Gates' pivot was pre-planned early on. Why? Because these "vaccines" are doing EXACTLY the depopulation they planned for, and now that this is impossible to refute, they feign ignorance and surprise and claim we need superior vaccines when these are doing exactly what their agendas called for.
The new "vaccines" will be even deadlier, though the side effects will be staggered out further.
The "vaxxed" have been conned.
Turn your backs on an illegitimate and criminal government aiding, abetting and colluding with criminal corporations that own said government.
Without a doubt, elimination of the control group is foremost in their minds at this point. They managed to eliminate almost entirely any control group for ordinary childhood vaccinations, which is why it's so hard to prove/disprove anything about vaxxes & autism. This is what they want with the COVID vax--too few "purebloods" to study incidence of relatively rare adverse events.
According to Dr. Larry Kwak, Dr. Steven T. Rosen and Dr. Idit Shachar, these are things we could be on the look out:
"mRNA also activates danger sensors in the primal immune system, which in turn indirectly promotes the release of pro-inflammation factors, specifically interferons, which have been associated with autoimmunity. This issue is underscored by a clinical trial of an mRNA lung cancer vaccine in 2019, in which blood tests revealed elevated indicators for autoimmunity concerns in 20% of patients. "
Immune responses directly against RNA molecules themselves cause autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus. In 2014 in the early days of the technology, an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine inventor published on this potential long-term concern of mRNA vaccines.
Published animal safety studies showed traces of COVID-19 spike protein in the brain, heart, and other vital organs, and the European Medicines Agency’s assessment report acknowledged that low levels of mRNA itself were detected in most tissues. The potential consequences of vaccines crossing the natural blood-brain barrier in children’s developing brains are of the utmost concern to all future humanity.
One last theoretical concern is the Jannsen vaccine, which uses a virus stripped of its own genes to deliver payload DNA. Such virus vectors can cause cancer when they randomly insert their payload near a gene that causes cancer. This is more than a hypothetical concern, as this year, a clinical trial of gene therapy for sickle cell disease (admittedly, using a different virus) was suspended when two patients who received the therapy more than five years ago developed blood cancers.
As the evidence continues to mount against vaccines, and unequivocally against mandates, what is the most best reasonable theory explaining why there is no let up, and even greater urgency, from governments as well as corporate and other leaders, for vaccinations even among the young? It cannot be driven exclusively by greed. It borders on pure evil.
Thank you for this. I expressed similar thoughts about their motives in last week’s Townhall column: “Because, make no mistake, that is largely what is driving this insane push to inoculate pre-adolescents: adults’ irrational fear—not for their children, who are at virtually no risk from the virus, but for themselves….
There are, of course, other factors at play—namely, Big Pharma's astronomical profits and the fact that Fauci, et al. must eradicate any potential control group that might eventually reveal their folly. But mostly we’re just talking about supposed grownups being scared out of their minds.”
Thank you for your work on these data, el goto malo! I'd like to point some key people to this and your other substack articles. What can I say is your expertise? Data collection and interpretation? Statistics Analyst? Thank you!
I myself just got back my serology test and I'm happy to report that it's positive! I nursed my COVID sick husband (neither of us jabbed) - mild cold symptoms and headache and tired yet wired - and I was most definitely in his space while he was infectious. I got a headache and tired myself for 2-3 days yet the 2 PCR tests I got we're negative. Hence why I got the antibody test. I feel vindicated! I'm hoping full natural immunity will suffice as I go back in person to my college for the spring semester. I do not want to have to get PCR tested every week nor wear any mask, which is hard to breathe in and also hard to teach a language in.
Everyone obsesses about cases and covid deaths and both are unknown. Cases are not symptomatic disease expression. They are positive PCR tests using unknown cycle counts but believed to be 40 or more. A reasonable cycle threshold is 30.
Deaths are not deaths from covid. They are deaths from or with covid within 28 days of a positive test. Deaths are no doubt significantly overstated. When Italy audited their covid deaths attempting to isolate deaths from covid, they found about 3% of "covid" deaths were from covid. The CDC admits only 5% of covid deaths are exclusively from covid.
Finally, the covid porn is maintained by never restarting the covid clock like we do for other death causes. About 650,000 people die from heart disease every year. Worldometer shows 782,000 deaths from or with covid since the start of this entire fiasco. Where's the outrage and panic over heart disease deaths?
That Latvia is doing exactly what they hated the Russians doing to them is dumbfounding. We adopted our oldest son in Riga, and we had to hide the fact that he was a Russian by birth, or risk the locals' wrath.
I'm not sure what the adjustments you make to deaths are, but it's easy to calculate the absolute risk reduction for each age cohort assuming the UK information is perfectly fine. Take the 50-59 year old cohort. The deaths per 100,000 in the 28 days from 2nd dose category are 1.4 and 8.1 for vaxxed and unvaxxed. Both are in deaths per 100,000 so the calculation is (8.1-1.4)/100,000 or .000067 or .0067% in the period. I'm not certain if the period is inclusive of week 41 and week 44, but assume it is. That's 4 weeks. There are 12 four week periods in a year. If I remember my statistics correctly, that means your risk of NOT dying from the virus if you're not vaxxed is 99.92%. If you're between 50 and 59 your risk of dying from anything but covid is much greater than your risk of dying from covid. Your risk from an adverse vax reaction is no doubt much greater.
Notice on Table 1 comparing Lipitor to placebo that two categories of events combine Fatal and Nonfatal together as though there is no difference between a fatal and nonfatal event. The way it is presented, there were more of these events in the Placebo group than the Lipitor group. But there is no way to know from the way the data is presented if there were more all cause deaths in the placebo group or the Lipitor group. I should think that would be a critical bit of information. The last item in the long list is Nonvascular Death, where Lipitor numbers were greater than Placebo numbers.
The world needs a control group. Hold the line.
Thank you for helping to keep me sane. I am happy to participate in the control group.
Gates' pivot was pre-planned early on. Why? Because these "vaccines" are doing EXACTLY the depopulation they planned for, and now that this is impossible to refute, they feign ignorance and surprise and claim we need superior vaccines when these are doing exactly what their agendas called for.
The new "vaccines" will be even deadlier, though the side effects will be staggered out further.
The "vaxxed" have been conned.
Turn your backs on an illegitimate and criminal government aiding, abetting and colluding with criminal corporations that own said government.
Do NOT comply.
Without a doubt, elimination of the control group is foremost in their minds at this point. They managed to eliminate almost entirely any control group for ordinary childhood vaccinations, which is why it's so hard to prove/disprove anything about vaxxes & autism. This is what they want with the COVID vax--too few "purebloods" to study incidence of relatively rare adverse events.
According to Dr. Larry Kwak, Dr. Steven T. Rosen and Dr. Idit Shachar, these are things we could be on the look out:
"mRNA also activates danger sensors in the primal immune system, which in turn indirectly promotes the release of pro-inflammation factors, specifically interferons, which have been associated with autoimmunity. This issue is underscored by a clinical trial of an mRNA lung cancer vaccine in 2019, in which blood tests revealed elevated indicators for autoimmunity concerns in 20% of patients. "
Immune responses directly against RNA molecules themselves cause autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus. In 2014 in the early days of the technology, an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine inventor published on this potential long-term concern of mRNA vaccines.
Published animal safety studies showed traces of COVID-19 spike protein in the brain, heart, and other vital organs, and the European Medicines Agency’s assessment report acknowledged that low levels of mRNA itself were detected in most tissues. The potential consequences of vaccines crossing the natural blood-brain barrier in children’s developing brains are of the utmost concern to all future humanity.
One last theoretical concern is the Jannsen vaccine, which uses a virus stripped of its own genes to deliver payload DNA. Such virus vectors can cause cancer when they randomly insert their payload near a gene that causes cancer. This is more than a hypothetical concern, as this year, a clinical trial of gene therapy for sickle cell disease (admittedly, using a different virus) was suspended when two patients who received the therapy more than five years ago developed blood cancers.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/oct/28/applying-brakes-on-warp-speed-covid-19-vaccination/
As the evidence continues to mount against vaccines, and unequivocally against mandates, what is the most best reasonable theory explaining why there is no let up, and even greater urgency, from governments as well as corporate and other leaders, for vaccinations even among the young? It cannot be driven exclusively by greed. It borders on pure evil.
Thank you for this. I expressed similar thoughts about their motives in last week’s Townhall column: “Because, make no mistake, that is largely what is driving this insane push to inoculate pre-adolescents: adults’ irrational fear—not for their children, who are at virtually no risk from the virus, but for themselves….
There are, of course, other factors at play—namely, Big Pharma's astronomical profits and the fact that Fauci, et al. must eradicate any potential control group that might eventually reveal their folly. But mostly we’re just talking about supposed grownups being scared out of their minds.”
https://townhall.com/columnists/robjenkins/2021/10/31/dont-let-them-jab-your-healthy-kids-n2598301
Thank you for your work on these data, el goto malo! I'd like to point some key people to this and your other substack articles. What can I say is your expertise? Data collection and interpretation? Statistics Analyst? Thank you!
I myself just got back my serology test and I'm happy to report that it's positive! I nursed my COVID sick husband (neither of us jabbed) - mild cold symptoms and headache and tired yet wired - and I was most definitely in his space while he was infectious. I got a headache and tired myself for 2-3 days yet the 2 PCR tests I got we're negative. Hence why I got the antibody test. I feel vindicated! I'm hoping full natural immunity will suffice as I go back in person to my college for the spring semester. I do not want to have to get PCR tested every week nor wear any mask, which is hard to breathe in and also hard to teach a language in.
Any recommendations? Thank you again!
The long-term data that seems to be evolving looks dire.
So, it is now premeditated murder, instead of manslaughter.
"I was just doing my job!!" Is going to be the most pathetic defense of the Public Health workers at their trials.
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.
Everyone obsesses about cases and covid deaths and both are unknown. Cases are not symptomatic disease expression. They are positive PCR tests using unknown cycle counts but believed to be 40 or more. A reasonable cycle threshold is 30.
Deaths are not deaths from covid. They are deaths from or with covid within 28 days of a positive test. Deaths are no doubt significantly overstated. When Italy audited their covid deaths attempting to isolate deaths from covid, they found about 3% of "covid" deaths were from covid. The CDC admits only 5% of covid deaths are exclusively from covid.
Finally, the covid porn is maintained by never restarting the covid clock like we do for other death causes. About 650,000 people die from heart disease every year. Worldometer shows 782,000 deaths from or with covid since the start of this entire fiasco. Where's the outrage and panic over heart disease deaths?
That Latvia is doing exactly what they hated the Russians doing to them is dumbfounding. We adopted our oldest son in Riga, and we had to hide the fact that he was a Russian by birth, or risk the locals' wrath.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/vaccine-wary-latvia-bodies-pile-up-hospital-morgue-2021-11-09/
So it’s much worse than the previous waves and it’s all down to low vaccination rates. but weren’t vaccination rates even lower in the previous waves?
I'm not sure what the adjustments you make to deaths are, but it's easy to calculate the absolute risk reduction for each age cohort assuming the UK information is perfectly fine. Take the 50-59 year old cohort. The deaths per 100,000 in the 28 days from 2nd dose category are 1.4 and 8.1 for vaxxed and unvaxxed. Both are in deaths per 100,000 so the calculation is (8.1-1.4)/100,000 or .000067 or .0067% in the period. I'm not certain if the period is inclusive of week 41 and week 44, but assume it is. That's 4 weeks. There are 12 four week periods in a year. If I remember my statistics correctly, that means your risk of NOT dying from the virus if you're not vaxxed is 99.92%. If you're between 50 and 59 your risk of dying from anything but covid is much greater than your risk of dying from covid. Your risk from an adverse vax reaction is no doubt much greater.
Pfizer has played sleight of hand reporting forever. For example, look back in time to this 2020 article on Lipitor (atorvastatin) and vascular events https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109720345484?via%3Dihub
Notice on Table 1 comparing Lipitor to placebo that two categories of events combine Fatal and Nonfatal together as though there is no difference between a fatal and nonfatal event. The way it is presented, there were more of these events in the Placebo group than the Lipitor group. But there is no way to know from the way the data is presented if there were more all cause deaths in the placebo group or the Lipitor group. I should think that would be a critical bit of information. The last item in the long list is Nonvascular Death, where Lipitor numbers were greater than Placebo numbers.