199 Comments

They know their ideas cannot stand scrutiny, so they must ban that scrutiny to hold on to their power.

In November we're going to find out if elections still matter.

Edit: Forgot to add, Ron Paul was right.

Expand full comment

Elections still matter. The question is - are we going to be allowed to have one? Remember, Uncle Joe, the other Uncle Joe (Stalin), reminded us that, "It's not who votes that counts. It's who counts the votes"). And last time around 'They' counted the votes!

Expand full comment

There is so much evidence of election misconduct it supports the very question in deed is it possible to restore integrity. What was revealing in 2020 was the overt, almost braggadocio way election officials violated the law in the open, giving press conferences to confess, nay brag about there crimes. We processed ballots that appeared well after the submission deadline set by law, without the traceability or supervision required by law, and mixed the ballots with legally processed ballots so as to make them inseparable in direct violation of orders from 3 federal judges and the United States Supreme Court (Georgia). At least 6 states had nearly identical violations reported by the perpetrators in public statements and press conferences "in their own words" (almost as if all these elections officials were reading from the same script). So secure in the notion there could be no consequences brought upon them, a confidence now proven founded. They were of course just following orders.

We honestly have no idea if ballots were or were not properly processed in past elections, if every vote cast was from a valid, legal and living voter, and so on. Honestly considered there are a million or more ways to corrupt without detection. But in 2020 we know, by public statements of those responsible, and other clearly observable facts Compare the number of votes cast, as an example, with the census estimates of adult population and you will note several states reported turnouts of over 100% of the adult population. You will if you are diligent find more than one state.

Yet those asking "how can this be" are misinformation propagandist soon to be criminal wards of the federal government.

Regardless of your desired outcome, if you ignore the public admissions and claim it's all made up misinformation, you are in fact the misinformed.

Expand full comment

I think the election cheating has happened for a long time, on both sides of the aisle. In Nov 2020 they were desperate and had not planned for Trump’s landslide, so they got sloppy in their cheating and exposed themselves to the world.

BTW the numbers exceeding the census are the number of registered voters including active and inactive status. It’s NOT the number of people who voted that exceeds the census, but the number who are registered to vote…

Expand full comment

Exactly. They thought that their Hillary would have an easy win and didn't organize their vote fraud and got burned. They are determined to never allow a legitimate election to be held again.

Expand full comment

Scares me to think what they will pull in upcoming elections. In the US they can’t allow the House to go R. What will they pull?!

Expand full comment

With no consequences… 🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️

In my homeschool, if you cheat on anything…? THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES!!! But if you cheat in an election in the good ol USA, you get to be president… 🔥🔥🔥

Expand full comment
RemovedApr 28, 2022·edited Apr 28, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Troll go away.

Expand full comment

Pretty sure the faux Joe US President said the same thing!

Expand full comment

Bingo 🔥🔥🔥

Expand full comment

Looks like it was timed so that it can be extensively used for the midterms with the knowledge that it will take probably a year before a court hears a case about it. It’s an obvious violation of the First Amendment, but hey that’s never stopped this Administration before...

Expand full comment

It's their MO. Do shit they know will be shot down, but by the time it is, they've achieved their short-term goals.

Expand full comment

Sadly I am not sure federal courts will "shoot it down" anymore. The integrity of the courts is no more firm than that of elections officials.

Expand full comment

How can unelected bureaucrats create an unconstitutional Disinformation Governance Board out of thin air? It wasn't legislated/funded by Congress! Where the hell are our "lawfare" lawyers? America First Legal? Somebody!

Expand full comment

The silence from the GOP is deafening... we all know that McConnell and friends approve of this message...

Expand full comment

Are you still under the illusion there are two dominant parties in opposition?

Expand full comment

Nope. Just pointing out the obvious. There’s just the Uniparty. But we can still try to get rid of some of them in the primaries even though they keep trying to use the splitter strategy- people are starting to notice these things finally.

Expand full comment

George Orwell final warning: "Don't let it happen. It depends on you"

https://www.bitchute.com/video/KBwKpAw9saQ/

Any little bit helps. Do not comply for example. Make it as difficult on them as you can.

Expand full comment

Rhetorical question, right? How? They just do.

Just as a DC court can hold over 600 people for over a year without trial or in many cases indictments. Simply by ignoring the constitutional limits and knowing there remains nothing of consequence or consequences to impede.

Expand full comment

Gonna be real interesting to see how the DHS squares off against Musk's Twitter. Given how much of his wealth depends on government contracts, they've definitely got leverage to use.

Expand full comment

I'm still of the mind they will figure out some way to shut it down. That way the board can say they 'tried', but the swamp remains intact. If this is how it goes, expect Twitter to continue to bomb.

Expand full comment

I just saw today where they said Elon doesn't take over for another 6 months. Some people have been able to reopen their accounts, others, like Dr Zelenko started a new one, amassed followers, and on the 3rd day was shut down. My understanding is Elon's IT people are in there, but no outright remark from Elon on that.

Expand full comment
Apr 28, 2022·edited Apr 28, 2022

it seems unlikely that Elon has achieved any staff changes. It takes time for things like that even once a new exec takes charge, and he's many months from that. "Closing" such a deal will take months, and may never happen. The FTC can block mergers and acquisitions on the claims of anti-trust and has a history of defining exactly what is 'non competitive' and 'effective monopoly' to fit their goals of the moment (aka political objectives). IT could take years to overcome, more than long enough for some other shinny object to attract Elon's attention and fuel his desires.

Expand full comment
Apr 28, 2022·edited Apr 28, 2022

It's not a merger or a large social platform purchasing another, and social media aren't subject to much if any regulation yet. Someone complained to the SEC about the buy, and they dismissed it. There's no basis for anti-trust issues here, they do not apply. Apparently, Elon got his IT people in there or got Twitter's to lock down the coding.

Expand full comment

Zelenko is here: https://twitter.com/ZelenkoZev

Expand full comment

not anymore :(

Expand full comment

That wouldn't surprise me.

Expand full comment

Everyone who thinks Twitter is the savior need to rethink that. It’s just pathetic.

Expand full comment

My two cent analogy; All the folks gushing that Elon will save them, and twitter, is like the pathetic dude so happy that the girlfriend who cheated in him is coming over for the weekend.

Sad state of affairs (no pun intended).

Expand full comment

Wonderful analogy!!

Expand full comment

As far as I'm concerned, Musk is just another overpaid billionaire elite who fantasized about leaving earth to fry and taking only the most obedient and subservient of peasants to be slaves in an elite utopia on another planet. I have no faith in him fixing anything or being any more able to take criticism.or allow dissent.

But watching the antiTrump vax zealot omg Ukraine crowd shitting their collective pants over it is at least good for a laugh. A cynical absurdist laugh. Gotta find a relief valve anywhere you can these days.

Expand full comment

I will admit- I enjoyed his comment back to AOC.

Expand full comment

It's part of the fightback in this war for the truth.

To see how important it is see the reaction from the media, the blue checkmarks, the leaked audio by Project Veritas and now the new government department that has been formed in response to Musks takeover.

Unfortunately with the odds very much in favour of the globalists in the US, Twitters long term fate is not looking promising if it is not allowed to censor anymore.

Expand full comment

Gab exists.

Expand full comment

I've been on Gab for years now, and I'm very happy with it. Never had a Twitter or FB account.

Expand full comment

And no one uses it very much.

Expand full comment

The solution is obvious: do not allow scrutiny.

Asking the wrong questions is "disinformation" and "insurrection". The land or false equivalences has no exit.

No escape.

Only an imperative to control "for the greater good". Which is never good for the the many.

Expand full comment

I suspect they do not. See France.

Expand full comment

The Dolores Umbridge Karen face is the predictable stuff of nightmares.

Expand full comment
author

this is flat out dianna moon glompers.

Expand full comment

Came her to point out that lumpen manjaw. Phizz don't lie.

Expand full comment

I’m thinking Quentin Tarantino in a former life…

Expand full comment

Spot on!

Expand full comment

Probably sports man-hands, too.

Expand full comment

Among other things...

Expand full comment

It's like nature abhors a vacuum and with Psaki leaving we have our new Supreme Liar.

Expand full comment

A couple months ago Brett Weinstein did a bit on the DHS's new trifecta:

misinformation: stuff that isn't true, but which isn't deliberately untrue

disinformation: stuff that's deliberately untrue

malinformation: stuff that's true, but that's bad for trust in the authorities

With that last one, they've got all the bases covered. Oh, what you said was true? Too bad it was inconvenient for the people who matter. You're still a terrorist for saying it.

Expand full comment

Ah, the delicious MDM sandwich.

Expand full comment

Mis Dis Mal, Miss Dismal

Expand full comment

One should never be judged by their looks.

That said, does she ever look creepy and evil.

Expand full comment

I disagree. People absolutely should be judged by their appearance. Biology and neurology are intimately related and the latter determines psychology.

One should especially judge by looks those who are old enough for their sins to have been written on their features.

Expand full comment
Apr 28, 2022·edited Apr 28, 2022

"The Picture of Dorian Gray" - a case in point. And I must say, she strongly resembles an acquaintance who has been termed "The Psycho B*tch from Hell" by those who know her. That jaw, those eyes - Yikes!! Amongst these fascists, it does seem like the young women are the worst, as Orwell pointed out. Perhaps she and her soul sister Gretchen Whitmer will have a house fall on them. We can only hope.

Expand full comment

"By the time they are fifty, everyone has the face they deserve." Carl Jung, I think. And it's true.

Expand full comment

You are very close. "At fifty, everyone has the face he deserves". Said our friend George Orwell. Gosh, he's getting quoted a lot lately.

Expand full comment

Interesting. Having to stop scrolling to think about that one.

Expand full comment

"She previously was a disinformation fellow at the Wilson Center..."

Actual spit-take. Whiskey cocktail on computer screen. I will now attempt to go back and read past that sentence.

Expand full comment

LOL Bro! Wife rushed to office to see why I was laughing hysterically.

Expand full comment

That stopped me as well! WTF is a disinformation fellow and what is the Wilson Centre?? It sounds like someone who specialises in generating 'disinformation' or as we plebs call it : lies.

Expand full comment

A shameless propagandist and a liar with a criminal mind.

Expand full comment

Woodrow Wilson. Hate that guy.

Expand full comment

haha! Yeah I got caught there too...

Expand full comment

Same! Look forward to a future article from you in this one Chris.

Expand full comment

"Irregular migration."

She means illegal immigration, right?

Illegal immigration?

Did I translate it correctly? ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION?

Expand full comment

Carefull lass! Simply admitting that you speak the language makes you suspect.

Expand full comment

I did it on porpoise. :)

Expand full comment

Guttermouth, that would be "malinformation" per John Carter above.

Expand full comment

Whoops.

Sorry not sorry. We're all terrorists now anyway, right?

Expand full comment

I noticed "irregular migration" also. If it's not a typo, it sure reeks of euphemism.

Expand full comment

That's a gift from your neighbor to the north. Trudeau came up with that one when our illegal immigration problem started.... can't call them that so the new term became "irregular immigration" - words matter and the left had mastered basterdizing the English language.

Expand full comment

The right is just as good at it.

Expand full comment

it seems not so good, judging by results

Expand full comment

Well we know she wouldn't have called it "illegal."

And I caught a reference to "irregular migration" somewhere else yesterday, from some other woke libral.

So I'm guessing that's going to be the new lefty euphemism we'll have shoved on our faces for the next 6 months or so.

Expand full comment

Let's go back to using 'wetbacks'.

Expand full comment

Well I hope it wasn't a typo, because I thought it was pretty clever. Definitely "govspeak".

Expand full comment
Apr 29, 2022·edited Apr 29, 2022

LA_Bob, is that you? From Petro's blog? (cave here)

Expand full comment
Apr 30, 2022·edited Apr 30, 2022

Indeed. I knew you read Gato, because you've referenced it before. But I don't recall seeing you comment as...."you".

What on earth does "Tardigrade" mean?

Oh, and, Hi!

Expand full comment

Tardigrades, a.k.a. water bears, are amazing creatures. I can only aspire to that amount of amazingness. And Hi back!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsStKuWHI_c

Expand full comment

Good video. Very good video, in fact. I had no idea you pooped chrystal, but I always suspected you were kind of awesome.

Expand full comment

Now, now. She's just the female version of Brianna Wu.

All kidding aside, how DID we fall into this movie? Is it the universe being ironic because we loved sci-fi too much? Is Orwell punishing me because I preferred Brave New World?

Expand full comment

When Turkey is starting to sound rational, we’re in big trouble folks, big trouble.

Expand full comment

Yes.

Expand full comment

Damn! Orwell's bio indicates he thought was writing a dystopian satire, not an instruction manual.

Expand full comment

When DHS was created I knew this day would come. The name "Homeland Security", taken directly from the Third Reich literature of Hitlers National Socialist Party should have been the red flag of danger to everyone.

Expand full comment

What we really need to do is repeal the patriot act, and dismantle the DHS. While we are at it, we can get rid of the department of education, the CDC, and I'm sure there are quite a few other government agencies we can rid our selves of. Maybe some of those redundant intelligence agencies would be a good start.

Expand full comment

Get rid of the FDA as well. They're corrupt and useless. And the See Eye Aye and the Eff Bee Eye.

Expand full comment

Add NIH, NIAID, FBI, CIA, we could save some serious coin, Pay off our debts and be happier and healthier! I’m sure there are others we could cut too!

Expand full comment

These people treat the masses like the vaccine treats the immune system. The destruction of autonomy in favour of what 'we' say is best. Instead of teaching people how to improve their immune health with diet and lifestyle, we'll ram genetic instructions down their throat. Instead of teaching them how to think, we'll blast them with our nonsense until they parrot it.

If you don't agree with the poor information floating around, you create better information whose truth resonates with people. That is the remedy. Unless of course your goal isn't to spread light but in fact to keep people under your thumb.

Expand full comment

Their goal is collectivism--literally to nationalize the vulnerabilities and failings of any one person and make them everyone's problem. The cloak they employ to carry this out is victimization and the dagger is the offloading of personal responsibility onto society at large.

Expand full comment

Not just teaching. Enabling. Healthy diet and lifestyle aren't universally accessible and cost time and money,neither of which the elites habe any intention of giving up to the workers. I happen to have a good one,who provides an onsite gym for free, but that's rare.

Expand full comment

LOL LOL LOL "we/zey/zem, in order to form a more perfect union, impose social justice, ensure your proper pronouning, provide for the common pretense, promote the gender welfare, and secure the blessings of wokery for ourselves but certainly not for you, do ordain and establish..."

Brilliant!

But seriously, all I had to do was look at the Ukranian flag on her tweets and that tells me EXACTLY all I need to know. Like you said--free speech helps us figure out who the asshats are....

Expand full comment

But don't worry, none of this will ever be used to suppress the speech of those advocating for it. 🤪 (sarcasm)

Expand full comment

That's no sarcasm, that's what will happen.

Expand full comment

9/11 was my red pill moment, but I thought it was to goad us into a war in the Middle East. Something Israeli/oil- related, whatever. Inexcusable, but plausible. I laughed at the conspiracy theorists that said it was to get the Patriot Act passed. I’m not laughing at them anymore.

Expand full comment

It can be both, and often is.

Expand full comment

You were half right, and that's a whole lot more right than a lot of people were.

Expand full comment

God that smug smirk makes me want to punch her lights out.

Expand full comment

Me too.

Expand full comment

Orwell wept...

Expand full comment

Jesus wept.

Expand full comment