if must be fear. it’s always fear. if you won’t get the jab, it’s because you’re chicken.
so we must threaten them with the health of their loved ones if they do not comply.
the whole set of talking points is kind of masterful if you unplug the part of your brain than handles morality. it’s one of those little chocolate cakes some french chef must have made in a uranium centrifuge: it’s the size of a matchbox and weighs more than a manhole cover.
if the fallacy density of his seemingly simple statements got any higher, it would risk tearing a hole in the universe. you need like 12 years at evil marketing school to craft a statement like that.
this would be a grotesque enough set of false framing, no true scotsman, gaslighting, straw manning, and outright emotional manipulation even if the vaccines stopped the spread of covid.
but clearly, they do not. at all.
so in the face of that “data” the “facts” become plain: this is pure emotional manipulation.
he’s teaching you how to use dishonest psyop tactics as a form of big pharma MLM and framing the literal abandonment of rationality as “facts and data.” it enables and validates the complaint and weaponizes them as a self-aggrandized guilt trip marketing vector against the rest.
“if you loved me, you’d get vaxxed!”
you just got hired as an unpaid sales intern.
at least they learned from getting busted last time and having to pay out big!
unfortunately, what they learned was “let’s not get caught next time.”
alas, despite this “expansive corporate integrity agreement” they seem to be the same old pfizer only now they were smart enough to be sure they banned doctors from speaking against them, sold them straight to governments, and got full, blanket lability waivers for these products that no one could possibly be hesitant about if they knew the facts.
because that’s what you always do when the data and facts are on your side, right?
i know a lot of folks in biotech and most are fine people. lots of small companies work on lots of really important science. it’s where all the actual innovation is taking place. big pharma is another beast altogether. these are marketing and manipulation experts. they lie, bribe, cheat, and rig markets. they capture regulators in a revolving door of sinecure and employment opportunities.
they play dirty enough to make a congolese cobalt miner break down and weep.
they are not your friends.
and they do not have you best interests at heart.
That video fucking infuriated me, and the fact that it probably caused 99% of the people who watched it to mouth "yaaas" and nod sagely infuriates me more.
I am NOT "hesitant." My long-term decisions about my life, especially including my health, are not emotionally driven. I am highly educated and intelligent, not that this is a qualifier for anything other than having better starting equipment to make informed choices. I am not superstitious. I am not "a conspiracy theorist." I am literally NONE of the boxes you and your cohort have tried to shove me in for the past year and a half, you Doctor Krieger Von Deathray-looking fuckhead.
What I am, now, is angry. Angry and now immovable. I will no longer believe anything your industry says. Sorry, gato. Te respeto profundamente, pero...
>>> i know a lot of folks in biotech and most are fine people
Citation fucking needed from here on out. My default assumption is anyone designing things to put in my body and sell them to me are Mengele-types being kept on just a short enough leash, and I will literally have to see them rescue puppies and kittens from traffic and resist putting them in a blender for at least a week before assuming their humanity.
To be honest, in between depressive meltdowns, much of my soul-searching in the past year and a half- besides abandoning faith in basically everything- has been to question how much of my extensive "science-centric" higher education was fucking propaganda in itself. After all, I haven't seen a single study I read in grad school successfully replicated. Maybe we don't even have brains in our skulls, but bunches of yarn and paper clips being pulled in various tangles by hamsters, and it's all been a lie.
Hesitancy is sly word. It presumes the default position is vaccinated.
I love my family so much that I was able to convince them not to be afraid of the virus.
The truth is exactly the opposite. We dont get the vax b/c we arent afraid of the disease (I had it and it wasnt that bad). Fear was what drove millions to get the shot in the first place. Hesitancy is based on a thoughtful rational or sometimes intuitional weighing of risks versus benefits. Its breathtakingly irresponsible and evil for a man like him to make a statement like this.
So if it's 'fear' that's driving vaccine 'hesistancy', is it not 'fear' that's driving vaccine 'advocacy'? How's that go again? What's good for the goose is..
That's like the CEO of McDonald's complaining about healthy diets and "Big Mac hesitancy".
"Won't someone *please* think of our profits???"
I think H. L. Mencken’s quip can be repurposed for Big Pharma:
The whole aim of * the medical pharmaceutical cartel is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
* originally practical politics
How does my getting the jab "help the health of others?" It doesn't! It doesn't even help my health.
"Vaccine ̵h̵e̵s̵i̵t̵a̵n̵c̵y̵ promotion is never coming from facts and data. It is in most cases ̵f̵e̵a̵r̵ greed.
There. I fixed it.
"The Chinese biological laboratory in Wuhan is owned by Glaxosmithkline,
which (accidentally) owns Pfizer!" (the one who makes the vaccine against
the virus which was (accidentally) started at the Wuhan Biological Lab and
which was (accidentally) funded by Dr. Fauci, who (accidentally) promotes
"GlaxoSmithKline is (accidentally) managed by the finance division of Black Rock, which (accidentally) manages the finances of the Open Foundation Company (Soros Foundation), which (accidentally) manages the French AXA!
"Soros (accidentally) owns the German company Winterthur, which
(accidentally) built a Chinese laboratory in Wuhan and was bought by the
German Allianz, which (coincidentally) has Vanguard as a shareholder, who (coincidentally) is a shareholder of Black Rock," which (coincidentally)
controls central banks and manages about a third of global investment
"Black Rock" is also (coincidentally) a major shareholder of MICROSOFT,
owned by Bill Gates, who (coincidentally) is a shareholder of Pfizer (which
- remember? Sells a miracle vaccine) and (coincidentally) is now the first
sponsor of the 'WHO!
Now you understand how a dead bat sold in a wet market in China has infected the WHOLE PLANET! ""
That was a very condensed version………..the following site is for the full picture of the villains and history of their deadly deeds leading up to today.
WARNING….be prepared for mental over load with the detailed and depressing history of what Hitler and his Third Reich could only have dreamed about doing to the World.
The millions dying Worldwide from COVID are simply pawns on a chess board of power and wealth to men like Soros.
We are here and it is now. Further than that, all human knowledge is moonshine. – HL Mencken
His remarks are dehumanizing/gaslighting. To be human isn't just to fear, but to reason through things and make moral conclusions, which is the actual primary reason people are "hesitant."
Here are my facts and data:
Here's a 2016 (so pre-covid and non-political) article about Moderna and their technology, but the VP of BioNTech also comments on the technology being unsafe for repeated doses. See pages 15 & 16 if you don't want to read the whole thing.
When did they "solve" the safety issues?
Read this post and check out the dates and other data yourself.
Oh, and Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna? Formerly the CEO of BioMeriuex, who, according to the Chinese Communist Party, was "instrumental" in creating the Wuhan Lab. He was not there at the time, but think about the connections, and he was on the board until August of 2019.
on board of merieux thru Aug 2019 see page 54:
Given these reasons, the crap messaging from the CDC and FDA, and Pfizer's history, why exactly WOULDN'T I be hesitant to take this vaccine? I'd have to be gullible to believe "safe and effective" with zero proof.
When Albert Bourla stated that love was stronger than fear, I was expecting him to say, "Treat the vaccine hesitant with love. I joined medicine out of concern for my fellow man. I hope that the vaccine hesitant will feel that I truly care for their health and wish to do everything possible to keep us all safe." I NEVER expected he would argue that the unvaccinated should force themselves to undergo a risky medical procedure to avoid killing other people. "If you loved your family you should get vaccinated in order to keep them safe." (By implication the unvaccinated don't care about us and are making us unsafe by failing to get vaccinated.) This is so sad. My heart is breaking.
Well- he can yammer all he wants but my valid excuse is “because I don’t want to” and that’s all he needs to know. And it will suffice- no matter how much you try to sideline me. I. Do. Not. Care.
Of course the hesitant are fearful. They are fearful of an unsafe product from a corporation that has a history of corruption and has paid out billion in fines and fearful of government that never has your best. But make no mistake, the people who took the vaccine took it out of fear too! Fear of dying.
It's the emotional abusive language for me. The other side of the "you'll do this if you love me" coin is "why did you make me hit you?"
Nah, I'm hesitant about jaywalking, not about being forced to take a medicine that I bear 100% of the costs and you get 100% of the profits.
One clear takeaway here: there was intent to deceive. Where are the lawyers? Maybe we can recover $10 - $20B for damages to families who lost loved ones, for the injured. But save a little extra for the wood to build the gallows and for plane trips to Gitmo.
How can I give informed consent when information is being withheld? I can’t and as such I refuse to do so. What information is being withheld? I'm so glad you asked!!
1) Their patents have "company proprietary secret sauce ingredients" and the government let them get away with that! This is NOT Kentucy Fried Chicken. This is an experimental gene therapy injection.
2) The raw data from the “Phase 2 Human Experimental Trials” which completed in October 2020, has not been made publicly available. Pfizer & Moderna have said that they will release it “sometime in 2022”. Talk to me AFTER that.
There is NO NEGOTIATION on this point. You do NOT claim "science" and get to withhold information that they admit exists. NO, NEIN, NYET, NEVER.
Without the raw data we cannot verify their claims for safety & efficacy.
Think about the precedent you are setting. You are letting large corporations with:
1) A blatant financial conflict of interest.
2) A recent history of maiming and killing thousands of the “customers” annually.
3) Decide what information about their “products” I get to see.
And I have to take it? ROTFLMAO. No. That is stark raving mad.
Go ahead and give your "uninformed consent" all you want but I refuse to and you coerce me at your own peril.
If you stay really really quiet you can hear Joseph Goebbels laughing in hell right now
prostitutes for big pharma
I agree with our esteemed feline author that there are good intentions in medicine. However, I also emphatically agree that being in bed with government has so warped the entire field that many people are doing harm while thinking they are doing good. The AMA, FDA, CDC, etc, have done such a great job enslaving the minds of doctors, that now you can see them murdering their patients and being proud of it.
I recently moved to a new town and asked on a alternative health forum where I could find a doctor that doesn't just push drugs and vaccines. No one had an answer. Big Pharma, coupled with the lethal power of The State, have pretty much completely destroyed the delivery of medicine in this country.
I'm glad you brought it up, but his whole argument falls apart when you point out it doesn't stop transmission. In fact, it increases the chances that someone will be infectious and not know it. So his whole spiel is utterly ridiculous.
But their quackery doesn’t work unless you partake in their quackery too
Flip it, "you're going to affect everyone.." no no buddy, you speak of hypothetical (what we have not observed in practice, we're still alive not in hospital) it is YOU who WISHES to AFFECT everyone's health with your FOR PROFIT shots that you charge the government that fleeces the debt slave taxpayer.... do NOT let them frame this in this way
It's not fear...it's self preservation.
lets take bourlas children and play voodoo doll with them and the jab and see what happens. he loves them sooooooo much and believes in the jab, then offer your kids first on the altar of big pharma, roll up their sleeves and give them the jab. in the meantime mr bourla, F*** off.
My extended family tried to throw this "caring" BS in my face because we all normally spend Thanksgiving together. They claimed I needed to take a test to "protect them" because we're unvaxx'd. My youngest daughter and I recovered from covid early this month (both mild cases). I stated that EVERYBODY except for us needed to be tested because Walensky of the CDC stated on CNN in August that you can still spread it even if you're vaxx'd. I also stated that our state health dept told me on the phone when they called about our positive tests to not bother taking another test for 90 days because we could still test positive. Well, that wasn't good enough. My cousin in particular said they still want me to test. I said fine, send me $65 for two over the counter rapid tests because we're not going through anybody who sends test results to the state health dept because if we test positive, all they're going to do is call and ask me why I tested when they said not to (plus it would inflate #s). She wrote back that vaccines are free and that everybody who isn't vaxx'd should be for the good of everybody. And there we go. This was not about testing but about attempting to pressure me into vaxxing my daughters and me (even though we've recovered from covid recently). We're having a separate Thanksgiving now. I'm not risking my or my daughters' health to make them feel good about themselves, nor do I want us to be blamed if any of them get sick.
I am a person of a certain age (let’s say I qualify for Medicare & SSI benefits). I am a person of a certain age that the Industrial Medical Healthcare & Insurance System loves, because now I’m old and likely in poor health (like millions of ‘seniors’) and I am ripe for the picking for all the senior ‘vaxxes’, tests & procedures that a person on my age should get. News flash to that System, before I had these ‘benefits’ I rarely went to the doctor, had no health insurance, paid out of pocket for my ‘healthcare’, never got a flu shot (though they could often be had for free), have it had the flu or a flu like illness in over 14 years, nor did I take prescription drugs or get unlimited diagnostic tests. So that I chose not to get this experimental injection out of ‘fear & data’ like Mr. Pfizer says, is completely wrong.
On the contrary, I chose not to get it because I have never believed in putting a lot excessive pharmaceuticals into my body and because I did read ‘the data’ (but not Pfizer’s)! So once again these Pharma guys are totally FOS!
Heaven forbid one should actually perform his own risk assessment and elect not to consume the product his company is selling. Initially, I declined to partake in the product out of love, so that it could be available to others who wanted or needed it more, statistically speaking. I've become ever more comfortable with that decision as the data unfolded, and if I were to take his product now, it would certainly be based out of fear. As in fear of losing my livelihood and surrendering to the ultimatum that I (and millions of others) currently face.
I don't know what kind of love the Pfizer CEO is describing but I prefer the biblical version.
"And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love." (1 Corinthians 13:13)
The hypocrisy! Bourla says to use "love" to convince the "hesitant", while governments and corporations all over the world are using coercion and blackmail, also known as "mandates" and "passports". And now, little kids will be forced to choose between education and survival.
I thought maybe this video clip dated back to the early days of the "vaccines". So I tracked it down to the source, dated October 17, 2021. Bourla has no excuse: if he wants the administration of these vaccines to be based on "love", he should have condemned the mandates. Instead he is silent to that issue.
In this interview, Bourla also claims (at 6:00) that "There is no vaccine that has been more studied in the history of humanity, because we have the scrutiny of all healthcare authorities, and we are at the stage that many of them, they have electronic medical records, so we know exactly what is happening after the administration of billions of those." This is the basis for his argument that the "vaccine" is safe for children. But, is there really any country, anywhere, that tracks these records and makes the data available for public scrutiny? Or is this guy not only a psychopath, but also a transparent liar? Or is he trying to say that he has the data but can't release it, and so we're supposed to trust him?
Pfizer CEO and Keith Olbermann must use the same 'scientific measures' to identify fear as the only possible reason to object to mass COVID vaccination. How fun would it be to have these frauds debate real public health advocates? Drs Malone, Kory etc would mop the floor with Albert Bourla & expose him as a bigger liar and fraud than Sanjay Gupta roached by Joe Rogan over Ivermectin.
Fear it is not.. Matthew Crawford and MD panel Malone, Kory etc.. Oct 2021
Interesting data and facts and separate things here.
Meanwhile, I was told this week by people who I associate with (thru sports) that they wished people like me who refused to be vaccinated with experimental tortured baby kidney concoctions that are killing people (in my family and in my neighborhood - their friends too) would suffer under a no shop passport law. No groceries or medications? Good. I deserve it. I live in a very conservative state in a very liberal neighborhood. Was I shocked? I godda say yes. I am pretty well liked - so I thought. haha. Am I mad? Nope. So glad I know where we stand. I let them know that even though they are the super spreaders at this point, I hope none of them ever is subject to the yellow star treatment they want for me and mine.
Take it to them my friends.
Do you see from the comments what the "experts" have done? They have destroyed the reputation of not only the FDA and CDC and the government as a whole, but of ALL OF MEDICINE. I feel this way more and more - that they all have an emotional stake in their "brilliant" discoveries and inventions and are not interested at all in any evidence to the contrary. They will torture puppies and create opium addicts as a price not too high for their gift to humanity! They have a hero complex. Okay, when I'm not so angry and skeptical I can recognize that lives have been saved through advanced treatments and medicine for fatal diseases. But at what price? We KNEW the government could not be trusted, but the medical community did not do enough to speak up over the last 2 years and they have a LONG way to go to re-earn basic trust. Stronger ethics safeguards, more transparency, taking a bigger picture perspective on health and well being, owning unintended consequences. A really long way to go.
"Never based on facts and data."
Fair, anyway. The "facts and data" on vaccines have been defined by one-sided assumption since the late 80s, so how can hesitancy be "based" on them? It's more a confession of scientific Orwellianism than a description of a reality about anti-vaxxers.
Does Albert Bourla seem like a loving person when he argues that we should use love to persuade the vaccine hesitant to get vaccinated? To me, his argument still seems fear based (not love based).
The messaging is like when in 'A Christmas Story' the kids convince the poor sucker to put his tongue on the frozen pole.
If he is so confident in his products ability to stop coronavirus spreading to the vulnerable and so empathetic to the vaccine hesitant then put him up to a Q and A of people like Robert Malone, Geert Vanden Bossche, Martin Kulldorff et al.
Didn't think so....
Well I'm afraid to watch the video because based on the commentary I expect my head will explode.
I take some comfort in the fact that the first two dozen replies I saw on that tweet all seemed to echo your sentiments.
Mayo Clinic Covid Information: Get the Facts
Q: What are the long term side effects of the CV19 vaccine?
A: "Because COVID-19 vaccines clinical trials only started in the summer of 2020, it’s not yet clear if these vaccines will have long-term side effects. However, vaccines rarely cause long-term side effects.
If you're concerned, in the U.S., safety data on COVID-19 vaccines will be reported to a national program called the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. This data is available to the public. The CDC has also created v-safe, a smartphone-based tool that allows users to report COVID-19 vaccine side effects."
Could be that people actually want to wait until the FDA trials have been completed to see if there are no long term side effects before getting jab'd.
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on creating a European compensation fund for victims of the ‘COVID-19 vaccines’ https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2021-0475_EN.html#_edn2
"The fear comes from the inside." This is an unsupported assertion and immediately begs the question, i.e., assumes as a given that which he's supposed to be proving.
It would be so easy to fake that the vaccines work—just stop testing and declare victory. At least pick a place with high vax rates, like Ireland, or Lithuania, and stop testing and say it works. Why won’t they do that? Too incompetent?
I am not offended by his comments on the video but I am confused by his thought process. We now know that vaccinated can get infected and transmit the infection while having as high a viral load as unvaccinated. The difference as I see it is that the symptoms most likely are more mild and perhaps the vaccinated wont believe that they have the virus and as a result be more of a spreader than the unvaccinated person who is lying in bed with a fever and muscle aches. COVID is the gift that keeps on giving its love no matter what.....
Im not hesitant. I’m skeptical.
Big Pharma just loves us to death!
Tedious. This behavior is so incredibly tedious. It's like we've never seen sleazy emotional manipulation before, and he's come up with something fresh and new. "I'd like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony." Edward Bernays lives.
Do you guys know that Bourla is, of all things, a veterinarian? Yes, a horse and pet and livestock medicine expert! Quoting Pfizer's own biography: "Albert is a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine and holds a Ph.D. in the Biotechnology of Reproduction from the Veterinary School of Aristotle University." https://www.pfizer.com/people/leadership/executives/albert_bourla-dvm-phd
Satan on how to speak to vaccine hesitant....
Well the Pfizer bozo said it loud and clear : "I've found in life in general that there's only one emotion that's stronger than fear, and this is laugh [...] so try to conquer your fear by using the laugh".
You bet it does, it's been my medicine throughout this pantomimne and believe me it works, the punch line beats the jab one by far, so keep it coming and we'll keep on laughing.