post vaccination spikes in covid risk
a hypothesis on cause
many have looked at rises in covid cases as vaccination efforts take off and have wondered if this is more than mere correlation. in many cases, a lot of it seems driven by a rise in testing that accelerates at the same time as vaccination. this has been especially true in asia where many countries were testing as such low levels that their sample rate rose by 10X around vaccinations and was still 80-90% lower than many western nations. this has driven apparent case spikes that are more data artifact than epidemic.
but this does not seem to explain all or even most of the phenomenon globally. we get studies like THESE that actually track covid risk ratio post vaccination and many show that risk of testing positive for covid rises for about 9 days post 1st dose of mRNA vaccine and does not really drop until day 14.
this has led many to posit that there is a window of added vulnerability to covid that comes from the first vaccination. while this is possible, i’d like to put forward another explanation that i think may better suit the data:
this is not actually covid. it’s just something that tests positive for covid.
i recently spoke about mRNA vaccines and the manner in which they provide instructions to code for a protein (S1) that is sufficiently similar to the S protein from covid 19 to elicit an immune response that developed immunity to wild covid. the data there has some striking similarities to the curves above.
the S1 protein is found in plasma in high concentrations on a curve that looks an awful lot like the curve of increased vulnerability. we also see actual covid S proteins released starting right around peak vulnerability risk ratio of 9 days. (posited from cell necrosis releasing non-active virus)
what we do NOT see however, is a rise in IgG-nucleocapsid and we would see that if this were a real covid infection by live virus.
so this raises an interesting question: is the spike in “positive tests for covid” really just PCR tests mistaking the S1 protein or trace, non-clinical virus released as part of the immune response/training cycle?
this seems plausible, at least in many cases. TaqPath, for example, targets the S gene. so do many others. it could easily be that they are mistaking either S1 for S or that they are catching trace covid that is widely present in people now (endemic) but not clinical or even “live” because the activated immune system is killing the cells in which it resided.
this seems a parsimonious and plausible explanation for the odd “case bumps” and rise in risk ratio observed post vaccination.
this analysis is admittedly very limited at this point. the ogata study was very small and it’s far from definitive that it can be directly compared to the risk studies, but it looks like a useful thread on which to pull.
would love to see some more data here and get some thoughts on how one could flesh this out and either bolster or refute this idea.
thoughts?
I agree. This might be the reason. However, the powers that be cannot admit it because they claim the nanoparticles don't leave the injection site, the nanoparticles and/or the "vaccine" encoded spikes don't enter the blood stream, and the "vaccinated" don't shed the "vaccine" encoded spikes. All must be true for this to explain the +PCRs this way.
Some thoughts...
We don't know who is being tested. What percentage of the +PCRs were symptomatic and what percentage were detected through screening?
I've read a number of times that the lymphocytes drop for two to three weeks after injection, which would make the injected susceptible to all infections. I haven't investigated this.
We don't know how specific these PCR tests are. Are they detecting other viruses that share nucleotides with SARS-CoV-2?
I've heard, many times now, that no lab in the world was isolated SARS-CoV-2 from a person with Covid-19. I've also heard that the original genome was created from fragments using artificial intelligence. I have no idea how to confirm either of these claims.
I've heard about a lab study in California in which thousands of samples (lung lavage?) taken from people with Covid-19 were sent to different labs for genomic analysis. They found Influenza A and Influenza B...no SARS-CoV-2. I've searched for this study (using DuckDuckGo), but I haven't found it.
The rise in cases after "vaccination" drives has been seen in many countries now. The cases rise followed shortly by a rise in deaths, often without the delay seen with natural infection. Mongolia was particularly striking. They had exactly one death until March. They started the vaccination campaign in late February and the cases and deaths spiked. Japan and Taiwan are now having the same problem. I expect they have good data on the crossover between injections, +PCRs, infections, and deaths.
Given the astounding number of deaths after "vaccination" in the US, UK, and Europe...which are thought to be under-reported...we cannot exclude the possibility that people who die from an adverse event are testing positive and counted as Covid-19 deaths...the ultimate insult, imo.
We have many questions without answers...and the people who have the data aren't going to release anything that undermines their narrative.
If you are interested, these two videos discuss some of what I mentioned about. These doctors are convinced the virus is a bio-weapon created to reduce population. Dr. Lee Merritt's presentations are especially disturbing. A year ago, I would have thought them wing-nuts. (A year ago, they might have thought themselves wing-nuts.) Now, I find them harder to dismiss. They may be stressed, but they're not idiots. And they've been right so far about the injections.
Roundtable with Drs. Lee Merritt, Sherry Tenpenny, Christiane Northup, Larry Pavlevsky, and others...
https://rumble.com/vhiltf-follow-up-to-the-5-doctors-discussion-of-the-covid-shots-as-bioweapons.html?fbclid=IwAR2Dmsj760Us1U24hZR0b-sIRriMeRdWMEqU4A0K8qjgpv03sDYaCXmlICw
Mike Adams interview with Lee Merritt...
https://www.brighteon.com/a39081f7-59cd-415a-8233-f4a24b655b54
Did you watch Greenland? Does anyone really think there isn't a list of who lives and who dies in the event of a nuclear war or asteroid strike? The best and brightest from science, medicine, art, technology, art & music (I hope), and healthy young people...will be shuttled off to bunkers to wait out the storm? If people feel capable and entitled to make such as list, I suspect they are capable of doing anything. About four percent of the world's population is to some degree psychopathic. Many of them run the world. They don't have a moral compass.
The past year has pushed me past my usual inhibition to go down rabbit holes. The people who suspect something's up wrt to the virus or the "vaccines" or the election or the border...are a motley crew. I'm not always comfortable, but I keep an open mind...especially since the "crazy people" seem the be the ones telling the truth.
pcr testing is too many positives with no eventual disease. 'cases' id'ed by pcr inflate observed 'prevalence'. one sample: 9 persons in ny yankee baseball 'organization' test positive after receiving j&j shot...... we need to hold judgement on pcr positive until symptoms and a better test. yes i see that some effects of the mrna vax could be hitting the shot rna.... but j&j is a dna..... covidian dogma is muddying the stream of consciousness.