197 Comments

I'm officially a Gatopal™!!! YAY!!!

Expand full comment

More importantly, the Bad Cat has supplied me with your substack. I did not have it! I *know* from previous exposure to your rantings back on "BlueBird" that data is your bitch. Yay for me too!

Expand full comment

Glad to be back in your life!

Expand full comment

Same here. Thank you Joel. Oh I am very jealous of your being a gatopal!

Expand full comment

Me as well. Great work, Joel, keep it coming!

Expand full comment

gatopal is another word for frickin' hero.

You guys are doing such good work. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Joel, you used to be my first tw read in the morning here in Massachusetts.

Good work!

Expand full comment

You might be interested in my namesake on BlueBird - https://twitter.com/mdccclxx

Expand full comment

Got it, thanks! And regards to Clare Craig. She's special, and has been terribly maligned.

Expand full comment

And now can you please adjust the Alberta death stats and let us see how (safe and effective?) this looks in reality!

Expand full comment

Joel, nice work. But I cannot see in your paper where you confirm the 1-14 day group are actually added to the unvaccinated. Not doubting you, but is there some text/evidence missing, or am I a bit slow?

Expand full comment

It is in the original post https://metatron.substack.com/p/alberta-just-inadvertently-confessed by Joel Smalley, 2022.01.13, right at the top, with red underscore.

Expand full comment

That says they excluded the first 14 days from the vaxxed data set, but not that they then transferred it to unvaxxed. I assume it is just a matter of adding the totals, but cannot see where they are.

Expand full comment

The benefit of the doubt? Considering how hard they are massaging the message for it to look the worst possible for the unvaxedd and the best possible otherwise, I have no doubt that this is exactly what they did. But you are right, Joel could verify and prove that. Joel?

Expand full comment

This is my interpretation and fits with what was done in the trials and elsewhere around the world. If they simply discarded those results, it would still significantly skew the results.

Expand full comment

Bravo Joel, you've unearthed a real bombshell here

Expand full comment

I’m a citizen of Alberta, and I’m outraged that my taxes are used to deceive me. As a retired trial lawyer, and incidentally a PhD chemist, I’ve got the time and the chops to chase this one down. Time for a barrage of letters and a FOIP request.

Expand full comment

UPDATE: I have sent the FOIP request, and sent letters to my MLA, the Minister of Health and a leading local journalist. Along the way I learned how to use web archive! I'll keep you posted.

Expand full comment

Great news. Yes archive.org is a great way to see what changed and when. They've been busted changing all the Dr Malone entries after his first interview.

Expand full comment

Go get them Phil and yes report back!

Expand full comment

Is there a way we can pitch in to make this happen? I genuinely want to see the person who made the call to take down the data answer some questions on-camera.

Expand full comment

good luck with that

Expand full comment

The html code of the archived page shows that they commented out the code lol

Expand full comment

I'm in Alberta as well and fighting this shite. Welcome aboard. We can always use more experienced help.

Expand full comment

Please write out your results somewhere, and share widely. (Twitter: @kotosquito)

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 20, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Ditto

Expand full comment

My son's friend came down with Covid within 2 days of his vax. Within a couple more he was in the hospital and within 2 weeks, he was dead. The doctor said it was like Covid on steriods. Unstoppable.

He was considered an unvaxxed death. That's when I knew the stats were lies.

Expand full comment

Geez, that's horrifying! Does his own family see this? Or are they convinced their son is just an outlier?

My parents made comments to that effect after their vaccine failure. "Oh, it just didn't work on us, because we're really old and have weakened immune systems." I was like, um, if the vax doesn't work on on people who are "really old and have weakened immune systems," then who is it for, because nobody else needs it!

Expand full comment

I'm actually crying right now. I think it's finally all coming into view.

Expand full comment

I'm afraid it's only coming into view for those who have their eyes at least partially open. That same die-hard double-mask and triple-vax crowd will never see it.

Expand full comment

Something has to wake people up. The pressure to vax everyone is outrageous. My daughter in BC has lost her job over the vax mandates. This should not be happening.

Expand full comment

I’ll bet you that’s where they get all of their deaths in young people - within the first 14 days. Sickening.

Expand full comment

My teenaged nephew got it within a few days of his booster. His fever went up to 107. Luckily though, he is recovering and didn’t suffer any permanent damage.

Expand full comment

I have already linked without proof that high vaccination rate 'causes' high death rate afterwards and always governments are blaming the actual 'wave'. These waves are closer to the vaccination rate rather than the infection wave of neighbouring countries...

Expand full comment

Heartbreaking. So sad for your son and his friend's family.

Expand full comment

I’m generally a calm, rational person, though it’s becoming increasingly difficult to maintain that composure and to not wish for total—even divine—ruination upon the people responsible for this farce.

Expand full comment

I'm trying to overcome my vindictive nature, but I'm not having any trouble wishing divine retribution on these people. I want them right up next to the furnace in the next life.

Expand full comment

Let's go Brandon

Expand full comment

Mr Gato, do you think it should be considered medical malpractice for a pedicatrician to rec covid shots to health 5-11 or 11-17 year olds? I do. Im a eye doc and I've run afoul of a few referring pediatricians b/c people have asked my opinion and i've said i think its wrong and inappropriate to push these vaxxes like this on healthy kids. Some of the peds docs have threatening to stop referring me patients and my partners were upset. We docs are stuck in these situations where we have all the wrong incentives and are so worried about loss of jobs, income , status and reputation. its so depressing. Everyone is afraid and everyone just tows the line.

Expand full comment

MiFly. RN here.

I 100% sympathize with you. I have been in a similar but much less consequential situation at my hospital - talking to people about mild concerns about the vaccines is fraught with danger and threats of loss of a job. Being truly open and honest about it? It is not possible.

The ONLY group that can turn this situation around is physicians. The rest of us can help but if we are to get out of this, it rests on physicians.

I have no idea what will happen in the future but I guarantee one thing:

I will be making it very clear to all doctors who take care of me in the future that my faith in health care is gone. It is at zero. And it is because:

1. No support of informed consent long after it was glaringly apparent transmission was not prevented

2. We stood by silently when people were bribed with donuts in exchange for injecting something in their body when we knew damn well the effects of obesity on those who contracted Covid

3. When the FDA went to court and asked for 75 years to release the data it said it reviewed exhaustively in ~ 3 months prior to approving the vaccines, NOT A SINGLE DOCTOR, not a single nurse, not a single major medical organization uttered a peep in protest.

I have loved working closely with the doctors in my career but I will never look at our professions the same way and I am just being honest here - I am done with doctors. Done. All of us but especially the doctors had a DUTY to protect patients and the informed consent. They failed and became indistinguishable from Pfizer drug sales reps.

You get it. You understand what is at stake. But your colleagues need to understand that they are playing with fire. They are not going to emerge from this catastrophe and pick back up where they were back in Jan. 2020.

It’s different now.

Expand full comment

Wow, you are spot-on. Within my immediate family, we have all expressed a complete loss of confidence in the medical industry. My daughter said her new go-to question for evaluating a physician would be, "Do you recommend the COVID vax?" and then seeing how informed and honest he/she was about it. Good test! And we're scared to death of hospitals now. Too many stories of patients being refused early treatment, put on vents, and then families trying to get them Ivermectin, and the hospital refuses the treatment, won't release the patient, won't allow another doc to prescribe. They are fighting tooth-and-nail in court to let patients DIE! When was this ever a thing in the US?

Expand full comment

thank you Lena.

Expand full comment

to Lena: 💕🐱🙏🐱💕.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Dr. Mifly for doing what is right. As a mom to three kids in that age group I appreciate you standing up for the kids. Anecdotally, in my observations, kids with the injections have been more likely to get symptomatic covid. As we all fear, the injections also seem to be interfering with the innate immune system of the kids. Injected kids seem to be out of school more often. In my small community a young, previously healthy child spent many days in the hospital, septic, post injection. We need more physicians like you.

Expand full comment

Also consider the possibility that the injections aren’t simply making people more susceptible to “covid” and other diseases, but are actually toxic and poisoning them and are, in fact, the *cause* of those illnesses and deaths. And that they were designed to do just that.

Expand full comment

Talk it out with them. If they don't get it -fuck 'em.

Expand full comment

Professor Norman Fenton has presented this exact same issue here: https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/12/possible-systematic-miscategorisation.html

I have serious doubts that these vaccines do much of anything other than send people to the hospital with vaccine injuries.

Expand full comment

Last April(?) Dr. Fleming ran his Event 2021 seminar; based on covid vax trials, his figures for absolute effectiveness were around 1% at best.

Apart from acute injuries, there will be some long-term damage, too.

Expand full comment

Long-term damage, yep. Everybody watch the quality of life years and life expectancy data nose dive over the coming months/years. A lot of shortened life span and disability coming. Which the tech companies are just rubbing their hands together at the thought. Connect the metaverse concept now?

Expand full comment

That's why big pharma and the government co-conspirators are so desperate to get everyone vaxxed - so there's no control group.

Expand full comment

They lose. There are millions of us who are wise to them and we are *not* going to take the clot shot now. Not under any circumstances.

Expand full comment

This is the least incriminating thing they've done. For about a month they were counting ALL new cases under 12 as unvaccinated including about 1-2k post 14 day cases. They've corrected it. By my estimation, I've found about 50 errors on their page (they do fix them occassionally to their credit). Unfortunately for them I have their raw data from the day before they deleted it and months of screenshots of the errors in the way they track information

Expand full comment

Well done to both you and Joel. This work is unimaginably important.

A point to consider. Pfizer trial had an efficacy endpoint of 7 days post 2nd jab. So what happened to to the post jab risk there? It doesn’t show!

It is something I looked at a while ago and the most probable answer (to me) is they wrote out 311 participants from the BNT trial arm results for “Important Protocol Deviation”.

This unusual category applied only to the second jab cohort where a large number (311, way more than those who caught Covid in the placebo arm) were excluded for IPD.

Having worked through the IPD definition it is clear that it is a retrospective assessment of product failure due to dosing and storing issues. But in all cases the doses were “administered”. So why administer the wrong dose or wrongly stored product? Answer: They can’t have known that at the time. So what made them suspect failure. Hmmm I think we can guess.

But surely Pfizer couldn’t have been so disorganised that this would happen in the first place? P Thacker’s expose of Ventavia is evidence that they could exclude participants at will if they wished to be pedantic.

The kicker is that the IPD rate in the main trial rate was then much higher in a much smaller trial - that of juveniles. Why would a much smaller (and later) trial get IPD worse? The IPD data is an artefact and is telling us something deeper.

The release of the IPD data will confirm if the trial was frauded. I know where my money would lie.

Expand full comment

I wonder if all the IPDs will be like, "went to local ER with stroke/heart attack/neuro issues, instead of calling study doctors, so kicked out of trial..."

Expand full comment

that is wishful thinking imo. i suspect we wont see that data straight up

Expand full comment

exposing datacrime is a thoughtcrime, comrade

Expand full comment

Does anybody honestly think these companies won't keep filling people with jabs right up until the time they're stopped by the courts?

Expand full comment

This is Alex Berenson's substack on how the current Pfizer CEO, in a previous posting, was killing cows as long as he possibly could by selling a vax he knew to be dangerous.

Expand full comment

This is Alberta yesterday:

Currently hospitalized Three doses 231

Currently hospitalized Two doses 461

Currently hospitalized One dose 50

Currently hospitalized Unvaccinated 359

This is Alberta 28Dec2021:

3 doses: no data

2 doses: 119

1 dose: 9

Unvax'd: 190

The inversion is staggering.

https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#vaccine-outcomes

Expand full comment

For those following the plot (special thanks to you Gato), we have always known that the "14 day window" was the place to bury the true covid picture. Another analogy? Doing a 40 yard dash but moving the window of when you start the timer to 10 yard and running a total of 50 yards, then taking the last 40 yard measurement because, ya know, it's hard to speed up coming out of starting blocks and IT'S NOT REALLY FAIR...let's just take our time once we are at top speed.

How long before the public catches on to the rapid increase of "all cause" deaths during a time when we have vaccines? This will be written about and analyzed for decades.

Expand full comment

YOY all-cause death data will be releasing shortly. that's why the wheels are coming off. that's why Boris dropped everything yesterday.

Expand full comment

On the contrary - they are pushing harder than ever on the boosters - Israel will start on babies in April with jab one.

What they are doing is getting as many people jabbed then doing their best to infect them -- this creates billions of mutation factories....

Eventually we'll get a Marek's type outcome in humans - on steroids

Expand full comment

This is also their last chance to convince anybody to do it. They have to get that control group down as small as possible, but their mission will have been accomplished. The death rate will be up for who knows how many years to come, and the birth rate will probably be down for a similar time.

It's so much easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission, eh?

Expand full comment

In the UK, I think they’ll be able to bring forward future mortality (displaced mortality), and hide it within the current periods mortality.

Fertility will be somewhat similar, due to immigration. Mothers not born in the UK, have far more children, compared with mothers born in the UK.

As I understand it, one of the purposes of this exercise is to accelerate the invigoration of the UK population. They want a healthier, more intelligent, harder working, population, who have lower expectations, than than the indigenous population.

Expand full comment

They'll be able to hide all kinds of stuff. They're already blaming every well known vax side effect on COVID long-term effects, and now that everybody's getting COVID, it'll be easy to say it was caused by the sickness, not the shot. And they won't fund any of the studies that want to compare to unvaxxed.

Expand full comment

I totally agree.

Expand full comment

Israel is different; it is the only jabbed country where fertility has not suffered, according to data.

Expand full comment

It seems way too early to judge fertility outcomes. Way too many variables during this first year of vaccination, coupled with so much illness, use of drugs & alcohol, etc.

Expand full comment

The obvious conclusion was there was such an increase in miscarriages that it became impossible to ignore. However, long term fertility studies will take some time.

Expand full comment

Where have you seen your data? Do you think somehow there is some characteristic of being Jewish that allows the Israeli people protection against infertility? Also, I believe in vitro treatments are covered by the government in Israel, could this be effecting data?

Expand full comment

I took the info in my stride and had no further need to think about it, so no speculations on my part. You may look here:

https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/10/08/study-concludes-womens-fertility-harmed-in-vaccinating-countries/

Expand full comment

Wow, that does not look good. New Zealand and to a lesser degree Australia will provide interesting further data on this. There hasn't been much public data on seroprevalence in NZ but it seems like it's still under 1% of population (0.1% in April 21 is the latest I can find). Presumably we'll have a huge omicron outbreak in NZ soon and with so few unvaccinated people left, the only group they'll be able to dump the two week 'worry window' numbers on will be the double vaxxed.. Would be really interested to here more on NZ specifically, we're in a unique situation down here now..

Expand full comment

Tasmania opened the borders on 15th of December - currently 100% Omicron, almost completely naive population, just started vaxing 5-11 and boosting away, school just about to start. The figures - if and when they become available - will be fascinating. The icing on the strudel -approx 66% of Tasmanians tested are Vit D deficient at the end of winter.

Expand full comment

Perfect murder, she wrote.

Expand full comment

I forgot to mention only about 10k adults remain unvaxxed

Expand full comment

Check out Chris Martensen on Peakprosperity.com. His latest public video on NZ. When the Oct/Nov/Dec deaths are released nwxt month we will have a picture. I think it's going to be obvious. The key is to remember we have not had flu deaths in 2020 or 2021. These are usually 500 per year.

Expand full comment

Of course it was intentional. Everyone from

Fauci on down knows/knew you can’t vaccinate for a coronavirus.

Trump gave them the go ahead and the cover with warp speed to cut all the necessary

Corners.

The scientists knew better.

Expand full comment

Trumptards will have a lot of explaining to do by 2024, assuming that their favorite golem seeks the presidency again. Much more dirt about the Covid-19 scare will have become public knowledge and been subjected to analyses like the one explained here. What they probably don't see coming (because they are profoundly stupid) is an intense MSM demonization campaign to blame them for what the pharmico-medical mafia has done. Should be a layup given Trump's advocacy for jabs and his "Operation Warp Speed" to circumvent rigorous testing of the dangerous injections.

Expand full comment

So will morons who voted for joe.

Expand full comment

Well, yes, but it doesn't matter. Bidencrats control most institutions: schools, banks, Big Biz, MSM, the three-letter agencies, etc. They will be kicking bloody snot out of the heads of Trumpchumps to cover up and divert attention from their own malfeasance.

Expand full comment

It must be a hardwired part of the Brain that favors duality. "Pillar and Post." They are both the same thing, but call them different things and people will defend their definition, to the exclusion of rational thought.

If you are an American, then there hasn't been an actual legitimate "President" since 1860, as Lincoln (and most of those following) were ineligible, since they held foreign Titles of Nobility ("Esquire"), which was explicitly forbidden in the TONA, or 13th Amendment to The Constitution for the united States of America (Federal Constitution, ratified 1787).

It's been a Cuckoo Bird occupation by the two foreign subcontractors (British Territorial and Roman Municipal) since then. If you read carefully, you can see that they are careful to stay within their limited Authority and Jurisdiction (for example, "United States" is defined as "only Washington D.C." in Title 26, found here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7701 and "United States" is defined as "The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Possessions" in Title 18 found here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=18-USC-80204913-943489798&term_occur=999&term_src= ).

Any time the word "State" appears, look closely at the "definition." It always comes back to "D.C. and Puerto Rico." They try very hard to imply that it encompasses the 50 actual states, but they never mention any by name. Funny, eh?

Trump was a Judas Goat, designed to further polarize and divide. Biden is so hopelessly inept that it is clearly by design. It's like nobody ever watched WWF. They. Are. Playing. you.

Expand full comment

A lot of "Trumptards" were railing against all the lockdown/mask/vax bullshite the whole time, but since the Left owns the media, they were all shushed, shamed, and censored. Remember in December of 2020 when Ron Johnson held a Congressional hearing trying to get attention on Dr. Koury and Ivermectin? You know, the one that YouTube took down, so no one could see it? And then a few months ago, another such hearing with many vax-injured patients, and FB took that one down, too? Just because Trump, who is not a scientist, got tricked by Fauci--who lied to his face about the origins of the virus--doesn't really speak as poorly of Trump as it does Fauci and his CIA pals at Eco Health. Regardless, I agree that the media will continue to coddle the Fauchster, Pfizer, and Joe "Vax Mandate" Biden, and will start blaming it all on Trump.

Expand full comment

Well, I haven't any sympathy for Trump's supporters. Most of them are natural born bootlickers with a great fondness of maiming and killing for Zion. Their hero, meanwhile, is a fat, secular hypochondriac with a horrid diet. He was primed to be duped, and when he learned about the virus' fondness for gluttons, his enthusiasm for the new potions became invincible, for practical purposes. (JB Pritzker, gov of Illinois, is another enthusiast for socializing the costs of his excess eating.) Also, there are reports that he took money from the pharmaceutical industry. Haven't confirmed that, but it's consistent with his public statements this year encouraging people to take the injections.

Check out the 2nd amendment when you get a chance. It has a clue about how Trump's supporters will be put down. When read in its context, all it says is that the "free State" won't deprive its farm animals and sheep the centrally controlled "Militia" defined implicity in Article I and Article II. Already we can see signs that the National Guard, so called, will be turned into a death squad or something close to that. The bootlickers will go down clutching their precious Constitution (of no authority) with their bloody hands.

Expand full comment

Allan, you are so close...yet so far. You are a fairly intelligent ignorati.

Article 2 applies, first off, to Americans, not U.S. Citizens. All three Constitutions are service contracts. The Bills of Rights were added as an afterthought to ensure that the "Hired Help" (the Brits that remained here to continue operating the wheels of government) would not try a reprise of the Lexington and Concord Arms Confiscation fiasco.

The Constitutional guarantees never went anywhere, but the people got dumbed down, to the point where they allowed themselves to be classified as "Tories" (British Territorial U.S. Citizens). Brits that are "residing" (meaning on temporary assignment to provide government services) have no access to the Bills of Rights. Those accrue to the Employers. Contracts always have two sides- Employer and Employee. The Constitutions stipulate what the Hired Help must do. They don't even mention the Employers, save for the Preamble and the BoR.

Finally, the term "Free State" is not discussing a polity or instrumentality. It would have said "Free States," if that were the case, since there were 13 of them initially.

It is the "State of being Free," an existential condition that is the absence of tyranny. And if you are one of the living "people," then you are of the "Militia." The word "Militia" derives from the Latin "Miles," which means...people!

The "National Guard" has nothing whatsoever to do with the notion of a "Militia" as enumerated in Article the Second. The "National Guard" is obedient to the Foreign subcontractors (British Territorial and Roman Municipal), and has nothing whatsoever to do with the living people on the several states.

And the Constitutions could disappear tomorrow and it would not matter one whit for Americans, since our founding document is and has always been The Unanimous Declaration of Independence. Or did people forget that America functioned just fine for almost 11 years without delegating or subcontracting our government out to foreigners?

Expand full comment

Well put and great sleuthing. The problem with this whole line of reasoning, though, is that we shouldn't even have to explain this intentional muddying of the waters. It is painfully obvious. Once the event occurs, the new stage initiates. Period.

no jabs = no vax;

initial jab = partially vaxed;

final jab = full vax (final for one or two jab courses);

These drunks are using the streetlight for support rather than illumination.

The figures aren't lying, but the liars are figuring.

Expand full comment

These problems existed since the beginning. We are grouping with changing definitions constantly.

There are dozens of groups to consider:

1. Wave 1 recovered

2. Wave 2 recovered

3. Wave 3 recovered

4. Wave 4 recovered.

5. #s1-4 + mcvaxxed 1 dose

5. Mcvaxxed dose 1 only

6. Mcvaxxed 2 dose before wave 3

7. Mcvaxxed dose 1 before wave 3

8. Mcvaxxed dose 2 DURING wave 3

9. Mcvaxxed dose 2 DURING wave 4

10. You get the picture…

11. Simple binning of data by oversimplification of definitions makes it impossible to see anything. Adding dirt to anything…even if it’s just a teensy weensy dirt…makes it dirty data. Thank goodness cats are such extra clean animals.

We could argue that omicron is a different virus entirely. Immune social status doesn’t seem to matter one bit now. Omicron is Gods way of saying “I decide that you are all equal…”

Expand full comment