Disagree. Certainly before widespread mandates, the overwhelming majority of takers of the shots were some combination of naive trust in the recommendations of medical staff and/or confident in the reputation of Pharma, Government regulators, etc. and/or peer pressure from their social circle and/or other factors. Coercion (threat of los…
Disagree. Certainly before widespread mandates, the overwhelming majority of takers of the shots were some combination of naive trust in the recommendations of medical staff and/or confident in the reputation of Pharma, Government regulators, etc. and/or peer pressure from their social circle and/or other factors. Coercion (threat of loss of job, privileges, etc.) was not even a factor, unless you consider advertising, nudge from family and friends, etc. "coercion."
Even though we now have creeping tyranny, I suspect that the majority getting the jabs are still doing it for the above reasons.
I agree with this in the beginning. But now with all of the mRNA failure and so many side effects, it’s unbelievable that parents would jab their children who are not impacted at all by this virus
Disagree. Certainly before widespread mandates, the overwhelming majority of takers of the shots were some combination of naive trust in the recommendations of medical staff and/or confident in the reputation of Pharma, Government regulators, etc. and/or peer pressure from their social circle and/or other factors. Coercion (threat of loss of job, privileges, etc.) was not even a factor, unless you consider advertising, nudge from family and friends, etc. "coercion."
Even though we now have creeping tyranny, I suspect that the majority getting the jabs are still doing it for the above reasons.
I agree with this in the beginning. But now with all of the mRNA failure and so many side effects, it’s unbelievable that parents would jab their children who are not impacted at all by this virus
What failures? Media is silent, so these trusting fools think all is well