54 Comments
User's avatar
Sophia's avatar

Still too high. They must have used Dominion machines.

Expand full comment
Schrödinger's Cat's avatar

Can't vote a "zero" score. "One" is as low as you can go on that grid. They need to allow some negative scores.

Expand full comment
Sophia's avatar

Yes to the negative scores!

Expand full comment
Bootsorourke's avatar

yes!!

Expand full comment
Gigolo Joe's avatar

They sneaked in a bunch of 10's and got it up to 5.8, it's j͇u͇s͇t͇ that important to them. It is astonishing to me why anyone would devote time in their lives to do this. I know it shouldn't be, but it is.

Expand full comment
midama's avatar

Check out the reviews on google (maybe it will be “adjusted” later but, for now, the truth is out there).

https://tinyurl.com/fauxidoc

Expand full comment
Gigolo Joe's avatar

What's weird is it's not clear where these votes came from. There appears to be no demographic to explain the extra votes.

Expand full comment
Rob Landeros's avatar

0.5 out of 100 on Metacritic.

https://www.metacritic.com/movie/fauci

Expand full comment
midama's avatar

Lol! I just shared the image of the rating from IMDB! Didn’t check comments before. Poor gatito, I wonder how many times he’ll get this!

Expand full comment
EntropyWave's avatar

Remember when you were a kid and you'd blow up a balloon until it popped? Remember that anxious terror you'd feel with each new breath as the balloon stretched beyond the boundaries of anything you thought to be reasonably possible? Yeah, I think that's exactly how these clowns feel about right now.

Expand full comment
Timothy's avatar

Funny how many of the positive reviews on IMDB say something like “IMDB really needs to do something about all the fake reviews”. This is how censorship really happens: not all at once, but by a million paper cuts. And unfortunately, the side that wants censorship is FAR better at paper cut arguments than we are.

Expand full comment
Schrödinger's Cat's avatar

IMdB is owned and operated by Amazon.com. Reckon there's any bias there?

Expand full comment
Stanley Roper's avatar

If Fauci were portrayed by Leslie Nielsen I’d watch

Expand full comment
el gato malo's avatar

"the naked arrogance 2 1/2"

Expand full comment
The Great Santini's avatar

Let’s go Brandon!

Expand full comment
tinapj's avatar

And just like that I no longer trust Rotten Tomatoes.

Expand full comment
Connor Charchuk's avatar

They've been manipulating ratings for a long time.

Expand full comment
cmpalmer75's avatar

We used to laugh at the crazies and their crazy ideas last year.

We're not laughing any longer.

Expand full comment
DeepStateSeeker's avatar

Gato is legion.

Expand full comment
Lorraine Fullmer's avatar

Well said, gato malo! With Merck's new pill color (molnupiravir), I'm not sure if the red pill/blue pill has the same meaning it used to. You think they did that on purpose?

Expand full comment
Webster Whorf's avatar

Sickening propaganda.

Expand full comment
Alice Smith's avatar

The trailer isn’t going down too well on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/SwAF6sYb94s

Expand full comment
Bootsorourke's avatar

ooh! Thank you for this!

Expand full comment
Timothy's avatar

Just checked again, audience score is now live. Sitting at a stunning 91% for critics, for the audience it's a........

4%.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/fauci

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmNZtjfWaCjDacwDpDVgq7D8NYxw8VJzARAGybvtyQKDDp

Expand full comment
Timothy's avatar

500+ audience reviews now, and we're down to 2%. A lot more people are talking about it now, censorship (if that's what RT was trying to do) backfires yet again.

Expand full comment
Timothy's avatar

Apparently there are 250+ ratings too (they don't seem to publish all of them, so I can't verify). Amazing how they all just popped into existence in less than 24 hours.

Expand full comment
Lincoln Microphone LLC's avatar

"have fun rounding up your neighbors" is the line that stops 'em in their fascist tracks

Expand full comment
Darling Sneauxflayke's avatar

RT has been shit for years, so this isn't a shock for me. At least since the audience ratings for Captain Marvel were in the toilet and all the access nerd media was yelling "sexism!", and continuing on through the rest of the schlock Disney has produced through it's newly acquired brands. I'M LOOKING AT YOU LUCASFILM.

Expand full comment
Anna Karenina's avatar

Everyone please read up on Edward Bernays and Yuri Bezmenov. Propaganda and ideological subversion tactics must be understood. You will not regret it.

Expand full comment
Formerly_Known_As_Someone's avatar

So how does one become a “critic”? Are there any standards or can you just throw up a few reviews on a blog?

Expand full comment
midama's avatar

Not ten minutes ago this other image came up. A slight synchronization of which to make note. 😄

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TAveBaqRcWukk1kuNlep9js_zYbwoV1F/view?usp=drivesdk

Expand full comment
midama's avatar

No puedo. Me vomito.

As a copywriter, I can officially say this is the worst kind of drivel driven slobbery copy topped with shameless boot-loving submission. The urge I feel to rewrite this is an itch that’s quickly turning into a rash.

“With his signature blend of scientific acumen, candor and integrity, Dr. Anthony Fauci became America's most unlikely cultural icon during COVID-19. A world-renowned infectious disease specialist and the longest-serving public health leader in Washington, D.C., he has valiantly overseen the U.S. response to 50 years' worth of epidemics, including HIV/AIDS, SARS and Ebola. FAUCI is an unprecedented portrait of one of our most vital public servants, whose work saved millions while he faced threats from anonymous adversaries.”

Expand full comment
KatLee's avatar

🤮🤮🤮

Expand full comment
Pierre's avatar

Read the metascore 'critics' reviews. Absolutely insane.

Expand full comment
Dr. Joe P.'s avatar

I looked at IMDB yesterday and th rating was 1.7/10. So far, so good.

Just now I looked and mirabili dictu, it’s 5.8/10!!!!

And below the rating?

“NOTE: Our rating mechanism has detected unusual voting activity on this title. To preserve the reliability of our rating system, an alternate weighting calculation has been applied.”

🤦

Expand full comment
Brian Dixon's avatar

Are you sure it's suppression of the audience score, not simply the absence of an audience score as Fox News says?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rotten-tomatoes-audiences-ignore-fauci-documentary

Expand full comment
Rob Landeros's avatar

Let’s not be naive.

Expand full comment
Lori's avatar

Bravo....

Expand full comment
Zelkova's avatar

Last picture I saw of the reviews the audience score was 3 or 4.

Expand full comment
The Wiltster's avatar

Every time I think the nakedness of the B.S. has reached its zenith, I am surprised yet again! Wow. Just wow.

Expand full comment
Bootsorourke's avatar

Oh my!!!

Expand full comment
Big G's avatar

A perfect score!

Expand full comment
Lillia Gajewski's avatar

That's funny.

Expand full comment
Ms. P's avatar

Oh Snap!

Expand full comment
En Phyvit's avatar

Maybe nobody has watched it?

Expand full comment
Isris's avatar

The metacritic user reviews are currently at 0.7. Sounds much closer to reality.

Expand full comment
Arne's avatar

How many lockdown opponents were going to decide whether to watch this based on what they saw on Rotten Tomatoes?

Expand full comment
Alan m hot's avatar

Does this link work for you?

https://rottentomatoes.com/m/fauci

Expand full comment
KatLee's avatar

Ha! Did it crash?!

Expand full comment
John Rice's avatar

Keep posting!!

Expand full comment
BLAIR YOUNG's avatar

Yup

Expand full comment