I am trusting nothing coming from the pharmaceuticals at this point… and I am a physician. Think I will stick with the FLCCC protocol which seems fairly effective and very low side effect profile! Not to mention eating right and being active!
Lets hope thats the end. They are so desperate for digital id though, I wouldnt be surprised to see them argue that you need to take both as that combination results in the greatest risk reduction
Even if it doesn’t work, the statistics will be manipulated to make it look like it does; the “vaccines”, as you say, are going to be a fiasco and a disaster too big to hide. Watch the anchors get thrown out on testing and the PCR CTs get wound waaayy back. “Cases” will plummet.
Even though this is probably just-slightly reformulated IVM it might be the way out for those of us too wise to take the venom.
I think “they” know the vaccine mandates will fail. So here is the magic, face-saving pill.
Surely, any pill capable of these results should have similar results in all coronaviruses and flus, or at least an easily adaptable pill would. What then will people die of? If your understanding is (and mine is) that the vast majority of Covid deaths were people nearing death anyway then this pill will not, nor could it, do much of anything. In Ireland, where I am, there was essentially zero excess death in 2020. So whose lives would the pill save? Whose lives would the vaccine save for that matter?
Has this medicine undergone the full multiple years of testing, or is it another 'released under emergency licence' drug? However you can't take us to court if you die.
"But still get vaccinated, get boosters, and continue wearing your mask."
Someone help me understand why I should trust or care about this? All seriousness- I WANT to be more rational here, but all I see is yet another thing I'm not letting anywhere near my body made by people who want to destroy the entire fucking world.
"is this why there was such intense action to keep ivermectin from being adopted in the US?"
Emergency Use Authorization is based on the "strict" condition that no alternative exists so all early treatment was squashed to guarantee a vaccine program was rolled out. Sorry I can't remember who and where but more than a few MDs under the umbrella of Kory, Malone, Yeadon, McCollough etc have commented that this looked like Pfizers way to compete with the off patent treatments. Market share targets usually explains more than public health.
I suspect they've had this pill in mind all along, but they were eager to test mRNA vaccines/technology. So what if they didn't work and caused a lot of side effects? They got a ton of data from the mass vaccination program + a boatload of money. They knew a variant could cause devastation (ADE) - maybe they see one coming down the pike, and besides they are nervous that news about the adverse events is catching on. So they release the pill (making another massive influx of $$$) and they look like heroes. Wake up - we are pawns. "Never let a crisis go to waste".
If they're smart, they'll use this as a way to fully walk back all NPIs. LOLOLOLOL! Listen, those who are optimistic please pour that energy into the universe because I do want you to be right.
Not sure I agree with the exit ramp theories here.
I have a hard time believing this government is going to let this end with me having gotten away with disobeying them with relatively minimal financial, social, and psychological damage.
I'm going to be very, VERY pleasantly surprised if this moves any needles anywhere in the country for vax mandates- especially because I wonder how the hundred million or so that allowed themselves to be coerced, unwillingly, into the vax will feel- the strategists HAVE to have taken that into account.
They can't allow us to have beaten the system. We have to be punished before everything can go back to normal.
At this point, immunization isn't an option, we've already hit Hope-Simpson range so 4-6 weeks for two shots or a booster during which time you are more vulnerable to infection is a clear no-go, regardless what OSHA says. They don't have much choice but to rush a therapeutic and hope this goes away. I'm not confident - we apparently aren't using monoclonals enough except in Florida, and I don't see how we get enough tablets in the supply chain to stave off the seasonal wave. It's especially problematic if it turns out Merck's compound works better since it's been known since October 2020 but they sat on it for whatever reason. However it turns out - this election needs to be a start, need to pay attention, hold them accountable for what is happening.
I am trusting nothing coming from the pharmaceuticals at this point… and I am a physician. Think I will stick with the FLCCC protocol which seems fairly effective and very low side effect profile! Not to mention eating right and being active!
"Pfizer says it stopped trials early as the initial results were so positive." I guess that's how you avoid looking at any long-term effects.
Lets hope thats the end. They are so desperate for digital id though, I wouldnt be surprised to see them argue that you need to take both as that combination results in the greatest risk reduction
Pfizermectin to the rescue! ... For just $500/pill!
Even if it doesn’t work, the statistics will be manipulated to make it look like it does; the “vaccines”, as you say, are going to be a fiasco and a disaster too big to hide. Watch the anchors get thrown out on testing and the PCR CTs get wound waaayy back. “Cases” will plummet.
Even though this is probably just-slightly reformulated IVM it might be the way out for those of us too wise to take the venom.
I think “they” know the vaccine mandates will fail. So here is the magic, face-saving pill.
Surely, any pill capable of these results should have similar results in all coronaviruses and flus, or at least an easily adaptable pill would. What then will people die of? If your understanding is (and mine is) that the vast majority of Covid deaths were people nearing death anyway then this pill will not, nor could it, do much of anything. In Ireland, where I am, there was essentially zero excess death in 2020. So whose lives would the pill save? Whose lives would the vaccine save for that matter?
Has this medicine undergone the full multiple years of testing, or is it another 'released under emergency licence' drug? However you can't take us to court if you die.
"But still get vaccinated, get boosters, and continue wearing your mask."
Someone help me understand why I should trust or care about this? All seriousness- I WANT to be more rational here, but all I see is yet another thing I'm not letting anywhere near my body made by people who want to destroy the entire fucking world.
My bet is, it's slightly-changed Ivermectin. Changed enough for a patent.
"is this why there was such intense action to keep ivermectin from being adopted in the US?"
Emergency Use Authorization is based on the "strict" condition that no alternative exists so all early treatment was squashed to guarantee a vaccine program was rolled out. Sorry I can't remember who and where but more than a few MDs under the umbrella of Kory, Malone, Yeadon, McCollough etc have commented that this looked like Pfizers way to compete with the off patent treatments. Market share targets usually explains more than public health.
I suspect they've had this pill in mind all along, but they were eager to test mRNA vaccines/technology. So what if they didn't work and caused a lot of side effects? They got a ton of data from the mass vaccination program + a boatload of money. They knew a variant could cause devastation (ADE) - maybe they see one coming down the pike, and besides they are nervous that news about the adverse events is catching on. So they release the pill (making another massive influx of $$$) and they look like heroes. Wake up - we are pawns. "Never let a crisis go to waste".
[insert side-eye GIF of your choice here]
If they're smart, they'll use this as a way to fully walk back all NPIs. LOLOLOLOL! Listen, those who are optimistic please pour that energy into the universe because I do want you to be right.
Not sure I agree with the exit ramp theories here.
I have a hard time believing this government is going to let this end with me having gotten away with disobeying them with relatively minimal financial, social, and psychological damage.
I'm going to be very, VERY pleasantly surprised if this moves any needles anywhere in the country for vax mandates- especially because I wonder how the hundred million or so that allowed themselves to be coerced, unwillingly, into the vax will feel- the strategists HAVE to have taken that into account.
They can't allow us to have beaten the system. We have to be punished before everything can go back to normal.
At this point, immunization isn't an option, we've already hit Hope-Simpson range so 4-6 weeks for two shots or a booster during which time you are more vulnerable to infection is a clear no-go, regardless what OSHA says. They don't have much choice but to rush a therapeutic and hope this goes away. I'm not confident - we apparently aren't using monoclonals enough except in Florida, and I don't see how we get enough tablets in the supply chain to stave off the seasonal wave. It's especially problematic if it turns out Merck's compound works better since it's been known since October 2020 but they sat on it for whatever reason. However it turns out - this election needs to be a start, need to pay attention, hold them accountable for what is happening.
Just in time. Let's put covid behind us, Gates has already hinted a smallpox pandemic is next.
"if a simple pill drops risk 89% (far more than vaccines do in real life) then why vaxx? why take the risk?"
Because the government says that in order to live, we must take the vax. Until THAT changes, nothing else makes any difference.