Valid points. I refer you to Pfizer Study Intervention No. PF-07302048, Protocol No. C4591001 Sect. 8.3.5.3. p. 69 Occupational Exposure, where it states: "An occupational Exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned contact with the study intervention, [vaccine byproducts] which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE [advers…
Valid points. I refer you to Pfizer Study Intervention No. PF-07302048, Protocol No. C4591001 Sect. 8.3.5.3. p. 69 Occupational Exposure, where it states: "An occupational Exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned contact with the study intervention, [vaccine byproducts] which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE [adverse event]. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participants care." Also see Sect. 10.3.3. p. 128 where it states to be "Reported on the Vaccine SAE Report Form to Pfizer Safety Within 24 Hours of Awareness"....Include all AEs/ SAEs associated with occupational exposure." Here is Pfizer's own admission that contact with vaccinees can cause SAE's [serious adverse events] in those thus exposed through shedding.
Addendum: Sect. 8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding states: "An Exposure during breastfeeding occurs if: ...An example of environmental Exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by INHALATION or SKIN CONTACT." Emphasis mine.
I remember reading what you've quoted above but that goes back quite a while and although I remember interpreting what I read as NOT referring to spike protein shedding, that's all I remember right now. I'll try to find the original article and comment further.
I suppose we really don't know about spike protein shedding.
If the following doesn't convince you of the reality of Spike Protein shedding I can't imagine what would. Dr. Simone Gold, founder of AFLDS, and imprisoned for her stance on the vaccines, put forth an issue brief in May 2021 entitled" Identifying Post-vaccination Complications & Their Causes: an Analysis of Covid-19 Patient Data, where she states, that vaccinated individuals "can shed some of these (Spike Protein) particles to close contacts." I also direct your attention to a April 29th 2021 tweet of Gold's where she states that Pfizer "acknowledges this mechanism" of shedding.
But there is confusion here... are we picking up shed "S" proteins, which is bad (venom-like molecular structure), or are we picking up shed mRNA that codes for "S" proteins, that can take over our ribosomes and create beaucoup "S" proteins? Or, even worse scenario, shed mRNA snuck into the jabbs that codes for mutant proteins known to affect fertility, or worst case, that infertility mRNA payload PLUS the adjuvant that ramps up LINE1 to enable reverse transcription to DNA, allowing the codes for mutant proteins to be integrated into reproductive cell DNA (sperm/egg) and thus passed on to make the next generation less fertile?
I have to thank you for being persistent and willing to engage in conversation like this. I'm going to read both the papers you've just brought up. I haven't seen the article by Simone Gold but will look for it. I'm also planning on attending a function very soon where there will be a few covid warriors/heroes. One of the speakers is an expert in vaccinology and he will likely have some good insight into spike protein shedding. I'll plan on asking the question! I may not reply for a few days, we have a bit of a snow storm so that means lots of shoveling on top of day to day chores. Cheers.
Valid points. I refer you to Pfizer Study Intervention No. PF-07302048, Protocol No. C4591001 Sect. 8.3.5.3. p. 69 Occupational Exposure, where it states: "An occupational Exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned contact with the study intervention, [vaccine byproducts] which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE [adverse event]. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participants care." Also see Sect. 10.3.3. p. 128 where it states to be "Reported on the Vaccine SAE Report Form to Pfizer Safety Within 24 Hours of Awareness"....Include all AEs/ SAEs associated with occupational exposure." Here is Pfizer's own admission that contact with vaccinees can cause SAE's [serious adverse events] in those thus exposed through shedding.
Addendum: Sect. 8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding states: "An Exposure during breastfeeding occurs if: ...An example of environmental Exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by INHALATION or SKIN CONTACT." Emphasis mine.
I remember reading what you've quoted above but that goes back quite a while and although I remember interpreting what I read as NOT referring to spike protein shedding, that's all I remember right now. I'll try to find the original article and comment further.
I suppose we really don't know about spike protein shedding.
If the following doesn't convince you of the reality of Spike Protein shedding I can't imagine what would. Dr. Simone Gold, founder of AFLDS, and imprisoned for her stance on the vaccines, put forth an issue brief in May 2021 entitled" Identifying Post-vaccination Complications & Their Causes: an Analysis of Covid-19 Patient Data, where she states, that vaccinated individuals "can shed some of these (Spike Protein) particles to close contacts." I also direct your attention to a April 29th 2021 tweet of Gold's where she states that Pfizer "acknowledges this mechanism" of shedding.
But there is confusion here... are we picking up shed "S" proteins, which is bad (venom-like molecular structure), or are we picking up shed mRNA that codes for "S" proteins, that can take over our ribosomes and create beaucoup "S" proteins? Or, even worse scenario, shed mRNA snuck into the jabbs that codes for mutant proteins known to affect fertility, or worst case, that infertility mRNA payload PLUS the adjuvant that ramps up LINE1 to enable reverse transcription to DNA, allowing the codes for mutant proteins to be integrated into reproductive cell DNA (sperm/egg) and thus passed on to make the next generation less fertile?
I have to thank you for being persistent and willing to engage in conversation like this. I'm going to read both the papers you've just brought up. I haven't seen the article by Simone Gold but will look for it. I'm also planning on attending a function very soon where there will be a few covid warriors/heroes. One of the speakers is an expert in vaccinology and he will likely have some good insight into spike protein shedding. I'll plan on asking the question! I may not reply for a few days, we have a bit of a snow storm so that means lots of shoveling on top of day to day chores. Cheers.