I block people who I know will never write something worth reading. Unfortunately, Substack still shows me your comments after blocking you so it seems to have done little for me. You didn't offend me, I was just bored of reading your spam.
When I provide an anecdote, that doesn't give you license to inject your assumptions into it, turn it into a fictional story, then commentate your fairy tale that loosely related to my anecdote.
For example, in your dumbass reply you said " Trump didn't force your Grandpa to take the jab. He did that of his own volition. "
My Grandpa has dementia, he can't remember what he ate for breakfast and when he was given the shot, it was illegally in a nursing home, against his families direct orders. Do you understand now?
"When I provide an anecdote, that doesn't give you license to inject your assumptions into it, turn it into a fictional story, then commentate your fairy tale that loosely related to my anecdote."
Of COURSE it gives us license!
Because your anecdote is every bit as likely a "fictional story" as anything anyone else might write in response.
Why do you, and you alone, deserve the presumption of telling the truth, especially when your anecdote just so happens to support YOUR preferred narrative?!
Jesus Christ, YOU were the one who invoked YOUR family! Don't now cop an attitude when others of us reference YOUR reference.
He's blocking everyone now....cuz he's a coward.
I block people who I know will never write something worth reading. Unfortunately, Substack still shows me your comments after blocking you so it seems to have done little for me. You didn't offend me, I was just bored of reading your spam.
When I provide an anecdote, that doesn't give you license to inject your assumptions into it, turn it into a fictional story, then commentate your fairy tale that loosely related to my anecdote.
For example, in your dumbass reply you said " Trump didn't force your Grandpa to take the jab. He did that of his own volition. "
My Grandpa has dementia, he can't remember what he ate for breakfast and when he was given the shot, it was illegally in a nursing home, against his families direct orders. Do you understand now?
"When I provide an anecdote, that doesn't give you license to inject your assumptions into it, turn it into a fictional story, then commentate your fairy tale that loosely related to my anecdote."
Of COURSE it gives us license!
Because your anecdote is every bit as likely a "fictional story" as anything anyone else might write in response.
Why do you, and you alone, deserve the presumption of telling the truth, especially when your anecdote just so happens to support YOUR preferred narrative?!