I disagree. His rationale is that mRNA gene therapy (never intended as vax), was for people who were probably going to die. It was more of a Hail, Mary, NEVER intended for general population level treatment.
All medicines can be dangerous, depending on dosage, underlying conditions etc. People have OD'd on aspirin.
A kitchen knife is da…
I disagree. His rationale is that mRNA gene therapy (never intended as vax), was for people who were probably going to die. It was more of a Hail, Mary, NEVER intended for general population level treatment.
All medicines can be dangerous, depending on dosage, underlying conditions etc. People have OD'd on aspirin.
A kitchen knife is dangerous, but is used for good. His efforts were likely to make the therapy work in spite of any dangers.
In short, it's possible you are correct, but the evidence I have seen is weak and circumstantial. Far from proof.
Malone has transformed into a rights warrior, complete with attempts to put actions today into historical and revolutionary perspective. He is not a natural performer, as far as I can see.
I believe he legitimately is a good man that sees evil at his doorstep.
For the past 2 years, all the evidence I've seen of the people involved in this in any way - even peripherally - is nothing but utter criminal malevolence through and through. Right now, I assume they're all guilty until proven otherwise.
I disagree. His rationale is that mRNA gene therapy (never intended as vax), was for people who were probably going to die. It was more of a Hail, Mary, NEVER intended for general population level treatment.
All medicines can be dangerous, depending on dosage, underlying conditions etc. People have OD'd on aspirin.
A kitchen knife is dangerous, but is used for good. His efforts were likely to make the therapy work in spite of any dangers.
In short, it's possible you are correct, but the evidence I have seen is weak and circumstantial. Far from proof.
Malone has transformed into a rights warrior, complete with attempts to put actions today into historical and revolutionary perspective. He is not a natural performer, as far as I can see.
I believe he legitimately is a good man that sees evil at his doorstep.
For the past 2 years, all the evidence I've seen of the people involved in this in any way - even peripherally - is nothing but utter criminal malevolence through and through. Right now, I assume they're all guilty until proven otherwise.