"if a vaccine cannot teach you to resist a disease, more of it probably cannot either. this idea that you need to keep antibodies high by boosting all the time has never had any basis in fact. it would seem to imply that you cannot remember the response and replicate it even 6 months post inoculation. nothing about that has ever passed the smell test." And yet, this is *exactly* what proponents of boosters claim. And, maybe more importantly, it is what people--some of whom I personally know and love--believe. Boosting == More Protection. For me, this is a core claim which is actually based upon the same logic as boosters have ALWAYS been based upon! And so, again we find ourselves at a fork in the road. If boosters are not efficacious for covid, then maybe, just maybe, they are generally less efficacious than has been suggested previously. Stated differently, the holes in the vaccination boat have always been there. It's just that some of us are just now noticing them.
Anyone expecting any of these authorities to admit, at any point in time up to their positioning on the gibbets, to any of their large and small crimes, come see the portfolio of bridges I wish I could get rich from selling ya.
What I find puzzling is the number of prominent intellectual voices continuing to ask plaintively about when we can expect our apologies. This is the feebleness of the smart set these days.
We are truly, collectively, all on our own here. Even more so because of so much craziness infusing every level of "our side" too. Very few wise voices. At least this establishment has never, at any point, on any issue, wavered from unrelenting common sense backed up by good scientific analysis.
I already posted this on Steve Kirsch's related article, but I'll copy it here:
In my opinion, they're no longer pushing this crap for profit motives. It's full on ass-covering mode. They have the data. They know how to, and already have, give it appropriate analysis.
The blatant amount of playing stupid or ignorant is because they know that the best case scenario (if the true scope of this debacle ever gets out to the average idiot) is that they spend the rest of their lives in prison.
"the core claim from this data is that vaccines are associated with lower all cause deaths. 944.9 deaths per 100k person years vs 1026.7 in never vaxxed." All that data massaging and this was the best they could get? Note the lack of error bars, R value, etc. - at this point you don't need to be much of a skeptic to realize that +/-10% doesn't reach statistical significance. In a random sample, you can easily get 10% in favor of injected simply by not injecting people who won't benefit, such as terminally ill.
Data. Charts. Graphs. Statistics. Why do we even waste any more time reviewing, scrutinizing amd discussing them? They’re all fake. At this point, feels like a waste of time and energy. Let’s move on.
Awesome piece of work, the fact that the ONS numbers simply cant stack up shows how panic-stricken the authorities must be to cover up the truth and the amateurish manipulation of the numbers highlights this charade.
I never understood the current obsession with antibodies: "the shot raises your antibodies!" Yes, and a snake bite raises your antibodies. Why would anyone assume that raised antibodies is automatically a good thing?
If you look at the pandemic exercises, they see as as a dumbed-down mass that they can cajole, manipulate or threaten into obedience. I think that actually makes them the stupid ones. But of course, if all we do is collect data and make graphs, we can do that all the way up to when they load us into the cattle cars.
"if a vaccine cannot teach you to resist a disease, more of it probably cannot either. this idea that you need to keep antibodies high by boosting all the time has never had any basis in fact. it would seem to imply that you cannot remember the response and replicate it even 6 months post inoculation. nothing about that has ever passed the smell test." And yet, this is *exactly* what proponents of boosters claim. And, maybe more importantly, it is what people--some of whom I personally know and love--believe. Boosting == More Protection. For me, this is a core claim which is actually based upon the same logic as boosters have ALWAYS been based upon! And so, again we find ourselves at a fork in the road. If boosters are not efficacious for covid, then maybe, just maybe, they are generally less efficacious than has been suggested previously. Stated differently, the holes in the vaccination boat have always been there. It's just that some of us are just now noticing them.
Thankfully I never got injected with their abomination
Glad I got off the train at 2 shots - regret them both. Thankfully the side effects I had for a few months are gone now
"this is bad data, possibly by design"
This is a very generous comment
Anyone expecting any of these authorities to admit, at any point in time up to their positioning on the gibbets, to any of their large and small crimes, come see the portfolio of bridges I wish I could get rich from selling ya.
What I find puzzling is the number of prominent intellectual voices continuing to ask plaintively about when we can expect our apologies. This is the feebleness of the smart set these days.
We are truly, collectively, all on our own here. Even more so because of so much craziness infusing every level of "our side" too. Very few wise voices. At least this establishment has never, at any point, on any issue, wavered from unrelenting common sense backed up by good scientific analysis.
edited for spelling
I already posted this on Steve Kirsch's related article, but I'll copy it here:
In my opinion, they're no longer pushing this crap for profit motives. It's full on ass-covering mode. They have the data. They know how to, and already have, give it appropriate analysis.
The blatant amount of playing stupid or ignorant is because they know that the best case scenario (if the true scope of this debacle ever gets out to the average idiot) is that they spend the rest of their lives in prison.
Sadly, both my brother and his wife, and my sister and her husband lasted until Fall, 2022, then got jabbed because their kids wanted them to.
So stupid...
###
Context addendum: my brother is 71, my sister is 56.
"the core claim from this data is that vaccines are associated with lower all cause deaths. 944.9 deaths per 100k person years vs 1026.7 in never vaxxed." All that data massaging and this was the best they could get? Note the lack of error bars, R value, etc. - at this point you don't need to be much of a skeptic to realize that +/-10% doesn't reach statistical significance. In a random sample, you can easily get 10% in favor of injected simply by not injecting people who won't benefit, such as terminally ill.
Data. Charts. Graphs. Statistics. Why do we even waste any more time reviewing, scrutinizing amd discussing them? They’re all fake. At this point, feels like a waste of time and energy. Let’s move on.
It feels like we're in an extended episode of The Twilight Zone.
NEW SUBSTACK RELEASE. The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street. Twilight Zone meets the Covid Tyranny. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-monsters-are-due-on-maple-street
Twilight Zone Spoof: Nightmare at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. President Pfauci finds himself in an underground bunker beneath the White House besieged by “anti-vaxxer” forces. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/twilight-zone-spoof-nightmare-at
BONUS: Free Download. THE ALTERNATIVE COVID-19 NARRATIVE HANDBOOK. A Collection of useful links. Get it here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-alternative-covid-narrative-handbook
Subscribe to Turfseer's Newsletter. Songs, music videos and much more.
Awesome piece of work, the fact that the ONS numbers simply cant stack up shows how panic-stricken the authorities must be to cover up the truth and the amateurish manipulation of the numbers highlights this charade.
They can do whatever they want with whatever numbers they want. Its called the FYTW clause.
F$ck you thats why. And nobody can do anything about it.
I never understood the current obsession with antibodies: "the shot raises your antibodies!" Yes, and a snake bite raises your antibodies. Why would anyone assume that raised antibodies is automatically a good thing?
If you look at the pandemic exercises, they see as as a dumbed-down mass that they can cajole, manipulate or threaten into obedience. I think that actually makes them the stupid ones. But of course, if all we do is collect data and make graphs, we can do that all the way up to when they load us into the cattle cars.
Agreed. It is easy to bury it but the shunning and ridicule takes its toll. It's like high school but in a dangerous, deadly way.
Alive and well
Not sure if you are aware of Norman Fenton gato: https://open.substack.com/pub/wherearethenumbers/p/uk-statistics-regulator-agrees-with?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android
Data Swapped = Data Swamp
Edit: not you gato; them