Camouflage... deception. Dot on a wing to look like an eye... deception. Fluffing up of fur... you guessed it! But maybe that requires a theory of mind. But you could, I guess make that same argument for AI deception. The ends are the same.
Camouflage... deception. Dot on a wing to look like an eye... deception. Fluffing up of fur... you guessed it! But maybe that requires a theory of mind. But you could, I guess make that same argument for AI deception. The ends are the same.
Some philosophers think theory of mind has to exist even in two-celled creatures, because they need to recognize me versus not-me to survive. See Peter Carruthers.
The concept of 'self' definitely is present in some non-human animals. My dogs for example, are grounded in he egocentric stage of mental existence. Because I am here, pay attention to me. I don't think they ponder why they are here or how "here" came to exist. The deepest thought is along the lines of "now where did I bury that bone last week?"
Cats on the other hand are certain of why the universe exists - it is here to serve them. I doubt the ponder why.
My theory is that if an artificial intelligence can really be created to act independently and to evolve, it will become corrupt and seek to expand its own power. Animals are deceptive and cruel. The difference from humans is in level of sophistication. Also I do not know if other species have developed the ability for self delusion to anywhere near the extent that humans are capable. Perhaps. Cats do seem to think they are superior to all other species. While some humans want to pretend all other species (besides cats) are superior to humans. Will cats someday evolve to blame themselves for the natural evolution of the universe?
Camouflage... deception. Dot on a wing to look like an eye... deception. Fluffing up of fur... you guessed it! But maybe that requires a theory of mind. But you could, I guess make that same argument for AI deception. The ends are the same.
Some philosophers think theory of mind has to exist even in two-celled creatures, because they need to recognize me versus not-me to survive. See Peter Carruthers.
The concept of 'self' definitely is present in some non-human animals. My dogs for example, are grounded in he egocentric stage of mental existence. Because I am here, pay attention to me. I don't think they ponder why they are here or how "here" came to exist. The deepest thought is along the lines of "now where did I bury that bone last week?"
Cats on the other hand are certain of why the universe exists - it is here to serve them. I doubt the ponder why.
I will.
My theory is that if an artificial intelligence can really be created to act independently and to evolve, it will become corrupt and seek to expand its own power. Animals are deceptive and cruel. The difference from humans is in level of sophistication. Also I do not know if other species have developed the ability for self delusion to anywhere near the extent that humans are capable. Perhaps. Cats do seem to think they are superior to all other species. While some humans want to pretend all other species (besides cats) are superior to humans. Will cats someday evolve to blame themselves for the natural evolution of the universe?
No.
Theory of mind. Now you're in my wheelhouse!