i don’t think so and the reason requires a quick diversion into how to calculate real risk per individual. foremost, we know one thing with 100% certainty:
those who are boosted for longer than 21 days were once boosted for fewer than 21 days.
--------
This also leads to a fake 100% VE, because everybody who didn't get through the worry window is counted as unvaxxed. Therefore, only the people who DO get through the worry window are counted as vaxxed -- and there's your fake 100% VE.
Wondering if you have any thoughts or response to Ron Unz's pushback against our side's claims that all cause mortality has been going up because of the vaccine. The Unglossed Substack published a piece on it yesterday, and was significantly (not totally) in agreement with Unz's reading of the data. I don't understand how there is such a huge divergence in how the data is interpreted.
So although male mortality is higher than female mortality with the jabs, aren’t there a lot more reports of adverse events by women post-jab than there are by men? In other words, are more women being non-fatally injured but more men are dying after getting jabbed?
What will it take to make people (who believed/followed the narrative) voice their anger about all this?! Serious question. Is this information simply still not getting through the firewall? If so we need to find a way to open some ports.
Another great article- thank you again. There is the data of especially toxic batches of Covaxx- aka "hot batches" that might need to be accounted for as well. See "Midwestern Doctor's" article from yesterday.
I am really hoping that you will engage Brian Mowrey (Unglossed). His critique of your conclusions, if addressed would be very illuminating to the unwashed.
Thank you for all the hard work. What a shame this has happened. And how shameful of the politicians and health agencies that are now nothing but arms of the paid off politicians and drug companies. Truly shameful. I had the hardest time accepting that they really don't give a damn how many die. But now I fully know that.
Isn't it a known issue that before women go through menopause (mid-late 40's) that their average risk for heart problems is lower than men, but after menopause this balances off to about the same? Might that have some reason why women's higher mortality numbers went up in the 50+ age brackets?
The ONS data assumes patients are telling the truth about their vaccination status. I have heard credible people confess that they lie to medical professionals when asked their vaccine status.
About the 21 day window: is it true ONS considers the subject unvaccinated in that window?
I did some work with this data while ago and basically came up with Denmark's recommendation that no one <50 get a vax, but had to put a big Norman Fenton caveat in that I wasn't sure about the 21 day window, which would have degraded the vax efficacy.
If you really want to see stark contrast, try modelling “lost years of reasonable, healthy life”. There are actuarial tables for life and reputable estimates of end-of-life misery so it can be done. Given that those who died of COVID averaged in their 80s and those who died of “suddenly” were 30 (just a guess, that)...
Isn’t this the time to start screaming at the top of our lungs?
I continually see Twitter messages from Biden( I do not follow him) telling everyone to get their CV19 boosters. I mean, this is a government who wants us dead. What am I missing?
Another great piece - please keep them coming as this info is not to be found elsewhere although the WSJ has an opinion writer who is getting around to asking questions asked here last year vis a vis excess deaths, shots promoting susceptibility to new variants etc...
i don’t think so and the reason requires a quick diversion into how to calculate real risk per individual. foremost, we know one thing with 100% certainty:
those who are boosted for longer than 21 days were once boosted for fewer than 21 days.
--------
This also leads to a fake 100% VE, because everybody who didn't get through the worry window is counted as unvaxxed. Therefore, only the people who DO get through the worry window are counted as vaxxed -- and there's your fake 100% VE.
I’m glad my parents (82,81 in better than average health for their age) stopped at 3 shots - “I’m no lab rat”
Wondering if you have any thoughts or response to Ron Unz's pushback against our side's claims that all cause mortality has been going up because of the vaccine. The Unglossed Substack published a piece on it yesterday, and was significantly (not totally) in agreement with Unz's reading of the data. I don't understand how there is such a huge divergence in how the data is interpreted.
So although male mortality is higher than female mortality with the jabs, aren’t there a lot more reports of adverse events by women post-jab than there are by men? In other words, are more women being non-fatally injured but more men are dying after getting jabbed?
What will it take to make people (who believed/followed the narrative) voice their anger about all this?! Serious question. Is this information simply still not getting through the firewall? If so we need to find a way to open some ports.
Another great article- thank you again. There is the data of especially toxic batches of Covaxx- aka "hot batches" that might need to be accounted for as well. See "Midwestern Doctor's" article from yesterday.
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/we-now-have-definitive-proof-pfizer
I am really hoping that you will engage Brian Mowrey (Unglossed). His critique of your conclusions, if addressed would be very illuminating to the unwashed.
So, this all means that dogs and cats are cohabitating on Jabs Bad Island?
Welcome!
Thank you for all the hard work. What a shame this has happened. And how shameful of the politicians and health agencies that are now nothing but arms of the paid off politicians and drug companies. Truly shameful. I had the hardest time accepting that they really don't give a damn how many die. But now I fully know that.
Isn't it a known issue that before women go through menopause (mid-late 40's) that their average risk for heart problems is lower than men, but after menopause this balances off to about the same? Might that have some reason why women's higher mortality numbers went up in the 50+ age brackets?
The ONS data assumes patients are telling the truth about their vaccination status. I have heard credible people confess that they lie to medical professionals when asked their vaccine status.
About the 21 day window: is it true ONS considers the subject unvaccinated in that window?
I did some work with this data while ago and basically came up with Denmark's recommendation that no one <50 get a vax, but had to put a big Norman Fenton caveat in that I wasn't sure about the 21 day window, which would have degraded the vax efficacy.
cheers
https://elliottmiddleton.substack.com/p/vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-deaths
If you really want to see stark contrast, try modelling “lost years of reasonable, healthy life”. There are actuarial tables for life and reputable estimates of end-of-life misery so it can be done. Given that those who died of COVID averaged in their 80s and those who died of “suddenly” were 30 (just a guess, that)...
Isn’t this the time to start screaming at the top of our lungs?
I continually see Twitter messages from Biden( I do not follow him) telling everyone to get their CV19 boosters. I mean, this is a government who wants us dead. What am I missing?
ASMR data? Ooh, I feel so tingly and relaxed. 😌
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASMR
Another great piece - please keep them coming as this info is not to be found elsewhere although the WSJ has an opinion writer who is getting around to asking questions asked here last year vis a vis excess deaths, shots promoting susceptibility to new variants etc...