good products do not need universal liability shields, but bad actors are enabled by them
Effing A, el gato. I have been calling for the repeal of that act along with the following for a while now:
• Bayh-Dole Act
• National Defense Authorization Act of 2012
Yesterday, Jeff Childers proposed:
“We need a federal law removing vaccine injury liability shields.” (https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/c-and-c-news-friday-october-21-2022/)
I planted this seed at Aaron Siri’s post (https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/we-will-be-challenging-any-states/) yesterday and hope we can focus legislative efforts on protecting the people FROM BigPharma instead of the reverse.
This is the ONLY reason for the committee decision to put these products on the childhood vax schedule. It would exonerate the manufacturers from liability for adverse events. Even for adults!
Vote in freedom-lovers. Push them to repeal the bill. Then watch Biden veto it and the Pharma shills fail to override the veto.
Three well-tested vaccines?
Please go deeper. The corruption surrounding those three is evident. And the DTP is the reason the 1986 Act was proposed in the first place. Big Pharma could not sustain a vaccine market when they had to pay out for so many lawsuits.
jennifer has some very WRONG data on childhood va$$ines.
HPV is being sued for FRAUD!!!
MMR is being sued for FRAUD!!
NOT ONE childhood va$$ine has been tested against a saline placebo, they
are NOT safe or effective!!
STOP THEM ALL!
AMEN. I'm quite sure many people don't even realize that these companies have this liability shield. Every time I mention it to someone they are usually shocked and didn't know. If only we all could have this business model huh? Mandate a product on the people, have government steal money to purchase said product for everyone and laugh all the way to our mansions outside of Seattle.
Seems to me this would end almost all vaccine uptake. Every parent wises up and films their paediatrician listing the potential side effects, which they won’t do on film, which causes vaccine refusal, which.......on and on. But how many will awaken? Even the grossly injured among us are still in denial. How can this be!?
This law is the worst, the lynchpin for all the other liability protections and perverse incentives, well documented by Katherine Watt in Bailiwick News.
I love that buck-passing diagram.
Two other Substackers I’d like to mention here are realnotrare (accounts of C19 vax injuries with names and pictures), and Karen Kingston who has done groundbreaking research.
Remember why the 1986 law was passed - we wanted to expand our bio-warfare efforts, so we needed vaccine manufacturers (which are the only loophole on the ban on bio warfare research) & that means we had to buy them off. That is, we had to expand that industry dramatically & quickly, so we had to bribe them w/ lots & lots of things (including immunity). Not sure the DoD will sign off on this, but it should be done. It's time to make bio warfare TRULY illegal, which means we can't keep using vaccines as our loophole. Like I said, treat them like any other product - stop subsidizing their illegal bio warfare efforts.
I can't wait to vote again in a few weeks. I know that Republicans will do the right thing for the American people.
<slow clap> This would literally be a single-issue vote for me, because of everything you said.
Revoking the 1986 Act seems like a good idea, but it isn't--if you understand how the Swamp works. You have to revoke some and leave in the good stuff or we will lose all access to adverse event data on vaccines--Meryl
Here is a comment from my friend Barb Loe Fisher on this:
With repeal of the 1986 Act, VAERS, the VIS, and the requirement that permanent records be kept for all vaccines given, manufacturer’s name and lot number will also be eliminated. When the Act was passed in November 1986, the doctors were still liable for medical malpractice and the companies were still liable for design defect. If Congress had not eliminated medical malpractice cases against negligent doctors and other vaccine providers in 1987, and had not gutted the Act with weakening amendments and allowed DHHS/Justice to gut the law through rule making in the 1990s, and the Supreme Court majority had not ignored the legislative history and eliminated design defect lawsuits in 2011, there would be plenty of lawsuits today against Pfizer and Moderna for design defect and they would be won. If Congress would repeal the Act’s weaking amendments and rule changes; add teeth to the informing and VAERS reporting requirements by applying legal penalties for doctors failing to inform and report; require DHHS to fulfill the Act’s vaccine safety research provisions, and invalidate the Supreme Court’s tragically flawed ruling by reaffirming manufacturer liability for design defect, the spirit and intent of the Act would be affirmed.
However, Congress - red or blue - has always bowed to the industry, which is the biggest lobby on Capitol Hill and in which the majority of the nation’s 401Ks are invested.
People better be careful what they wish for when they do not understand the tort reform landscape - independent of the 1986 Act - that has made suing corporations and doctors almost impossible in the U.S. https://www.nvic.org/law-policy-federal/vaccine-injury-compensation/nvic-position-statement
The way forward is not to take down the only law in the U.S. that acknowledges government licensed and recommended vaccines injure and kill, but to strike down mandatory vaccination laws and free the people from the chemical chains that the Pharma-Government business partnership has put them in.
Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC Co-founder & President
Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC Co-founder & President (National Vaccine Information Center, the oldest vaccine safety organization in the US)
Gonna disagree whole heartedly on your well tested comment DTP was such a bad vaccine they stopped using it in the states. It was one of the reasons the 86 Act came to be. Read Dr Aaby and Christine Stabel Benz work on how dangerous that Vax was in third work countires...and once again I'd urge u to read Dissolving Illusions and follow that up with the newly released Turtles All the Way Down. Love ur work and ur writing we just don't agree on this topic
This should be distilled down to a few paragraphs as a letter to Congressional representatives.
Again, MMR, DTP and polio were not "well tested vaxxes." They were never tested against saline placebos. They were only tested against other neurotoxin-laden injections. Each has a track-record of unleashing new, virulent viral strains and / or documented damage from the Al and Hg and other toxic substances (formaldehyde, etc.) that they contain.
I wrote about a small fraction of that evidence here:
There's a second liability shield being thrown up by forcing children to get the vaccine: that of public opinion. We have one party that has forced this on everyone, and already we're seeing the results. I've seen reports of three teenagers with heart attacks in three days: one made it, but two didn't. Suddenly "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome" is everywhere. And for right now, we have a very strong control group. Only 4 % of children have gotten the shot. If the unvaccinated children grow older and don't suffer "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome" then we have a culprit, the vaccine.
People see what they want to see, and if these yahoos can keep playing the "well we can't *really* know it was the vaccine" game, they might stand a chance politically. But once the evidence becomes incontrovertible? They're done. And they will sacrifice the children of the nation to provide them a smokescreen from that moment.
I've read two things and not sure they are true. Maybe a ferocious feline can find the answer.
1) Putting it on the schedule means it isn't an EUA anymore?
2) Pfizer is upping the cost of the jab by 400%?