i think they are expressing the political bias of their leadership and seeking political patronage. they get held hostage by section 230.
interestingly enough, if there were no 230 and these rights were not so tenuous, i suspect these companies would be harder to capture. it works like a sword dangling over their head. if you hold the string, you can demand all manner of behavior.
i think they are expressing the political bias of their leadership and seeking political patronage. they get held hostage by section 230.
interestingly enough, if there were no 230 and these rights were not so tenuous, i suspect these companies would be harder to capture. it works like a sword dangling over their head. if you hold the string, you can demand all manner of behavior.
I agree that Jack...for all his weirdness...does seem discomfited...and Mark has been caught on camera expressing doubts about the injections to his staff.
Obviously, I prefer they are caught...as bad as that is...than complicit.
If they don't like what's going on, though, they have to power to change it.
i think they are expressing the political bias of their leadership and seeking political patronage. they get held hostage by section 230.
interestingly enough, if there were no 230 and these rights were not so tenuous, i suspect these companies would be harder to capture. it works like a sword dangling over their head. if you hold the string, you can demand all manner of behavior.
I agree that Jack...for all his weirdness...does seem discomfited...and Mark has been caught on camera expressing doubts about the injections to his staff.
Obviously, I prefer they are caught...as bad as that is...than complicit.
If they don't like what's going on, though, they have to power to change it.
We need more bravery. Now.