Yes, I get into spats on an investing site (and, apparently my first censored message in nearly a year -- still awaiting my "appeal") asking such awkward questions as "Since when is six months of data 'long term'?" or "How can they claim 100% efficacy in preventing infection when no one is ever presented with a virus challenge?" I think …
Yes, I get into spats on an investing site (and, apparently my first censored message in nearly a year -- still awaiting my "appeal") asking such awkward questions as "Since when is six months of data 'long term'?" or "How can they claim 100% efficacy in preventing infection when no one is ever presented with a virus challenge?" I think more likely it was some pointed questions, this time, about why strangely silent on reports or even studies of adverse events?
Yes, I get into spats on an investing site (and, apparently my first censored message in nearly a year -- still awaiting my "appeal") asking such awkward questions as "Since when is six months of data 'long term'?" or "How can they claim 100% efficacy in preventing infection when no one is ever presented with a virus challenge?" I think more likely it was some pointed questions, this time, about why strangely silent on reports or even studies of adverse events?