I agree. This might be the reason. However, the powers that be cannot admit it because they claim the nanoparticles don't leave the injection site, the nanoparticles and/or the "vaccine" encoded spikes don't enter the blood stream, and the "vaccinated" don't shed the "vaccine" encoded spikes. All must be true for this to explain the +PCRs this way.
Some thoughts...
We don't know who is being tested. What percentage of the +PCRs were symptomatic and what percentage were detected through screening?
I've read a number of times that the lymphocytes drop for two to three weeks after injection, which would make the injected susceptible to all infections. I haven't investigated this.
We don't know how specific these PCR tests are. Are they detecting other viruses that share nucleotides with SARS-CoV-2?
I've heard, many times now, that no lab in the world was isolated SARS-CoV-2 from a person with Covid-19. I've also heard that the original genome was created from fragments using artificial intelligence. I have no idea how to confirm either of these claims.
I've heard about a lab study in California in which thousands of samples (lung lavage?) taken from people with Covid-19 were sent to different labs for genomic analysis. They found Influenza A and Influenza B...no SARS-CoV-2. I've searched for this study (using DuckDuckGo), but I haven't found it.
The rise in cases after "vaccination" drives has been seen in many countries now. The cases rise followed shortly by a rise in deaths, often without the delay seen with natural infection. Mongolia was particularly striking. They had exactly one death until March. They started the vaccination campaign in late February and the cases and deaths spiked. Japan and Taiwan are now having the same problem. I expect they have good data on the crossover between injections, +PCRs, infections, and deaths.
Given the astounding number of deaths after "vaccination" in the US, UK, and Europe...which are thought to be under-reported...we cannot exclude the possibility that people who die from an adverse event are testing positive and counted as Covid-19 deaths...the ultimate insult, imo.
We have many questions without answers...and the people who have the data aren't going to release anything that undermines their narrative.
If you are interested, these two videos discuss some of what I mentioned about. These doctors are convinced the virus is a bio-weapon created to reduce population. Dr. Lee Merritt's presentations are especially disturbing. A year ago, I would have thought them wing-nuts. (A year ago, they might have thought themselves wing-nuts.) Now, I find them harder to dismiss. They may be stressed, but they're not idiots. And they've been right so far about the injections.
Roundtable with Drs. Lee Merritt, Sherry Tenpenny, Christiane Northup, Larry Pavlevsky, and others...
Did you watch Greenland? Does anyone really think there isn't a list of who lives and who dies in the event of a nuclear war or asteroid strike? The best and brightest from science, medicine, art, technology, art & music (I hope), and healthy young people...will be shuttled off to bunkers to wait out the storm? If people feel capable and entitled to make such as list, I suspect they are capable of doing anything. About four percent of the world's population is to some degree psychopathic. Many of them run the world. They don't have a moral compass.
The past year has pushed me past my usual inhibition to go down rabbit holes. The people who suspect something's up wrt to the virus or the "vaccines" or the election or the border...are a motley crew. I'm not always comfortable, but I keep an open mind...especially since the "crazy people" seem the be the ones telling the truth.
pcr testing is too many positives with no eventual disease. 'cases' id'ed by pcr inflate observed 'prevalence'. one sample: 9 persons in ny yankee baseball 'organization' test positive after receiving j&j shot...... we need to hold judgement on pcr positive until symptoms and a better test. yes i see that some effects of the mrna vax could be hitting the shot rna.... but j&j is a dna..... covidian dogma is muddying the stream of consciousness.
J&J and AstraZeneca both use a viral vector to deliver the mRNA instructions to the cell. The "vaccine" encoded spike is synthesized by the cell regardless of the delivery mechanism.
per nytimes: "The Johnson & Johnson vaccine is based on the virus’s genetic instructions for building the spike protein. But unlike the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, which store the instructions in single-stranded RNA, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine uses double-stranded DNA. "
The sequence is DNA to RNA to protein. You can see it in the graphic. Even though the instructions for the spike protein are encoded in DNA, they are translated to mRNA in the cell. The ribosomes then use to mRNA to make the spike protein. The mRNA would be quickly degraded outside the cell, so the viral vector "vaccines" probably can't travel as far as from the injection site as the lipid nanoparticle mRNA "vaccines" can.
WRT to the PCR tests...they are amplifying certain stretches of nucleotides in the virus genome that are alleged to be unique to the virus. We don't really know if they are unique to this virus. And the ridiculously high amplification threshold (38-45) is just amplifying noise. These tests reveal nothing about current infection, viral load, or transmissibility.
Since the CDC has lowered the amplification threshold for "fully vaccinated" breakthrough infections to 28 cycles, it's more likely they are detecting something meaningful in the US.
The question is...are they detecting evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in "fully vaccinated" people...or are they detecting the "vaccine" encoded spike protein in the mucosal tissues of the airways?
A few weeks ago, the Salk Institute released a study that showed the spike itself can damage the endothelial cells lining the blood and lymph vessels...the weird symptoms associated with C19 disease. We have no evidence that the "vaccine" encoded spike is less virulent than the wild virus spike, despite their claims to the contrary. A study released last week showed that the "vaccine" encoded spike was found in the plasma of 11 of 13 study subjects for a couple weeks following the first injection.
So, is the rise in +PCRs a result of the "vaccine" encoded spike expressing itself in the airways?
Are the "vaccine" encoded spikes the cause of C19 disease and death in the "fully vaccinated" people? Are people dying from "vaccine" induced C19 disease without infection with the virus itself?
i have seen joel's work, but am struggling with the way he handles baselines. many of them seem to buck what look like the usual trends and when i spot checked a couple of them, i could not replicate them.
iirc, in the us trials they did not "book" a case unless positive test w/ 2 symptoms...... which means a test done for school or other non medical reason was not allowed in the test....
This positivity vpossibly just due to S protein does not explain the deaths post vaccination.....this has happened corresponding to roll out everywhere!!
I’m confused, are you saying that the increase in spike protein from the vaccine is driving the positive pcr testing? I suppose what might happen is if the sequences used for pcr recognition are the same as the mRNA used for the spike protein vaccine and the pcr testing was picking up vaccine mRNA. I’ve wondered if they were, but haven’t seen it shown. Also, I understand that the mRNA in the vaccine is somewhat modified from the native viral sequence to increase immunogenicity which would decrease the cross reaction of the pcr sequences to native nucleic acid sequences
What would be the explanation for a similar spike in deaths post-vaccination? Quite a few countries show deaths increase as soon as mass vaccination starts.
it's "deaths with" not "deaths from" covid, so the testing rates affects it much the same way, especially in places where the testing level was very low to begin with and disproportionately if they are starting to test either all deaths for the first time, or all deaths of vaccinated people for some sort of reporting system.
deaths and hospitalizations are often as or more affected by jumps in sample rate as cases.
this is especially so in places that use the "any death for any reason for X days after a + PCR test = covid death" definition.
I agree. This might be the reason. However, the powers that be cannot admit it because they claim the nanoparticles don't leave the injection site, the nanoparticles and/or the "vaccine" encoded spikes don't enter the blood stream, and the "vaccinated" don't shed the "vaccine" encoded spikes. All must be true for this to explain the +PCRs this way.
Some thoughts...
We don't know who is being tested. What percentage of the +PCRs were symptomatic and what percentage were detected through screening?
I've read a number of times that the lymphocytes drop for two to three weeks after injection, which would make the injected susceptible to all infections. I haven't investigated this.
We don't know how specific these PCR tests are. Are they detecting other viruses that share nucleotides with SARS-CoV-2?
I've heard, many times now, that no lab in the world was isolated SARS-CoV-2 from a person with Covid-19. I've also heard that the original genome was created from fragments using artificial intelligence. I have no idea how to confirm either of these claims.
I've heard about a lab study in California in which thousands of samples (lung lavage?) taken from people with Covid-19 were sent to different labs for genomic analysis. They found Influenza A and Influenza B...no SARS-CoV-2. I've searched for this study (using DuckDuckGo), but I haven't found it.
The rise in cases after "vaccination" drives has been seen in many countries now. The cases rise followed shortly by a rise in deaths, often without the delay seen with natural infection. Mongolia was particularly striking. They had exactly one death until March. They started the vaccination campaign in late February and the cases and deaths spiked. Japan and Taiwan are now having the same problem. I expect they have good data on the crossover between injections, +PCRs, infections, and deaths.
Given the astounding number of deaths after "vaccination" in the US, UK, and Europe...which are thought to be under-reported...we cannot exclude the possibility that people who die from an adverse event are testing positive and counted as Covid-19 deaths...the ultimate insult, imo.
We have many questions without answers...and the people who have the data aren't going to release anything that undermines their narrative.
If you are interested, these two videos discuss some of what I mentioned about. These doctors are convinced the virus is a bio-weapon created to reduce population. Dr. Lee Merritt's presentations are especially disturbing. A year ago, I would have thought them wing-nuts. (A year ago, they might have thought themselves wing-nuts.) Now, I find them harder to dismiss. They may be stressed, but they're not idiots. And they've been right so far about the injections.
Roundtable with Drs. Lee Merritt, Sherry Tenpenny, Christiane Northup, Larry Pavlevsky, and others...
https://rumble.com/vhiltf-follow-up-to-the-5-doctors-discussion-of-the-covid-shots-as-bioweapons.html?fbclid=IwAR2Dmsj760Us1U24hZR0b-sIRriMeRdWMEqU4A0K8qjgpv03sDYaCXmlICw
Mike Adams interview with Lee Merritt...
https://www.brighteon.com/a39081f7-59cd-415a-8233-f4a24b655b54
Did you watch Greenland? Does anyone really think there isn't a list of who lives and who dies in the event of a nuclear war or asteroid strike? The best and brightest from science, medicine, art, technology, art & music (I hope), and healthy young people...will be shuttled off to bunkers to wait out the storm? If people feel capable and entitled to make such as list, I suspect they are capable of doing anything. About four percent of the world's population is to some degree psychopathic. Many of them run the world. They don't have a moral compass.
The past year has pushed me past my usual inhibition to go down rabbit holes. The people who suspect something's up wrt to the virus or the "vaccines" or the election or the border...are a motley crew. I'm not always comfortable, but I keep an open mind...especially since the "crazy people" seem the be the ones telling the truth.
pcr testing is too many positives with no eventual disease. 'cases' id'ed by pcr inflate observed 'prevalence'. one sample: 9 persons in ny yankee baseball 'organization' test positive after receiving j&j shot...... we need to hold judgement on pcr positive until symptoms and a better test. yes i see that some effects of the mrna vax could be hitting the shot rna.... but j&j is a dna..... covidian dogma is muddying the stream of consciousness.
J&J and AstraZeneca both use a viral vector to deliver the mRNA instructions to the cell. The "vaccine" encoded spike is synthesized by the cell regardless of the delivery mechanism.
per nytimes: "The Johnson & Johnson vaccine is based on the virus’s genetic instructions for building the spike protein. But unlike the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, which store the instructions in single-stranded RNA, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine uses double-stranded DNA. "
I presume AZN is same using a virus carrier.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine.html
yeah, i do not know why they need dna when the virus is an rna virus.....?
The sequence is DNA to RNA to protein. You can see it in the graphic. Even though the instructions for the spike protein are encoded in DNA, they are translated to mRNA in the cell. The ribosomes then use to mRNA to make the spike protein. The mRNA would be quickly degraded outside the cell, so the viral vector "vaccines" probably can't travel as far as from the injection site as the lipid nanoparticle mRNA "vaccines" can.
WRT to the PCR tests...they are amplifying certain stretches of nucleotides in the virus genome that are alleged to be unique to the virus. We don't really know if they are unique to this virus. And the ridiculously high amplification threshold (38-45) is just amplifying noise. These tests reveal nothing about current infection, viral load, or transmissibility.
Since the CDC has lowered the amplification threshold for "fully vaccinated" breakthrough infections to 28 cycles, it's more likely they are detecting something meaningful in the US.
The question is...are they detecting evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in "fully vaccinated" people...or are they detecting the "vaccine" encoded spike protein in the mucosal tissues of the airways?
A few weeks ago, the Salk Institute released a study that showed the spike itself can damage the endothelial cells lining the blood and lymph vessels...the weird symptoms associated with C19 disease. We have no evidence that the "vaccine" encoded spike is less virulent than the wild virus spike, despite their claims to the contrary. A study released last week showed that the "vaccine" encoded spike was found in the plasma of 11 of 13 study subjects for a couple weeks following the first injection.
So, is the rise in +PCRs a result of the "vaccine" encoded spike expressing itself in the airways?
Are the "vaccine" encoded spikes the cause of C19 disease and death in the "fully vaccinated" people? Are people dying from "vaccine" induced C19 disease without infection with the virus itself?
The vaccine trials showed increase in "cases" in the two weeks after first dose - data excluded from RELATIVE efficacy calculations: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-modernas-95-effective-vaccines-we-need-more-details-and-the-raw-data. Since the vaccine trials were only set up to show reduction in severe disease, the important question is "did deaths decline?" See latest at https://twitter.com/RealJoelSmalley. Also, look there for his vax/case charts. He has done over 100 and there is a video...
i have seen joel's work, but am struggling with the way he handles baselines. many of them seem to buck what look like the usual trends and when i spot checked a couple of them, i could not replicate them.
iirc, in the us trials they did not "book" a case unless positive test w/ 2 symptoms...... which means a test done for school or other non medical reason was not allowed in the test....
Are those s proteins reaching the upper respiratory tract even via vaccination?
This positivity vpossibly just due to S protein does not explain the deaths post vaccination.....this has happened corresponding to roll out everywhere!!
yes, it does.
see other response to same issue.
I’m confused, are you saying that the increase in spike protein from the vaccine is driving the positive pcr testing? I suppose what might happen is if the sequences used for pcr recognition are the same as the mRNA used for the spike protein vaccine and the pcr testing was picking up vaccine mRNA. I’ve wondered if they were, but haven’t seen it shown. Also, I understand that the mRNA in the vaccine is somewhat modified from the native viral sequence to increase immunogenicity which would decrease the cross reaction of the pcr sequences to native nucleic acid sequences
in at least some cases, they seem to be as the PCR tests explicitly key off the S gene.
there also seems to be an additional effect where post immunization, we see a rise in actual S protein.
this is hypothesized to be immune response driven cell necrosis releasing trace covid into the system.
that could also be a driver of PCR +.
What would be the explanation for a similar spike in deaths post-vaccination? Quite a few countries show deaths increase as soon as mass vaccination starts.
This account has chronicled most of them - https://twitter.com/MConceptions
it's "deaths with" not "deaths from" covid, so the testing rates affects it much the same way, especially in places where the testing level was very low to begin with and disproportionately if they are starting to test either all deaths for the first time, or all deaths of vaccinated people for some sort of reporting system.
deaths and hospitalizations are often as or more affected by jumps in sample rate as cases.
this is especially so in places that use the "any death for any reason for X days after a + PCR test = covid death" definition.
does matter that early on the priority vax recipients are the frail elderly......
yes. and the semantics hyperbole continues with "infection," "confirmed cases," etc. based solely on PCR tests.