regarding the known risks and benefits. However it is not clear to me that this would apply to private actors (employers) as well as to govt. entities:
https://bretigne.typepad.com/on_the_banks/2021/03/do-mask-mandates-violate-federal-law.html
I'm hearing Twilight Zone music. If you had told me a year ago that OSHA would be riding to our rescue (rather than just harassing small businesses for huge fines and sinking them), I'd laughed myself silly. But bizarro world. Go, OSHA! (And, yes, pop the popcorn, 'cuz this is gonna get good.)
This is a battle royale I can get behind! 😎