216 Comments

That self-righteous woman holding up the sign is out of central casting:

1) Contempt for blue-collar workers...check!

2) Masked outdoors...check!

3) Rainbow colored shade rims...check!

4) Tufts of hair colored a shade not ever found on a human head...check!

The only way it gets more woke is if it is really an individual with XY chromosomes pretending to be a woman...

Expand full comment

The aggressive psychopath eyes...check.

Expand full comment

The vacant, unthinking, cool kid, self righteous, arrogant, half smile eyes of the "I owned you" lib.

Expand full comment

This idiotic "wokism" would be funny in a pathetic way if it didn't have such awful implications. I live in Toronto and I am a Gay White Man (NOT A LGBTcvobizq... whatever) and I know way too many guys (and women) like this. They are conceited airheads living in an echo chamber. I try to get my acquaintances to think just ONE original thought. Nada. I try to get them to see that Gay men (and what's left of the Gay movement) are coming to be considered cheerleaders for this fascistic and anti-freedom cabal that rule over us. Nada. I know I am in the minority - I'd estimate that only 15% of Gay men feel as I do. But I do know that when the SHTF, we'll all be lumped together. All I can do is try to get out of the way because I can see there is no way to get through to these people. And I NEVER wear rainbow colored anything!

Expand full comment

Good for you. Keep fighting this madness.

Expand full comment

You are the definition of pride in being who you are. I note my gay friends also have differing politics and seem to tolerate each other, something I wish others might do.

Expand full comment

I truly feel your pain.

Expand full comment

Many gay men and lesbians (especially 45 y.o. +) I know complain about Gay, Inc. What you just described is basically what they consider to be the result of the embrace of corporate gayness, aka Gay, Inc.

Expand full comment

As a senior, I don't know much about the younger bunch. Once age arrives we pretty much are who we are. But my gay friends live decent quiet lives now, most are reasonable well-off not struggling. I suspect they wonder, as I do, why the anger. I must admin loosing some friends in the late 80's was very hard. Survivors of those days have strong memories.

Expand full comment

One can’t help but wonder if she was paid to be there, ticking all the boxes.

Expand full comment

Or if she was posing in a nongendered bathroom.

Expand full comment

Lol!

Expand full comment

Some people who do not look like you are still thinking people. All are human. More opinionated division is what you are promoting, and less would be helpful right now, it seems to me, if you are trying to bring right minded folks together. One believes in these injections and mandates, or one doesn't.

Expand full comment

I don't think it was saying the woman isn't human... only that she fits a stereotype, and that the colour of her hair isn't found naturally in a human.

Expand full comment

Some people who wear the uniform and colors and symbols and assorted trappings of their cause have zero interest in the opposing parties’ perspective.

I submit that she seems one such.

She’s a soldier.

Expand full comment

You cant really reason with people who have been driven insane with fear and ideology.

Expand full comment

Jacket that keeps expanding in girth as it covers her ample midsection… check!

I only say this to illustrate these self- anointed moral superiors barely take care of their own health while admonishing everyone else for putting people at risk.

Expand full comment

The process of othering people begins with small otherings....again, the only relevant metric to be accepted into the right side of history here is how one feels about the mandates and injections....the rest will make you disqualify otherwise good folks who believe as you do, who you cast off due to your prejudices. I wont. How we look is irrelevant in this cause.

Expand full comment

A woman unironically holding a sign portraying herself as standing up to oppression while supporting violations of human rights by state power is not one of the good folks. She may come around eventually and I would accept her, but as it stands she’s one of the lost.

Expand full comment

I agree...but I wonder what her sign said before it was Photoshopped (because it clearly was)?

Expand full comment

Very good. So, she's an idiot...she just manifests her idiocy visually rather than textually.

Expand full comment

yes. she has it all. You can see the woke illness coming at you, even with the mask. I think she's wearing butterfly wings too (ruining butterfly wings for me)

Expand full comment

Smart move on part. Better to look like an dunce than to open her mouth or pen some woke slogan thereby proving it.

Expand full comment

so, the same thing

Expand full comment

not cool! I had not even noticed ...

Expand full comment

How delightful. Instead of refuting her message, the top comment needs to critique her non-traditional appearance and throw shade at transgender people.

Gee, I wonder where these people get the idea that the opposition is full of intolerant bigots?

I want out of this dichotomy. Woke, anti-woke, it’s all a ready made distraction from the totalitarianism at our doorstep. Let people live as they want, as long as they aren’t hurting others or infringing on others’ rights. The “leftist” agendas may seemingly have the upper hand right now, but does the “right” stand for freedom? Or simply freedom to believe in what they believe in?

Expand full comment

Wake the hell up. Wokeness is pushed by our oligarchy in order to divide the people as much as possible. It needs to be mocked relentlessly and then extirpated.

I give not a rat's rump if someone wants to dress up as a member of the opposite sex, but I care deeply if you force me to pretend that s/he indeed a member of the opposite sex. Transgenderism is dangerous; it is an assault on reality. Fundamental science (male/female) is discarded in order to accede to confused individuals' feelings.

Expand full comment

If a man can say he identifies as she , why can’t the unvaxxed identify as triple vaxxed ?

Expand full comment

For what it’s worth, I agree with this point too. The hypocrisy needs to be pointed out. Similarly, I do like throwing the “my body, my choice” back in the left’s face.

Expand full comment

Peace to you, Teri G. Have a good day.

Expand full comment

Exactly right! I love this modern "science."

Expand full comment

I still wouldn't. They can screw themselves

Expand full comment

Forced speech helps no one.

When Trans bullshit comes up, I say I'm transing to a Silverback

Expand full comment

I like this app, I can love my own comments. This disturbs people. I think it's hilarious

Expand full comment

So reality is simply “fundamental science”? The whole of a human being’s identity is their biology? Nothing more than the crude flesh we inhabit? And feelings have no part of life? All seems pretty dark to me.

I agree entirely with the “forcing you to pretend” business. The laws enacted in places to criminalize the use of “incorrect” pronouns are ridiculous and antithetical to a free society. I also agree that “wokeness” is being used to drive a wedge. But my overall point is that the ones pushing it do not care about it philosophically. It’s just a way to divide and conquer along with creating a lifelong pharmaceutical/medical dependency in the case of transgender people. I would prefer my focus to be on the elite power that creates these distractions, not its victims. Nor do I wish to have the hubris to invalidate another person’s life experience, especially one that I don’t completely understand. Where “wokeness” fails is in its hypocrisy, that they don’t afford others the freedom they want for themselves. However, when I read comments that judge people simply based on their appearance and dismiss a life experience because it’s at odds with how someone is expected to act based on their interpretation of the importance of their physical form… well, I’m not seeing much a difference from the complaints leveled at the “woke.”

Expand full comment

"The whole of a human being’s identity is their biology? Nothing more than the crude flesh we inhabit? And feelings have no part of life? All seems pretty dark to me."

Well... yes, essentially. We are what we are, and that is a truth that transcends feelings, wishes, or any other such thing. When we watch a nature show, we hear the voiceover tell us that the lion with the visible testes and the mane is the male, and the ones without either feature are the females. It wasn't necessary to ask them if they identify as such. We know what "male" means, and it's not a matter of feelings any more than being a lion is about feelings, or about how being a human is about feelings.

If I thought I was Napoleon Bonaparte, and really felt that was who I was at the very core of my being, that would not make it so. I would still be the actual 'me,' whatever that is. My feeling that I am Napoleon would simply be false, without any subjectivity involved. The people around me might feel great sympathy for one whose feelings are so misaligned with reality, but it wouldn't be doing me a favor to indulge the delusion. It is simply false.

It doesn't change the equation if the delusion is changed from a specific one, like I am Napoleon or Christ or Genghis Khan, to a generic one, like if I thought I was black, or if I thought I was a cat, or if I thought I was an alien from space, or yes, if I thought I was a woman despite my male appearance and XY chromosomal configuration. It simply is objectively false to say that there is any notion of a true gender identity that differs from the biological reality. Yes, the equipment you were born with defines you as being male or female, and only one of those (other than the unusual developmental anomaly of being intersex).

That's not to say I don't take the pain of someone with gender dysphoria seriously, or that I would wish any harm upon such a person. It's just that it's not any more valid to say you actually are the thing you want to be than if you wanted to be a cat or a member of another race (Sorry Elizabeth Warren; I would like be part Native American too... that would be really cool).

Expand full comment

That’s a thoughtful response that I disagree with in some parts, but I respect the opinion. To be specific, I think there is a difference between biological sex and gender expression, but I do agree that there are parties that want to pretend that isn’t the case and that could be anywhere from bordering on to outright delusional and therefore potentially harmful for one’s mental health. But each case is different and a lot of this is semantics. Words reflect concepts and both are human inventions… we agree upon terms so we can communicate, and maybe that’s the biggest casualty in this “culture war.” More broadly speaking though, I don’t think that having different definitions of what a “man” or “woman” is necessarily harmful, and I think what is at the root of these identity issues is a more specific version of examining what it is to be alive and be human. And that can be a great thing, in my experience…

Put another way, and you hightlighted some examples, there are lots of things a person or groups of people can believe in that have no empirical rational basis. And then there is the question of what is actually empirical and if rationality itself is aligned with “truth.” This all gets very muddy the more one tries to nail it down, and I can’t speak for anyone else. The key for me comes down to: are your beliefs infringing on others’ freedom? When some try to enforce their validation on others, that’s crossing the line in my opinion. Prior to that, I don’t care. Nor do I wish to try and judge what constitutes “self-harm.” I believe in sovereignty and if people use their free will to indulge in fantasy that hurts themselves, that’s on them.

Again though, I respect your post though I think the “you are what you are” part is far too materialist for me to co-sign. I believe that we are consciousness first and physical second, not the other way around, so that renders much of your argument moot to me. (You might say that makes me crazy too… ah well…). But I have no quarrel with you, what made me respond to the first post is the tendency to drag the “woke” gay/trans “commoners” who have little to directly do with the rise of totalitarianism. Our (read: non-elites) anger would be best directed at the ones attempting to oppress us, not at the obnoxious chickwith the rainbow hair at Starbucks who goes by “zey.” It alienates potential allies and gives TPTB another tool to divide and conquer. It’s a tale old as time and I don’t feel like ending up in a religious war after this “pandemic” charade runs its course. To my eye, that’s what keeps “the left” up at night and when they speak of intolerant bigots, I don’t really have to squint too hard to see where they’re coming from. Being scared/hateful of people who live life differently than yourself is an unfortunate tendency and one that has historically always turned out nasty.

Expand full comment

1st 2 were right on target. 3rd... well rainbow is now an utter symbol of oppression and tyranny... do you not agree?

He WAS addressing her message of the 1st 3 points.

Who's side are YOU on?

Have you complained about commie/nazi left recently ?

Btw, I'm not on the right m

Expand full comment

I don’t agree that the “rainbow” is a symbol of oppression. I see using the plight of a historically marginalized group to then further marginalize a larger group of people.

I’m on the side of freedom. Freedom for everyone to live their life as they see fit and allowing others the same. I complain about the left frequently, for what it’s worth, they do seem to be the dominant ideology at the moment. But it’s always just for the moment, true power changes it’s colors like a chameleon. 15 years ago, it was pretty apparent that the right was more directly responsible for furthering the totalitarian state (under the guise of terrorism).

When we lose track of the humanity of those that we disagree with, we end down the path of authoritarianism, no matter our whether our starting point is left/right/up/down/etc. The more I see people critique “wokeness” and the LGBTetc (yes, the acronym is obviously ridiculous) for their lifestyle as opposed to their infringement on others’ sovereignty, I can understand the “SJW” fears of a world where the “social deviants” are actually persecuted (and the ones doing it feel just). Such a world may seem far away at the moment, but this pendulum can switch in a heartbeat. I know a lot of people draw comparisons of the current situation to the rise of Nazism, but consider for a moment that movement was a response to the one before it.

For me, freedom is simple. As long as you aren’t hurting or coercing others, you are free to be however you’d like. I simply worry that many who are in that camp now would not hesitate to discriminate against others if the shoe was on the other foot. I also do realize that there are many who are opposed to wokeism that do truly value individual choice. I just felt it necessary to call attention to an issue that I see repeatedly in these circles, which is the tendency to dunk on gay/trans folks not for their hypocrisy regarding personal autonomy, but for their very existence. It’s a slippery slope that plays into the hands of the elites, in my opinion.

Expand full comment

Don’t forget the part about being pregnant. Men can be pregnant ya know!

Expand full comment

John Henry, you are a riot, devastating you. I wish I could follow you... Twitter was a *brief * lot of fun following characters like you. Btw, it broke my heart seeing how much truckers loved their kids on one clip

Expand full comment

Thank you, John. Substack has been great; it is encouraging to see that so many have rejected the narrative. Stay strong!

Expand full comment

I hate to poop on anyone's parade, but that sign is clearly photoshopped. You and I know it's an accurate paraphrasing, though.

Expand full comment

5) Soulless eyes

Expand full comment

You forgot that he/she has butterfly wings coming off her coat....! Everyone's gotta be proud of something I guess...

Expand full comment

Just another wokist, hating non-wokists. Because you have to believe in something. She’s on a mission. She feels alive. Her raison d’etre. Change or shame everyone who doesn’t think like she does.

Intolerance in the flesh. Superiority complex.

Expand full comment

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. "

Expand full comment

“The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants” - Albert Camus

Expand full comment

"The protection of the masses has in all times been the pretense of tyranny" -- Henry George (1886)

Expand full comment

C.S. Lewis hit the nail on the head.

Expand full comment

Always.

Expand full comment

I’m transgender and I’m unvaccinated. I support the right of everyone to choose for themselves. All of the mandates and vaccine passports have to end.

Expand full comment

Genderqueer and pansexual here, also unvaxxed (but just got over omicron that worse migraines tbh neck yeah natural immunity!) and with you 100% on this. If you give up bodily autonomy and the right to medical choice/informed consent to anyone, whether government or corporation, you are positioned to lose everything. You become a literal serf. Your body is no longer your own. No one should take these shots except through their own completely free uncoerced choice.

Expand full comment

❤️ my body my choice

Expand full comment

Cool! Glad there's a trans person in here who thinks as we do. The more different types of folks, the better.

Expand full comment

As a Canadian, your relentless pillorying of the leftist loonies' outrage, including that emanating from the sock-puppet p.m., is greatly appreciated.

Expand full comment

God bless you. I love your bravery. Texas salutes you and your buddies

Expand full comment

Watched Viva Frei broadcast live for four hours yesterday on Rumble from the heart of the Ottowa. Beautiful, peaceful group of people enjoying their first taste of autonomy in two years, the feeling is profound. The most interesting part is Viva attempted to talk to some of the “counter protesters” who were about 40 people, all masked and very dour. Most refused to talk. One guy offered that non vaccinated people were 18 times more likely to land in the hospital, that was the best he could muster. The only other lady who would talk seemed genuine and offered the same hospital statistic, but did not know Pfizer and Moderna enjoy immunity from liability. Honestly felt bad for the woman, she has no idea what she doesn’t know. The rest felt paid to be there and instructed to keep their mouth shut. The edifice is crumbling.

Expand full comment

Wow. How can anyone NOT be aware the covid jab companies have liability protection?! I loved, "she has no idea what she doesn't know." Describes most of my husband's jabbed family of origin.

Expand full comment

I suspect they are being paid and know little to nothing about the issue and care even less. You've got to be pretty motivated to stand outnumbered in frigid weather. Motivated by passionate knowledge or money. Doesn't seem to be knowledge.

Expand full comment

"Doesn't seem to be knowledge"

Expand full comment

Good line.

Expand full comment

plants (both meanings)

Expand full comment

Dour! So spot on. What is it with totalitarians. So humorless, so lifeless, so pathetic. Get some joy in your life people. Take that damn diaper off and breath the air God gave you! You depress me just by looking at you.

Expand full comment

I saw some of that stream as well. It was amazing how many of the "counter protestors" were informed they were not allowed to speak and complied. And they still think they are on the right side. Mass formation psychosis is real.

Expand full comment

I saw that protest. Not very enthusiastic

Expand full comment

I keep telling people that you can't just impose draconian measures on society in general without overwhelming consensus and obtained through a democratic process that protects the rights of the minority. Even a significant percentage of people that complied are still angry and resentful.

It is just unrealistic to banish hardworking and honest people from public life without some backlash. What did the overlords think was going to happen? Don't blame those fighting for their freedom - blame those politicians and public policy dictators for arbitrarily imposing such grotesque and polarizing measures without regard for consent of the governed.

Expand full comment

The analogy that is frequently used: what do you do about someone who insists on lighting a match during an air raid? There are occasions where public health requires a unified response and restrictions on personal liberty. This was NOT one of them, and it will make it difficult to argue for such restrictions when a REAL killer comes along. Sometimes I think that was the plan. The sort of people who can lie, and kill, so easily are probably capable of anything.

Expand full comment

"There are occasions where public health requires a unified response and restrictions on personal liberty"

Never.

Expand full comment

100% agree. There is NEVER an occasion where public health needs restrictions on the liberty guaranteed by our Constitution. NEVER. Even a real Pandemic does not trump the Consititution. And EVERY STATES Governors EMERGENCY POWERs Need Stripping RIGHT NOW AND FOREVER.

Expand full comment

The same 18th century forefathers who penned the Constitution would submit to, and initiate, regional quarantines during epidemics. I believe Alexander Hamilton and his wife had to endure something of a strip search during a yellow fever scare.

BUT I AGREE that we need to place much stricter controls on the sweeping, police-state authority of public health officials. If we're not careful, we are going to be ruled by nervous technocrats afraid of EVERY virus that comes along.

Expand full comment

Never a quarantine of the healthy. That is obvious nonsense now and even was then when our medical understanding was less.

Expand full comment

Or PAID to be scared of EVERYTHING not approved of by our overlords.

Expand full comment

A red light is a restriction on personal liberty. An Ebola quarantine is a restriction on personal liberty. Just because this crisis was administered by people who were either monumentally incompetent, or evil, doesn't mean we go full anarchist.

Expand full comment

I can go through a red light anytime I want. Might there be consequences (some serious)? Yes. Nevertheless, my choice. And, never in history have we forced healthy people to quarantine or shutter businesses. That's not productive and is corrosive to individual liberty. Full anarchy by people who understand the NAP would be ideal, actually.

Expand full comment

Quarantining the healthy was always a bad idea -- just like removing traffic lights. The solution to "really bad government" is NOT "no government at all." We are the thinking side, remember.

Expand full comment

Government is a necessary evil, and for too long, I think, people have concentrated on the "necessary" bit of that more than the "evil" bit. Yes, all governments are inherently evil, and must be distrusted as such. It's why our founders in America went out of their way to tie it down and restrict it so that it is unable to do anything beyond the "necessary" bits, but that is always a very tenuous thing.

The founders went out of their way to design checks and balances, but the way around all of this has become obvious... simply lie to the people with the media... keep lying until the lie prompts the people to vote and act as the liars want, and voila, a government of and by the people, ostensibly doing what the people want, serves the needs of the liars (the oligarchs) and not the people who have been fooled by the lies.

No government at all, aka anarchy, is a temporary state at best, as some person is invariably going to notice that and gather whatever forces are needed to take over, making him the de facto government. There has to be enough government to prevent that from happening, and to occupy what would otherwise be a void, where unrest from not having an official way to deal with torts or criminal actions would lead to unrest that would eventually result in the imposition of some kind of government, and it may not at that stage be one that is particularly concerned with liberty. That's why it is imperative to create a government that is all about liberty before there is an emergency state where people will take whatever they can get, which is what the founders did when they wrote the Constitution of the United States just over a decade after the Declaration of Independence was signed. The founders realized that it would require vigilance on the part of all citizens to protect the Constitution, and we haven't done that.

Expand full comment

In 1918-19 San Francisco did it but the people eventually rioted

Expand full comment

👍 Never!!! 👍

Expand full comment

The answer isn't more gov't, and the probability of better gov't is a paradox. In my opinion the answer is less government.

Expand full comment

YES. 100% ...we need to now take our Federal top heavy institutions apart and get rid of them forever. Let's face it, we have had more truth from individuals and better data analysis from individuals than from all these institutions. The Dept of ED is paying schools to keep kids in masks. The NIH/CDC/FDA are totally captured and cannot even convene a group of clinicians/practicing doctors for the best approach. The Medicare office is PAYING HOSPITALS to KILL PATIENTS. Our ATTORNEY:S general are letting illegals and criminals out in our STREETS with no bail and no consequences.

Try and Name one institution that is working as the founder's envisioned...

Expand full comment

The founders never imagined most of our existing federal government. We have strayed far from their vision. I agree that it’s time to disband most agencies and sell their real estate.

Expand full comment

Yup. But to American Citizens only. No Chinese or foregin buyers. No to Bill Gates. I want our pork production and farmland back in the hands of America

Expand full comment

People don't get it when I say that nearly everything the federal government does is unconstitutional.

Expand full comment

If they wipe us out, I hope I get to see from the afterlife what happens to the collaborators . THEY WILL RICHLY, UTTERLY DESERVE IT. COWARDS

Expand full comment

The collaborators ought to at least thank us for trying to keep their country alive. Cowards, idiots

Expand full comment

Even though you’re not in Ottawa, you’ve nailed it. I live near Ottawa. Believe me, people here take huge risks by even expressing a little sympathy for the protestors.

My own siblings - elsewhere in Canada - remind me that the organizers want to stage a “coup”. To lighten the mood, I reply that, if that’s the case, it’s the first coup I’ve seen that included bouncy castles. They just get angry.

It really is insane. I could give more examples from the last week, but it’s too depressing.

I can only hope the pandemic is over soon so these people can start healing. They’re really not in a good way, mentally.

Expand full comment

I hope the current government in Canada does fall and you get to hold new elections. Maybe vote for some truckers rather that the same old scumbags that seem to get elected year after year.

Expand full comment

I’m from the North. Politicians are all despised here, with blackface being by far the most despised. Ottawa is as bad as your D.C. it’s going to happen that all roads and bridges will be blocked, as well as the international borders . Little food will be delivered . No garbage picked up . It might get interesting.

Expand full comment

There were two roads to take, fear or freedom. Unfortunately many chose fear and I think somehow they took comfort in that. It’s going to take a very long time for those people to come back from that road if ever.

Expand full comment

Some I know, don’t want it to be over. They’ve settled into their media sanctioned righteousness, without doubt. And some people never question their decisions and will never admit they misjudged this situation and the politicians agenda, even though they could explain they didn’t have all the information, at the time. It’s sad because the media is reinforcing their decisions daily, although it’s clear to the awake that the politics of the jab are apparent.

Expand full comment

Liberals hating against bouncy castles just proves that they’re dour, fun-hating, Karen’s that must impose their wishes on all the rest of us.

Expand full comment

An ironic statistic, more children have died in Australia from bouncy castle accidents than Covid

Expand full comment

the “always winter, never christmas” crowd

Expand full comment

They can't heal. They are hypochondriacs. They are prescription drug-addled. This is their dream - to let their fear of disease and death rule the world. The pandemic is already gone, and no healing on their part. Soon their power will be gone and the hypochondriacs can go back to their houses and doctor's offices where they belong. But there will be no healing on their part. Hypochondriacs do not want healing.

Expand full comment

Those poor souls. Never expected to see them in charge tho!

Expand full comment

The pandemic was over LAST YEAR.

Expand full comment

You could even argue that there never really was one.

Expand full comment

the virus will never leave. It never was going to. and they will keep doing this stupidity

Expand full comment

Yes, it will just take different forms.

Expand full comment

and new "improved" viruses

Expand full comment

But.. but...carbon footprint passes!!

Expand full comment

From what I can tell, the Estupid virus got here long before COVID ever did!

Expand full comment

They will NEVER heal and things will NEVER go back to normal. Start living by these words or you're going to be sorely disappointed. This protest is like this plandemic - it was always going to separate the free mountain goats from the enslaved sheep. The best outcome is that each group goes its own way and Canada separates (along east-west lines from what I can see) . I don't have to tell you about the worst case ...

Expand full comment

May I ask in all seriousness, what huge risks to people take there by even expressing a little sympathy for the protestors?

Expand full comment

Losing friends, being cancelled, etc. So, nothing life-threatening, but needlessly bad.

Expand full comment

Any friends that would be lost over this were not really friends in the first place. Once you face that hard truth (which I have done), life is easier and you breathe more freely. There are new friends to be had, people who refuse to "cancel" a friend over ideology. There is no reasoning with an idealogue, by definition, so better to have reasonable people in your life who will have honest, heartfelt conversations that will end with amiability whether or not they end in consensus.

Expand full comment

that you cant even leave the country without a jab is astonishing, put people in a corner don't be surprised when they fight back

Expand full comment

It’s the most fun winter party here in Ottawa!!!

Expand full comment

Cheers guys!! Thank you for showing the rest of the world how it’s done. We ❤️You.

Expand full comment

I want to see! Anything of your experience on Instagram?

Expand full comment

Only gettr

@mikey38sc

Expand full comment

Love it!! Thanks!

Expand full comment

thanks. I'll try that

Expand full comment