how the definitions of "full vaccinated" and now "boosted" are exaggerating (and possibly creating from whole cloth) VE and turning the data into gibberish
I've pointed this out time and time again. This is part of how the trick is done with rates per 100k, the unvaccinated cohort gets smaller and the vaccinated bigger while the vaccinated cases count as unvaccinated. It's fraud. There are dozens of problems with it and no honest person thinks it is fine. The fact governments and scientists all over the world are ok with it shows that none of them are honest.
I have been explaining this to my friends who are Doctors, and they can't even do the simple math to understand it. They did all go to California public schools and colleges so that probably explains it.
So this is a version of Immortal Time Bias right?! This is huge! Honestly the best thing I've seen you write so far.
It seems like we should be able to model the rates of vaccination against the change in the Unvaccinated population and see if the "waning efficacy" is actually all this effect. Because as fewer people get vaccinated and pollute the Unvaccinated pool, the apparent efficacy will fade. I bet it's not the entire fading effect but it's part of it.
Also, cohort got changed to chortling in one spot.
Incredible analysis. No one will ever be fully vaccinated so the powers that be can keep profiting. The live medical experiment will continue until we the people put an end to it.
The data collection mechanisms they have in place are - to anyone with experience in doing such systems analysis - laughably bad and obviously really are intentional obfuscation and cheating. It's heads we win, tails you lose - well it was meant to be anyway, but now things are so bad even with a biased coin they can't maintain it.
Thanks I knew and forgot this, so I leveled back on up reading. My family (wife/rang of kids) is remaining all jab-free and certain we're sadly going to bite our lips on a lot of "I told you so's" - I ran out of saliva trying to stop my wider circles getting 2-3 jabs. Already had a tragedy just outside my regular contact field, albeit none of my friends will ascribe it so even though he had clots followed by rapid organ failure and was an ox of 47 year old. RIP. Also two cancers popping up, but so hard to ascribe that directly. Also two friends in with tachycardia, the docs said it was lag from covid. Likewise some rheumatoid flair-ups in 40's and 50's chaps, and IBS in a 19 year old. A long-tail of issues. Oh and an annoying rash for my mum after her booster, and I don't mean me.
Vaccinating the control group should be a crime since they mandated these vaccines and made people take them that did not want them. This should not just be people losing their jobs this should be people going to jail.
“ let’s start in highly vaccinated iceland where, despite ~80% vaccination rates and over 50% of the population boosted, cases are literally exploding”
Is “despite” the correct word? “Due to” seems more accurate each day
This explains why they pivoted so quickly from the full vaccination campaign to the booster campaign. Unless I am mistaken, the phased age group rollouts also help perpetuate the sleight-of-hand by ensuring a perpetual cohort in the 2 week windows to forge the 'overall' effectiveness statistical fraud. I imagine that many people at the CDC or White House or state-level public health don't have the wherewithal to grasp this, so I have to assume they were carefully influenced to achieve this perpetual rolling new vaccination effect. Or did they manage that just with vaccine supply distribution?
Now imagine we are later trying to prove malfeasance in court against drug companies and regulators in order to hold them accountable. Just think carefully about the mental faculties, knowledge, and reasoning ability demonstrated by the Supreme Court justices regarding covid and the OSHA mandate.
-Expert Witness gato: "by counting a 2 week period against the previous group, you always produce a false efficacy rating, especially if that 2 week period is a unique window of vulnerability."
- Sotomayor: "Are you saying the vaccines don't work? Don't you know a 100,000 children are dying every second?"
-Breyer: "Indeed, over 800 billion Americans have caught covid this month alone."
Excellent explanation. For another look at what I believe is a datacrime (ignoring survivorship bias), here is a look at how the UK is possibly misleading on the data on pregnancy & vaccines: https://inumero.substack.com/p/uk-vaccines-and-pregnancy-part-3
I have been complaining about the abuse of this move since the summer. Measure cases one way and population size a completely different way to rig VE. It drives me bananas.
A close second is "age-adjusted VE" with some undisclosed adjustments.
VE should be used in tandem with other things, like absolute and relative growth rates.
I've pointed this out time and time again. This is part of how the trick is done with rates per 100k, the unvaccinated cohort gets smaller and the vaccinated bigger while the vaccinated cases count as unvaccinated. It's fraud. There are dozens of problems with it and no honest person thinks it is fine. The fact governments and scientists all over the world are ok with it shows that none of them are honest.
I have been explaining this to my friends who are Doctors, and they can't even do the simple math to understand it. They did all go to California public schools and colleges so that probably explains it.
So this is a version of Immortal Time Bias right?! This is huge! Honestly the best thing I've seen you write so far.
It seems like we should be able to model the rates of vaccination against the change in the Unvaccinated population and see if the "waning efficacy" is actually all this effect. Because as fewer people get vaccinated and pollute the Unvaccinated pool, the apparent efficacy will fade. I bet it's not the entire fading effect but it's part of it.
Also, cohort got changed to chortling in one spot.
Incredible analysis. No one will ever be fully vaccinated so the powers that be can keep profiting. The live medical experiment will continue until we the people put an end to it.
Independent analysis by Norman Fenton on the same thing, the effects of the two week delay.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6umArFc-fdc
The data collection mechanisms they have in place are - to anyone with experience in doing such systems analysis - laughably bad and obviously really are intentional obfuscation and cheating. It's heads we win, tails you lose - well it was meant to be anyway, but now things are so bad even with a biased coin they can't maintain it.
Vaccinating into a pandemic with a non-sterilizing shot that makes the recipient more susceptible to the disease is genocide.
Proof is:
1. The 2-week assignment of shot status
2. Ending the study at 6 months as effectiveness wanes
3. Boosting without studying
Question is, what do we do now?
Like a shark that can't stop swimming, this predatory system must keep moving to survive.
The faster it jabs, the stronger it gets. Stops and it dies.
Thanks I knew and forgot this, so I leveled back on up reading. My family (wife/rang of kids) is remaining all jab-free and certain we're sadly going to bite our lips on a lot of "I told you so's" - I ran out of saliva trying to stop my wider circles getting 2-3 jabs. Already had a tragedy just outside my regular contact field, albeit none of my friends will ascribe it so even though he had clots followed by rapid organ failure and was an ox of 47 year old. RIP. Also two cancers popping up, but so hard to ascribe that directly. Also two friends in with tachycardia, the docs said it was lag from covid. Likewise some rheumatoid flair-ups in 40's and 50's chaps, and IBS in a 19 year old. A long-tail of issues. Oh and an annoying rash for my mum after her booster, and I don't mean me.
Vaccinating the control group should be a crime since they mandated these vaccines and made people take them that did not want them. This should not just be people losing their jobs this should be people going to jail.
Will read later. But you say:
“ let’s start in highly vaccinated iceland where, despite ~80% vaccination rates and over 50% of the population boosted, cases are literally exploding”
Is “despite” the correct word? “Due to” seems more accurate each day
The same people who quote these numbers also insist the only reliable trial data is from Gold Standard Random Controlled Trials.
This explains why they pivoted so quickly from the full vaccination campaign to the booster campaign. Unless I am mistaken, the phased age group rollouts also help perpetuate the sleight-of-hand by ensuring a perpetual cohort in the 2 week windows to forge the 'overall' effectiveness statistical fraud. I imagine that many people at the CDC or White House or state-level public health don't have the wherewithal to grasp this, so I have to assume they were carefully influenced to achieve this perpetual rolling new vaccination effect. Or did they manage that just with vaccine supply distribution?
Now imagine we are later trying to prove malfeasance in court against drug companies and regulators in order to hold them accountable. Just think carefully about the mental faculties, knowledge, and reasoning ability demonstrated by the Supreme Court justices regarding covid and the OSHA mandate.
-Expert Witness gato: "by counting a 2 week period against the previous group, you always produce a false efficacy rating, especially if that 2 week period is a unique window of vulnerability."
- Sotomayor: "Are you saying the vaccines don't work? Don't you know a 100,000 children are dying every second?"
-Breyer: "Indeed, over 800 billion Americans have caught covid this month alone."
-Thomas: [picard face palm]
Data manipulation is always intentional. My first boss told us, tell me your starting point and I will tell you what you are trying to sell me.
Excellent explanation. For another look at what I believe is a datacrime (ignoring survivorship bias), here is a look at how the UK is possibly misleading on the data on pregnancy & vaccines: https://inumero.substack.com/p/uk-vaccines-and-pregnancy-part-3
I’m sure glad we have the cat to do the maths. Those feline toes & fingers are good!
I have been complaining about the abuse of this move since the summer. Measure cases one way and population size a completely different way to rig VE. It drives me bananas.
A close second is "age-adjusted VE" with some undisclosed adjustments.
VE should be used in tandem with other things, like absolute and relative growth rates.